Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia




More options …
Volume 63, Issue 5

Issues

Trichomes in the tribe Lactuceae (Asteraceae) — taxonomic implications

Karol Krak / Patrik Mráz
  • Department of Biology & Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University, Mánesova 23, SK-04001, Košice, Slovakia
  • Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 14, SK-84523, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2008-09-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-008-0106-z

Abstract

Although the infratribal classification of the Lactuceae has been the focus of several studies, relationships between the genera are not yet fully resolved. While trichome characters have been shown to be an important tool in taxa delimitation in many plant families, a detailed study on trichomes within the Lactuceae was still lacking. We assess here how trichome types can contribute to the clarification of generic relationships in this tribe. Trichome diversity was investigated on stems and leaves of 135 representatives of 53 genera by light and scanning electron microscopy. According to their morphology and anatomy, trichomes were classified into eight types and several subtypes. Phenetic analysis based on the presence or absence of particular trichome types was performed. The previously supposed monophyly of exclusively American genera and affinities between several closely related genera were confirmed. A new circumscription of the subtribe Hieraciinae is proposed, in accordance with recent molecular data. According to the present study, this subtribe is characterized by a unique combination of two trichome types and comprises the following genera: Andryala, Hieracium, Hispidella, Pilosella, Stenotheca. The previously included genera Arnoseris, Hololeion and Tolpis do not belong to this assemblage and their removal from the Hieraciinae should be reconsidered.

Keywords: Compositae; light microscopy; micromorphological characters; SEM; systematics

  • [1] Al-Shamary K.I.A. & Gornall R.J. 1994. Trichome anatomy of the Saxifragaceae s. l. from the southern hemisphere. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 114: 99–131. Google Scholar

  • [2] Askerova R.K. 1970. A contribution to the palynological characterization of the tribe Cichorieae of Compositae. Botanicheskiĭ Zhurn. 55: 660–668. (In Russian). Google Scholar

  • [3] Baggøe J. 1980. SEM — studies in ligules of Lactuceae (Compositae). Botanisk Tidsskr. 75: 199–217. Google Scholar

  • [4] Beaman J.H. 1990. Revision of Hieracium (Asteraceae) in Mexico and Central America. Systematic Botany Monogr. 29: 1–77. Google Scholar

  • [5] Blackmore S. 1981. Palynology and intergeneric relationships in subtribe Hyoseridine (Compositae: Lactuceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 82: 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1981.tb00947.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Blackmore S. 1984. Compositae-Lactuceae. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 42: 45–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-6667(84)90062-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Blackmore S. & Jarvis C.E. 1986. Palynology of the genus Tolpis Adanson (Compositae: Lactuceae). Pollen et Spores 28: 111–122. Google Scholar

  • [8] Blackmore S. & Persson V. 1996. Palynology and systematics of the Crepidinae (Compositae: Lactuceae), pp. 111–122. In: Hind D.J.N. & Beentje H.J. (eds.), Compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, vol. 1. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 111–122. Google Scholar

  • [9] Bremer K. 1994. Asteraceae: Cladistics and classification. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. Google Scholar

  • [10] Chambers K.L. 1955. A biosystematic study of the annual species of Microseris. Contr. Dudley Herb. 4: 207–312. Google Scholar

  • [11] Cronquist A. 1977. The Compositae revisited. Britonia 29: 137–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2805847CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Faust W.Z. & Jones S.B. 1973. The systematic value of trichome complements in a North American group of Vernonia (Compositae). Rhodora 75: 517–528. Google Scholar

  • [13] Fehrer J., Gemeinholzer B., Chrtek J.Jr. & Bräutigam S. 2007. Incongruent plastid and nuclear DNA phylogenies reveal ancient intergeneric hybridisation in Pilosella hawkweeds (Hieracium, Cichorieae, Asteraceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 42: 347–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.07.004CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Guppy G.A. 1978. Species relationships of Hieracium (Asteraceae) in British Columbia. Can. J. Bot. 56: 3008–3019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b78-365CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Holmgren P.K., Holmgren N.H. & Barnett L.C. (eds) 1990. Index herbariorum. Part I: The herbaria of the world, ed. 8. Regnum Veget. 120: 1–693. Google Scholar

