Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biomonitoring

1 Issue per year


Emerging Science

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-4606
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Prioritization of the biomarkers to be analyzed in the French biomonitoring program

Clémence Fillol
  • Corresponding author
  • Institut de veille sanitaire, Département Santé environnement, 12 rue du Val d’Osne, 94415 Saint Maurice, France
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Robert Garnier
  • Corresponding author
  • Paris poison center. Hôpitaux universitaires Saint- Louis-Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, AP-HP & Université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jean-Ulrich Mullot
  • Corresponding author
  • Laboratoire d’Analyses de Surveillance et d’Expertise de la Marine, 83000 Toulon, France
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Céline Boudet
  • Corresponding author
  • Institut National de l’Environnement Industriel et des Risques, (INERIS), 60 550 Verneuil en Halatte, France
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Isabelle Momas
  • Corresponding author
  • Université Paris Descartes, Laboratoire Santé Publique et Environnement – EA 4064, Paris, France
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Louis Rachid Salmi
  • Corresponding author
  • Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897- Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie- Biostatistique, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • CHU de Bordeaux, Pole de sante publique, Service d’information medicale, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Stéphanie Vandentorren
  • Corresponding author
  • Institut de veille sanitaire, Département Santé environnement, 12 rue du Val d’Osne, 94415 Saint Maurice, France
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-10-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bimo-2014-0010

Abstract

The aim of this work was to develop a comprehensive prioritization method to select the biomarkers to be monitored in the French national biomonitoring program. The first step consisted in building an exhaustive list of biomarkers. The next step involved prioritizing the initial list of biomarkers according to specific scientific questions about human exposure to chemicals in the environment, and meet logistical, feasibility and budgetary constraints. The Delphi consensus method was used to prioritize biomarkers and was developed in three phases: i) the definition of relevant criteria for selecting biomarkers; ii) the prioritization of the biomarker list based on these criteria and iii) the validation of the list by the stakeholders. Among the eight relevant criteria for selecting biomarkers, hazard identification and social perception were the highest-rated and lowestrated criteria, respectively. After scoring each criterion for each group of biomarkers, and discussing the relative ranking of each group during a round table meeting, the final prioritized list obtained contained both historic (e.g. dioxins or lead) and emerging substances (e.g. phthalates, bisphenol A). Combining rigor and flexibility, our method has clearly helped to build a prioritized list shared and supported by many international actors.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Keywords : Biomonitoring; Biomarkers; Environmental epidemiology; Delphi process

References

  • [1] Toniolo P, Boffeta P, Shuker D, Rothman, Hulka, Pearce et al.. Application of Biomarkers in Cancer Epidemiology - Workshop Report. Lyon (France): IARC Scientific Publications, N°. 142; 1997: p.1. Google Scholar

  • [2] Paustenbach D, Galbraith D: Biomonitoring and biomarkers: exposure assessment will never be the same. Environ Health Perspect 2006, 114: 1143-1149. Google Scholar

  • [3] Pirkle JL, Needham LL, Sexton K: Improving exposure assessment by monitoring human tissues for toxic chemicals. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 1995, 5: 405-424. Google Scholar

  • [4] Calafat AM: The U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and human exposure to environmental chemicals. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2012, 215: 99-101. Google Scholar

  • [5] Needham LL, Calafat AM, Barr DB: Uses and issues of biomonitoring. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007, 210: 229-238. Google Scholar

  • [6] Becker K, Conrad A, Kirsch N, Kolossa-Gehring M, Schulz C, Seiwert M et al.: German Environmental Survey (GerES): human biomonitoring as a tool to identify exposure pathways. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007, 210: 267-269. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Seifert B, Becker K, Hoffmann K, Krause C, Schulz C: The German Environmental Survey 1990/1992 (GerES II): a representative population study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2000, 10: 103-114. Google Scholar

  • [8] Verner MA, Sonneborn D, Lancz K, Muckle G, Ayotte P, Dewailly E et al.: Toxicokinetic modeling of persistent organic pollutant levels in blood from birth to 45 months of age in longitudinal birth cohort studies. Environ Health Perspect 2013, 121: 131-137. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Cerna M, Krskova A, Cejchanova M, Spevackova V: Human biomonitoring in the Czech Republic: an overview. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2012, 215: 109-119. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Schoeters G, Den HE, Colles A, Loots I, Morrens B, Keune H et al.: Concept of the Flemish human biomonitoring programme. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2012, 215: 102-108. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Haines DA, Murray J: Human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals--early results of the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey for males and females. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2012, 215: 133-137. Google Scholar

  • [12] Haines DA, Arbuckle TE, Lye E, Legrand M, Fisher M, Langlois R et al.: Reporting results of human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals to study participants: a comparison of approaches followed in two Canadian studies. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011, 65: 191-198. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Fillol C, Dor F, Clozel B, Goria S, Seta N: Does arsenic in soil contribute to arsenic urinary concentrations in a French population living in a naturally arsenic contaminated area? Sci Total Environ 2010, 408: 6011-6016. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Frery N, Maury-Brachet R, Maillot E, Deheeger M, de MB, Boudou A: Gold-mining activities and mercury contamination of native amerindian communities in French Guiana: key role of fish in dietary uptake. Environ Health Perspect 2001, 109: 449-456. Google Scholar

