Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics

Editor-in-Chief: Schipper, Burkhard

Ed. by Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Wenzelburger, Jan

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.229
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.271

CiteScore 2016: 0.30

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.458
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.553

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2015: 0.16

Online
ISSN
1935-1704
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

On the Price of Commitment Assets in a General Equilibrium Model with Credit Constraints and Tempted Consumers

Łukasz Woźny
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Quantitative Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, al. Niepodległości 162, 02–554 Warsaw, Poland
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-02-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2015-0019

Abstract

We analyze a three period production economy, where households exhibit problems of self-control and face credit constraints. Apart from liquid assets, a single commitment (illiquid) asset is available that allows to commit to a planned consumption path. We compare general equilibrium allocations of the two models: one, where households choices are determined using Gul and Pesendorfer (2001, “Temptation and Self-Control.” Econometrica 69:1403–35; GP, henceforth) model and the other, where households choices come from a (βδ) quasi-hyperbolic discounting model. Contrary to the results of Kocherlakota (2001, “Looking for Evidence of Time-Inconsistent Preferences in Asset Market Data.” Quarterly Review 13–24) or Gabrieli and Ghosal (2013, “Non-Existence of Competitive Equilibria with Dynamically Inconsistent Preferences.” Economic Theory 52:299–313), we show that, when a production sector is incorporated into the economy with commitment asset and credit constraints, we can restore the equilibrium existence (without recalling measure space of consumers (see Luttmer and Mariotti 2006, “Competitive Equilibrium When Preferences Change Over Time.” Economic Theory 27:679–90)) and unlike Gul and Pesendorfer (2004b, “Self Control, Revealed Preferences and Consumption Choice.” Review of Economic Studies 7:243–64), we show that the equilibrium allocations of both models (GP and βδ) imply positive consumption of the commitment asset and corner consumption of one of the liquid assets. We also provide an example showing, when equilibrium allocations of both models are different.

Keywords: time-dependent preferences; time-consistency; self-control; general equilibrium; commitment asset; illiquid bonds; credit constraints

JEL: D51; D91

References

  • Ameriks, J., A. Caplin, J. Leahy, and T. Tyler. 2007. “Measuring Self-Control Problems.” American Economic Review 97:966–72. [Crossref]

  • Angeletos, G.-M., D. Laibson, A. Repetto, J. Tobacman, and S. Weinberg. 2001. “The Hyberbolic Consumption Model: Calibration, Simulation, and Empirical Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15:47–68. [Crossref]

  • Balbus, Ł., K. Reffett, and Ł. Woźny. 2015. “Time Consistent Markov Policies in Dynamic Economies with Quasi-Hyperbolic Consumers.” International Journal of Game Theory 44:83–112. [Web of Science]

  • Dekel, E., B. L. Lipman, and A. Rustichini. 2009. “Temptation-Driven Preferences.” Review of Economic Studies 76:937–71. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Dziewulski, P. 2015. “Efficiency of Competitive Equilibria in Economies with Time-Dependent Preferences.” Journal of Economic Theory 159:311–25. [Web of Science]

  • Gabrieli, T., and S. Ghosal. 2013. “Non-Existence of Competitive Equilibria with Dynamically Inconsistent Preferences.” Economic Theory 52:299–313. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Gul, F., and W. Pesendorfer. 2001. “Temptation and Self-Control.” Econometrica 69:1403–35. [Crossref]

  • Gul, F., and W. Pesendorfer. 2004a. “Self-Control and the Theory of Consumption.” Econometrica 72:119–58. [Crossref]

  • Gul, F., and W. Pesendorfer. 2004b. “Self Control, Revealed Preferences and Consumption Choice.” Review of Economic Studies 7:243–64.

  • Herings, P., and K. Rohde. 2006. “Time-Inconsistent Preferences in a General Equilibrium Model.” Economic Theory 29:591–619. [Crossref]

  • Kocherlakota, N. R. 2001. “Looking for Evidence of Time-Inconsistent Preferences in Asset Market Data.” Quarterly Review 25:13–24.

  • Krusell, P., B. Kuruşçu, and A. A. J. Smith. 2002. “Equilibrium Welfare and Government Policy with Quasi-Geometric Discounting.” Journal of Economic Theory 105:42–72. [Crossref]

  • Krusell, P., B. Kuruscu, and A. A. J. Smith. 2010. “Temptation and Taxation.” Econometrica 78:2063–84. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Laibson, D. 1997. “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:443–77. [Crossref]

  • Luttmer, E. G. J., and T. Mariotti. 2003. “Subjective Discounting in an Exchange Economy.” Journal of Political Economy 111:959–89.

  • Luttmer, E. G. J., and T. Mariotti. 2006. “Competitive Equilibrium When Preferences Change Over Time.” Economic Theory 27:679–90. [Crossref]

  • Luttmer, E. G. J., and T. Mariotti. 2007. “Efficiency and Equilibrium When Preferences are Time-Inconsistent.” Journal of Economic Theory 132:493–506.

  • Noor, J. 2007. “Commitment and Self-Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 135: 1–34.

  • Olszewski, W. 2011. “A Model of Consumption-Dependent Temptation.” Theory and Decisions 70:83–93.

  • Rogerson, R. 1988. “Indivisible Labor, Lotteries and Equilibrium.” Journal of Monetary Economics 21:3–16. [Crossref]

  • Strotz, R. H. 1956. “Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization.” Review of Economic Studies 23:165–80. [Crossref]

  • Woźny, Ł. 2015. “On Incentives, Temptation and Self-Control.” Mathematical Social Sciences 74:60–7. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Yilmaz, M. 2013. “Repeated Moral Hazard with a Time-Inconsistent Agent.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 95:70–89.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-02-03

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Funding: Financial support from the NCN grant DEC-2013/11/D/HS4/03813 is greatly acknowledged.



Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, ISSN (Print) 2194-6124, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2015-0019. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in