Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia




More options …
Volume 62, Issue 4

Issues

Intrinsic rate of natural increase of Brueelia amandavae (Ischnocera, Phthiraptera) populations infesting Indian red avadavat

Nidhi Gupta / Sandeep Kumar / Arun Saxena
Published Online: 2007-08-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-007-0088-2

Abstract

The incubation period of eggs, duration of three nymphal instars, adult longevity and the daily egg-deposition rate of the ischnoceran Phthiraptera, Brueelia amandavae, were determined by rearing the louse in vitro (35 ± 1°C, 75–82% RH, feather diet). The data obtained were utilized for life table construction and determination of the intrinsic rate of natural increase (0.031 per day) and the doubling time (23.45 days) of the louse population. The doubling time of the louse in in vivo experiments was 21.5 days.

Keywords: Phthiraptera; biology; life cycle

  • [1] Birch L.C. 1948. Intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. Anim. Ecol. 17: 15–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1605CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Brown N.S. 1970. The effect of host beak condition on the size of Menacanthus stramineus population of domestic chickens. Poultry Sci. 51: 162–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Evans F.C. & Smith F.E. 1952. The intrinsic rate of natural increase for a human louse, Pediculus humanus L. Amer. Nat. 830: 299–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/281737CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Glees E.E. & Raun E.S. 1959. Effects of chicken body louse infestation on egg production. J. Econ. Entomol. 52: 358–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Howe R.W. 1953. The rapid determination of the intrinsic rate of increase of an insect population. Ann. Appl. Biol. 40: 134–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1953.tb02372.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Leslie P.H. & Park T. 1949. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of Tribolium castamenum Herbst. Ecology 30: 469–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1932450CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Marshall A.G. 1981. The Ecology of Ectoparasitic Insects. Acad. Press London, 417 pp. Google Scholar

  • [8] Murray M.D. & Gordon G. 1969. Ecology of lice on sheep. VII. Population dynamics of Damalinia ovis (Schrank). Aust. J. Zool. 7: 179–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ZO9690179CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Rust R.W. 1974. The population dynamics and host utilization of Geomydoecus oregonus, a parasite of Thomomys bottae. Oecologia 15: 287–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00345184CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Stockdale H.J. & Raun E.S. 1965. Biology of the chicken body louse, Menacanthus stramineus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 58: 802–805. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Winston P.W. & Bates D.H. 1960. Saturated solution for the control of humidity in biological research. Ecology 49: 232–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1931961CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2007-08-01

Published in Print: 2007-08-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 458–461, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-007-0088-2.

Export Citation

© 2007 Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Surendra Kumar, Padam Singh, and Vijay Kumar
Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 2016, Volume 40, Number 3, Page 853
[4]
Vijay Kumar and S. S. Hasan
Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 2016, Volume 40, Number 2, Page 374
[5]
Arun Kumar Saxena, Nidhi Gupta, Sandeep Kumar, Vikram Khan, Gaurav Arya, and Smiriti Saxena
Entomological News, 2009, Volume 120, Number 4, Page 363

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in