Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics

Editor-in-Chief: Cavalcanti, Tiago / Kambourov, Gueorgui

Ed. by Abraham, Arpad / Carceles-Poveda , Eva / Debortoli, Davide / Schwartzman, Felipe / Wang, Pengfei

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.462

CiteScore 2017: 0.62

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.553
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.605

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Macroeconomic costs of gender gaps in a model with entrepreneurship and household production

David Cuberes / Marc Teignier
Published Online: 2017-12-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2017-0031


This paper examines the quantitative effects of gender gaps in entrepreneurship and workforce participation in an occupational choice model with a household sector and endogenous female labor supply. Gender gaps in workforce participation have a direct negative effect on market, while gender gaps in entrepreneurship affect negatively market output not only by reducing wages and labor force participation but also by reducing the average talent of entrepreneurs and aggregate productivity. We estimate the effects of these gender gaps for 37 European countries, as well as the United States, and find that gender gaps cause an average loss of 17.5% in market output and 13.2% in total output, which also includes household output. Interestingly, the total output loss would be similar (12%) in a model without household sector, since the market output loss is larger when the female labor supply is endogenous. Eastern Europe is the region with the lowest income fall due to gender gaps, while Southern Europe is the region with the largest fall. Northern Europe is the region with the largest productivity fall, which is due to the presence of high gender gaps in entrepreneurship.

Keywords: gender inequality; household production; factor misallocation; aggregate productivity

JEL Classification: E2; J21; J24; O40


  • Antunes, A., T. Cavalcanti, and A. Villamil. 2015. “The Effects of Credit Subsidies on Development.” Economic Theory 58: 1–30.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aguirre, D., L. Hoteit, C. Rupp, and K. Sabbagh. 2012. “Empowering the Third Billion: Women and the World of Work in 2012.” Startegy (formerly Booz and Company) report (Arlington, Virginia).

  • Bridgman, B. 2016. “Home Productivity.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 71: 60–76.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bridgman, B., G. Duernecker, and B. Herrendorf. 2017. “Structural Transformation, Marketization, and Household Production around the World.” Journal of Development Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Buera, F. J. and Y. Shin. 2011. “Self-Insurance vs. Self-Financing: A Welfare Analysis of the Persistence of Shocks.” Journal of Economic Theory 146: 845–862.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Buera, F. J., J. P. Kaboski, and Y. Shin. 2011. “Finance and Development: A Tale of Two Sectors.” American Economic Review 101 (5): 1964–2002.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cavalcanti, T. and J. Tavares. 2008. “Assessing the Engines of Liberation: Home Appliances and Female Labor Force Participation.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (1): 81–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cavalcanti, T. and J. Tavares. 2016. “The Output Cost of Gender Discrimination: A Model-Based Macroeconomic Estimate.” Economic Journal 126 (590): 109–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cerina, F., A. Moro, and M. Rendall. 2017. The Role of Gender in Employment Polarization. University of Zurich WP 250.Google Scholar

  • Chiappori, P.-A. 1997. “Introducing Household Production in Collective Models of Labor Supply.” Journal of Political Economy 105 (1): 191–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cuberes, D. and M. Teignier. 2014. “Gender Inequality and Economic Growth: A Critical Review.” Journal of International Development 26 (2): 260–276.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cuberes, D., and M. Teignier. 2016. “Aggregate Costs of Gender Gaps in the Labor Market: A Quantitative Estimate.” Journal of Human Capital 10 (1): 1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Doepke, M. and M. Tertilt. 2009. “Women’s Liberation: What’s in it for Men?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4): 1541–1591.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Duernecker, G., and B. Herrendorf. 2017. On the Allocation of Time - A Quantitative Analysis of the Roles of Taxes and Productivities. European Economic Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Esteve-Volart, B. 2009. “Gender Discrimination and Growth: Theory and Evidence from India.” Manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Fernandez, R. 2009. “Women’s Rights and Development.” NBER Working Paper No 15355.Google Scholar

  • Galor, O. and D. N. Weil. 1996. “The Gender Gap, Fertility, and Growth.” American Economic Review 85 (3): 374–387.Google Scholar

  • Goldman Sachs. 2007. “Gender Inequality, Growth, and Global Ageing.” Global Economics Paper No. 154.Google Scholar

  • Gollin, D., S. L. Parente, and R. Rogerson, 2004. “Farm Work, Home Work, and International Productivity Differences.” Review of Economic Dynamics 7: 827–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwood, J., A. Seshadri, and M. Yorukoglu. 2005. “Engines of Liberation.” Review of Economic Studies 72: 109–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guner, N., R. Kaygusuz, and G. Ventura. 2012a. “Taxation and Household Labor Supply.” Review of Economic Studies 79: 1113–1149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guner, N., R. Kaygusuz, and G. Ventura. 2012b. “Taxing Women: A Macroeconomic Analysis.” Journal of Monetary Economics 59: 111–128.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hsieh, C., E. Hurst, C. Jones, and P. Klenow. 2013. “The Allocation of Talent and US Economic Growth.” NBER Working Paper No. 18693.Google Scholar

  • International Labor Organization. 2014. “Global Employment Trends.”Google Scholar

  • Lagerlof, N. 2003. “Gender Equality and Long Run Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth 8: 403–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lucas Jr., R. E. 1978. “On the Size Distribution of Business Firms.” The Bell Journal of Economics 9 (2): 508–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKinsey & Company. 2015. “The Power of Parity: How Advancing Women’s Equality Can Add $12 Trillion to Global Growth.” September.Google Scholar

  • Moro, A., M. Solmaz, and S. Tanaka. 2017. “Does Home Production Drive Structural Transformation?” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 9 (3): 116–146.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ngai, L. R., and B. Petrongolo. 2017. “Gender Gaps and the Rise of the Service Economy.” American Economic Journal – Macroeconomics 9 (4): 1–44.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ngai, L. R. and A. Pissarides. 2011. “Taxes, Social Subsidy, and the Allocation of Work Time.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3: 1–26.Google Scholar

  • Prescott, E. C. 2004. “Why Do Americans Work So Much More than Europeans?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 10316.Google Scholar

  • Rendall, M. 2017. “Brain Versus Brawn: The Realization of Women’s Comparative Advantage.” Manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Rogerson, R. 2007. “Taxation and Market Work: Is Scandinavia an Outlier?” Economic Theory 32: 59–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rogerson, R. 2008. “Structural Transformation and the Deterioration of European Labor Market Outcomes.” Journal of Political Economy 116: 235–259.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • World Bank. 2012. “World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development.”Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-12-27

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Volume 18, Issue 1, 20170031, ISSN (Online) 1935-1690, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2017-0031.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in