Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Life Sciences

formerly Central European Journal of Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Ratajczak, Mariusz

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.504
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.583

CiteScore 2018: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.266
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.311

ICV 2017: 154.48

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 8, Issue 7


Volume 10 (2015)

Movements and flight morphology in the endangered Large Blue butterflies

Piotr Skórka / Piotr Nowicki / Joanna Kudłek / Aleksandra Pępkowska / Ewa Śliwińska / Magdalena Witek / Josef Settele / Michal Woyciechowski
Published Online: 2013-04-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0190-5


Movements and flight morphology of the endangered Large Blue butterflies Phengaris teleius and P. nausithous in southern Poland were studied with mark-release-recapture surveys and GIS analyses. Most individuals moved relatively small distances (<40 metres) within their habitat patches. Distances covered by both species were positively related to season progression and wing length, and negatively related to body mass. P. teleius movement distances slightly exceeded those of P. nausithous. In addition, females moved longer distances than males, although the difference was significant only in P. teleius. Morphological traits appeared to be good indicators of the inter-specific and inter-sexual differences in mobility. While P. teleius individuals were heavier than P. nausithous ones, they had considerably longer wings, which may explain longer movements in the former species. Similarly, females were heavier than males in both species, but they invested more in wing size, which is likely to compensate for the negative impact of body mass on movement distances. Our results indicate that combination of GIS analysis of movement distances recorded with mark-release-recapture methods and morphometric measurements taken in field during non-lethal handling of captured individuals proved useful for studying the mobility potential of the endangered insect species.

Keywords: Dispersal; Maculinea; Metapopulation; Mobility; Morphometric measurements

  • [1] Hanski I., Metapopulation ecology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999 Google Scholar

  • [2] Bergman K.-O., Landin J., Distribution of occupied and vacant sites and migration of Lopinga achine (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) in a fragmented landscape, Biol. Conserv., 2001, 102, 183–190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00081-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Trakhtenbrot A., Nathan R., Perry G., Richardson D.M., The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation, Divers. Distrib., 2005, 11, 173–181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00156.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Wiens J.A., Stenseth N.C., Van Horne B., Ims R.A., Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology, Oikos, 1993, 66, 369–380 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3544931CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Auckland J.N., Debinski, D.M., Clark R.W., Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius, Ecol. Entomol., 2004, 29, 139–149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00581.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Ims R.A., Yoccoz N.G., Studying transfer processes in metapopulations: emigrations, migration and colonisation, In: Hanski I., Gilpin M.E. (Eds.) Metapopulation biology, Academic Press, San Diego, 1997 Google Scholar

  • [7] Dudley R., Srygley R.B., Flight physiology of neotropical butterflies: allometry of airspeed during natural free flight, J. Experim. Biol., 1994, 191, 125–139 Google Scholar

  • [8] Berwaerts K., Van Dyck H., Aerts P., Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria, Funct. Ecol., 2002, 16, 484–491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00650.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Palmer J.O., Dingle H., Responses of selection on flight behaviour in a migratory population of milkweed bugs Oncopeltus fasciatus, Evolution, 1989, 43, 1805–1808 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2409395CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Hill J.K., Thomas C.D., Blakeley D.S., Evolution of flight morphology in a butterfly that has recently expanded its geographical range, Oecologia, 1999, 121, 165–170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050918CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Merckx T., Van Dyck H., Interrelations among habitat use, behaviour, and flight related morphology in two cooccurring Satyrine butterflies, Maniola jurtina and Pyronia tithonus, J. Insect. Behav., 2002, 15, 541–561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016385301634CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Baguette M., Mennechez G., Petit S., Schtickzelle N., Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia, C.R. Biol., 2003, 326, S200–S209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00058-1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Norberg U., Leimar, O., Spatial and temporal variation in flight morphology in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2002, 77, 445–453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00115.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Kuussaari M., Heliola J., Poyry J., Saarinen K., Contrasting trends of butterfly species preferring semi-natural grasslands, field margins and forest edges in northern Europe, J. Insect Conserv., 2007, 11, 351–366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9052-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] van Swaay C.A.M., Warren M., Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera), Nature and Environment 99, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, 1999 Google Scholar

  • [16] Thomas J.A., The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of Large blue butterfly, In: Pullin A.S. (Ed.) Ecology and conservation of butterflies, Chapman and Hall, London, 1995 Google Scholar

  • [17] Settele J., Kühn E., Thomas J.A., Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2, Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model, Pensoft Publishers, Sofia — Moscow, 2005 Google Scholar

