Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics

Editor-in-Chief: Schipper, Burkhard

Ed. by Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Wenzelburger, Jan

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.173
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.248

CiteScore 2018: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.163
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.186

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2018: 0.08

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Monopolistic Signal Provision

Luis Rayo
  • Corresponding author
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Management, London, United Kingdom
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-05-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2012-0003


I study a monopolist who sells a signal to a consumer with a hidden type. The consumer uses this signal to obtain social status, defined as the expectation of the consumer’s type conditional on the signal. The monopolist must decide how accurately different types are revealed. When pooling subsets of types, she reduces social surplus, but extracts greater information rents. I derive the optimal mechanism by examining the covariance between the consumer’s type and his virtual marginal value of social status.

Keywords: nonlinear pricing; signaling; information disclosure


  • Bagwell, Laurie Simon, and B. Douglas Bernheim. 1996. “Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption.” American Economic Review 86(3):349–73.Google Scholar

  • Banks, Jeffrey S., and Joel Sobel. 1987. “Equilibrium Selection in Signaling Games.” Econometrica 55(3):647–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, Gary S., and Kevin M. Murphy. 2000. Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Becker, Gary S., Kevin M., Murphy, and Edward L. Glaeser. 2000. “Social Markets and the Escalation of Quality: The World of Veblen Revisited.” in Becker, Gary S., and Murphy, Kevin M. (2000).Google Scholar

  • Bergemann, Dirk, and Martin Pesendorfer. 2007. “Information Structures in Optimal Auctions.” Journal of Economic Theory 137(1):580–609.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bernheim, B. Douglas. 1994. “A Theory of Conformity.” Journal of Political Economy 102(5):841–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Board, Simon. 2009. “Monopolistic Group Design with Peer Effects.” Theoretical Economics 4(1):89–125.Google Scholar

  • Cho, In-Koo, and David M. Kreps. 1987. “Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102(2):179–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, In-Koo, and Joel Sobel. 1990. “Strategic Stability and Uniqueness in Signaling Games.” Journal of Economic Theory 50(2):381–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Damiano, Ettore, and Hao Li. 2007. “Price Discrimination and Efficient Matching.” Economic Theory 30(2):243–63.Google Scholar

  • Damiano, Ettore, and Hao Li. 2008. “Competing Matchmaking.” Journal of the European Economic Association 6(4):789–818.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Daughety, Andrew F., and Jennifer F. Reinganum. 2010. “Public Goods, Social Pressure, and the Choice Between Privacy and Publicity.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 2(2):191–221.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Diaz-Diaz, Miguel, and Luis Rayo. 2012. “Conspicuous Consumption with Imperfect Competition.” mimeo, Central Bank of Mexico and LSE.Google Scholar

  • Fudenberg, Drew, and Jean Tirole. 2000. Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Glazer, Amihai, and Kai A. Konrad. 1996. “A Signaling Explanation for Charity.” American Economic Review 86(4):1019–28.Google Scholar

  • Gomes, Renato, and Alessandro Pavan. 2011. “Price Discrimination in Many-to-Many Matching Markets.” mimeo, Toulouse School of Economics and Northwestern University.Google Scholar

  • Guesnerie, Roger, and Jean-Jacques Laffont. 1984. “A Complete Solution to a Class of Principal-Agent Problems with an Application to the Control of a Self-Managed Firm.” Journal of Public Economics 25(3):329–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harbaugh, William T. 1998. “What do Donations Buy? A Model of Philanthropy Based on Prestige and Warm Glow.” Journal of Public Economics 67(2):269–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoppe, Heidrun C., Benny Moldovanu, and Emre Ozdenoren. 2011. “Coarse Matching with Incomplete Information.” Economic Theory 47(1):75–104.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lizzeri, Alessandro. 1999. “Information Revelation and Certification Intermediaries.” Rand Journal of Economics 30(2):214–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maskin, Eric, and John Riley. 1984. “Monopoly with Incomplete Information.” Rand Journal of Economics 15(2):171–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milgrom, Paul, and Ilya Segal. 2002. “Envelope Theorems for Arbitrary Choice Sets.” Econometrica 70(2):583–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moldovanu, Benny, Aner Sela, and Xianwen Shi. 2007. “Contests for Status.” Journal of Political Economy 115(2):338–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mussa, Michael, and Sherwin Rosen. 1978. “Monopoly and Product Quality.” Journal of Economic Theory 18(2):301–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Myerson, Roger B. 1981. “Optimal Auction Design.” Mathematics of Operations Research 6(1):58–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pesendorfer, Wolfgang. 1995. “Design Innovation and Fashion Cycles.” American Economic Review 85(4):771–92.Google Scholar

  • Ramey, Garey. 1996. “D1 Signaling Equilibria with Multiple Signals and a Continuum of Types.” Journal of Economic Theory 69(2):508–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rayo, Luis, and Ilya Segal. 2010. “Optimal Information Disclosure.” Journal of Political Economy 118(5):949–987.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Veblen, Thorstein B. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. London: Unwin Books.Google Scholar

  • Vikander, Nick E. 2010. “Targeted Advertising and Social Status.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 11–016/1.Google Scholar

  • Zubrickas, Robertas. 2012. “Optimal Grading.” mimeo, University of Zurich.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-05-08

Published in Print: 2013-01-01

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 27–58, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, ISSN (Print) 2194-6124, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2012-0003.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Zhuoran Lu
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2019
Lisa Windsteiger
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2018
George Deltas and Eleftherios Zacharias
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2018
Lisa Windsteiger
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2017
Robertas Zubrickas
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012
Heidrun C. Hoppe-Wewetzer, Benny Moldovanu, and Emre Ozdenoren
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2008
Ettore Damiano and Hao NMI1 Li
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2003
Arianna Degan and Ming Li
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
Luyi Yang, Laurens Debo, and Varun Gupta
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
Lisa Windsteiger
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2018
Ronen Gradwohl and Rann Smorodinsky
Games and Economic Behavior, 2017, Volume 104, Page 293
Renato Gomes and Alessandro Pavan
Theoretical Economics, 2016, Volume 11, Number 3, Page 1005
Thomas Trégouët
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2015, Volume 42, Page 34
Gilat Levy and Ronny Razin
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2015, Volume 7, Number 2, Page 308
Rogério Mazali and José A. Rodrigues-Neto
Games and Economic Behavior, 2013, Volume 82, Page 103
T.R. Johnson
Journal of Economic Theory, 2013, Volume 148, Number 4, Page 1700

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in