Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics

Editor-in-Chief: Cavalcanti, Tiago / Kambourov, Gueorgui

Ed. by Abraham, Arpad / Carceles-Poveda , Eva / Debortoli, Davide / Lambertini, Luisa / Nimark, Kristoffer / Wang, Pengfei

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.043
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.376

CiteScore 2016: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.312
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.272

Online
ISSN
1935-1690
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Business cycle synchronization across U.S. states

Luís Aguiar-Conraria
  • Universidade do Minho, NIPE and Departamento de Economia, Largo do Paço, 4704-553 Braga, Portugal
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Pedro Brinca
  • Corresponding author
  • Nova School of Business and Economics, Lisbon, Portugal
  • University of Porto, Faculty of Economics, CEF.UP, Porto, Portugal
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Haukur Viðar Guðjónsson / Maria Joana Soares
  • Universidade do Minho, NIPE and Departmento de Matemática e Aplicações, Largo do Paço, 4704-553 Braga, Portugal
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-06-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2015-0158

Abstract

We use wavelet analysis to conclude that individual U.S. states’ business cycles are very well synchronized. We also find evidence of a strong and significant correlation between business cycle dissimilitudes and the distance between each pair of states, consistent to gravity type mechanisms where distance affects trade. Trade, in turn, increases business cycle synchronization, while a higher degree of industry specialization is associated with a higher dissimilitude of the state cycle with the aggregate economy. Finally, there is evidence that business cycle dissimilitudes have been decreasing with time, consistent with the previous findings coupled with the idea that information and communications technology make distances smaller.

Keywords: business cycle synchronization; continuous wavelet transform; trade

JEL Classification: E37; E52; R11

References

  • Aguiar-Conraria, L., and M. J. Soares. 2011. “Business Cycle Synchronization and the Euro: A Wavelet Analysis.” Journal of Macroeconomics 33 (3): 477–489.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Aguiar-Conraria, L., and M. J. Soares. 2014. “The Continuous Wavelet Transform: Moving Beyond Uni and Bivariate Analysis.” Journal of Economic Surveys 28 (2): 344–375.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aguiar-Conraria, L., P. C. Magalhães, and M. J. Soares. 2013. “The Nationalization of Electoral Cycles in the United States: A Wavelet Analysis.” Public Choice 156 (3–4): 387–408.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aguiar-Conraria, L., M. Martins, and M. J. Soares. 2013. “Convergence of the Economic Sentiment Cycles in the Eurozone: A Time-Frequency Analysis.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (3): 377–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, J. E., and E. van Wincoop. 2003. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle.” American Economic Review 93 (1): 170–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Backus, D., P. Kehoe, and F. Kydland. 1992. “International Real Business Cycles.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (4): 745–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baxter, M., and M. Crucini. 1995. “Business Cycles and the Asset Structure of Foreign Trade.” International Economic Review 36 (4): 821–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baxter, M., and M. Kouparitsas. 2005. “Determinants of Business Cycle Comovement: A Robust Analysis.” Journal of Monetary Economics 52 (1): 113–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cairncross, F. 1997. The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar

  • Clark, T. E., and E. van Wincoop. 2001. “Borders and Business Cycles.” Journal of International Economics 55 (1): 59–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coe, D. T., and E. Helpman. 1995. “International R&D Spillovers.” European Economic Review 39 (5): 859–887.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Crone, T., and A. Clayton-Matthews. 2005. “Consistent Economic Indexes for the 50 States.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (4): 593–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Haan, J., R. Inklaar, and R. Jong-A-Pin. 2008. “Will Business Cycles in the Euro Area Converge? A Critical Survey of Empirical Research.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (2): 234–273.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frankel, J. A., and A. K. Rose. 1997. “Is EMU more Justifiable ex Post than ex Ante?” European Economic Review 41 (3–5): 753–760.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frankel, J. A., and A. K. Rose. 1998. “The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria.” The Economic Journal 108 (449): 1009–1025.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guha, D., and A. Banerji. 1998/1999. “Testing for Regional Cycles: A Markov-Switching Approach.” Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 25 (3/4): 163–182.Google Scholar

  • Imbs, J. 2004. “Trade, Finance, Specialization, and Synchronization.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (3): 723–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Inklaar, R., R. Jong-A-Pin, and J. De Haan. 2008. “Trade and Business Cycle Synchronization in OECD Countries – a Re-Examination.” European Economic Review 52 (4): 646–666.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kouparitsas, M. A. 2001. “Is the United States an Optimum Currency Area? An Empirical Analysis of Regional Business Cycles.” Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper 2001-21.Google Scholar

  • Krugman, P. R. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press.Google Scholar

  • Krugman, P. 1993. “Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU.” In The Transition to Economic and Monetary Union in Europe, edited by F. Giavazzi and F. Torres. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, New York.Google Scholar

  • Magrini, S., M. Gerelimetto, and H. E. Duran. 2013. “Business Cycle Dynamics Across the US States.” B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 13 (1): 795–822.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Owyang, M. T., J. Piger, and H. J. Wall. 2005. “Business Cycle Phases in U.S. States.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (4): 604–616.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rua, A. 2010. “Measuring Comovement in the Time-Frequency Space.” Journal of Macroeconomics 32 (2): 685–691.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rua, A., and Lopes, A. S. 2015. “Cohesion within the euro area and the US: a wavelet-based view.” OECD Journal: Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis 2014 (2): 63–76.Google Scholar

  • Stock, J. H., and M. W. Watson. 1989. “New Indexes of Coincident and Leading Economic Indicators.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1989, Volume 4. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press, 351–409.Google Scholar

  • Tinbergen, J. 1962. “An Analysis of World Trade Flows.” In Shaping the World Economy, edited by J. Tinbergen. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar

  • Wen, Y. 2007. “By Force Of Demand: Explaining International Comovements.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-06-08


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, ISSN (Online) 1935-1690, ISSN (Print) 2194-6116, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2015-0158.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in