Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur

Ed. by Demske, Ulrike / Haustein, Jens / Köbele, Susanne / Nübling, Damaris

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.20

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.112
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.055

Online
ISSN
1865-9373
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 138, Issue 1

Issues

Mikko Höglund, Paul Rickmann, Juhani Rundanko u. Jukka Havu (Hgg.):Perspectives on Complementation:Structure, Variation and Boundaries

Dr. Elena Smirnova
Published Online: 2016-04-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2016-0006

Reviewed publication

HöglundMikko RickmannPaul RundankoJuhani u. HavuJukka (Hgg.)Perspectives on Complementation: Structure, Variation and Boundaries, London Palgrave Macmillan 2015272 S.

Literatur

  • Davis, Mark 2012: Recent shifts with three nonfinite verbal complements in English. Data from the 100 million word TIME Corpus (1920s–2000s), in: Bas Aarts [u. a.] (Hgg.): Current Change in the English Verb Phrase. Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Cambridge, S. 46–67.Google Scholar

  • Denison, David 1998: Syntax, in: Suzanne Romaine (Hg.): The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 4: 1776–1997, Cambridge, S. 92–329.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele 1995: Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, Chicago u. London.Google Scholar

  • Langacker, Ronald W. 2008: Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Michaelis, Laura A. 2012: Making the Case for Construction Grammar, in: Hans C. Boas u. Ivan A. Sag (Hgg.): Sign‑Based Construction Grammar, Stanford, S. 31–69Google Scholar

  • Noonan, Michael 2007 [1985]: Complementation, in: Timothy Shopen (Hg.): Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Cambridge (Complex Constructions 2), S. 52–150.Google Scholar

  • Rappaport Hovav, Malka u. Beth Levin 1998: Building Verb Meanings, in: Miriam Butt u. Wilhelm Geuder (Hgg.): The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors, Stanford, S. 97–134.Google Scholar

  • Rohdenburg, Günter 1995: On the Replacement of Finite Complement Clauses by Infinitives in English, in: English Studies 76/4, S. 367–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • – 1996: Cognitive Complexity and Increased Grammatical Explicitness in English, in: Cognitive Linguistics 7/2, S. 149–182.Google Scholar

  • Sag, Ivan A. 2010: English Filler‑Gap Constructions, in: Language 86/3, S. 486–545.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • – 2012: Sign‑Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis, in: Hans C. Boas u. Ivan A. Sag (Hgg.): Sign‑Based Construction Grammar, Stanford, S. 69–202.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-04-11

Published in Print: 2016-03-01


Citation Information: Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur, Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages 107–162, ISSN (Online) 1865-9373, ISSN (Print) 0005-8076, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2016-0006.

Export Citation

© 2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in