  • [18] Witek M., Sliwinska E.B., Skórka P., Nowicki P., Wantuch M., Vrabec V., et al., Host ant specificity of large blue butterflies Phengaris (Maculinea) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inhabiting humid grasslands in East-central Europe, Eur. J. Entomol., 2008, 105, 871–887 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Nowicki P., Pepkowska A., Kudlek J., Skórka P., Witek M., Settele J., et al., From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: Lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies, Biol. Conserv., 2007, 140, 119–129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.001CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Nowicki P., Witek M., Skórka P., Settele J., Woyciechowski M., Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation, Popul. Ecol., 2005, 47, 193–202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10144-005-0222-3CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Nowicki P., Halecki W., Kalarus K., All natural habitat edges matter equally for endangered Maculinea butterflies, J. Insect Conserv., 2013, 17, 139–146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9492-1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Underwood A.J., Experiments in ecology, Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997 Google Scholar

  • [23] Quinn G.P., Keough M.J., Experimental design and data analysis for biologists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806384CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Hovestadt T., Nowicki P., Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches: analysis of mark-release-recapture data using randomization procedures, Isr. J. Ecol. Evol., 2008, 54, 137–154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1560/IJEE.54.1.137CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Kőrösi A., Örvössy N., Batáry P., Kövér S., Peregovits L., Restricted within-habitat movement and time-constrained egg laying of female Maculinea rebeli butterflies, Oecologia, 2008, 156, 455–464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-0986-1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Settele J., Metapopulationsanalyse auf Rasterdatenbasis, Teubner, Stuttgart — Leipzig, 1997 Google Scholar

  • [27] Settele, J., How endangered is Maculinea nausithous? In: Settele J., Kühn E., Thomas J.A. (Eds.) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2, Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model, Pensoft Publishers, Sofia — Moscow, 2005 Google Scholar

  • [28] Nowicki P., Vrabec V., Evidence for positive densitydependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations, Oecologia, 2011, 167, 657–665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2025-xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Nowicki P., Settele J., Thomas J.A., Woyciechowski M., A review of population structure of Maculinea butterflies, In: Settele J., Kühn E., Thomas J.A. (Eds.) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2, Species ecology along an European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model, Pensoft Publishers, Sofia — Moscow, 2005 Google Scholar

  • [30] Sculley C.E., Boggs C.L., Mating system and sexual division of foraging effort affecting puddling behaviour by butterflies, Ecol. Entomol., 1996, 21, 193–197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1996.tb01187.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Brommer J.E., Fred M.S., Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar patches, Ecol. Entomol., 1999, 24, 125–131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1999.00190.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Bergman K.-O., Landin J., Population structure and movements of a threatened butterfly (Lopinga achine) in a fragmented landscape in Sweden, Biol. Conserv., 2002, 108, 361–369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00104-0CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Celik T., Adult demography, spatial distribution and movements of Zerynthia polyxena (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in a dense network of permanent habitats, Eur. J. Entomol., 2012, 109, 217–227 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Takeuchi T., Mate-locating behavior of the butterfly Lethe Diana (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): do males diurnally or seasonally change their mating strategy?, Zool. Sci., 2010, 27, 821–825 http://dx.doi.org/10.2108/zsj.27.821CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Thomas C.D., Hill J.K., Lewis O.-T., Evolutionary consequences of habitat fragmentation in a localized butterfly, J. Anim. Ecol., 1998, 67, 485–497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00213.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Marden J.H., Variability in the size, composition and function of insect flight muscles, Annu. Rev. Physiol., 2000, 62, 157–178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.157CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [37] Turlure C., Schtickzelle N., Baguette M., Resource grain scales mobility and adult morphology in butterflies, Landscape Ecol., 2010, 25, 95–108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9403-3CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Stevens V.M., Turlure C., Baguette M., Filling in the tapestry: a meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies, Biol. Rev., 2010, 85, 625–642 Google Scholar

  • [39] Sekar S., A meta-analysis of the traits affecting dispersal ability in butterflies: can wingspan be used as a proxy?, J. Anim. Ecol., 2012, 81, 174–184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01909.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Stevens V.M., Trochet A., Van Dyck H., Clobert J., Baguette M., How is dispersal integrated in life histories: a quantitative analysis using butterflies, Ecol. Lett., 2012, 15, 74–86 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01709.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Settele J., Thomas J.A., Boomsma J., Kühn E., Nash D., Anton C., et al., MACulinea butterflies of the habitats directive and European red list as indicators and tools for conservation and MANagement (MacMan), Verhandlungen der GfÖ, 2002, 32, 63 Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-04-23

Published in Print: 2013-07-01

Citation Information: Open Life Sciences, Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 662–669, ISSN (Online) 2391-5412, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0190-5.

Export Citation

© 2013 Versita Warsaw. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Konrad Kalarus, Piotr Skórka, Wiktor Halecki, Agata Jirak, Joanna Kajzer-Bonk, and Piotr Nowicki
Journal of Insect Conservation, 2013, Volume 17, Number 6, Page 1221

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in