Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Ludwig, Sandra / Schmitz, Hendrik

Ed. by Barigozzi, Francesca / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Jürges, Hendrik / Mastrobuoni, Giovanni / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / de Vries, Frans / Wenzel, Tobias


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.520
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.556

CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.356
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.394

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

Volume 20 (2020)

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

The Crucial Role of Social Welfare Criteria and Individual Heterogeneity for Optimal Inheritance Taxation

Esteban García-MirallesORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2625-1273
Published Online: 2020-01-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2019-0274

Abstract

This paper extends the calibrations of Piketty and Saez (2013. “A Theory of Optimal Inheritance Taxation.” Econometrica 81 (5): 1851–86) to unveil the importance of the assumed social welfare criteria and its interplay with individual heterogeneity on optimal inheritance taxation. I calibrate the full social optimal tax rate and find that it is highly sensitive to the assumed social welfare criteria. The optimal tax rate ranges from negative (under a utilitarian criterion) to positive and large (even assuming joy of giving motives). A decreasing marginal utility of consumption does not affect the results qualitatively, given the underlying distribution of wealth and income. I also calibrate the optimal tax rate by percentile of the distribution of bequest received, as in Piketty and Saez, but accounting for heterogeneity in wealth and labor income. This leads to significant variation in the optimal tax rate among zero-bequest receivers, contrary to their finding of a constant tax rate.

Keywords: optimal inheritance taxation; social welfare function; wealth inequality

JEL Classification: H21; H23; D31; D63

References

  • Atkinson, A., and J. E. Stiglitz. 1976. “The Design of Tax Structure: Direct Versus Indirect Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 6 (1–2): 55–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brunner, J. K., and S. Pech. 2012a. “Optimal Taxation of Bequests in a Model with Initial Wealth.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 114 (4): 1368–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brunner, J. K., and S. Pech. 2012b. “Optimal Taxation of Wealth Transfers When Bequests are Motivated by Joy of Giving.” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 12 (1).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Chamley, C. 1986. “Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in General Equilibrium with Infinite Lives.” Econometrica 54 (3): 607–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chetty, R. 2006. “A New Method of Estimating Risk Aversion.” American Economic Review 96 (5): 1821–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cremer, H., and P. Pestieau. 2011. “The Tax Treatment of Intergenerational Wealth Transfers.” CESifo Economic Studies 57 (2): 365–401.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Diamond, P. A. 1965. “National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model.” The American Economic Review 55 (5): 1126–50.Google Scholar

  • Elinder, M., O. Erixson, and H. Ohlsson. 2012. “The Impact of Inheritances on Heirs’ Labor and Capital Income.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 12 (1): 1–37.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Farhi, E., and I. Werning. 2010. “Progressive Estate Taxation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (2): 635–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farhi, E., and I. Werning. 2013. “Estate Taxation with Altruism Heterogeneity.” American Economic Review 103 (3): 489–95.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleurbaey, M., and F. Maniquet. 2018. “Optimal Income Taxation Theory and Principles of Fairness.” Journal of Economic Literature 56 (3): 1029–79.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judd, K. L. 1985. “Redistributive Taxation in a Simple Perfect Foresight Model.” Journal of Public Economics 28 (1): 59–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kindermann, F., L. Mayr, and D. Sachs. 2018. “Inheritance Taxation and Wealth Effects on the Labor Supply of Heirs.” NBER Working Paper No. 25081.Google Scholar

  • Kopczuk, W. 2013. “Incentive Effects of Inheritances and Optimal Estate Taxation.” The American Economic Review 103 (3): 472–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kopczuk, W., and J. P. Lupton. 2007. “To Leave or Not to Leave: The Distribution of Bequest Motives.” Review of Economic Studies 74 (1): 207–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kopczuk, W., and J. Slemrod. 2001. “The Impact of the Estate Tax on Wealth Accumulation and Avoidance Behavior.” In Rethinking Estate and Gift Taxation, edited by W. Gale, J. Hines, and J. Slemrod, 299–349. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

  • Piketty, T., and E. Saez. 2013. “A Theory of Optimal Inheritance Taxation.” Econometrica 81 (5): 1851–86.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Saez, E., and S. Stantcheva. 2016. “Generalized Social Marginal Welfare Weights for Optimal Tax Theory.” American Economic Review 106 (1): 24–45.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Straub, L., and I. Werning. 2020. “Positive Long-Run Capital Taxation: Chamley-Judd Revisited.” American Economic Review forthcoming.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2020-01-29


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 20190274, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2019-0274.

Export Citation

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in