Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics

Editor-in-Chief: Schipper, Burkhard

Ed. by Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Wenzelburger, Jan

2 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.229
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.271

CiteScore 2016: 0.30

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.398
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.232

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2016: 0.08

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Dynamic Stability of Post-Keynesian Pricing

Eric Kemp-Benedict
  • Corresponding author
  • Stockholm Environment Institute, Somerville, MA, USA
  • Email:
Published Online: 2017-02-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2016-0013


Conventional economic theory assumes a Walrasian pricing mechanism that is known to pose theoretical difficulties. Less well-known is that conventional price theory conflicts with empirical studies of price-setting in industrial firms. Post-Keynesian theory, which assumes mark-up pricing on normal costs and infrequent price changes, is consistent with observation, and we show in this paper that post-Keynesian pricing, unlike conventional pricing, features stable dynamics. We focus on the short run, because post-Keynesian theory posits complex and historically-contingent long-term price dynamics. Specifically, we show that under very general conditions, prices converge to a unique equilibrium price vector.

Keywords: general equilibrium; prices; post-Keynesian; Perron-Frobenius theorem; Sraffian

JEL Classification: E3: Prices; Business Fluctuations; and Cycles; C67: Input–Output Models; B5: current heterodox approaches


  • Abraham-Frois, G., and E. Berrebi. 1997. Prices, Profits and Rhythms of Accumulation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ackerman, F 1997. “Consumed in Theory: Alternative Perspectives on the Economics of Consumption.” Journal of Economic Issues 31(3): 651–664, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4227221.Google Scholar

  • Araujo, R.A., and A.B. Trigg. 2015. “A Neo-Kaldorian Approach to Structural Economic Dynamics.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 33(June): 25–36. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arrow, K.J., and G. Debreu. 1954. “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy.” Econometrica 22(3): 265–290. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aspromourgos, T 2004. “Sraffian Research Programmes and Unorthodox Economics.” Review of Political Economy 16(2): 179–206. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Axtell, R.L 2001. “Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes.” Science 293(5536): 1818–1820. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Basu, S., and J.G. Fernald. 1997. “Returns to Scale in U.S. Production: Estimates and Implications.” Journal of Political Economy 105(2): 249–283. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bilancini, E., and F. Petri. 2008. “A Comment on Gintis’s ‘The Dynamics of General Equilibrium.’.” Economics Bulletin 2(3): 1–7, http://www.economia.unimore.it/bilancini_ennio/EB-08B00001A.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Blinder, A.S 1994. “On Sticky Prices: Academic Theories Meet the Real World.” In Monetary Policy. , edited by N. Gregory Mankiw, 117–154. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Blinder, A.S Asking about Prices: A New Approach to Understanding Price Stickiness. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1998 .Google Scholar

  • Boggio, L 1985. “On the Stability of Production Prices.” Metroeconomica 37(3): 241–267. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boggio, L 1992. “Production Prices and Dynamic Stability: Results and Open Questions.” The Manchester School 60(3): 264–294. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brav, A., J.R. Graham, C.R. Harvey, and R. Michaely. 2005. “Payout Policy in the 21st Century.” Journal of Financial Economics 77(3): 483–527. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burnside, C 1996. “Production Function Regressions, Returns to Scale, and Externalities.” Journal of Monetary Economics 37(2): 177–201. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chamberlain, T.W., and M.J. Gordon. 1989. “Liquidity, Profitability, and Long-Run Survival: Theory and Evidence on Business Investment.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 11(4): 589–610, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4538156.Google Scholar

  • Coutts, K., and N. Norman. Post-Keynesian Approaches to Industrial Pricing. In: Harcourt G.C., and Kriesler P., editors. The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume 1: Theory and Origins 2013, http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.ezp.sub.su.se/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390766.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195390766-e-019.Google Scholar

  • Debreu, G 1959. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven: Press Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University. Monograph 17.Google Scholar

  • Debreu, G 1974. “Excess Demand Functions.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 1(1): 15–21. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Downward, P., and F. Lee. 2001. “Post Keynesian Pricing Theory ‘Reconfirmed’? A Critical Review of ‘Asking about Prices.’.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 23(3): 465–483. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fisher, F.M Disequilibrium Foundations of Equilibrium Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Fisher, F.M 2011. “The Stability of General Equilibrium—What Do We Know and Why Is It Important?.” In General Equilibrium Analysis: A Century After Walras. , edited by P. Bridel, 34–45. London, UK and New York, NY, US: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

