Adams, R., and J. Page. 2003. “International Migration, Remittances and Poverty in Developing Countries.” World Bank Policy Research Paper 3179, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Agarwal, R., and A. Horowitz. 2002. “Are International Remittances Altruism or Insurance? Evidence from Guyana Using Multiple-Migrant Households.” World Development 30: 2033–2044.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akkoyunlu, S., and K. Kholodilin. 2008. “A Link Between Workers’ Remittances and Business Cycles in Germany and Turkey.” Emerging Markets, Finance and Trade 44: 23–40.Google Scholar
Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economic Studies 58: 277–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barajas, A., R. Chami, C. Fullenkamp, and A. Garg. 2010. “The Global Financial Crisis and Workers’ Remittances to Africa: What’s the Damage?.” IMF Working Paper 10/24, Middle East and Central Asia Department.Google Scholar
Bugamelli, M., and F. Paternò. 2011. “Output Growth Volatility and Remittances.” Economica 78 (311): 480–500.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, T. V., K. Mohaddes, and M. Raissi. 2012. “Commodity Price Volatility and the Sources of Growth.” IMF Working Paper 12, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Chami, R., A. Barajas, T. Cosimano, C. Fullenkamp, M. Gapen, and P. Montiel. 2008. “Macroeconomic Consequences of Remittances.” IMF Occasional Paper 259.Google Scholar
Chami, R., D. Hakura, and P. Montiel. 2009. “Remittances: An Automatic Output Stabilizer?.” IMF Working Papers: 91/2009, International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Chinn, M. D., and H. Ito. 2008. “A New Measure of Financial Openness.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10 (3): 309–322.Google Scholar
de la Brière, B., E. Sadoulet, A. de Janvry, and S. Lambert. 2002. “The Roles of Destination, Gender, and Household Composition in Explaining Remittances: An analysis for the Dominican Sierra.” Journal of Development Economics 68: 309–328.Google Scholar
Durdu, C. B., and S. Sayan. 2008. “Emerging Market Business Cycles with Remittance Fluctuations.” International Finance Discussion Papers 946, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, US.Google Scholar
Faini, R. 1994. “Workers Remittances and the Real Exchange Rate: A Quantitative Framework.” Journal of Population Economics 7: 235–245.Google Scholar
Frankel, J. A. 2009. “Are Bilateral Remittances Countercyclical?.” NBER Working Paper 15419, Massachusetts, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gupta, P. 2005. “Macroeconomic Determinants of Remittances: Evidence from India.” IMF Working Paper No. 2224.Google Scholar
Hnatkovska, V., and N. Loayza. 2005. “Volatility and growth.” In Managing Economic Volatility and Crises: A Practitioner’s Guide, edited by Joshua Aizenman and Brian Pinto, 65–100. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoddinott, J. 1994. “A Model of Migration and Remittances Applied to Western Kenya.” Oxford Economic Papers 46: 459–476.Google Scholar
Hodrick, R., and E. C. Prescott. 1997. “Postwar US Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 29 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Kapur, D. 2005. “Remittances: the New Development Mantra?.” In Remittance Development Impact and Future Prospects, edited by S. Maimbo and D. Ratha, Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Lane, P. R., and G. M. Milesi-Ferretti. 2007. “The External Wealth of Nations Mark II: Revised and Extended Estimates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 1970–2004.” Journal of International Economics 73: 223–250.Google Scholar
Lueth, E., and M. Ruiz-Arranz. 2008. “Determinants of Bilateral Remittance Flows.” The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 8: Article 26.Google Scholar
Neagu, I. C., and M. Schiff. 2009. “Remittance Stability, Cyclicality and Stabilizing Impact in Developing Countries.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5077.Google Scholar
Polity IV Project (2012): Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2007, http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.
Ramey, G., and V. Ramey. 1995. “Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between Volatility and Growth.” American Economic Review 85: 1138–1151.Google Scholar
Rapoport, H., and F. Docquier. 2006. “The Economics of Migrants’ Remittances.” In Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, edited by S.-C. Kolm and J. M, Ythier, vol. 2, 1135–1198. The Netherlands: North Holland.Google Scholar
Ratha, D. 2005. “Workers’ Remittances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance.” Economics Seminar Series Paper 9, St. Cloud State University.Google Scholar
Ratha, D., and W. Shaw. 2007. “South-South Migration and Remittances.” Development Prospects Group, World Bank (data updated in 2010).Google Scholar
Roberts, K., and M. Morris. 2003. “Fortune, Risk and Remittances: An Application of Option Theory to Participation in Village-Based Migration Networks.” International Migration Review 37: 1252–1281.Google Scholar
Roodman, D. 2006. “How to Do xtabond2: An Introduction to “Difference” and “System” GMM in Stata.” Working Paper No. 103, The Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
Sayan, S., and A. Tekin-Koru. 2008. “The Effects of Economic Developments and Policies in Host Countries on Workers’ Remittance Receipts of Developing Countries: The Cases of Turkey and Mexico Compared.” In The Impact of Rich Country Policies on Developing Economies, edited by R. Lucas, L. Squire and T. Srinivasan, London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sayan, S. 2004. “Guest Workers’ Remittances and Output Fluctuations in Host and Home Countries: The Case of Remittances from Turkish Workers in Germany.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 40: 68–81.Google Scholar
Vargas-Silva, C., and P. Huang. 2006. “Macroeconomic Determinants of Workers’ Remittances: Host versus Home Country’s Economic Conditions.” Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 15: 81–99.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2013-09-26
Published in Print: 2013-01-01
For discussions on the effects of remittances, see, among others, Adams and Page (2003), Kapur (2005), Lueth and Ruiz-Arranz (2008), Chami et al. (2009), Giuliano and Ruiz-Arranz (2009), Frankel (2009) and Mundaca (2009).