  • [16] Hoot S.B. 1991. Phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae based on epidermal microcharacters and macromorphology. Syst. Bot. 16: 741–755. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2418876CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Jansen R.K., Michaels H.J. & Palmer J.D. 1991. Phylogeny and character evolution in the Asteraceae based on chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping. Syst. Bot. 16: 98–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2418976CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Jarvis C.E. 1980. Systematic studies in the genus Tolpis Adanson. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, University of Reading. Google Scholar

  • [19] Jeffrey C. 1966. Notes on Compositae: The Cichoriaceae in East Tropical Africa. Kew Bull. 18: 427–445. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4115797CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Karis P.O., Källersjö M. & Bremer K. 1992. Phylogenetic analysis of the Cichorioideae (Asteraceae) with emphasis on the Mutisieae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 416–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2399778CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Kim K.J., Jansen R.K., Wallace R.S., Michaels H.J. & Palmer J.D. 1992. Phylogenetic implication of rbcL sequence variation in the Asteraceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 428–445. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2399779CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Korolyuk E.A. 1997. Structure of seed surfaces of the subtribe Asterinae (Asteraceae) from Siberia. Botanicheskiĭ Zhurn. 82: 29–34. (In Russian). Google Scholar

  • [23] Lack H.W. 1977. Picris sinuata (Lam.) Lack comb. nova (Asteraceae, Lactuceae), eine verkannte Art aus Nordafrika. Willdenowia 8: 49–65. Google Scholar

  • [24] Lee J., Baldwin B.G. & Gottlieb L.D. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among primarily North American genera of Cichorieae (Compositae) based on analysis of 18S–26S nuclear rDNA ITS and ETS sequences. Syst. Bot. 28: 616–626. Google Scholar

  • [25] Mavrodiev E.V., Edwards C.E., Albach D.C., Gitzendanner M.A., Soltis P.S. & Soltis DE. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships in subtribe Scorzonerinae (Asteraceae: Cichorioideae: Cichorieae) based on ITS sequence data. Taxon 53: 699–712. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4135445CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Mráz P. & Polónyi J. 1988. Metódy elektrónovej mikroskopie živočíšnych tkanív. Veda, Bratislava, 312 pp. Google Scholar

  • [27] Napp-Zinn K. & Eble M. 1980. Beiträge zur systematischen Anatomie der Asteraceae-Anthemideae: Die Trichome. Plant Syst. Evol. 136: 169–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01004625CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28] Park S.-J., Korompai E.J., Francisco-Ortega J., Santos-Guerra A. & Jansen R.K. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Tolpis (Asteraceae: Lactuceae) based on ndhF sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 226: 23–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s006060170071CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Page R.D.M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12: 357–358. Google Scholar

  • [30] Pavlíček A., Hrdá Š. & Flegr J. 1999. FreeTree — freeware program for construction of phylogenetic trees on the basis of distance data and for bootstrap/jackknife analysis of the trees robustness. Application in the RAPD analysis of genus Frenkelia. Folia Biol. Prague, 45: 97–99. Google Scholar

  • [31] Pittoni H. 1974. Behaarung und chromosomenzahlen sternhaarigen Leontodon — Sippen. Phyton (Horn) 16: 165–183. Google Scholar

  • [32] Samuel R., Stuessy T.F., Tremetsberger K., Baeza C.M. & Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Cichorieae) based on ITS, plastid trnL intron, trnL-F spacer and matK sequences. Am. J. Bot. 90: 496–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.3.496CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Sahu T.R. 1982. Trichome studies in Parthenium hysterophorus and their taxonomic importance. Feddes Repert. 93: 437–441. Google Scholar

  • [34] Sahu T.R. 1984. Taxonomic implications of trichome complements to Vernonia (Compositae) in India. Feddes Repert. 95: 237–249. Google Scholar

  • [35] Sennikov A.N. & Illarionova I.D. 2002. Carpological studies in Asteraceae — Cichorieae, 1. subtribe Hieraciinae. Komarovia 2: 97–125. Google Scholar

  • [36] Spring O. 2000. Chemotaxonomy based on metabolites from glandular trichomes. Advances Bot. Res. 31: 153–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(00)31009-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [37] Stebbins G.L. 1953. A new classification of the tribe Cichoriae, family Compositae. Madroño 12: 65–81. Google Scholar

