Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics

Editor-in-Chief: Cavalcanti, Tiago / Kambourov, Gueorgui

Ed. by Abraham, Arpad / Carceles-Poveda , Eva / Debortoli, Davide / Lambertini, Luisa / Nimark, Kristoffer / Wang, Pengfei

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.462

CiteScore 2017: 0.62

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.553
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.605

Online
ISSN
1935-1690
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Foreign official holdings of US treasuries, stock effect and the economy: a DSGE approach

John Nana Francois
  • Corresponding author
  • West Texas A&M University, Department of Economics, 2501 4th Avenue, Canyon, United States of America
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-09-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2016-0170

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of shocks to foreign official holdings of long-term U.S. Treasuries (FOHL) on macroeconomic aggregates using a dynamic general equilibrium model. The model treats short- and long-term bonds as imperfect substitutes through endogenous portfolio adjustment frictions. This provides a channel for changes in relative supply of assests to influence asset prices. Three key findings emerge: (1) positive shocks to FOHL impact the long-term interest rate and the term spread negatively through a stock effect channel – defined as persistent changes in interest rates as a result of movement along the Treasury demand curve. This result is consistent with findings in the empirical literature. (2) Through a feedback mechanism from an endogenous term structure in the model, the decline in the long-term interest rate induces an expansion in economic activity which leads to an increase in consumption, output and inflation. Both the stock effect and the feedback mechanism are generated by the portfolio frictions. (3) Higher degrees of persistence of FOHL shocks or imperfect asset substitution generate a prolonged negative stock effect following shocks to FOHL. This causes a longer delay of the term spread to return to its steady state after it falls; hence, inducing an extended and stronger stimulative feedback effect from the endogenous term structure into the modeled economy.  These findings help explain macroeconomic events such as the so-called ``Greenspan conundrum'' of the mid 2000s.

Keywords: DSGE; Foreign Official Holdings of US Treasuries; Imperfect Asset Substitution; Near-Structural VARs; Portfolio Adjustment Costs

JEL Classification: E43; E52; E58; F21; G12

References

  • Altig, D., L. J. Christiano, M. Eichenbaum, and J. Linde. 2011. “Firm-Specific Capital, Nominal Rigidities and the Business Cycle.” Review of Economic Dynamics 14: 225–247.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andrés, J., J. D. Loṕez-Salido, and E. Nelson. 2004. “Tobin’s Imperfect Asset Substitution in Optimizing General Equilibrium.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 36: 655–690.Google Scholar

  • Beltran, D. O., M. Kretchmer, J. Marquez, and C. P. Thomas. 2013. “Foreign Holdings of US Treasuries and US Treasury Yields.” Journal of International Money and Finance 32: 1120–1143.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bernanke, B., V. Reinhart, and B. Sack. 2004. “Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound: An Empirical Assessment.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2004: 1–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bernanke, B. S. 2005. The Global Saving Glut and the US Current Account Deficit, Remarks by Governor Ben s. Bernanke at the Homer Jones Lecture, St. Louis, Missouri, April 14.Google Scholar

  • Bertaut, C., L. P. DeMarco, S. Kamin, and R. Tryon. 2012. “Abs Inflows to the United States and the Global Financial Crisis.” Journal of International Economics 88: 219–234.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bertaut, C. C., and R. W. Tyron. 2007. Monthly Estimates of U.S. Cross-Boarder Securities Positions, International Finance Discussion Papers 910, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar

  • Borio, C. E., G. Galati, and A. Heath. 2008. FX Reserve Management: Trends and Challenges, BIS Papers 40, Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar

  • Chari, V. V., P. J. Kehoe, and E. R. McGrattan. 2000. “Sticky Price Models of the Business Cycle: Can the Contract Multiplier Solve the Persistence Problem?” Econometrica 68: 1151–1179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, H., V. Cúrdia, and A. Ferrero. 2012. “The Macroeconomic Effects of Large-Scale Asset Purchase Programmes.” The Economic Journal 564: F289–F315.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • D’Amico, S., and T. B. King. 2013. “Flow and Stock Effects of Large-Scale Treasury Purchases: Evidence on the Importance of Local Supply.” Journal of Financial Economics 108: 425–448.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Davig, T., and E. M. Leeper. 2007. “Fluctuating macro policies and the fiscal theory.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2006, edited by Daron Acemoglu, Kenneth Rogoff, and Michael Woodford, Vol. 21, 247–316. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Falagiarda, M. 2014. “Evaluating Quantitative Easing: a Dsge Approach.” International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance 7: 302–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Falagiarda, M., and M. Marzo. 2012. A DSGE model with Endogenous Term Structure, Working Papers wp830, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita’ di Bologna.Google Scholar

  • Favilukis, J., D. Kohn, S. C. Ludvigson, and S. Van Nieuwerburgh. 2012. “International Capital Flows and House Prices: Theory and Evidence.” In Housing and the Financial Crisis, edited by Edward L. Glaeser, and Todd Sinai, 235–299. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Favilukis, J., S. C. Ludvigson, and S. Van Nieuwerburgh. 2014. Foreign Ownership of US Safe Assets: Good Or Bad? Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

