Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Jürges, Hendrik

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Ludwig, Sandra / Schmitz, Hendrik

Ed. by Barigozzi, Francesca / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mastrobuoni, Giovanni / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / de Vries, Frans / Wenzel, Tobias


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.520
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.556

CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.356
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.394

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 19, Issue 4

Issues

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

To Be a Blood Donor or Not to Be? Investigating Institutional and Student Characteristics at a Military College

Bing Jiang
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Economics and Business, Virginia Military Institute, 320 Scott Shipp Hall, Lexington, VA 24450, United States of America
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Samuel K. Allen
  • Department of Economics and Business, Virginia Military Institute, 301 Scott Shipp Hall, Lexington, VA 24450, United States of America
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-06-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2018-0104

Abstract

Using data from 21 voluntary blood drives over a five-year period, we establish connections between undergraduate students’ blood donation behaviors and their demographic, academic, leadership, and military characteristics at a military college in the United States. We find that blood donation participation rates for students at this military college are much higher than the national average for the 18- to 24-year-olds. Certain characteristics such as fitness, athletic status, academic performance, and intent to pursue a military career after graduation are significantly correlated with blood donation. We also find that college students’ blood donation behaviors may be influenced by their attitudes toward civic responsibility, time constraints, incentives, peer effects and the characteristics of blood collection agencies. This study provides new insights into individual characteristics that correlate with blood donation. It also highlights the role of unique military education and institutional characteristics in promoting better fitness, the pursuit of a military career, and selfless service among young people, all of which might help explain demonstrated higher blood donation participation than their peers elsewhere.

Keywords: blood donation; military college students; institutional characteristics

JEL Classification: D90; I12; I23; J18

References

  • Akerlof, George A., and Rachel E. Kranton. 2000. “Economics and Identity.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 715–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Akerlof, George A., and Rachel E. Kranton. 2002. “Identity and Schooling: Some Lessons for the Economics of Education.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (4): 1167–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Akerlof, George A., and Rachel E. Kranton. 2005. “Identity and the Economics of Organizations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 9–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Akerlof, George A., and Rachel E. Kranton. 2010. Identity Economics: How Our Identity Shapes Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton, New Jersey; Woodstock, Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Alesina, Alberto, and Paola Giuliano. 2015. “Culture and Institutions.” Journal of Economic Literature 53 (4): 898–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ariely, Dan, Anat Bracha, and Stephan Meier. 2009. “Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially.” American Economic Review 99 (1): 544–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baldassarri, Delia, and Guy Grossman. 2013. “The Effect of Group Attachment and Social Position on Prosocial Behavior. Evidence from Lab-In-The-Field Experiments.” PLoS ONE 8 (3): e58750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Balke, Bruno, G. P. Grillo, E. B. Konecci, and U. C. Luft. 1954. “Work Capacity after Blood Donation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 7 (3): 231–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, Gary S. 1974. “A Theory of Social Interactions.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1063–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ben-Ner, Avner, Brian P. McCall, Massoud Stephane, and Hua Wang. 2009. “Identity and In-Group/Out-Group Differentiation in Work and Giving Behaviors: Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72 (1): 153–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Binzel, Christine, and Dietmar Fehr. 2013. “Social Distance and Trust: Experimental Evidence from a Slum in Cairo.” Journal of Development Economics 103: 99–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boe, Gerard P. 1977. “A Descriptive Characterization and Comparison of Blood Donors and Non-Donors in A Community Blood Program.” Dissertation Abstracts International 37 (8): 3879.Google Scholar

  • Boe, Gerard P., and Leonard D. Ponder. 1981. “Blood Donors and Non-Donors: A Review of the Research.” The American Journal of Medical Technology 47 (4): 248–53.Google Scholar

  • Boe, Gerard P., and J. M. Timmens. 1966. “A Study of Blood Donor Motivation.” Military Medicine 131 (5): 447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borgonovi, Francesca, and Koji Miyamoto. 2010. “Education and Civic and Social Engagement.” In Improving Health and Social Cohesion through Education, 65–110. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/improving-health-and-social-cohesion-through-education/education-and-civic-and-social-engagement_9789264086319-5-en.

