Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Open Life Sciences

formerly Central European Journal of Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Ratajczak, Mariusz

Managing Editor: Michalczyk, Katarzyna

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.814
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.870

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.362
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.538
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.929

Open Access
See all formats and pricing

Select Volume and Issue


Movements and flight morphology in the endangered Large Blue butterflies

1190Institute of Zoology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-625, Poznan, Poland

2190Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, 30-387, Kraków, Poland

3190Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-120, Kraków, Poland

4190Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-679, Warsaw, Poland

5190Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, D-06120, Halle, Germany

© 2013 Versita Warsaw. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Citation Information: Open Life Sciences. Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 662–669, ISSN (Online) 2391-5412, DOI: 10.2478/s11535-013-0190-5, April 2013

Publication History

Published Online:


Movements and flight morphology of the endangered Large Blue butterflies Phengaris teleius and P. nausithous in southern Poland were studied with mark-release-recapture surveys and GIS analyses. Most individuals moved relatively small distances (<40 metres) within their habitat patches. Distances covered by both species were positively related to season progression and wing length, and negatively related to body mass. P. teleius movement distances slightly exceeded those of P. nausithous. In addition, females moved longer distances than males, although the difference was significant only in P. teleius. Morphological traits appeared to be good indicators of the inter-specific and inter-sexual differences in mobility. While P. teleius individuals were heavier than P. nausithous ones, they had considerably longer wings, which may explain longer movements in the former species. Similarly, females were heavier than males in both species, but they invested more in wing size, which is likely to compensate for the negative impact of body mass on movement distances. Our results indicate that combination of GIS analysis of movement distances recorded with mark-release-recapture methods and morphometric measurements taken in field during non-lethal handling of captured individuals proved useful for studying the mobility potential of the endangered insect species.

Keywords: Dispersal; Maculinea; Metapopulation; Mobility; Morphometric measurements

  • [1] Hanski I., Metapopulation ecology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999

  • [2] Bergman K.-O., Landin J., Distribution of occupied and vacant sites and migration of Lopinga achine (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) in a fragmented landscape, Biol. Conserv., 2001, 102, 183–190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00081-7 [Crossref]

  • [3] Trakhtenbrot A., Nathan R., Perry G., Richardson D.M., The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation, Divers. Distrib., 2005, 11, 173–181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00156.x [Crossref]

  • [4] Wiens J.A., Stenseth N.C., Van Horne B., Ims R.A., Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology, Oikos, 1993, 66, 369–380 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3544931 [Crossref]

  • [5] Auckland J.N., Debinski, D.M., Clark R.W., Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius, Ecol. Entomol., 2004, 29, 139–149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00581.x [Crossref]

  • [6] Ims R.A., Yoccoz N.G., Studying transfer processes in metapopulations: emigrations, migration and colonisation, In: Hanski I., Gilpin M.E. (Eds.) Metapopulation biology, Academic Press, San Diego, 1997

  • [7] Dudley R., Srygley R.B., Flight physiology of neotropical butterflies: allometry of airspeed during natural free flight, J. Experim. Biol., 1994, 191, 125–139

  • [8] Berwaerts K., Van Dyck H., Aerts P., Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria, Funct. Ecol., 2002, 16, 484–491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00650.x [Crossref]

  • [9] Palmer J.O., Dingle H., Responses of selection on flight behaviour in a migratory population of milkweed bugs Oncopeltus fasciatus, Evolution, 1989, 43, 1805–1808 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2409395 [Crossref]

  • [10] Hill J.K., Thomas C.D., Blakeley D.S., Evolution of flight morphology in a butterfly that has recently expanded its geographical range, Oecologia, 1999, 121, 165–170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050918 [Crossref]

  • [11] Merckx T., Van Dyck H., Interrelations among habitat use, behaviour, and flight related morphology in two cooccurring Satyrine butterflies, Maniola jurtina and Pyronia tithonus, J. Insect. Behav., 2002, 15, 541–561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016385301634 [Crossref]

  • [12] Baguette M., Mennechez G., Petit S., Schtickzelle N., Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia, C.R. Biol., 2003, 326, S200–S209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00058-1 [Crossref]

  • [13] Norberg U., Leimar, O., Spatial and temporal variation in flight morphology in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2002, 77, 445–453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00115.x [Crossref]

  • [14] Kuussaari M., Heliola J., Poyry J., Saarinen K., Contrasting trends of butterfly species preferring semi-natural grasslands, field margins and forest edges in northern Europe, J. Insect Conserv., 2007, 11, 351–366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9052-7 [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [15] van Swaay C.A.M., Warren M., Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera), Nature and Environment 99, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, 1999

  • [16] Thomas J.A., The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of Large blue butterfly, In: Pullin A.S. (Ed.) Ecology and conservation of butterflies, Chapman and Hall, London, 1995

  • [17] Settele J., Kühn E., Thomas J.A., Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2, Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model, Pensoft Publishers, Sofia — Moscow, 2005

