Ahn, T., P. Arcidiacono, and W. Wessels. 2011. “The Distributional Impacts of Minimum Wage Increases When Both Labor Supply and Labor Demand Are Endogenous.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics29(1):12–23.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Burkhauser, R. V., K. A. Couch, and D. C. Wittenburg. 2000. “Who Minimum Wage Increases Bite: An Analysis Using Monthly Data from the SIPP and the CPS.” Southern Economic Journal67(1):16–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gould, E. D., B. A. Weinberg, and D. B. Mustard. 2002. “Crime Rates and Local Labor Market Opportunities in the United States: 1979–1997.” The Review of Economics and Statistics84(1):45–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. R., and M. P. Todaro. 1970. “Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis.” The American Economic Review60(1):126–42.Google Scholar
Lemos, S. 2005. “Political Variables as Instruments for the Minimum Wage.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy4(1):1–33.Google Scholar
Neumark, D., and W. Wascher. 1995. “The Effects of Minimum Wages on Teenage Employment and Enrollment: Evidence from Matched CPS Surveys.” NBER Working Papers 5092, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., April 1995.Google Scholar
Neumark, D., and W. Wascher. 2006. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Review of Evidence from the New Minimum Wage Research.” Working Paper 12663, National Bureau of Economic Research, November 2006.Google Scholar
Sabia, J., R. V. Burkhauser, and B. Hansen. 2012. “Are the Effects of Minimum Wage Increases Always Small? New Evidence from a Case Study of New York State.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review65(2):350–376.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. P. 2009. “Using Local Labor Market Data to Re-Examine the Employment Effects of the Minimum Wage.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review62(3):343–66.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2014-02-04
Published in Print: 2014-07-01
Neumark and Wascher (2006) conduct a review of studies that examine the employment effect of changes in the minimum wage. See also Currie and Fallick (1996), Ahn, Arcidiacono, and Wessels (2011), Burkhauser, Couch, and Wittenburg (2000) and Sabia, Burkhauser, and Hansen (2012).
Neumark and Wascher (1995) use matched CPS data to study the effect of minimum wages on employment and enrollment decisions of youth. They find that increases in the minimum wage raise the likelihood that lower-skilled teenagers will become unemployed, replaced by higher-skilled teenagers who leave school. They also find an increase in the probability that displaced workers will be not only unemployed but also not enrolled in school.
Jacob and Lefgren (2003) and Luallen (2006) estimate that daily juvenile property crime decreases by 14% and 28.8% on days that students must be in school, respectively. Raphael and Winter-Ember (2001) and Gould, Weinberg, and Mustard (2002) find that declining labor opportunities cause an increase in crime. In particular, Raphael and Winter-Ember (2001) find that an increase in unemployment causes a rise in property crimes, which are crimes often associated with illicit income.
Harris and Todaro (1970) show a minimum wage in a two-sector model can induce queuing and increase employment in the uncovered sector; Lochner (2004) discusses current and future opportunity costs of crime.
A similar panel analysis could be performed on state- or county-level crime data, but such an analysis would be unable to capture individual levels of heterogeneity and the ability to identify minimum wage workers.
Respondents to the NLSY97 report up to 11 wages in a given survey year. A respondent is considered to be bound by a minimum wage change if at least one of the reported jobs fits the aforementioned criteria. Jobs with reported wages of zero dollars are considered invalid and excluded from the data.
We are unable to make use of national incident-based data, such as National Incident-Based Reporting System data, due to changes in jurisdictional reporting during the time period that we study.
This approach replaces 31% of missing answers regarding activity in overall crime affecting approximately 74% of respondents who ever report criminal activity. We do not replace missing values for respondents who never report criminal activity (individuals who have only missing values and/or report zero crime). Alternative treatments of missing values did not impact our analysis.
The NLSY questionnaire suggests “other property” crimes as “fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheat[ing] someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what [the respondent] said it was.”
It is difficult to make a direct comparison between these numbers and national crime statistics. Here we present crime participation rates, whereas national crime statistics are measures of crime incidence.
Age groups are admittedly ad hoc, though the division does capture major features of the crime-age profile. Results combining all teenagers were largely similar.
Lemos (2005) shows that minimum wage changes do not appear to be endogenous to employment conditions in Brazil.
Missing data for each variable are replaced as zeros for respondents who reported this information in any other year of the survey. Pooling the age groups improves precision in the employment regression; point estimates are similar with and without pooling.
Marginal effects from the logit specification are similar.
Marginal effects from the logit and OLS specifications are comparable.
Standard errors are not clustered at the state level because we include state fixed effects.
Thompson (2009) finds that workers of a similar age range, 19- to 22-years-old, do not experience disemployment effects due to the minimum wage.
Chaplin, Turner, and Pape (2003) also find that dropout-eligible teens leave school when the minimum wage rises.
Although the disemployment effects for 14- to 16-year-olds lack precision, teens who commit crime also experience the strongest disemployment effects. OLS estimates on employment become more negative and precise when limited to individuals who ever commit crime.
Full time is defined as greater than 48 weeks employed, being unemployed is having zero weeks.
Information on search is not available for much of our sample (76% are missing between-job search information). Nonetheless the conditional means of search were informative: individuals bound by a minimum wage who committed a crime searched at 43.4% annual rate, while those who did not commit a crime, but still experienced a binding minimum wage, search at 32.3% rate. Thus it appears a major reason for part-time work among those committing a crime is search frictions in the labor market.
Gang members were 25% more likely to be high school drop outs, and 38% more likely to not be employed over the current year.
A number of interesting questions regarding transitions between the licit and illicit labor market can in principle be addressed with our data, but in practice are difficult to document. Examining transitions of those committing a crime in into the labor market at t showed the opposite of a queuing effect: the probability of non-employment increased among this group following a minimum wage increase. Similarly, looking at the increased probability of working (either full or part time) following participation in a crime at we saw no significant impact of the changing minimum wage on work for this group.