Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics

Editor-in-Chief: Cavalcanti, Tiago / Kambourov, Gueorgui

Ed. by Abraham, Arpad / Carceles-Poveda , Eva / Debortoli, Davide / Lambertini, Luisa / Nimark, Kristoffer / Wang, Pengfei

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.043
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.376

CiteScore 2016: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.312
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.272

Online
ISSN
1935-1690
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Liquidity constraints, international trade, and optimal monetary policy

Wai-Ming Ho
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Economics, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada, Phone: 416 736 2100 ext.22319. Fax: 416 736 5987
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-09-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2015-0203

Abstract

The availability of liquidity matters for an economy’s production and trade as firms need working capital to finance their operations. This paper studies the interaction between trade and capital flows operating through the liquidity allocations in the financial markets using a small-open-economy, overlapping-generations model. Working capital requirements distort the intratemporal consumption allocations. International capital inflows help easing liquidity in the domestic credit market, facilitating trade and improving the intratemporal allocation, while distorting the intertemporal allocation of the economy. We show how the government can use the Friedman rule and differentiated consumption taxes to address the tradeoff between the intratemporal and intertemporal distortions and achieve the second best optimum. Imposing a higher tax rate on imports can reduce the international borrowing to imports ratio and enhance the efficiency in using capital inflows to facilitate trade flows.

Keywords: excessive borrowing; Friedman rule; intratemporal and intertemporal trade; liquidity constraints; small open economy

JEL Classification: E52; E63; F41

References

  • Abel, A. 1987. “Optimal Monetary Growth.” Journal of Monetary Economics 19: 437–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aiyagari, R., R. A. Braun, and Z. Eckstein. 1998. “Inflation, Transaction, Services and Welfare.” Journal of Political Economy 106 (6): 1274–1301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Antràs, P., and R. J. Caballero. 2009. “Trade and Capital Flows: A Financial Frictions Perspective.” Journal of Political Economy 117 (4): 701–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arseneau, D. M. 2007. “The Inflation Tax in an Open Economy with Imperfect Competition.” Review of Economic Dynamics 10: 126–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beck, T. 2002. “Financial Development and International Trade. Is There a Link?” Journal of International Economics 57: 107–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beck, T. 2003. “Financial Dependence and International Trade.” Review of International Economics 11: 296–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benigno, G., and P. Benigno. 2003. “Price Stability in Open Economies.” Review of Economic Studies 70 (4): 743–764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bernanke, B., and M. Gertler. 1989. “Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations.” American Economic Review 79 (1): 14–31.Google Scholar

  • Bhattacharya, J., and J. Haslag. 2001. “On the Use of the Inflation Tax When Nondistortionary Taxes are Available.” Review of Economic Dynamics 4: 823–841.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhattacharya, J., J. Haslag, and S. Russell. 2003. “Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy, and the Inflation Tax: Equivalence Results.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 7: 647–669.Google Scholar

  • Bhattacharya, J., J. Haslag, and A. Martin. 2005. “Heterogeneity, Redistribution, and the Friedman Rule.” International Economic Review 46: 437–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhattacharya, J., J. Haslag, and S. Russell. 2005. “The Role of Money in Two Alternative Models: When is the Friedman Rule Optimal and Why?” Journal of Monetary Economics 52: 1401–1433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhattacharya, J., J. Haslag, and A. Martin. 2006. “Sub-optimality of the Friedman Rule in Townsend’s Turnpike and Stochastic Relocation Models of Money: Do Infinite Lives and Initial Dates Matter?” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30: 879–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caballero, R. J., E. Farhi, and P.-O. Gourinchas. 2008. “An Equilibrium Model of ‘Global Imbalances’ and Low Interest Rates.” American Economic Review 98 (1): 358–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campa, J. M., and L. S. Goldberg. 2005. “Exchange Rate Pass-Through into Import Prices.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87: 679–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carlstrom, C. T., and T. S. Fuerst. 2002. “Optimal Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy: A General Equilibrium Analysis.”. In Loayza, N., and K. Schmidt-Hebbel (Eds.) Monetary Policy: Rules And Transmission Mechanisms. Santiago: Central Bank of Chile.Google Scholar

  • Chari, V. V., and P. J. Kehoe. 1999. “Optimal Fiscal And Monetary Policy.”. In Taylor, J. B., and M. D. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics. 1671–1745. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

  • Chari, V. V., L. J. Christiano, and P. J. Kehoe. 1996. “Optimality of the Friedman Rule in Economies with Distorting Taxes.” Journal of Monetary Economics 37: 203–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cooley, T. F., and and V. Quadrini. 2003. “Common Currencies vs. Monetary Independence.” Review of Economic Studies 70: 785–806.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correia, I., and P. Teles. 1996. “Is the Friedman Rule Optimal When Money is an Intermediate Good?” Journal of Monetary Economics 38: 223–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corsetti, G., and P. Pesenti. 2005. “International Dimensions of Optimal Monetary Policy.” Journal of Monetary Economics 52: 281–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crucini, M. J., and M. Shintani. 2008. “Persistence in Law of One Price Deviations: Evidence from Micro-data.” Journal of Monetary Economics 55: 629–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cunha, A. B. 2008. “The Optimality of the Friedman Rule When Some Distorting Taxes are Exogenous.” Economic Theory 35: 267–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • da Costa, C., and I. Werning. 2008. “On the Optimality of Friedman Rule with Heterogeneous Agents and Non-linear Income Taxation.” Journal of Political Economy 116: 82–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Erosa, A., and G. Ventura. 2002. “On Inflation as a Regressive Consumption Tax.” Journal of Monetary Economies 49: 761–795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fisher, E. O. 1990. “Sustainable Balance of Trade Deficits.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 411–450.Google Scholar

