Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


12 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.759
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.803

CiteScore 2016: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.300
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.476

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 62, Issue 6 (Dec 2007)


Morphology of eggs and spermatheca of Odontotarsus purpureolineatus (Heteroptera, Scutelleridae)

Selami Candan
  • Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, Gazi University, 06500 Teknikokullar, Ankara, Turkey
  • Email:
/ Zekiye Suludere
  • Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, Gazi University, 06500 Teknikokullar, Ankara, Turkey
  • Email:
/ Mahmut Erbey
  • Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, Gazi University, 06500 Teknikokullar, Ankara, Turkey
  • Email:
Published Online: 2007-12-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-007-0137-x


The morphology of the spermatheca and eggs of Odontotarsus purpureolineatus were studied by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The spherical eggs were about 1.35 mm long and 1.09 mm wide. The egg batches generally consist of 13–14 eggs. The egg surface is covered by polygonal (hexagonal and pentagonal shapes prevail) ridges and tiny chorionic tubercles. There were 8–10 aero-micropylar processes between the polygons. The spermatheca of O. purpureolineatus is characterized by a spherical spermathecal bulb, a pumping region, a flange of pump and dilation of spermathecal duct. Spermathecal processes and a median spermathecal dilation with sclerotized rod are missing. The spermathecal bulb and the pumping region possess many pores.

Keywords: Heteroptera; Scutelleridae; Odontotarsus purpureolineatus; morphology; scanning electron microscopy

  • [1] Adams T.S. 2001. Morphology of the internal reproductive system of the male and female two-spotted stink bug, Perillus bioculatus (F.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) and the transfer of products during mating. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 39: 45–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Bundy C.S. & McPherson R.M. 2000. Morphological examination of stink bug (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) eggs on cotton and soybeans, with a key to genera. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 616–624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0616:MEOSBH]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Candan S. 1999. External morphology of eggs of Ancyrosoma leucogrammes (Gmelin) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). G. U. Journal of Science 12: 933–941. [In Turkish with English summary]. Google Scholar

  • [4] Candan, S. & Suludere Z. 1999. Chorionic structure of Graphosoma lineatum (Linneaus, 1758) (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae). J. Entomol. Res. Soc. 1(3): 1–7. Google Scholar

  • [5] Candan S. & Suludere Z. 2001. Chorionic structure of eggs with parasites and normal of Rhaphigaster nebulosa (Poda, 1761) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Türk. Entomol. Derg. 25: 41–48. [in Turkish with English summary]. Google Scholar

  • [6] Candan S. & Suludere Z. 2003. Scanning electron microscope studies of the eggs of Psacasta exanthematica Scopoli, 1763 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Scutelleridae). Pol. Pismo Entomol. 72: 241–247. Google Scholar

  • [7] Candan S. & Suludere Z. 2006a. Chorion morphology of eggs of Aelia albovittata Fieber, 1868 and Aelia rostrata Boheman, 1852 (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J. Entomol. Res. Soc. 8: 61–71. Google Scholar

  • [8] Candan S. & Suludere Z. 2006b. Studies on the external morphology of the eggs of Eurygaster maura (Linnaeus, 1758) (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae). Polish J. Entomol. 75: 369–374. Google Scholar

  • [9] Candan S., Suludere Z. & Açýkgöz F. 2005a. Chorion morphology of eggs of the North American stink bug Euschistus variolarius (Palisot de Beauvois, 1817) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): A scanning electron microscopy study. Entomol. News 116: 177–182. Google Scholar

  • [10] Candan S., Suludere Z. & Durak D. 2005b. Ultrastructure of the eggs chorion of Ceraleptus obtusus (Brullé, 1839) (Heteroptera: Coreidae). Ohio J. Sci. 105: 138–141. Google Scholar

  • [11] Candan S., Suludere Z. & Kýyak S. 2001. External morphology of eggs of Codophila varia (Fabricus, 1787) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J. Entomol. Res. Soc. 3: 33–39. Google Scholar

  • [12] Cobben R.H. 1968. Evolutionary Trends in Heteroptera. Part 1. Eggs, Architecture of the Shell, Gross Embryology and Ecolosion. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 475 pp. Google Scholar

  • [13] Davey K.G. 1965. Reproduction in the Insects. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburg, 96 pp. Google Scholar

  • [14] Dufour L. 1833. Recherches anatomique et physiologiques sur les Hemipteres. Mem. Pres. Acad. Sci. IV: 133–461; pls. I–XIX. Google Scholar

  • [15] Dupuis C. 1955. Les génitalia des Hémiptères Hétéroptères (Génitalia externes des deux sexes; Voies ectodermiques femelles). Revue de la morphologie. Lexique de la nomenclature. Index bibliographique analytique. Mém. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 6: 183–278. Google Scholar

  • [16] Durai P.S.S. 1987. A revision of the Dinidoridae of the World (Heteroptera: Pentatomoidae). Orient. Insects 21: 163–360. Google Scholar

  • [17] Esselbaugh C.O. 1946. A study of the eggs of the Pentatomidae (Hemiptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 39: 667–691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Grigorov P. 1988. Electron-microscopic study of the egg’s chorion [sic] in species of the genus Eurygaster Lap. (Heteroptera, Scutelleridae). Rasteniev’dni Nauki [Plant Science] 25: 94–99. Google Scholar