Remittances are defined as the sum of workers’ remittances, compensation of employees and migrants’ transfers (World Bank 2009). Although, this definition is not beyond criticism (Chami et al. 2008), it is based on the data availability at the cross-country level and is also frequently used in the literature. For example, Bugamelli and Paternò (2011) use the same definition in their study of 60 emerging and developing economies and document a negative effect of remittances on output growth volatility.
Authors’ own calculation from the World Bank data.
For example, Sayan (2004), Akkoyunlu and Kholodilin (2008) and Sayan and Tekin-Koru (2008) have studied the case of Turkey and Germany, and Sayan and Tekin-Koru (2008) and Vargas-Silva (2008) have studied the case of Mexico and the USA.
Given that growth is negatively related to volatility (since the seminal work of Ramey and Ramey 1995, there is a large literature on this relationship), we consider business cycle in terms of the second moment.
This approach of taking 5-year averages is also standard in the volatility-growth literature. Examples include, among others, Martin and Rogers (2000), Kneller and Young (2001) and Cavalcanti, Mohaddes and Raissi (2012).
Another motive closely tied to these motives and is based on the migration networks literature is the options motive (for a detailed discussion, see Roberts and Morris 2003).
Business cycles in developed countries are, to a large extent, correlated (Ambler, Cardia, and Zimmermann 2004) although there may be divergence at some points in time. Given that these countries are usually remittance senders, it is reasonable to consider that other remittance sending countries follow similar business cycle patterns as the USA.
Total world remittance inflows are also informative but the number of home countries differ across years in the dataset.
Some papers estimate volatility as the standard deviation of the series rather than that of the detrended series. The difference between the two approaches lies in the treatment of the trend growth rate. The standard deviation of the growth series implicitly assumes a constant trend growth, while the standard deviation of the detrended series allows the trend to follow a time-dependent process (Hnatkovska and Loayza 2005, p. 74–75).
This is based on the recommendation by Ravn and Uhlig (2002, p. 371) who show that the parameter should be adjusted approximately with the fourth power of the frequency change.
There is a difference between volatility and uncertainty. Volatility measures both the predictable and unpredictable changes, while uncertainty measures only the unpredictable changes (Ramey and Ramey 1995). We do not make this distinction here.
The Chinn and Ito (2008) capital account openness index is based on the following information regarding actual restrictions on capital flows: i) the presence of multiple exchange rates, ii) restrictions on current account transactions, iii) restrictions on capital account transactions, and iv) the requirement of the surrender of export proceeds. A possible alternative to capital account openness could be the financial integration index constructed by Lane and Milesi-Ferretti (2007). However, this is a price based measure that also reflects changes in the macroeconomic conditions even in the absence of any regulatory change on capital account transactions (endnote 5 in Chinn and Ito, 2008). The macroeconomic determinants included in our equation (3) capture the effect of the financial integration index.
Several other variables, such as the interest rate differential between the home and host countries (Faini 1994, El Sakka and McNabb 1999), or the federal fund rate (Vargas-Silva and Huang 2006) have also been included as determinants of remittance flows. However, they cannot be applied at the cross-country level.
An anonymous referee has also recommended this exercise.
The following are the sources of data: i) World Bank: remittance flows, migration stock, openness (the ratio of exports plus imports to GDP), nominal exchange rate, M2-GDP ratio, and CPI inflation; ii) Penn World Table 6.2: real GDP, and investment-GDP ratio; iii) Chinn and Ito (2008): capital account openness; iv) Polity IV Project (Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2007): Polity2.
Roodman (2006) provides an excellent user guide for dynamic panel data estimation. In this paper, we estimate using the “xtdpdsys” command in STATA.
The growth volatility of a country may depend on the ROW volatility. However, in the data, the correlation between the two volatilities is only 0.14.
However, we conduct a separate analysis in Section 5.4 only for the middle-income countries for which a relatively large number of countries are available. In some specifications, the number of instruments exceeds the number of countries.
Although the results are robust, they should be treated with caution because our sample period spans until 2007, and the great recession may have changed the migration stock in 2010.
(Remittance inflows – Remittance outflows)/GDP.
The number of countries in each group is almost the same if the top 10% host countries are chosen instead of the top 10. The results (not reported) do not meaningfully change from those reported in the table if the top 10% or even the top 5% of the sample of countries are chosen. The results also remain robust if changes in the inflation and exchange rate are included in the equations.