  • Camerer, Colin F. 2011. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, David E. 2006. Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape Our Civic Life. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Candelo, Natalia, Catherine Eckel, and Cathleen Johnson. 2018. “Social Distance Matters in Dictator Games: Evidence from 11 Mexican Villages.” Games 9 (4): 77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chamla, J. H., L. S. Leland, and Kevin Walsh. 2006. “Eliciting Repeat Blood Donations: Tell Early Career Donors Why Their Blood Type Is Special and More Will Give Again.” Vox Sanguinis 90 (4): 302–07.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Charness, Gary, and Uri Gneezy. 2008. “What’s in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 68 (1): 29–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, Yan, and Sherry Xin Li. 2009. “Group Identity and Social Preferences.” American Economic Review 99 (1): 431–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chliaoutakis, Joannes, Deanna J. Trakas, Fotini Socrataki, Chrysoula Lemonidou, and Dimitris Papaioannou. 1994. “Blood Donor Behaviour in Greece: Implications for Health Policy.” Social Science & Medicine 38 (10): 1461–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chuan, Amanda, and Anya Savikhin Samek. 2014. ““Feel the Warmth” Glow: A Field Experiment on Manipulating the Act of Giving.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 108: 198–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cox, J. C., and W. H. Orman. 2015. “Trust and Trustworthiness of Immigrants and Native-Born Americans.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 57 (1): 1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, Edward L. 1971. “Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18 (1): 105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dee, Thomas S. 2004. “Are There Civic Returns to Education?” Journal of Public Economics 88 (9–10): 1697–720.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dee, Thomas S. 2010. “Education and Civic Engagement,” in Economics of Education, edited by B. McGaw, P. Peterson, and E. Baker. Amsterdam: Elsevier. International Encyclopedia of Education vol. 8 Set, 3rd ed., edited by D.J. Brewer and P.J. McEwan.Google Scholar

  • Dobbie, Will, and Roland G. Fryer, Jr. 2015. “The Impact of Voluntary Youth Service on Future Outcomes: Evidence from Teach for America.” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 15 (3): 1031–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elster, Jon. 1990. “Selfishness and Altruism.” In Beyond Self-Interest, edited by J.J. Mansbridge, 44–52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Evans, Roy, and Eamonn Ferguson. 2014. “Defining and Measuring Blood Donor Altruism: A Theoretical Approach from Biology, Economics and Psychology.” Vox Sanguinis 106 (2): 118–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferguson, Eamonn, Femke Atsma, Wim De Kort, and Ingrid Veldhuizen. 2012. “Exploring the Pattern of Blood Donor Beliefs in First‐Time, Novice, and Experienced Donors: Differentiating Reluctant Altruism, Pure Altruism, Impure Altruism, and Warm Glow.” Transfusion 52 (2): 343–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gillespie, Theresa W., and Christopher D. Hillyer. 2002. “Blood Donors and Factors Impacting the Blood Donation Decision.” Transfusion Medicine Reviews 16 (2): 115–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glynn, Simone A., Steven H. Kleinman, George B. Schreiber, Thomas Zuck, Suzanne Mc Combs, James Bethel, George Garratty, and Alan E. Williams. 2002. “Motivations to Donate Blood: Demographic Comparisons.” Transfusion 42 (2): 216–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glynn, Simone A., Alan E. Williams, Catharie C. Nass, James Bethel, Debra Kessler, P. Edward, Joy Fridey Scott, Steven H. Kleinman, and George B. Schreiber. 2003. “Attitudes toward Blood Donation Incentives in the United States: Implications for Donor Recruitment.” Transfusion 43 (1): 7–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goette, Lorenz, David Huffman, and Stephan Meier. 2006. “The Impact of Group Membership on Cooperation and Norm Enforcement: Evidence Using Random Assignment to Real Social Groups.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 212–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goette, Lorenz, Alois Stutzer, and Beat M. Frey. 2010. “Prosocial Motivation and Blood Donations: A Survey of the Empirical Literature.” Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy 37 (3): 149–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Healy, Kieran. 2000. “Embedded Altruism: Blood Collection Regimes and the European Union’s Donor Population.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (6): 1633–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henrich, Joseph. 2015. “Culture and Social Behavior.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 3 (1): 84–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henrich, Joseph, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gintis, and Richard McElreath. 2001. “In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies.” American Economic Review 91 (2): 73–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henrich, Joseph, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gintis, Richard McElreath, et al. 2005. “’Economic Man’ in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6): 795–815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karacan, Eda, Guldane Cengiz Seval, Zeynep Aktan, Meltem Ayli, and Refia Palabiyikoglu. 2013. “Blood Donors and Factors Impacting the Blood Donation Decision: Motives for Donating Blood in Turkish Sample.” Transfusion and Apheresis Science 49 (3): 468–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lemmens, K. P. H., C. Abraham, T. Hoekstra, R. A. C. Ruiter, W. L. A. M. De Kort, J. Brug, and H. P. Schaalma. 2005. “Why Don’t Young People Volunteer to Give Blood? an Investigation of the Correlates of Donation Intentions among Young Nondonors.” Transfusion 45 (6): 945–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lepper, Mark R., David Greene, and Richard E. Nisbett. 1973. “Undermining Children’s Intrinsic Interest with Extrinsic Reward: A Test of the ‘Overjustification’ Hypothesis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28 (1): 129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • List, John A., and Anya C. Samak. 2013. “Exploring the Origins of Charitable Acts: Evidence from an Artefactual Field Experiment with Young Children.” Economics Letters 118 (3): 431–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • London, P., and B. M. Hemphill. 1965. “The Motivation of Blood Donors.” Transfusion 5: 559–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Masser, Barbara M., Katherine M. White, Melissa K. Hyde, Deborah J. Terry, and Natalie G. Robinson. 2009. “Predicting Blood Donation Intentions and Behavior among Australian Blood Donors: Testing an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model.” Transfusion 49 (2): 320–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matthews, Michael D., Jarle Eid, Dennis Kelly, Jennifer KS Bailey, and Christopher Peterson. 2006. “Character Strengths and Virtues of Developing Military Leaders: An International Comparison.” Military Psychology 18: 57–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norenzayan, A., and A. Shariff. 2008. “The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality.” Science 322 (1): 58–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunn, Nathan. 2012. “Culture and the Historical Process.” Economic History of Developing Regions 27 (sup1): S108–S126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Brien, Sheila F. 2006. “Donor Research: The Foundation for a Healthy Blood Supply.” Transfusion 46 (7): 1069–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oborne, David J., and S. Bradley. 1975. “Blood Donor and Nondonor Motivation: A Transnational Replication.” Journal of Applied Psychology 60 (3): 409–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oswalt, Robert M. 1977. “A Review of Blood Donor Motivation and Recruitment.” Transfusion 17 (2): 123–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Otto, Philipp E., and Friedel Bolle. 2011. “Multiple Facets of Altruism and Their Influence on Blood Donation.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 40 (5): 558–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perez-Truglia, Ricardo. 2018. “Markets, Trust and Cultural Biases Evidence from eBay.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 72 (1): 17–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, Christopher, and Martin EP Seligman. 2004. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification, vol. 1. Washington, DC: APA Press and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Piliavin, Jane Allyn. 1990. “Why Do They Give the Gift of Life? A Review of Research on Blood Donors since 1977.” Transfusion 30 (5): 444–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piliavin, Jane Allyn, and Peter L. Callero. 1991. Giving Blood: The Development of an Altruistic Identity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

