Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter May 9, 2009

Estimating hydraulic conductivity of a sandy soil under different plant covers using minidisk infiltrometer and a dye tracer experiment

  • Marián Homolák EMAIL logo , Jozef Capuliak , Viliam Pichler and Ľubomír Lichner
From the journal Biologia

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of sandy soil under different plant cover at the locality Mláky II at Sekule (southwest Slovakia). Two sites were demarcated at the locality, with mainly moss species at glade site, and pine forest at forest site. The estimation of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity was conducted by (a) minidisk infiltrometer and (b) the analysis of a dye tracer total resident concentration. The latter approach assumed the applicability of the stochastic—convective flow theory in the sandy soil. In the dye tracer experiment, two plots (1 × 1 m each) were established in both sites, and 100 mm of dye tracer (Brilliant Blue FCF) solution was applied on the soil surface. Similar results were obtained in both plots, with more than 70 % area of horizons stained in the depth of 30–50 cm. In some cases, the predicted and measured hydraulic conductivity were found within an order of magnitude, thus revealing similar impact of different plant cover on hydraulic properties of sandy soil studied. In contrast to sandy soils used for agriculture, the influence of the plant/surface humus and topsoil interface extended in the form of a highly heterogeneous matrix flow to the depth of 50–60 cm, where it was dampened by horizontal layering.

[1] Ankeny M.D., Ahmed M., Kaspar T.C. & Horton R. 1991. Simple field method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55: 467–469. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500020028x10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500020028xSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Ciani A., Goss K.U. & Schwarzenbach R.P. 2005. Light penetration in soil and particulate minerals. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 56: 561–574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00688.x10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00688.xSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Decagon 2005. Minidisk Infiltrometer User’s Manual. Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, USA, 22 pp. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dohnal M., Dušek J., Vogel T., Císlerová M., Lichner Ľ. & Štekauerová V. 2009. Ponded infiltration into soil with biopores — field experiment and modeling. Biologia 64: 580–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0078-710.2478/s11756-009-0078-7Search in Google Scholar

[5] Ellsworth T.R., Shouse P.J., Skaggs T.H., Jobes J.A. & Fargerlund J. 1996. Solute transport in unsaturated soil: Experimental design, parameter estimation, and model discrimination. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60: 397–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000020010x10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000020010xSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Flury M., Flühler H., Jury W.A. & Leuenberger J. 2000. Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: A field study. Water Resour. Res. 30: 1945–1954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94WR0087110.1029/94WR00871Search in Google Scholar

[7] Forrer I., Papritz A., Kasteel R., Flühler H. & Luca D. 2000. Quantifying dye tracer in soil profiles by image processing. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51: 313–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00315.x10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00315.xSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Ghodrati M. & Jury W.A. 1990. A field study using dyes to characterize preferential flow of water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54: 1558–1563. 10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060008xSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Homolák M. 2008. The measurement of transport properties of forest soil as a base for planning of forest’s amelioration. PhD Thesis. Technical University Zvolen, 96 pp. (In Slovak) Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jury W.A. & Roth K. 1990. Transfer functions and solute transport through soil: Theory and applications. Birkhaeuser Verlag, Basel, 226 pp. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Jury W.A. & Scotter D.R. 1994. A unified approach to stochastic-convective transport problems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 1327–1336. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050007x10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050007xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Kalivodová E., Kubíček F., Bedrna Z., Kalivoda H., Gavlas V., Kollár J., Gajdoš P. & Štepanovičová O. 2002. Sand dunes of Slovakia. Luka-Press, Bratislava, 60 pp. (In Slovak) Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kutilek M. & Nielsen D.R. 1994. Soil Hydrology. Catena, Cremlingen-Destedt, 370 pp. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Lichner Ľ., Nižnanská Z., Faško P., Šír M. & Tesař, M. 2005. The impact of plant cover and weather on soil-hydrological parameters of a water repellent soil at the locality Mláky II at Sekule. Acta Hydrologica Slovaca 6: 321–329. (In Slovak) Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lichner Ľ., Hallett P.D., Feeney D., Ďugová O., Šír M. & Tesař M. 2007a. Field measurement of the impact of hydrophobicity on soil water transport under different vegetation over time. Biologia 62: 537–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11756-007-0106-410.2478/s11756-007-0106-4Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lichner Ľ., Orfánus T., Nováková K., & Šír M. & Tesař M. 2007b. The impact of vegetation on hydraulic conductivity of sandy soil. Soil Water Res. 2: 59–66. 10.17221/2115-SWRSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Marhold K. & Hindák F. 1998. Checklist of non-vascular and vascular plants of Slovakia. Veda, Bratislava, 687 pp. (In Slovak) Search in Google Scholar

[18] Poletika N.N. & Jury W.A. 1994. Effects of soil surface management on water flow distribution and solute dispersion. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 999–1006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800040001x10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800040001xSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Soil Survey Division Staff 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18, 437 pp. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Toride N. & Leij F.J. 1996. Convective-dispersive stream tube model for field-scale solute transport: II. Examples and calibration. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60: 352–361. 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000020005xSearch in Google Scholar

[21] Weiler M. & Naef F. 2003: An experimental tracer study of the role of macropores in infiltration in grassland soil. Hydrol. Processes 17: 477–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.113610.1002/hyp.1136Search in Google Scholar

[22] WRB 1994: World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Wageningen/Rome, 161 pp. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhang R. 1997. Determination of soil sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity from the disk infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61: 1024–1030. 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040005xSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2009-5-9
Published in Print: 2009-6-1

© 2009 Slovak Academy of Sciences

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11756-009-0088-5/html
Scroll to top button