Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Life Sciences

formerly Central European Journal of Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Ratajczak, Mariusz


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.504
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.583

CiteScore 2018: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.266
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.311

ICV 2017: 154.48

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-5412
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 8, Issue 7

Issues

Volume 10 (2015)

Palomena prasina (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) vibratory signals and their tuning with plant substrates

Jernej Polajnar
  • National Institute of Biology, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Fondazione Edmund Mach, IT-38010, S. Michele all’Adige, Italy
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Andreja Kavčič / Alenka Kosi / Andrej Čokl
Published Online: 2013-04-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0188-z

Abstract

Palomena prasina is interesting for the study of vibrational communication within the Pentatomid subfamily Pentatominae, because its host range is limited to woody plants, unlike the better known Nezara viridula, whose vibrational communication is commonly used as a model for the whole family. The vibrational repertoire of P. prasina was described several decades ago and is redescribed in this paper using modern methods for non-contact vibration recording. Additionally, we hypothesized that this species has retained the capacity for signal frequency variation necessary for tuning to resonance properties of various host plants of Pentatominae, but if the signals are emited in the absence of mechanical feedback, they are tuned more specifically to their native acoustic environment — woody plants. By recording live bugs signalling on different substrates and comparing spectral properties of their signals among substrates, we found that there is a match between the signals emitted on a woody branch and those emitted on a non-resonant surface, while spectral properties of signals emitted on herbaceous plants differ. Our findings provide evidence in support of the signal tuning hypothesis and shed further light on the crucial role of substrate in vibrational communication of insects.

Keywords: Pentatominae; Vibrational communication; Signal propagation; Frequency characteristics

  • [1] Alford D.V., Pests of fruit crops: a color handbook, Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2007 Google Scholar

  • [2] Tuncer C., Saruhan İ., Akça İ., The insect pest problem affecting hazelnut kernel quality in Turkey, Acta Hortic., 2005, 686, 367–375 Google Scholar

  • [3] Čokl A., Gogala A., Blaževič A., Principles of sound recognition in three Pentatomide bug species (Heteroptera), Biol. Vestn., 1978, 26, 81–94 Google Scholar

  • [4] Čokl A., Virant-Doberlet M., Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 2003, 48, 29–50 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112605CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Čokl A., Stink bug interaction with host plants during communication, J. Insect Physiol., 2008, 54, 1113–1124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.06.004CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Michelsen A., Flemming F., Gogala M., Traue D., Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1982, 11, 269–281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00299304CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Magal C., Schöller M., Tautz J., Casas J., The role of leaf structure in vibration propagation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2000, 108, 2412–2418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1286098CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Čokl A., Plants as medium for communication with mechanical vibrations, In: Sapri R.C. (Ed.), Mechanical vibrations: measurement, effects and control, Nova Science Publishers, inc., New York, NY, 2009 Google Scholar

  • [9] Čokl A., Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Predatory bug Picromerus bidens communicates at different frequency levels, Cent. Eur. J. Biol, 2011, 6, 431–439 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11535-011-0015-yCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Polajnar J., Svenšek D., Čokl A., Resonance in herbaceous plant stems as a factor in vibrational communication of pentatomid bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. R. Soc. Interface, 2012, 9, 1898–1907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0770CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] McVean A., Field L.H., Communication by substratum vibration in the New Zealand tree weta, Hemideina femorata (Stenopelmatidae: Orthoptera), J. Zool., Lond., 1996, 239, 101–122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05440.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Virant-Doberlet M., Čokl A., Vibrational Communication in Insects, Neotrop. Entomol., 2004, 33, 121–134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2004000200001CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Todd J.W., Ecology and behavior of Nezara viridula, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 1989, 34, 273–292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.001421CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Panizzi A.R., McPherson J.E., James D.G., Javahery M., McPherson R.M., Stink bugs (Pentatomidae), In: Schaefer C.W., Panizzi A.R. (Eds.), Heteroptera of economic importance, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000 Google Scholar