  • Roth, Alvin, Vesna Prasnikar, Masahiro Okuno-Fujiwara, and Shmuel Zamir. 1991. “Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh and Tokyo: An Experimental Study.” American Economic Review 81 (1): 1068–95.Google Scholar

  • Sojka, B. Nilsson, and Peter Sojka. 2008. “The Blood Donation Experience: Self‐Reported Motives and Obstacles for Donating Blood.” Vox Sanguinis 94 (1): 56–63.Google Scholar

  • Stutzer, Alois, Lorenz Goette, and Michael Zehnder. 2011. “Active Decisions and Prosocial Behaviour: A Field Experiment on Blood Donation.” The Economic Journal 121 (556): F476–F493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by W.G. Austin, and S. Worchel, 33–47. Monteray: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.Google Scholar

  • Titmuss, Richard M. 1971. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

  • Upton, W. E. 1973. “Altruism, Attribution and Intrinsic Motivation in the Recruitment of Blood Donors.” Doctoral diss., Cornell University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34B.Google Scholar

  • Veldhuizen, I. J. T., C. J. M. Doggen, F. Atsma, and W. L. A. M. De Kort. 2009. “Donor Profiles: Demographic Factors and Their Influence on the Donor Career.” Vox Sanguinis 97 (2): 129–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whitt, S., and R. K. Wilson. 2007. “The Dictator Game, Fairness and Ethnicity in Postwar Bosnia.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 655–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wildman, John, and Bruce Hollingsworth. 2009. “Blood Donation and the Nature of Altruism.” Journal of Health Economics 28 (2): 492–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zillmer, E. A., R. A. Glidden, L. M. Honaker, and J. D. Meyer. 1989. “Mood States in the Volunteer Blood Donor.” Transfusion 29 (1): 27–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-06-21


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 19, Issue 4, 20180104, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2018-0104.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in