Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics

Editor-in-Chief: Schipper, Burkhard

Ed. by Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Wenzelburger, Jan


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.173
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.248

CiteScore 2018: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.163
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.186

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2018: 0.08

Online
ISSN
1935-1704
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Students’ Social Origins and Targeted Grading

Alessandro Tampieri
Published Online: 2019-06-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2017-0146

Abstract

We study an economy where a school can target grades according to students’social groups, and privileged students are more likely to obtain a high academic achievement. In this context, we analyse the welfare effects of introducing alternative policies. Banning targeted grading generally maximises welfare, through an increase in the wage of privileged students. This result does not hold though when the proportion of high achievers is large, and labour demand is high. In this case, banning wage discrimination among social groups maximises welfare, through an increase in the wages of underprivileged students.

Keywords: grade inflation; social background; signalling

JEL Classification: D82; I21

References

  • Allahar, A., and J. Côté. 2007. The Ivory Tower Blues, 195–98. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar

  • Arrow, K. J. 1973. “The Theory of Statistical Discrimination.” In Discrimination in Labor Markets, edited by Ashenfelter and Rees. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bar, T., V. Kadiyali, and A. Zussman. 2012. “Put Grades in Context.” Journal of Labor Economics 30 (2): 445–78.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Burgess, S., and E. Greaves. 2013. “Test Scores, Subjective Assessment and Stereotyping of Ethnic Minorities.” Journal of Labor Economics 31: 535–76.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carneiro, P., and J. J. Heckman. 2003. “Human Capital Policy”. In Inequality in America: What Role for Human Capital Policies?, edited by J. J. Heckman, and A. B. Krueger. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Chan, W., L. Hao, and W. Suen. 2007. “A Signalling Theory of Grade Inflation.” International Economic Review 48: 1065–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coate, S., and G. C. Loury. 1993. “Will Affirmative-Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes?” American Economic Review 83: 1220–40.Google Scholar

  • Cunha, F., J. J. Heckman, L. Lochner, and D. V. Masterov. 2006. “Interpreting the Evidence on Life Cycle Skill Formation.” Handbook of the Economics of Education 1, chapter 12: 697–812.Google Scholar

  • Dee, T. S., W. Dobbie, B. A. Jacob, and J. Rockoff. 2016. “The Causes and Consequences of Test Score Manipulation: Evidence from the New York Regents Examinations.” NBER Working Paper 22165.Google Scholar

  • Ehlers, T., and R. Schwager. 2016. “Honest Grading, Grade Inflation and Reputation.” CESifo Economic Studies 62: 506–21.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Figlio, D., and M. Lucas. 2004. “Do High Grading Standards Affect Student Performance?” Journal of Public Economics 88: 1815–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanna, R. N., and L. L. Linden. 2012. “Discrimination in Grading.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4: 146–68.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Higher Education Statistic Agency. Graduate Info in year 1996/97 and 2008/09.Google Scholar

  • Himmler, O., and R. Schwager. 2013. “Double Standards in Educational Standards: Are Disadvantaged Students Being Graded More Leniently?” German Economic Review 14: 166–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hodgen, J., D. Kuchemann, M. Brown, and R. Coe. 2009. “Children’s Understandings of Algebra 30 Years on.” Research in Mathematics Education 11: 193–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Singer. 2015. Welcome to the 2015 Recruiter Nation, Formerly Known as the Social Recruiting Survey. https://www.jobvite.com/jobvite-news-and-reports/welcome-to-the-2015-recruiter-nation-formerly-known-as-the-social-recruiting-survey/.

  • Johnson, V. E. 2003. Grade Inflation: A Crisis in College Education. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Joshi, H. E., and A. McCulloch. 2001. “Neighbourhood and Family Influences on the Cognitive Ability of Children in the British National Child Development Study.” Social Science and Medicine 53: 579–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kiss, D. 2010. “Are Immigrants Graded Worse in Primary and Secondary Education? Evidence for German Schools.” Ruhr Economic Paper 223, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.Google Scholar

  • Lavy, V., and R. Megalokonomou. 2017. “Persistency in Teachers’ Grading Biases and Effect on Longer Term Outcomes: University Admission Exams and Choice of Field of Study.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Lavy, V., and E. Sand. 2015. “On the Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short and Long Term Consequences of Teachers’ Stereotypical Biases.” NBER Working Paper 20909.Google Scholar

  • Lüdemann, E., and G. Schwerdt. 2010. “Migration Background and Educational Tracking: Is There a Double Disadvantage for Second-Generation Immigrants?” Journal of Population Economics 26: 455–81.Google Scholar

  • MacLeod, B. W., and M. Urquiola. 2015. “Reputation and School Competition.” American Economic Review 105: 3471–88.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Modica, S. 2008. “I voti di laurea non sono normali.” La Voce. http://www.lavoce.info/articoli/pagina1000421-351.html.

  • Moro, A., and P. Norman. 2003. “Affirmative Action in a Competitive Economy.” Journal of Public Economics 87: 567–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moro, A., and P. Norman. 2004. “A General Equilibrium Model of Statistical Discrimination.” Journal of Economic Theory 114: 1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norman, P. 2003. “Statistical Discrimination and Efficiency.” Review of Economic Studies 70: 615–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Popov, S. V., and D. Bernhardt. 2013. “University Competition and Grading Standards.” Economic Inquiry 51: 1764–78.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Prenzel, M., J. Baumert, W. Blum, R. Lehmann, D. Leutner, M. Neubrand, Reinhard Pekrun, Jurgen Rost, and Ulrich Schiefele. 2003 PISA 2003 Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs – Zusammenfassung, IPN - Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Kiel http://pisa.ipn.uni-kiel.de/Zusammenfassung\_2003.pdf.

  • Rojstaczer, S., and C. Healy. 2012. Teachers College Record 7. http://www.tcrecord.org.

  • Rosovsky, H., and M. Hartley. 2002. Evaluation and the Academy: Are We Doing the Right Thing? Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar

  • Schwager. 2012. “Grade Inflation, Social Background and Labour Market Matching.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 82: 56–66.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • U.K. Parlament. Equal Pay Act 1970.Google Scholar

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.Equal Pay Act of 1963.Google Scholar

  • Yang, H., and C.S. Yip. 2003. “An Economic Theory of Grade Inflation.” Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

  • Wikström, C., and M. Wikström. 2005. “Grade Inflation and School Competition: An Empirical Analysis based on the Swedish upper Secondary Schools.” Economic of Education Review 24: 309–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-06-12


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, Volume 20, Issue 1, 20170146, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2017-0146.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in