Abstract
The unsaturated zone of soil is one of the most important and complicated parts considering the water movement in the hydrologic cycle. Water transfer through its upper and lower boundary directly influences the amount of water in this zone. The depth of groundwater table usually delimits the lower boundary. The soil surface with or without plant canopy is the upper boundary. The soil surface reacts directly on meteorological conditions primary through evapotranspiration. It is determining the inflow of precipitation into deeper layers of a soil profile. Both physical and hydrophysical properties of the upper soil layer are changed under the extreme meteorological conditions. In case of such conditions the water can flow along preferential pathways down to the groundwater without filling up the soil matrix. Changes of physical and hydrophysical characteristics of the soil surface layer or of the root zone depend on the vegetation type, too. The water storage of 0–30 cm and 30–60 cm soil layers was calculated from monitored data of soil water contents in two different ecosystems, and the calculated water storages were compared with the integral water contents that are related to hydrolimits (field capacity, point of decreased availability and wilting point) in 1999 and 2000. It should be noted that it was considerably dryer in 2000 than in 1999, and during the vegetation period, it was also warmer in 2000 than in 1999. The higher air temperatures during the vegetation season and the lower cumulative rainfall in 2000 comparing to 1999 resulted in a decrease in the integral water contents in the root zone.
[1] Buchtele, J., Buchtelová, M. & Tesař, M. 2006. Role of vegetation in the variability of water regimes in the Šumava Mts forest. Biologia, Bratislava 61(Supl. 19): S246–S250. Search in Google Scholar
[2] Čermák, J. & Kučera, J. 2006. Transpiration of mature stands of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) as estimated by the tree-trunk heat balance method, pp. 311–317. In: Proc. Symp. Forest hydrology and watershed management. IAHS Publ. No. 167, Wallingford. Search in Google Scholar
[3] Farkas, Cs., Gyuricza, Cs. & Birkas, M. 2006. Seasonal changes of hydraulic properties of a Chromic Luvisol under different soil management. Biologia, Bratislava 61(Supl. 19): S344–S348. Search in Google Scholar
[4] Halabuk, A. 2006. Influence of different vegetation types on saturated hydraulic conductivity in alluvial topsoils. Biologia, Bratislava 61(Supl. 19): S334–S337. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0170-110.2478/s11756-006-0170-1Search in Google Scholar
[5] Kutilek, M. 1978. Soil science for water management. SNTL-ALFA, Prague. (In Czech) Search in Google Scholar
[6] Merta, M., Seidler, Ch. & Fjodorowa, T. 2006. Estimation of evaporation components in agricultural crops. Biologia, Bratislava 61(Supl. 19): S280–S283. Search in Google Scholar
[7] Mikulec, V. 2004. Impact of saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils on numerical simulation of soil water movement. In: Pollution and water resources. Columbia University Seminar Proceedings, Vol. XXXV, SAS, Bratislava, pp. 193–202. Search in Google Scholar
[8] Orfánus, T. 2005. Spatial assessment of soil drought indicators at regional scale: hydrolimits and soil water storage capacity in Záhorská nížina Lowland. Hydrol. Hydromech. 53: 164–176. Search in Google Scholar
[9] Rajkai, K. 1983. Ecological application of soil hydrophysical properties (in Hungarian). PhD thesis, RISSAC HAS, Budapest, 137 pp. Search in Google Scholar
[10] Stehlová, K. 2004. Assessment of change of soil water content in the soil profile at locality Bodíky in comparison with a forecast of its potential change in the time horizon 2010, 2030, and 2075, pp. 203–215. In: Halasi-Kun, G.J. (ed.), Pollution and water resources. Columbia University Seminar Proceedings, Vol. XXXV, SAS, Bratislava. Search in Google Scholar
[11] Štekauerová, V. & Nagy, V. 2003. Estimation of soil zone aeration water regime at Žitný ostrov localities. Acta Hydrologica Slovaca, 4: 45–73. (In Slovak) Search in Google Scholar
[12] Štekauerová, V. & Nagy, V. 2002. Influence of climate conditions on security necessary water for vegetation in various ecosystems. In: Halasi-Kun, G.J. (ed.), Pollution and water resources. Columbia University Seminar Proceedings, Vol. XXXIII–XXXIV, HAS, Budapest, 324–337. Search in Google Scholar
[13] Štekauerová, V., Skalová, J. & Šútor, J. 2002. Using of pedotransfer functions for assessment of hydrolimits. Rostlinná Výroba 48: 407–412. 10.17221/4388-PSESearch in Google Scholar
[14] Šútor, J., Štekauerová, V. & Majerčák, J. 2002. Climate changes and water regime of soil aeration zone in Slovakia Iowlands. I. Analysis of an impact of expected changes in average monthly temperatures. Acta Hydrologica Slovaca, 3: 143–154 (In Slovak). Search in Google Scholar
[15] Van Genuchten, M.Th. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44: 987–996. 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002xSearch in Google Scholar
© 2006 Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.