Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics

Editor-in-Chief: Cavalcanti, Tiago / Kambourov, Gueorgui

Ed. by Abraham, Arpad / Carceles-Poveda , Eva / Debortoli, Davide / Lambertini, Luisa / Nimark, Kristoffer / Wang, Pengfei

2 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.043
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.376

CiteScore 2016: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.312
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.272

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Nonlinear Taylor Rules and Asymmetric Preferences in Central Banking: Evidence from the United Kingdom and the United States

Alex Cukierman / Anton Muscatelli
Published Online: 2008-02-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1690.1488

This paper explores theoretically and empirically the view that Taylor rules are often nonlinear due to asymmetric central bank preferences, and that the nature of these asymmetries changes across different policy regimes. The theoretical model uses a standard new Keynesian framework to establish equivalence relations between the shape of nonlinearities in Taylor rules and asymmetries in monetary policy objectives. These relations are estimated and tested for the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US) over various subperiods by means of smooth transition regressions.There is often evidence in favor of nonlinear rules in both countries, and their character changes substantially over subperiods. The period preceding inflation targeting in the UK is characterized by a concave rule supporting dominant recession avoidance preferences, while the inflation targeting period is characterized by a convex rule supporting dominant inflation avoidance preferences on the part of policymakers. Dominant inflation avoidance appears during the Vietnam War in the US while, during the Burns/Miller and the Greenspan periods, recession avoidance dominates. Under Volcker the Taylor rule is linear. This is consistent with an offset by inflation avoidance of the more prevalent recession avoidance of the Fed.Findings from both countries support the view that reaction functions and the asymmetry properties of the underlying loss functions change in line with the regime and the main macroeconomic problem of the day.

Keywords: Taylor rules; nonlinearities; central banks; asymmetric preferences; recession avoidance; inflation avoidance; UK; US

About the article

Published Online: 2008-02-25

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, ISSN (Online) 1935-1690, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1690.1488.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

S. Borağan Aruoba, Luigi Bocola, and Frank Schorfheide
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2017
Edilean Kleber da Silva Bejarano Aragón and Marcelo Savino Portugal
Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 2010, Volume 40, Number 2, Page 373
Mikhail V. Oet and Kalle Lyytinen
Review of Finance, 2017, Page rfw054
Gerson Nhapulo and João Nicolau
South African Journal of Economics, 2017, Volume 85, Number 1, Page 28
Stephen Hansen and Michael McMahon
The Review of Economic Studies, 2016, Volume 83, Number 4, Page 1645
George B. Tawadros
Applied Economics, 2016, Volume 48, Number 49, Page 4758
Gabriela Bezerra de Medeiros, Marcelo Savino Portugal, and Edilean Kleber da Silva Bejarano Aragón
EconomiA, 2016, Volume 17, Number 1, Page 96
Chun Jiang, Na Jian, Tie-Ying Liu, and Chi-Wei Su
International Review of Economics & Finance, 2016, Volume 44, Page 349
Michael G. Arghyrou and Panayiotis Pourpourides
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2016, Volume 40, Page 80
William Miles and Sam Schreyer
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 2012, Volume 26, Number 2, Page 155
Anastassios A. Drakos and Georgios P. Kouretas
Economic Modelling, 2015, Volume 48, Page 83
Marcelo L. Moura and Alexandre de Carvalho
Journal of Macroeconomics, 2010, Volume 32, Number 1, Page 392
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2009, Volume 41, Number 6, Page 1099
Pei-Fen Chen, Jhih-Hong Zeng, and Chien-Chiang Lee
South African Journal of Economics, 2015, Volume 83, Number 4, Page 576
Abbas Valadkhani
International Review of Economics & Finance, 2014, Volume 33, Page 270
Anna Sznajderska
Economic Modelling, 2014, Volume 36, Page 547
Jean-Yves Gnabo and Diego Nicolas Moccero
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2015, Volume 55, Page 281
José Luiz Rossi and Terence Pagano
Applied Financial Economics, 2013, Volume 23, Number 10, Page 837
Dong Jin Lee and Jong Chil Son
Economic Modelling, 2013, Volume 31, Page 1
Alex Cukierman
European Journal of Political Economy, 2008, Volume 24, Number 4, Page 722
Ruthira Naraidoo and Ivan Paya
International Journal of Forecasting, 2012, Volume 28, Number 2, Page 446
Maik H. Wolters
Journal of Macroeconomics, 2012, Volume 34, Number 2, Page 342
Bořek Vašíček
Economic Systems, 2012, Volume 36, Number 2, Page 235
Costas Milas and Ruthira Naraidoo
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2012, Volume 56, Number 1, Page 173
Jens Klose
The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2011, Volume 22, Number 2, Page 149
Hilde C. Bjørnland, Karsten Gerdrup, Anne Sofie Jore, Christie Smith, and Leif Anders Thorsrud
The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2011, Volume 22, Number 1, Page 61
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2010, Volume 42, Number 5, Page 931

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in