Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biometrical Letters

The Journal of Polish Biometric Society

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1896-3811
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Check plots in field breeding experiments

Stanisław Mejza
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Iwona Mejza
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-12-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2013-0024

Summary

This paper deals with the problems of selection in the early stages of a breeding program. During the improvement process, it is not possible to use an experimental design that satisfies the requirement of replicating all the treatments, because of the large number of genotypes involved, the small amount of seed and the low availability of resources. Hence unreplicated designs are used. To control the real or potential heterogeneity of experimental units, control (check) plots are arranged in the trial. There are many methods of using the information resulting from check plots. All of the usually applied adjusting methods for unreplicated experiments are appropriate for some specific structure of soil fertility. Their disadvantage is the fact that, before and also after the experiment, we usually do not know what a kind of soil structure is present in the experiment. Hence we cannot say which of the existing methods is appropriate for a given experimental situation. The method of inference presented below avoids this disadvantage. It is always appropriate, because of the fact that a trend of soil variability is identified and estimated. In the paper the main tool used to explore this information will be based on a response surface methodology. To begin with we will try to identify a response surface characterizing the experimental environments. We assume that observed yield (or another trait) results directly from two components, one of them due to soil fertility and the other due to the genotype effect. This means that difference between observed yield and forecast can be treated as the estimate of a genotype effect. The obtained response surface will then be used to adjust the observations for genotypes. Finally, the data so adjusted are used for inferences concerning the next stage of the breeding program. The theoretical considerations are illustrated with an example involving yields of spring barley.

Keywords: breeding field experiments; check plots; phenotypic selection; unreplicated experiments

  • Baker R.J., McKenzie R.I.H. (1967): Use of control plots in yield trials. Crop. Sci. 7:335-337.Google Scholar

  • Box G.E.P., Draper N. (2007): Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

  • Bradley N. (2007): The response surface methodology. Indiana University South Bend. Briggs K.G., Shebeski L.H. (1967): Implications concerning the frequency of control plots in wheat breeding nurseries. Can. J. Plant Sci. 48: 149 - 153.Google Scholar

  • Cullis B.R., Warwick J.A., Fisher B.J., Read B.J., Gleeson A.C. (1989): A new procedure for the analysis of early generation variety trials. Appl. Statist. 38: 361-375.Google Scholar

  • Brownie C., Gumpertz M.L. (1997): Validity of Spatial Analyses for Field Trials. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2(1): 1-23. Golaszewski J. (1999): Application of geostatistical methods to analysis of the data from a pea breeding trial. Biometrical Letters 36(2): 145-157.Google Scholar

  • Golaszewski J. (2002): Geostatistical approach to data from field experiments with check plots - Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, EJPAU, Ser. Agronomy 5(2).Google Scholar

  • Holtsmark G., Larsen B.R. (1905): Om multigheder for at indskraenke de fejl, som ved marksforsog betinges af jordens uensartethed. Tidsskrift for Landbrugets Planteavl, 12: 330-351.Google Scholar

  • Kempton R.A. (1984): The design and analysis of unreplicated field trials. Vortr. Pflanzenzuchtg 7: 219-242.Google Scholar

  • Kempton R.A., Fox P.N. (1997): Statistical methods for plant variety evaluation. Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

  • Khuri A.I., Cornell J.A. (1987): Response Surfaces. Designs and Analysis. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New YorkGoogle Scholar

  • Khuri A.I. (2006): Response Surface Methodology and Related Topics. World Scientific, Singapore. Google Scholar

  • Martin R.J. (1986): On the design of experiments under spatial correlation. Biometrika 73: 247-277.Google Scholar

  • Mejza S., Marczynska K. (2011): Check plot density in estimation of soil fertility. Proceedings: Biometric Methods and Models in Current Science and Research, D. Hampel, J. Hartmann, J. Michalek , (eds) Central Institute of Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, Brno: 167-172.Google Scholar

  • Myers an R.H., Montgomery D.C. (2001): Response Surface Methodology, John Wiley and Sons, 2nd edition.Google Scholar

  • Sebolai B., Pedersen J.F., Marx D.B., Boykin D.L. (2005): Effect of control plot density, control plot arrangements, and assumption of random or fixed effects on nonreplicated experiments for germplasm screening using spatial models. Crop Sciences: 1978-198.Google Scholar

  • Utz H.F. (1997): PLABSTAT. A computer program for statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. Version 2N. Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics. University of Hohenheim, Germany.Google Scholar

  • Zimmerman D.L., Harville D.A. (1991): A Random Field Approach to the Analysis of Field - Plot Experiments and Other Spatial Experiments. Biometrics 47: 223-239. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-12-10

Published in Print: 2013-12-01


Citation Information: Biometrical Letters, Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 137–149, ISSN (Print) 1896-3811, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2013-0024.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in