  • [18] Witek M., Sliwinska E.B., Skórka P., Nowicki P., Wantuch M., Vrabec V., et al., Host ant specificity of large blue butterflies Phengaris (Maculinea) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inhabiting humid grasslands in East-central Europe, Eur. J. Entomol., 2008, 105, 871–887 [Crossref]

  • [19] Nowicki P., Pepkowska A., Kudlek J., Skórka P., Witek M., Settele J., et al., From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: Lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies, Biol. Conserv., 2007, 140, 119–129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.001 [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [20] Nowicki P., Witek M., Skórka P., Settele J., Woyciechowski M., Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation, Popul. Ecol., 2005, 47, 193–202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10144-005-0222-3 [Crossref]

  • [21] Nowicki P., Halecki W., Kalarus K., All natural habitat edges matter equally for endangered Maculinea butterflies, J. Insect Conserv., 2013, 17, 139–146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9492-1 [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [22] Underwood A.J., Experiments in ecology, Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

  • [23] Quinn G.P., Keough M.J., Experimental design and data analysis for biologists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806384 [Crossref]

  • [24] Hovestadt T., Nowicki P., Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches: analysis of mark-release-recapture data using randomization procedures, Isr. J. Ecol. Evol., 2008, 54, 137–154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1560/IJEE.54.1.137 [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [25] Kőrösi A., Örvössy N., Batáry P., Kövér S., Peregovits L., Restricted within-habitat movement and time-constrained egg laying of female Maculinea rebeli butterflies, Oecologia, 2008, 156, 455–464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-0986-1 [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [26] Settele J., Metapopulationsanalyse auf Rasterdatenbasis, Teubner, Stuttgart — Leipzig, 1997

  • [27] Settele, J., How endangered is Maculinea nausithous? In: Settele J., Kühn E., Thomas J.A. (Eds.) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2, Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model, Pensoft Publishers, Sofia — Moscow, 2005

  • [28] Nowicki P., Vrabec V., Evidence for positive densitydependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations, Oecologia, 2011, 167, 657–665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2025-x [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [29] Nowicki P., Settele J., Thomas J.A., Woyciechowski M., A review of population structure of Maculinea butterflies, In: Settele J., Kühn E., Thomas J.A. (Eds.) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2, Species ecology along an European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model, Pensoft Publishers, Sofia — Moscow, 2005

  • [30] Sculley C.E., Boggs C.L., Mating system and sexual division of foraging effort affecting puddling behaviour by butterflies, Ecol. Entomol., 1996, 21, 193–197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1996.tb01187.x [Crossref]

  • [31] Brommer J.E., Fred M.S., Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar patches, Ecol. Entomol., 1999, 24, 125–131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1999.00190.x [Crossref]

  • [32] Bergman K.-O., Landin J., Population structure and movements of a threatened butterfly (Lopinga achine) in a fragmented landscape in Sweden, Biol. Conserv., 2002, 108, 361–369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00104-0 [Crossref]

  • [33] Celik T., Adult demography, spatial distribution and movements of Zerynthia polyxena (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in a dense network of permanent habitats, Eur. J. Entomol., 2012, 109, 217–227 [Crossref]

  • [34] Takeuchi T., Mate-locating behavior of the butterfly Lethe Diana (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): do males diurnally or seasonally change their mating strategy?, Zool. Sci., 2010, 27, 821–825 http://dx.doi.org/10.2108/zsj.27.821 [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [35] Thomas C.D., Hill J.K., Lewis O.-T., Evolutionary consequences of habitat fragmentation in a localized butterfly, J. Anim. Ecol., 1998, 67, 485–497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00213.x [Crossref]

  • [36] Marden J.H., Variability in the size, composition and function of insect flight muscles, Annu. Rev. Physiol., 2000, 62, 157–178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.157 [Crossref]

  • [37] Turlure C., Schtickzelle N., Baguette M., Resource grain scales mobility and adult morphology in butterflies, Landscape Ecol., 2010, 25, 95–108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9403-3 [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [38] Stevens V.M., Turlure C., Baguette M., Filling in the tapestry: a meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies, Biol. Rev., 2010, 85, 625–642 [Web of Science]

  • [39] Sekar S., A meta-analysis of the traits affecting dispersal ability in butterflies: can wingspan be used as a proxy?, J. Anim. Ecol., 2012, 81, 174–184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01909.x [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [40] Stevens V.M., Trochet A., Van Dyck H., Clobert J., Baguette M., How is dispersal integrated in life histories: a quantitative analysis using butterflies, Ecol. Lett., 2012, 15, 74–86 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01709.x [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [41] Settele J., Thomas J.A., Boomsma J., Kühn E., Nash D., Anton C., et al., MACulinea butterflies of the habitats directive and European red list as indicators and tools for conservation and MANagement (MacMan), Verhandlungen der GfÖ, 2002, 32, 63

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Konrad Kalarus, Piotr Skórka, Wiktor Halecki, Agata Jirak, Joanna Kajzer-Bonk, and Piotr Nowicki
Journal of Insect Conservation, 2013, Volume 17, Number 6, Page 1221

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.