  • [15] McNett G.D., Cocroft R.B., Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers, Behav. Ecol., 2008, 16, 650–656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn017CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Čokl A., Species recognition during substrate-borne communication in Nezara viridula (L.) (Pentatomidae: Heteroptera), J. Insect Behav., 2011, 24, 468–487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10905-011-9272-xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Polajnar J., Čokl A., The effect of vibratory disturbance on sexual behaviour of the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae), Centr. Eur. J. Biol., 2008, 3, 189–197 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11535-008-0008-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Charif R.A., Waack A.M., Strickman L.M., Raven Pro 1.4 User’s Manual, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, 2010 Google Scholar

  • [19] Čokl A., McBrien H.L., Millar J.G., Comparison of substrate-borne vibrational signals of two stink bug species, Acrosternum hilare and Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Ann. Ent. Soc. Am., 2001, 94, 471–479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0471:COSBVS]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2011 Google Scholar

  • [21] Čokl A., Virant-Doberlet M., Stritih N., Structure and function of songs emitted by southern green stink bugs from Brazil, Florida, Italy and Slovenia, Physiol. Entomol., 2000, 25, 196–205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.2000.00187.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Blassioli Moraes M.C., Laumann R.A., Čokl A., Borges M., Vibratory signals of four Neotropical stink bug species, Physiol. Entomol, 2005, 30, 175–188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2005.00446.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] McBrien H.L., Čokl A., Millar J.G., Comparison of substrate-borne vibrational signals of two congeneric stink bug species, Thyanta pallidovirens and T. custator accera (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. Ins. Behav., 2002, 15, 715–738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021164021489CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Pavlovčič P., Čokl A., Songs of Holcostethus strictus (Fabricius): a different repertoire among landbugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Behav. Proc., 2001, 53, 65–73 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00144-3CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Cavalcante A., Silva C., Laumann R.A., Cavalcante Ferreira J.B., Blassioli Moraes M.C., Borges M., et al., Reproductive biology, mating behavior, and vibratory communication of the Brown-Winged Stink Bug, Edessa meditabunda (Fabr.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Psyche, 2012, 2012, 1–9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/978019CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Gogala M., Vibratory signals produced by Heteroptera — Pentatomomorpha and Cimicomorpha, In: Drosopoulos S., Claridge M.F. (Eds.), Insect sounds and communication, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006 Google Scholar

  • [27] Čokl A., Zorović M., Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Tuning of host plants with vibratory songs of Nezara viridula L (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. Exp. Biol., 2005, 208, 1481–1488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01557CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28] Cocroft R.B., Rodríguez R.L., Hunt R.E., Host shifts and signal divergence: mating signals covary with host use in a complex of specialized plant-feeding insects, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 99, 60–72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01345.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Rodríguez R.L., Ramaswamy K., Cocroft R.B., Evidence that female preferences have shaped signal evolution in a clade of specialized plantfeeding insects, Proc. R. Soc. B, 2006, 273, 2585–2593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3635CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Sullivan-Beckers L., Cocroft R.B., The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals, Evolution, 2010, 64, 3158–3171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01073.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Elias D.O., Mason A.C., Hoy R.R., The effect of substrate on the efficacy of seismic courtship signal transmission in the jumping spider Habronattus dossenus (Araneae: Salticidae), J. Exp. Biol., 2004, 207, 4105–4110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01261CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Henry C.S., Martínez Wells M.L., Adaptation or random change? The evolutionary response of songs to substrate properties in lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla), Anim. Behav., 2004, 68, 879–895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.032CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Cocroft R.B., Rodríguez R.L., The Behavioral Ecology of Insect Vibrational Communication, BioScience, 2005, 55, 323–334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0323:TBEOIV]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Endler J.A., Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution, Am. Nat., 1992, 139, S125–S153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/285308CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Endler J.A., Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 1993, 340, 215–225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1993.0060CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-04-23

Published in Print: 2013-07-01


Citation Information: Open Life Sciences, Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 670–680, ISSN (Online) 2391-5412, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0188-z.

Export Citation

© 2013 Versita Warsaw. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Jernej Polajnar, Anna Eriksson, Andrea Lucchi, Gianfranco Anfora, Meta Virant-Doberlet, and Valerio Mazzoni
Pest Management Science, 2015, Volume 71, Number 1, Page 15

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in