  • Gintis, H 2006. “The Emergence of a Price System from Decentralized Bilateral Exchange.” Contributions in Theoretical Economics 6(1): 1–15. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gintis, H 2007. “The Dynamics of General Equilibrium.” The Economic Journal 117(523): 1280–1309. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glucina, M.D., and K. Mayumi. 2010. “Connecting Thermodynamics and Economics.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1185(1): 11–29. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hall, R.L., and C.J. Hitch. 1939. “Price Theory and Business Behaviour.” Oxford Economic Papers 12–45. No. 2 (May). doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kemp-Benedict, E 2013. “Material Needs and Aggregate Demand.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 44(June): 16–26. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • King, J.E The Microfoundations Delusion: Metaphor and Dogma in the History of Macroeconomics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Kirman, A 1989. “The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes.” The Economic Journal 99(395): 126–139. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirman, A 1992. “Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(2): 117–136, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138411.Google Scholar

  • Kirman, A., and K.J. Koch. 1986. “Market Excess Demand in Exchange Economies with Identical Preferences and Collinear Endowments.” The Review of Economic Studies 53(3): 457–463. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lambrecht, B.M 2004. “The Timing and Terms of Mergers Motivated by Economies of Scale.” Journal of Financial Economics 72(1): 41–62. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lavoie, M 1994. “A Post Keynesian Approach to Consumer Choice.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 16(4): 539–562. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lavoie, M 2001. “Pricing.” In A New Guide to Post Keynesian Economics. , edited by R.P.F. Holt, and S. Pressman. London; New York: Routledge Contemporary Political Economy Series.Google Scholar

  • Lintner, J 1956. “Distribution of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes.” The American Economic Review 46(2): 97–113, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1910664.Google Scholar

  • Mantel, R.R 1974. “On the Characterization of Aggregate Excess Demand.” Journal of Economic Theory 7(3): 348–353. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oliveira Martins, J., S. Scarpetta, and D. Pilat. Mark-Up Ratios in Manufacturing Industries. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1996 OECD Economics Department Working Papers Parishttp://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/007750682315.Google Scholar

  • Robinson, J 1980. “Time in Economic Theory.” Kyklos 33(2): 219–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saari, D.G 1985. “Iterative Price Mechanisms.” Econometrica 53(5): 1117–1131. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saari, D.G 1995. “Mathematical Complexity of Simple Economics.” Notices of AMS 42: 222–230, http://www.ams.org/notices/199502/saari.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Sakellaris, P 2004. “Patterns of Plant Adjustment.” Journal of Monetary Economics 51(2): 425–450. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Setterfield, M 1995. “Historical Time and Economic Theory.” Review of Political Economy 7(1): 1–27. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Setterfield, M 2002. “A Model of Kaldorian Traverse: Cumulative Causation, Structural Change and Evolutionary Hysteresis.” In The Economics of Demand-Led Growth: Challenging the Supply-Side Vision of the Long Run. , edited by M. Setterfield, 215–233. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Simon, H.A., and C.P. Bonini. 1958. “The Size Distribution of Business Firms.” The American Economic Review 48(4): 607–617, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1808270.Google Scholar

  • Sonnenschein, H 1972. “Market Excess Demand Functions.” Econometrica 40(3): 549–563. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sraffa, P 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. , Indian Edition 1963. Bombay, India: Vora & Co.Google Scholar

  • Sraffa, P 1962. “Production of Commodities: A Comment.” The Economic Journal 72(286): 477–479. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steedman, I 1992. “Questions for Kaleckians.” Review of Political Economy 4(2): 125–151. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sternberg, S 2010. Dynamical Systems. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

  • Wu, H. 2009. “Entry Barriers and Markup Ratios: Evidence from OECD Countries.” Applied Economics Letters 16(2): 125–130. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Xu, D., and S. Yan. 2011. “Empirical Analysis of Largest Eigenvalue of Leontief Matrix.” In Modeling Risk Management for Resources and Environment in China. , edited by D.D. Wu, and Y. Zhou, 395–402. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Computational Risk Managementhttp://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-18387-4_44.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-02-24

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, ISSN (Print) 2194-6124, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2016-0013.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in