Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.252
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.755

CiteScore 2016: 0.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.330
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.526

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 3 (Jun 2017)

Issues

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Does Previous Marijuana Use Increase the Use of Other Drugs: An Almost Ideal Demand System Approach

Alexi Thompson / Yamaura Koichi
Published Online: 2017-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2016-0069

Abstract

From a policy standpoint, the legalization of marijuana may affect other drug markets. The Almost Ideal Demand Model is used to estimate drug substitution between the most common illegal street drugs in the US including cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamines. We control for past marijuana consumption. Results indicate that past marijuana consumption does not contribute to increased current consumption of other drugs. Further, marijuana is a weak complement to methamphetamines but marijuana price changes do not affect heroin or cocaine consumption.

Keywords: marijuana legalization; drug substitution; Almost Ideal Demand System

References

  • Aepli, M. 2014. “Consumer Demand for Alcoholic Beverages in Switzerland: A Two-Stage Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System for Low, Moderate, and Heavy Drinking Households.” Agricultural and Food Economics 2 (15):. http://www.agrifoodecon.com/content/2/1/15.Google Scholar

  • Cunningham, S., and K. Finlay. Identifying Demand Responses to Illegal Drug Supply Interdictions. 2015 Health Economics (Accepted for publication) http://ideas.repec.org/p/tul/wpaper/1312.html.Google Scholar

  • Deaton, A., and J. Muellbauer. 1980. “An Almost Ideal Demand System.” The American Economic Review 70: 312–326.Google Scholar

  • DiNardo, J. 1993. “Law Enforcement, the Price of Cocaine, and Cocaine Use.” Mathematical and Computer Modeling 17 (2): 53–64.Google Scholar

  • DiNardo, J., and T. Lemieux. (1992). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Alcohol, Marijuana, and American Youth: The Unintended Effects of Government RegulationNBER Working Paper no. 4212.Google Scholar

  • Dobkin, C., and N. Nicosia. 2009. “The War on Drugs: Methamphetamine, Public Health, and Crime.” American Economic Review 99 (1): 324–349.Google Scholar

  • Eales, J. S., and L. J. Unnevehr. 1988. “Demand for Beef and Chicken Products: Separability and Structural Change.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (3): 521–532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fanelli, L., and M. Mazzocchi. (2004).Back to the Future? Habits and Forward-Looking Behaviour for UK Alcohol and Tobacco DemandMIMEO, Università degli Studi di Bologna.Google Scholar

  • Fergusson, D. M., J. M. Boden, and L. J. Horwood. 2006. “Cannabis Use and Other Illicit Drug Use: Testing the Cannabis Gateway Hypothesis.” Addiction 101 (4): 556–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fries, A., R. Anthony, A. Cseko, C. Gaither, and E. Schulman. (2008).The Price and Purity of IIIicit Drugs: 1981–2007Institute for Defense Analysis.Google Scholar

  • Horowitz, J. 2001. “Should the DEA’s STRIDE Data Be Used for Economic Analyses of Markets for Illegal Drugs?” Journal of the American Statistical Association 96: 1254–1271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hunt-McCool, J., B. F. Kiker, and Y. Ng. 1994. “Estimates of the Demand for Medical Care under Different Functional Forms.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 9: 201–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jofre-Bonet, M., and N. M. Petrey. 2008. “Trading Apples for Oranges? Results of an Experiment on the Effects of Heroin and Cocaine Price Changes on Addicts’ Polydrug Use.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 66 (2): 281–311.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Johnston, L., P. O’Malley, and J. Bachman. 1981. Marijuana Decriminalization: The Impact on Youth 1975–1980. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

  • Kandel, D., and K. Yamaguchi. 1993. “From Beer to Crack: Developmental Patterns of Drug Involvement.” American Journal of Public Health 83: 851–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kandel, D. B., K. Yamaguchi, and L. C. Klein. 2006. “Testing the Gateway Hypothesis.” Addiction 101 (4): 470–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Office of National Drug Control Policy. 2016, https://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/the-national-drug-control-budget-fy-2013-funding-highlights.Google Scholar

  • Pacula, R. (1994).Can increasing the beer tax reduce marijuana consumption?Department of Economics, Duke University. Unpublished.Google Scholar

  • Pacula, R., J. Chriqui, and J. King. (2003).Decriminalization in the United States: What Does It Mean? NBER Working Paper, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research 9690.Google Scholar

  • Pacula, R., and R. Lundberg. 2014. “Why Changes in Price Matter When Thinking about Marijuana Policy: A Review of the Literature on the Elasticity of Demand.” Public Health Reviews 35 (2): 1–18.Google Scholar

  • Pudney, S. 2003. “The Road to Ruin? Sequences of Initiation to Drugs and Crime in Britain.” The Economic Journal 113 (486):. C182–C198.Google Scholar

  • Reuter, P., and J. Caulkins. (2004). 141–165 Illegal ‘Lemons’: Price Dispersion in Cocaine and Heroin MarketsUNODC, Bulletin on Narcotics. In Illicit Drug Markets, Vols. LVI, 1 and 2.Google Scholar

  • Saffer, H., and F. Chaloupka. 1995. “The Demand for Illicit Drugs.” National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No 5238.Google Scholar

  • Stone, J. 1953. The Measurement of Consumer’s Expenditure and Behavior in the United Kingdom, 1920–1938. Vol. 1. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Taljaard, P. R., Z. G. Alemu, and H. D. Van Schalkwyk. 2004. “The Demand for Meat in South Africa: An Almost Ideal Estimation.” Agrekon 43 (4): 430–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thies, C., and C. Register. 1993. “Decriminalization of Marijuana and the Demand for Alcohol, Marijuana and Cocaine.” Social Science Journal 30 (4): 385–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, A. 2013. “An Almost Ideal Supply Estimate of US Energy Substitution.” Energy Economics 40: 813–818.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2016 http://www.unodc.org/Accessed March 1, 2016.Google Scholar

  • United States Drug Enforcement Agency. 2016 https://www.dea.gov/resource-center/stride-data.shtmlAccessed March 15, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Van Ours, J. C., and J. Williams. 2007. “Cannabis Prices and Dynamics of Cannabis Use.” Journal of Health Economics 26: 578–596.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zellner, A. 1962. “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57: 348–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-06-01


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2016-0069.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in