  • [38] Stenglein S.A., Colares M.N., Arambarri A.M., Novona M.C., Vizcaíno C.E. & Katinas L. 2003. Leaf epidermal microcharacters of the Old World species of the Lotus (Leguminosae: Lotae) and their systematic significance. Aust. J. Bot. 51: 459–469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT02102CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [39] The International Plant Names Index. 2004. Published on the internet http://www.ipni.org [accessed July 2004]. Google Scholar

  • [40] Tomb A.S. 1975. Pollen morphology in the tribe Lactuceae (Compositae). Grana 15: 79–89. Google Scholar

  • [41] Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.M., Walters S.M. & Webb D.A. 1976. Flora Europaea 4. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • [42] Uphof J.C.T. 1962. Plant hairs. Encyclopedia of plant anatomy IV, Vol. 5. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin. Google Scholar

  • [43] Vuilleumier B.S. 1973. The genera of Lactuceae (Compositae) in the Southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arb. 54: 42–93. Google Scholar

  • [44] Werker E. 2000. Trichome diversity and development. Advances Bot. Res. 31: 1–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(00)31005-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45] Werker E., Ravid U. & Putievsky E. 1985. Glandular hairs and their secretions in the vegetative and reproductive organs of Salvia sclarea and S. dominica. Isr. J. Bot. 34: 239–252. Google Scholar

  • [46] Whitton J., Wallace R.S. & Jansen R.K. 1995. PHylogenetic relationships and patterns of character change based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Can. J. Bot. 73: 1058–1073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b95-357CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [47] Zahn K.H. 1921–1923. Hieracium. In: Engler A. (ed.), Das Pflanzenreich. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2008-09-11

Published in Print: 2008-10-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages 616–630, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-008-0106-z.

Export Citation

© 2008 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Violeta Milutinović, Marjan Niketić, Aleksej Krunić, Dejan Nikolić, Miloš Petković, Ljuboš Ušjak, and Silvana Petrović
Phytochemistry, 2018, Volume 154, Page 19
[2]
Sajna Mannethody and Sunojkumar Purayidathkandy
Flora, 2018, Volume 242, Page 70
[3]
Júlia Gabriela Camilotti, Ciane Costa Biu, Paulo Vitor Farago, Vera Lúcia Pereira dos Santos, Celia Regina Cavichiolo Franco, and Jane Manfron Budel
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 2014, Volume 57, Number 6, Page 867
[4]
L. F. da S. Constantino, L. B. dos S. Nascimento, L. M. Casanova, N. dos S. Moreira, E. A. Menezes, R. L. Esteves, S. S. Costa, and E. S. Tavares
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2017, Volume 16, Number 2, Page 238
[5]
V.S. Pavlenko-Barysheva
Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 2013, Volume 70, Number 5, Page 583
[6]
[7]
Lyudmila E. Muravnik, Olga V. Kostina, and Alexey L. Shavarda
Planta, 2016, Volume 244, Number 3, Page 737
[8]
Esra Martin, Özlem Çetin, Ahmet Duran, Bekir Doğan, and Zeynep Traȿ
CYTOLOGIA, 2015, Volume 80, Number 2, Page 237
[9]
Petr Vít, Barbora Šingliarová, Judita Zozomová-Lihová, Karol Marhold, and Karol Krak
Applications in Plant Sciences, 2015, Volume 3, Number 8, Page 1500048
[10]
Mariana de Andrade Wagner, Benoît Francis Patrice Loeuille, Carolina Moriani Siniscalchi, Gladys Flávia Melo-de-Pinna, and José Rubens Pirani
Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2014, Volume 300, Number 5, Page 1219
[11]
Selami Selvi, Mehmet Yavuz Paksoy, Rıdvan Polat, and Ugur Cakilcioglu
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2014, Volume 84, Number 2, Page 431
[12]
A.-K. Aschenbrenner, S. Horakh, and O. Spring
AoB Plants, 2013, Volume 5, Number 0, Page plt028
[14]
Samir Ait Said, Catherine Fernandez, Stéphane Greff, Arezki Derridj, Thierry Gauquelin, and Jean-Philippe Mevy
Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 2011, Volume 206, Number 4, Page 397
[15]
Tao DENG, Ying MENG, Hang SUN, and Ze-Long NIE
Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2011, Volume 49, Number 4, Page 339

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in