  • Friedman, M. 1969. The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Gahvari, F. 1988. “Lump-Sum Taxation and the Superneutrality of Optimum Quantity of Money in Life Cycle Growth Models.” Journal of Public Economics 36: 339–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gahvari, F. 2007. “The Friedman Rule: Old and New.” Journal of Monetary Economics 54: 581–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gale, D. 1971. “General Equilibrium with Imbalance of Trade.” Journal of International Economics 1: 141–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grossman, S. J., and L. Weiss. 1983. “A Transaction-based Model of the Monetary Transmission Mechanism.” American Economic Review 73: 871–880.Google Scholar

  • Guidotti, P. E., and C. A. Vegh. 1993. “The Optimal Inflation Tax When Money Reduces Transactions Costs: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Monetary Economics 31 (2): 189–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haslag, J., and A. Martin. 2007. “Optimality of the Friedman Rule in an Overlapping Generations Model with Spatial Separation.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39: 1741–1758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ho, W.-M., J. Zeng, and J. Zhang. 2007. “Inflation Taxation and Welfare with Externalities and Leisure.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39: 105–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holmstrom, B., and J. Tirole. 1997. “Financial Intermediation, Loanable Funds, and the Real Sector.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (3): 663–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jin, K. 2012. “Industrial Structure and Capital Flows.” American Economic Review 102: 2111–2146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ju, J., and S.-J. Wei. 2011. “When is Quality of Financial System a Source of Comparative Advantage?” Journal of International Economics 84: 178–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kimbrough, K. P. 1986. “The Optimal Quantity of Money Rule in the Theory of Public Finance.” Journal of Monetary Economics 18: 277–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kletzer, K., and P. Bardhan. 1987. “Credit Markets and Patterns of International Trade.” Journal of Development Economics 27: 57–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kocherlakota, N. R. 2005. “Optimal Monetary Policy: What We Know and What We Don’t Know.” International Economic Review 46: 715–729.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lai, C.-c., and C.-t. Chin. 2010. “(In)determinacy, Increasing Returns, and the Optimality of the Friedman Rule in an Endogenous Growing Open Economy.” Economic Theory 44: 69–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manova, K. 2008. “Credit Constraints, Equity Market Liberalizations and International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 76: 33–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manova, K. 2010. “Credit Constraints and the Adjustment to Trade Reform.”. In Porto, G., and B. Hoekman (Eds.) Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: Impacts, Determinants and Policy Responses. Washington, DC: The World Bank and CEPR.Google Scholar

  • Matsuyama, K. 2005. “Credit Market Imperfections and Patterns of International Trade and Capital Flows.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3: 714–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Palivos, T., and C. Yip. 1995. “Government Expenditure Financing in an Endogenous Growth Model.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27: 1159–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phelps, E. 1973. “Inflation in the Theory of Public Finance.” Swedish Journal of Economics 75: 67–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rotemberg, J. J. 1984. “A Monetary Equilibrium with Transactions Costs.” Journal of Political Economy 92: 40–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1967. “A Turnpike Refutation of the Golden Rule in a Welfare-Maximizing Many-Year Plan.”. In Shell, K. (Ed.), Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth. 269–280. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1968. “The Two-Part Golden Rule Deduced as the Asymptotic Turnpike of Catenary Motions.” Western Economic Journal 6: 85–89.Google Scholar

  • Schmitt-Grohé, S., and M. Uribe. 2003. “Anticipated Ramsey Reforms and the Uniform Taxation Principle: The Role of International Financial Markets.”.Working Paper 9862 National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

  • Schmitt-Grohé, S., and M. Uribe. 2010. “The Optimal Rate of Inflation.”.Working Paper 16054 National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

  • Shi, S. 1999. “Money, Capital, and Redistributive Effects of Monetary Policies.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23: 565–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, T. 1998. “The Friedman Rule and Optimal Monetary Policy.” Canadian Journal of Economics 31: 295–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, B. D. 2003. “Taking Intermediation Seriously.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 35: 1319–1358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Svaleryd, H., and J. Vlachos. 2005. “Financial Markets, the Pattern of Industrial Specialization and Comparative Advantage: Evidence from OECD Countries.” European Economic Review 49: 113–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wallace, N. 1984. “Some of the Choices for Monetary Policy.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 8: 15–24.Google Scholar

  • Weiss, L. 1980. “The Effects of Money Supply on Economic Welfare in the Steady State.” Econometrica 48: 565–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williamson, S. D. 1996. “Sequential Markets and the Suboptimality of the Friedman Rule.” Journal of Monetary Economics 37: 549–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williamson, S. D. 2005. “Limited Participation and the Neutrality of Money.” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 91: 1–20.Google Scholar

  • World Bank. Global Development Finance: External Debt of Developing Countries Washington, DC: World Bank 2012.Google Scholar

  • Wu, Y., and J. Zhang. 2000. “Monopolistic Competition, Increasing Returns to Scale, and the Welfare Costs of Inflation.” Journal of Monetary Economics 46: 417–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-09-15


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 20150203, ISSN (Online) 1935-1690, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2015-0203.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in