  • [15] Frery N, Vandentorren S, Etchevers A, Fillol C: Highlights of recent studies and future plans for the French human biomonitoring (HBM) programme. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2012, 215: 127-132. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Dor F, Haguenoer JM, Zmirou D, Empereur-Bissonnet P, Jongeneelen FJ, Nedellec V et al.: Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene as a biomarker of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposure of workers on a contaminated site: influence of exposure conditions. J Occup Environ Med 2000, 42: 391-397. Google Scholar

  • [17] Falq G, Zeghnoun A, Pascal M, Vernay M, Le SY, Garnier R et al.: Blood lead levels in the adult population living in France the French Nutrition and Health Survey (ENNS 2006-2007). Environ Int 2011, 37: 565-571. Google Scholar

  • [18] Saoudi A, Zeghnoun A, Bidondo ML, Garnier R, Cirimele V, Persoons R et al.: Urinary arsenic levels in the French adult population: the French National Nutrition and Health Study, 2006-2007. Sci Total Environ 2012, 433: 206-215. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Vandentorren S, Bois C, Pirus C, Sarter H, Salines G, Leridon H: Rationales, design and recruitment for the Elfe longitudinal study. BMC Pediatr 2009, 9: 58. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Inserm. Reproduction et environnement, Editions Inserm, juin 2011, 735 p, Collection Expertise collective. Google Scholar

  • [21] Brockhoff K. The performance of forecasting groups in computer dialogue and face-to-face discussion. In: Linstone HA, Turoff M, editors. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 2002. pp. 285-311. Google Scholar

  • [22] Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M: Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002, 11: 358-364. Google Scholar

  • [23] Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH: Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984, 74: 979-983. Google Scholar

  • [24] Hsu C-C, Sandford B. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(10):1-8. Google Scholar

  • [25] Jones J, Hunter D: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995, 311: 376-380. Google Scholar

  • [26] Streiner DL, orman G. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Google Scholar

  • [27] Baker J, Lovell K, Harris N. How experts are the experts? An exploration of the concept of ‘exper’ within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Researcher; 2006; 14, 1 ;59. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-08-13

Accepted: 2014-10-16

Published Online: 2014-10-29


Citation Information: Biomonitoring, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-4606, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bimo-2014-0010.

Export Citation

© 2014 Clémence Fillol et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Supplementary Article Materials

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Clémentine Dereumeaux, Abdesattar Saoudi, Vérène Wagner, Sarah Goria, and Perrine de CROUY-CHANEL
Vocation Sage-femme, 2017, Volume 16, Number 128, Page 10
[2]
Alexis Balicco, Amivi Oleko, Emmanuelle Szego, Laura Boschat, Valérie Deschamps, Abdessattar Saoudi, Abdelkrim Zeghnoun, and Clémence Fillol
Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique, 2017
[3]
Clémentine Dereumeaux, Abdesattar Saoudi, Amivi Oleko, Marie Pecheux, Stéphanie Vandentorren, Clémence Fillol, and Sébastien Denys
Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique, 2017
[4]
L. Rambaud and C. Fillol
Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l'Environnement, 2017, Volume 78, Number 2, Page 175
[5]
Clémentine Dereumeaux, Clémence Fillol, Marie-Aline Charles, and Sébastien Denys
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2017, Volume 220, Number 2, Page 64
[6]
Clémentine Dereumeaux, Abdesattar Saoudi, Marie Pecheux, Bénédicte Berat, Perrine de Crouy-Chanel, Cécile Zaros, Serge Brunel, Corinne Delamaire, Alain le Tertre, Agnès Lefranc, Stéphanie Vandentorren, and Laurence Guldner
Environment International, 2016, Volume 97, Page 56
[7]
L. Casteleyn, B. Dumez, K. Becker, M. Kolossa-Gehring, E. Den Hond, G. Schoeters, A. Castaño, H.M. Koch, J. Angerer, M. Esteban, K. Exley, O. Sepai, L. Bloemen, M. Horvat, L.E. Knudsen, A. Joas, R. Joas, P. Biot, G. Koppen, M-C. Dewolf, A. Katsonouri, A. Hadjipanayis, M. Cerná, A. Krsková, G. Schwedler, U. Fiddicke, J.K.S. Nielsen, J.F. Jensen, P. Rudnai, S. Közepésy, M. Mulcahy, R. Mannion, A.C. Gutleb, M.E. Fischer, D. Ligocka, M. Jakubowski, M.F. Reis, S. Namorado, I-R. Lupsa, A.E. Gurzau, K. Halzlova, M. Jajcaj, D. Mazej, J. Tratnik Snoj, M. Posada, E. López, M. Berglund, K. Larsson, A. Lehmann, P. Crettaz, and D. Aerts
Environmental Research, 2015, Volume 141, Page 3

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in