Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Life Sciences

formerly Central European Journal of Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Ratajczak, Mariusz

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.504
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.583

CiteScore 2018: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.266
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.311

ICV 2017: 154.48

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 10, Issue 1


Volume 10 (2015)

Habitat-conditioned feeding behaviour in Barbitistes constrictus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)

Peter Kaňuch / Anna Sliacka / Anton Krištín
Published Online: 2014-09-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2015-0001


Some insect herbivores can regulate their nourishment intake by different feeding behaviour. This mechanism allows them to persist with utilising different food resources according to the composition of the vegetation within their habitats. Using a two-choice experiment, we analysed foraging behaviour in females of the tree-dwelling bush-cricket Barbitistes constrictus (Orthoptera), which originated from two different forest habitats, spruce and beech forest. We found that individuals from the spruce forest mainly foraged on needle tips, and thus they nibbled more needles per day than individuals from the beech forest (medians 106.0 vs. 42.5; p < 0.0001). However, when the contents of droppings were dissected, the volume of consumed spruce was similar in both groups of bush-crickets (median > 90%), which is explained by the different feeding techniques of bush-crickets from different habitats. We propose possible scenarios for bush-cricket feeding adaptations to the deleterious effects of the host plant chemical compounds serving as a plant defence against herbivores.

Keywords: Diet; Bush-crickets; Phytophagy; Insect; Choice; Woodland


  • [1] Dethier V.G., Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects, Evolution, 1954, 8, 33-54 Google Scholar

  • [2] Bernays E.A., Chapman R.F., Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1994 Google Scholar

  • [3] Singer M.C., Thomas C.D., Evolutionary responses of a butterfly metapopulation to human- and climate-caused environmental variation, Am. Nat., 1996, 148, 9-39 Google Scholar

  • [4] Hanski I., Singer M.S., Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulation, Am. Nat., 2001, 158, 341-353 Google Scholar

  • [5] Berner D., Blanckenhorn W.U., Korner C., Grasshoppers cope with low host plant quality by compensatory feeding and food selection: N limitation challenged, Oikos, 2005, 111, 525-533 Google Scholar

  • [6] Franzke A., Unsicker S.B., Specht J., Köhler G., Weisser W.W., Being a generalist herbivore in a diverse world: how do diets from different grasslands influence food plant selection and fitness of the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus? Ecol. Entomol., 2010, 35, 126-138 Google Scholar

  • [7] Behmer S.T., Joern A., Coexisting generalist herbivores occupy unique nutritional feeding niches, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2008, 105, 1977-1982 Google Scholar

  • [8] Pearson R.E.G., Behmer S.T., Gruner D.S., Denno R.F., Effects of diet quality on performance and nutrient regulation in an omnivorous katydid, Ecol. Entomol., 2011, 36, 471-479 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Bernays E.A., Bright K.L., Mechanisms of dietary mixing in grasshoppers: A review, Comp. Biochem. Phys. A, 1993, 104, 125-131 Google Scholar

  • [10] Behmer S.T., Insect herbivore nutrient regulation, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 2009, 54, 165-187 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Papaj D.R., Lewis A.C., Insect learning: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993 Google Scholar

  • [12] Papaj D.R., Prokopy R.J., Ecological and evolutionary aspects of learning in phytophagous insects, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 1989, 34, 315-350 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Cunningham J.P., Jallow M.F.A., Wright D.J., Zalucki M.P., Learning in host selection in Helicoerpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Anim. Behav., 1998, 55, 227-234 Google Scholar

  • [14] Dukas R., Bernays E.A., Learning improves growth rate in grasshoppers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2000, 97, 2637-2640 Google Scholar

  • [15] McGuire T.R., Hirsch J., Behavior-genetic analysis of Phormia regina: conditioning, reliable individual differences, and selection, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1977, 74, 5193-5197 Google Scholar

  • [16] Mery F., Kawecki T.J., Experimental evolution of learning ability in fruit flies, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2002, 99, 14274-14279 Google Scholar

  • [17] Cox G.W., Alien species and evolution: The evolutionary ecology of exotic plants, animals, microbes, and interacting native species, Island Press, Washington DC, 2004 Google Scholar

  • [18] Scriber J.M., Integrating ancient patterns and current dynamics of insect-plant interactions: Taxonomic and geographic variation in herbivore specialization, Insect Sci., 2010, 17, 471-507 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Cunningham J.P., Zalucki M.P., West S.A., Learning in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a new look at the behaviour and control of a polyphagous pest, B. Entomol. Res., 1999, 89, 201-207 Google Scholar

  • [20] Detzel P., Die Heuschrecken Baden-Württembergs, Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1998, (in German) Google Scholar

  • [21] Holuša J., Heralt P., Drápela K., Occurrence and bionomy of Barbitistes constrictus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) in the eastern part of the Czech Republic, J. Forest Sci., 2006, 52, 61-73 Google Scholar

  • [22] Ingrisch S., Köhler G., Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas, Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdeburg, 1998, (in German) Google Scholar

  • [23] Gottwald J., Richter C., Wörner M., Habitatwahl, Nahrungswahl und Entwicklung von B. serricauda (Fabricius, 1787) und B. constrictus Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878 (Phaneropterinae), Articulata, 2002, 17, 51-78, (in German) Google Scholar

  • [24] Litvak M.E., Monson R.K., Patterns of induced and constitutive monoterpene production in conifer needles in relation to insect herbivory, Oecologia, 1998, 114, 531-540 Google Scholar

  • [25] Petrakis P.V., Spanos K., Feest A., Daskalakou E., Phenols in leaves and bark of Fagus sylvatica as determinants of insect occurrences, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2011, 12, 2769-2782 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Dukas R., Evolutionary biology of insect learning, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 2011, 53, 145-160 Google Scholar

  • [27] Zuna-Kratky T., Karner-Ranner E., Lederer E., Braun B., Berg H-M., Denner M., et al., Verbreitungsatlas der Heuschrecken und Fangschrecken Ostösterreichs, Verlag Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, 2009, (in German) Google Scholar

  • [28] Krištín A., Kaňuch P. (eds), Distribution of Barbitistes constrictus in Slovakia, http://www.orthoptera.sk, 2013 Google Scholar

  • [29] Haber A., Opaślik sosnowiec Barbitistes constrictus Br. Watt. (Locustidae Orth.), Państwowe wydawnictwo rolnicze i leśne, Warszawa, 1953, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [30] Saglam I.K., Caglar S.S., Distribution and habitat characteristics of the color polymorphic bush-cricket Isophya rizeensis Sevgili (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae) in Turkey, Entomol. News, 2005, 116, 309-324 Google Scholar

  • [31] Gangwere S.K., Monograph on food selection in Orthoptera, T. Am. Entomol. Soc., 1961, 87: 67-230 Google Scholar

  • [32] R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2010 Google Scholar

  • [33] Nykänen H., Koricheva J., Damage-induced changes in woody plants and their effects on insect herbivore performance: a meta-analysis, Oikos, 2004, 104, 247-268Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-03-04

Accepted: 2014-08-12

Published Online: 2014-09-19

Citation Information: Open Life Sciences, Volume 10, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2391-5412, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2015-0001.

Export Citation

©2015 Peter Kaňuch, et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in