Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics

Editor-in-Chief: Schipper, Burkhard

Ed. by Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Wenzelburger, Jan

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.229
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.271

CiteScore 2016: 0.30

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.398
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.232

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2016: 0.08

Online
ISSN
1935-1704
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Predicting Empirical Patterns in Viewing Japanese TV Dramas Using Case-Based Decision Theory

Keita Kinjo / Shinya Sugawara
Published Online: 2016-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2015-0014

Abstract

This article empirically analyzes consumer behavior of viewing TV dramas using case-based decision theory. The theory addresses an economic situation with structural ignorance, where states of the world are not naturally given nor simply formulated for a decision-maker. Under this theory, consumers make decisions based on subjective evaluations of previous purchases for similar goods. Our empirical analysis is concerned with viewing decisions on getsuku, the Japanese TV dramas broadcast at 9 pm Monday by the Fuji Television Network. The regularity of the schedule and the long-sustaining popularity of the program enable us to easily collect consumer data. Then, we conduct a web survey of individual audiences on subjective evaluations of previously watched dramas. For our empirical analysis, we utilize a simple linear model of the case-based model that allows the incorporation of flexible inference techniques. Our results demonstrate better performance of the case-based models than models based on traditional expected utility theory regarding both statistical model selection and one-step-ahead prediction. We also reveal that the successful performance of the case-based model in our analysis depends on the availability of individual subjective evaluations and that it is difficult to replace the individual-specific information using demographic information and aggregate data.

Keywords: case-based decision models; TV audience rate; Japanese getsuku drama; cultural economics; Kimutaku

JEL: D12; D83; Z11

References

  • Allenby, G. M., and P. E. Rossi. 1998. “Marketing Models of Consumer Heterogeneity.” Journal of Econometrics 89:57–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, G. S., and K. M. Murphy. 1988. “A Theory of Rational Addiction.” Journal of Political Economy 96:675–700.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bethlehem, J. 2010. “Selection Bias in Web Surveys.” International Statistical Review 78:161–88.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brito, P., and C. Barros. 2005. “Learning-by-Consuming and the Dynamics of the Demand and Prices of Cultural Goods.” Journal of Cultural Economics 29:83–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Camera, G., and M. Casari. 2009. “Cooperation among Strangers under the Shadow of the Future.” American Economic Review 99:979–1005.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cameron, C., and P. K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Danaher, P. J., T. Dagger, and M. Smith. 2011. “Forecasting Television Ratings.” International Journal of Forecasting 27:1215–40.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Doornik, J. A. 2012. Object-Oriented Matrix Programming Using Ox. London: Timberlake Consultants Press and Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Fujihira, Y. 2007. The Right Way to Use Audience Rate (Shichouritsu No Tadashii Tsukaikata, in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Asahi Shinbunsha.Google Scholar

  • Gayer, G., I. Gilboa, and O. Lieberman. 2007. “Rule-Based and Case-Based Reasoning in Housing Prices.” The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 7.Google Scholar

  • Gilboa, I., O. Lieberman, and D. Schmeidler. 2006. “Empirical Similarity.” Review of Economics and Statistics 88:433–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilboa, I., O. Lieberman, and D. Schmeidler. 2011. “A Similarity-Based Approach to Prediction.” Journal of Econometrics 162:124–31.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gilboa, I., and D. Schemeidler. 1995. “Case-Based Decision Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:605–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler. 1996. “Case-Based Optimization.” Games and Economic Behavior 15:1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler. 2001. A Theory of Case-Based Decisions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Goettler, R. L., and R. Shachar. 2001. “Spatial Competition in the Network Television Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics 32:624–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Golosnoy, V., and Y. Okhrin. 2008. “General Uncertainty in Portfolio Selection: A Case-Based Decision Approach.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 67:718–34.Google Scholar

  • Guilfoos, T., and A. D. Pape. 2016. “Predicting Human Cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Using Case-Based Decision Theory.” Theory and Decision, 80:1–32.Crossref

  • Higashino, K. 2012. The Devotion of Suspect X: A Detective Galileo Novel. New York, NY: Minotaur Books, English translation.Google Scholar

  • Ichimura, H., and T. S. Thompson. 1998. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Binary Choice Model with Random Coefficients of Unknown Distribution.” Journal of Econometrics 86:269–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Iwabuchi, K. ed. 2004. Feeling Asian Modernities: Transnational Consumption of Japanese TV Dramas. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

  • Japan Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications. 2012. Communications Usage Trend Survey (Tsuushin Riyou Doukou Chousa, in Japanese). Tokyo.

  • Kinjo, K., and T. Ebina. 2015. “State-Dependent Choice Model for TV Programs with Externality: Analysis of Viewing Behavior.” Journal of Media Economics 26:20–40.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lévy-Garbova, L., and C. Montmarquette. 1996. “A Microeconomic Study of Theatre Demand.” Journal of Cultural Economics 29:25–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lieberman, O. 2010. “Asymptotic Theory for Empirical Similarity Models.” Econometric Theory 26:1032–59.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lieberman, O. 2012. “A Similarity-Based Approach to Time-Varying Coeffcient Nonstationary Autoregression.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 33:484–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lieberman, O., and P. C. B. Phillips. 2014. “Norming Rates and Limit Theory for Some Time-Varying Coefficient Autoregressions.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 35:592–623.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manski, C. 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies 60:531–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matsui, A. 2000. “Expected Utility and Case-Based Reasoning.” Mathematical Social Science 39:1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, 105–42. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • McFadden, D. 1979. “Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Travel Behavior of Individuals: Some Recent Developments.” In Behavioral Travel Modeling, edited by D. Hensher and P. Stopher, 270–318. London: Croom-Heim.Google Scholar

  • Moretti, E. 2011. “Social Learning and Peer Effects in Consumption: Evidence from Movie Sales.” Review of Economic Studies 78:356–93.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moshkin, N. V., and R. Shachar. 2002. “The Asymmetric Information Model of State Dependence.” Marketing Science 21:435–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ossadnik, W., D. Wilmsmann, and B. Niemann. 2013. “Experimental Evidence on Case-Based Decision Theory.” Theory and Decision 75:211–32.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Pape, A. D., and K. J. Kurtz. 2013. “Evaluating Case-Based Decision Theory: Predicting Empirical Patterns of Human Classification Learning.” Games and Economic Behavior 82:52–65.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Rust, R. T., and M. I. Alpert. 1984. “An Audience Flow Model of Television Viewing Choice.” Marketing Science 3:113–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seaman, B. A. 2006. “Empirical Studies of Demand for the Performing Arts.” In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture 1, edited by V. A. Ginsburgh and D. Throsby, 415–572. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Shachar, R., and J. W. Emerson. 2000. “Cast Demographics, Unobserved Segments, and Heterogeneous Switching Costs in a Television Viewing Choice Model.” Journal of Marketing Research 37:173–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teitelbaum, J. C. 2015. “Analogical Legal Reasoning: Theory and Evidence.” American Law and Economics Review 17:160–91.Google Scholar

  • Yang, S., V. Narayan, and H. Assael. 2006. “Estimating the Interdependence of Television Program Viewership between Spouses: A Bayesian Simultaneous Equation Model.” Marketing Science 25:336–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-06-01

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology (Grant/Award Number: ‘Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientist (B) No. 25780272’, ‘Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientist (B) No. 15K17070’, ‘Research Activity start-up No. 25885021’) JST CREST.


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, ISSN (Print) 2194-6124, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2015-0014.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in