  • [19] Hinton H.E. 1981. Biology of Insect Eggs. Pergamon Press, Oxford, Vols I–III, 1125 pp. Google Scholar

  • [20] Javahery M. 1994. Development of eggs in some true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Part I. Pentatomoidae. Can. Entomol. 126: 401–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.4039/Ent126401-2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Kim R.H. & Lee C.E. 1994. Morphological studies on the spermathecae of Korean Podopinae and Asopinae (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Korean J. Entomol. 24: 217–223. Google Scholar

  • [22] Kocorek A. & Danielczok-Demska T. 2002. Comparative morphology of the spermatheca within the family Dinidoridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Eur. J. Entomol. 99: 91–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Kumar R. 1962. Morpho-taxonomical studies on the genitalia and salivary glands of some Pentatomoidae. Entomol. Tidskr. 83: 44–84. Google Scholar

  • [24] Kumar V., Morrison M.N., Babu A.M. & Thiagarjan V. 2002. Egg shell architecture of the stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff.): Ultrastructure of micropylar processes and egg burster. Insect Sci. Appl. 22: 67–74. Google Scholar

  • [25] Lee C.E. & Pendergrast J.G. 1983. The spermathecae of New Zealand Aradidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). J. Nat. Hist. 17: 113–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222938300770081CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Margaritis L.H. 1985. Structure and Physiology of the Eggshell, pp. 153–230. In: Kerkut G.A. & Gilbert L.I. (eds), Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology 1, Pergamon Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

  • [27] McDonald F.J.D. 1966. The genitalia of North American Pentatomoidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Quaest. Entomol. 2: 7–150. Google Scholar

  • [28] Mohan D. 1988. Host plant relationships with reference to the biology of fern infesting pentatomid, Coptosoma siamicum Walker, with notes on the fine architecture of the egg. J. Entomol. Res. (New Delhi). 12: 149–153. Google Scholar

  • [29] Pendergrast J.G. 1957. Studies on the reproductive organs of the Heteroptera with a consideration of their bearing on classification. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 109: 1–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Puchkova L.V. 1959. The eggs of true bugs (Hemiptera-Heteroptera) V. Pentatomoidea, I. Entomol. Obozr. 38: 634–648. Google Scholar

  • [31] Puchkova L.V. 1966. The morphology and biology of the eggs of the terrestrial bugs (Hemiptera). Horae Soc. Entomol. Ross. 51: 75–132. Google Scholar

  • [32] Salkeld E.H. 1983. A catalogue of the eggs of some Canadian Geometridae (Lepidoptera), with comments. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 126: 1–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Salkeld E.H. 1984. A catalogue of the eggs of some Canadian Noctuidae (Lepidoptera). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 127: 1–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Schumacher F. 1917. Eisprenger bei Wanzen aus der groupe der Pentatomiden (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). Sitz. Ber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin 1917: 438–443. Google Scholar

  • [35] Scudder G.G.E. 1959. The female genitalia of the Heteroptera: Morphology and bearing on classification. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 111: 405–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Servadei A. 1964. Il valore tassonomico delle spermateche degli emitteri eterotteri (Fam. Pentatomidae e Acanthosomatidae). Atti Acad. Naz. Ital. Entomol. 11: 58–86. Google Scholar

  • [37] Siebold Von C.TH. 1837. Fernere Beobachtungen über die Spermatozoen der wirbellosen Tiere. Arch. Anat. Physiol. Wiss. Medic. 1837: 381–439. Google Scholar

  • [38] Simiczyjew B. 1994. Egg morphology and chorion fine structure of Hydrometra stagnorum (Heteroptera). Zool. Pol. 39: 79–86. Google Scholar

  • [39] Southwood T.R.E. 1956. The structure of the eggs of the terrestrial Heteroptera and its relationship to the classification of the group. Trans R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 108: 163–221. Google Scholar

  • [40] Suludere Z. 1988. Studies on the external morphology of the eggs of some Argynninae species (Satyridae: Lepidoptera). Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. (Ser. C) 6: 9–28. Google Scholar

  • [41] Suludere Z., Candan S. & Kalender Y. 1999. Chorionic sculpturing in eggs of six species of Eurydema (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae) A scanning electron microscope investigation. J. Entomol. Res. Soc. 1(2): 27–56. Google Scholar

  • [42] Wolf K.W. & Reid W. 2001. Egg morphology and hatching in Mormidea pictiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Can. J. Zool. 79: 726–736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjz-79-4-726CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [43] Wolf K.W. & Reid W. 2003. The wart-like chorion of Edessa bifida (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 35: 469–473. Google Scholar

  • [44] Wolf W.K. & Reid W. 2004. Post depositional dynamics of eggs of Podisus sagitta (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae: Asopinae). A light and scanning electron microscopy study. J. Entomol. Res. Soc. 6: 1–11. Google Scholar

  • [45] Wolf K.W., Reid W. & Schrauf M. 2003. Optical illusions in scanning electron micrographs: the case of the eggshell of Acrosternum (Chinavia) marginatum (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Micron 34: 57–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-4328(02)00028-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2007-12-01

Published in Print: 2007-12-01

Citation Information: Biologia, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-007-0137-x.

Export Citation

© 2007 Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in