  • Fuhrer, J. C. 2000. “Habit Formation in Consumption and its Implications for Monetary-Policy Models.” American Economic Review 90: 367– 390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gertler, M., and P. Karadi. 2011. “A Model of Unconventional Monetary Policy.” Journal of Monetary Economics 58: 17–34.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwood, R., S. G. Hanson, J. S. Rudolph, and L. H. Summers. 2015. “The Optimal Maturity of Government Debt,” In The $13 Trillion Question: Managing the US Government’s Debt, edited by David Wessel, Vol. 1, 1–41. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

  • Harrison, R. 2011. “Asset Purchase Policies and Portfolio Balance Effects: a DSGE Analysis.” In Interest Rates, Prices and Liquidity: Lessons from the Financial Crisis, edited by Jagjit S. Chadha, and Sean Holly, 117–143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Harrison, R. 2012. Asset Purchase Policy at the Effective Lower Bound for Interest Rates, Bank of England working papers 444, Bank of England.Google Scholar

  • Ireland, P. N. 2004. “Technology Shocks in the New Keynesian Model.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 923–936.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, C., and M. Kulish. 2013. “Long-Term Interest Rates, Risk Premia and Unconventional Monetary Policy.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37: 2547–2561.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joyce, M., D. Miles, A. Scott, and D. Vayanos. 2012. “Quantitative Easing and Unconventional Monetary Policy–an Introduction.” The Economic Journal 122: F271–F288.Google Scholar

  • Kaminska, I., and G. Zinna. 2014. Official Demand for US Debt: Implications for US Real Interest Rates, 14-66, International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar

  • Kim, J. 2000. “Constructing and Estimating a Realistic Optimizing Model of Monetary Policy.” Journal of Monetary Economics 45: 329–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohn, D. 2015. Addicted to Debt: Foreign Purchases of US Treasuries and the Term-Premium. Tech. rep., Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.Google Scholar

  • Krishnamurthy, A., and A. Vissing-Jorgensen. 2012. “The Aggregate Demand for Treasury Debt.” Journal of Political Economy 120: 233–267.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leeper, E. 1991. “Equilibria Under’Active’and’Passive’Monetary and Fiscal Policies.” Journal of Monetary Economics 27: 129–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leeper, E. M., N. Traum, and T. B. Walker. 2017. “Clearing up the Fiscal Multiplier Morass.” American Economic Review 107: 2409–2454.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ljungqvist, L., and T. J. Sargent. 2004. Recursive Macroeconomic Theory, Vol. 1, 2nd ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Lucas, R. E. 1988. “Money Demand in the United States: A Quantitative Review.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 29: 137– 167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mankiw, N. G., and L. H. Summers. 1986. “Money Demand and the Effects of Fiscal Policies.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 18: 415–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marzo, M., U. Söderström, and P. Zagaglia. 2008. The Term Structure of Interest Rates and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism. Manuscript, Sveriges Riksbank.Google Scholar

  • Morrison, W. M., and M. Labonte. 2011. China's Holdings of U.S. Securities: Implications for the U.S. Economy. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar

  • Papaioannou, E., R. Portes, and G. Siourounis. 2006. “Optimal Currency Shares in International Reserves: the Impact of the Euro and the Prospects for the Dollar.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 20: 508–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rotemberg, J. J. 1982. “Monopolistic Price Adjustment and Aggregate Output.” Review of Economic Studies 49: 517–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudebusch, G., E. Swanson, and T. Wu. 2006. “The Bond Yield “Conundrum” from a Macro-Finance Perspective.” Monetary and Economic Studies 24: 83–109.Google Scholar

  • Schmitt-Grohé, S., and M. Uribe. 2004. “Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy Under Imperfect Competition.” Journal of Macroeconomics 26: 183–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sierra, J. 2014. “International Capital Flows and Bond Risk Premia.” The Quarterly Journal of Finance 4: 1450001.Google Scholar

  • Sims, C. A., and T. Zha. 1999. “Error Bands for Impulse Responses.” Econometrica 67: 1113–1155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swanson, E. T. 2011. “Let’s Twist Again: a High-Frequency Event-Study Analysis of Operation Twist and its Implications for qe2.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2011: 151–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, J. B. 1993. “Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39: 195–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tobin, J. 1969. “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1: 15–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tobin, J. 1982. “Money and Finance in the Macroeconomic Process.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 14: 171–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warnock, F. E., and V. C. Warnock. 2009. “International Capital Flows and US Interest Rates.” Journal of International Money and Finance 28: 903–919.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wolcott, E. L. 2016. “Impact of Foreign Official Purchases of US Treasuries on the Yield Curve.Google Scholar

  • Woodford, M. 2001. “Fiscal Requirements for Price Stability.” Journal of Money, Credit, & Banking 33: 669.Google Scholar

  • Zagaglia, P. 2013. “Forecasting Long-Term Interest Rates with a General-Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area: What Role for Liquidity Services of Bonds?” Asia-Pacific Financial Markets 20: 383–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zellner, A. 1962. “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57: 348–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-09-20


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 20160170, ISSN (Online) 1935-1690, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2016-0170.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in