Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.759
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.803

CiteScore 2017: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.299
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.544

Online
ISSN
1336-9563
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 64, Issue 5

Issues

How many heteropteran species can live on alien goldenrods Solidago canadensis and S. gigantea in Europe?

Magdaléna Roháčová / Pavel Drozd
  • Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, CZ-71000, Ostrava, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2009-09-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0151-2

Abstract

During the vegetation periods of 2001–2003 Heteroptera associated with the invasive alien tall goldenrods Solidago canadensis and S. gigantea were studied in seven model habitats in the north-eastern part of the Czech Republic. Heteropterans associated with adjacent growths were also studied in 2002–2003. A set of 3,042 specimens of 127 samples was analyzed with the aim of estimating average species richness, abundance and trophic structure of the heteropteran assemblages of the studied plant stand. On alien Solidago, 68 heteropteran species were recorded and 71 species were collected in the stands adjacent to the tall goldenrods with 48 shared species. Despite the nearly indentical species richness and similar abundances in Solidago and adjacent stands, there are differences in the trophic structure. The majority of the shared species and species found on Solidago canadensis only are polyphagous contrary to the majority of stenophagous species found on Solidago free stands only. Only a small proportion of heteropteran species that were recorded on alien Solidago stands are specialized to Asteraceae and their abundance was mostly low. Only the lygaeid Nysius senecionis, an Asteraceae specialist, occured in masses on S. canadensis in sunny and warm habitats. Similarly, predatory Orius minutus and O. niger reached high abundance values in Solidago stands compared to adjacent stands.

Keywords: Heteroptera; assemblage; plant-insect association; habitat; tall goldenrod; Czech Republic

  • [1] Aglyamzyanov R. 2006. Revision der paläarktischen Arten der Gattung Lygus Hahn (Heteroptera). Dissertation Thesis. Johannes Guttenberg-Universität, Mainz, 70 pp. Google Scholar

  • [2] Agrawal A.A., Kotanen P.M., Mitchell C.E., Power A.G., Godsoe W. & Klironomos J. 2005. Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies. Ecology 86: 2979–2989. DOI 10.1890/05-0219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/05-0219CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Altug I.G., Bouwmeester H.J. & König W.A. 2004. Isolation and functional expression of cDNAs encoding sesquiterpene synthases, including the enantiomeric (+)− and (−)-Germacrene D-Synthases from Solidago canadensis L. Proceedings (poster or lecture-abstract) of the annual fall meeting, German Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (GBM), Münster (Westfalen), Germany, September 19–22, 2004. http://www.gbm-online.de (accessed 12.02.2009). Google Scholar

  • [4] Aukema B. & Rieger C. (eds) 1995. Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. Vol. 1. Enicocephalomorpha, Dipsocoromorpha, Nepomorpha, Gerromorpha and Leptopodomorpha. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam, 222 pp. Google Scholar

  • [5] Aukema B. & Rieger C. (eds) 1996. Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. Vol. 2. Cimicomorpha I. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam, 361 pp. Google Scholar

  • [6] Aukema B. & Rieger C. (eds) 1999. Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. Vol. 3. Cimicomorpha II. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam, 577 pp. Google Scholar

  • [7] Aukema B. & Rieger C. (eds) 2001. Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. Vol. 4. Pentatomomorpha I. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam, xiv + 346 pp. Google Scholar

  • [8] Aukema B. & Rieger C. (eds) 2006. Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. Vol. 5. Pentatomomorpha II. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Wageningen, xiii + 550 pp. Google Scholar

  • [9] Baniameri V., Soleyman-Nejadian E. & Mohaghegh J. 2006. The predatory bug Orius niger: its biology and potential for controlling Thrips tabaci in Iran. Integrated Control in Protected Crops, Mediterranean Climate IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 29: 207–210. Google Scholar

  • [10] Berenbaum M.R. 1981. Patterns of furanocoumarin distribution and insect herbivory in the Umbelliferae: Plant chemistry and community structure. Ecology 62: 1254–1266. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1937290CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Blossey B. & Nötzold R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive non-indigenous plants — a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83: 887–889. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2261425CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Boháč P. & Kolár J. 1996. Vyšší geomorfologické jednotky České republiky. Český úrad zeměmeřičský a katastrální, Praha, 54 pp. + map. Google Scholar

  • [13] Bopp M. 1997. Die amerikanische Goldruten Solidago canadensis L. und S. gigantea Ait. als Neophyten in Mitteleuropa: Besiedlung durch Insekten. Gött. Naturk. Schr. 4: 181–206. Google Scholar

  • [14] Brändle M., Kühn I., Klotz S., Bell C. & Brandl, R. 2008. Species richness of herbivores on exotic host plants increases with time introduction of the host. Divers. Distrib. 14: 905–912 DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00511.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00511.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Colwell R.K. & Coddington J.A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 345: 101–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0091CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Cooper-Driver G.A. & Le Quesne P.W. 1987. Diterpenoids as insect antifeedants and growth inhibitors: role in Solidago species, pp. 534–550. In: Waller G.R. (ed.), Allelochemicals: Role in agriculture and forestry, 190th Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Chicago, II., 9/8-13/85, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-1987-0330.ch048CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Cuda J.P., Dunford J.C. & Leavengood J.M.Jr. 2007. Invertebrate fauna associated with torpedograss, Paniceum repens (Cyperales: Poaceae), in Lake Okeechobee, Florida, and prospects for biological control. Fla. Entomol. 90: 238–248. DOI 10.1653/0015-4040(2007)90[238:IFAWTP]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2007)90[238:IFAWTP]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Čapek M. 1971. The posibility of biological control of imported weeds of the genus Solidago L. in Europe. Acta Inst. For. Zvolen 1971: 429–441. Google Scholar

  • [19] Fathi S.A.A. & Nouri-Ganbalani G. 2009. Prey preference of Orius niger (Wolf) and O. minutus (L.) from Thrips tabaci (Lind.) and Tetranychus urticae (Koch). J. Entomol. 6: 42–48. DOI 10.3923/je.2009.42.48 http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/je.2009.42.48Google Scholar

  • [20] Flemion F., Ledbetter J.C. & Kelly E.S. 1954. Penetration and damage of plant tissue during feeding by the tarnished plant bug. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 17: 347–357. Google Scholar

  • [21] Frenzl M. & Brandl R. 2003. Diversity and abundance patterns of phytophagous insect communities on alien and native host plants in the Brassicaceae. Ecography 26: 723–730. DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03649.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03649.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Fontes E.M.G., Habeck D.H. & Slansky F.Jr. 1994. Phytophagous insects associated with goldenrods (Solidago spp.) in Gainesville, Florida. Fla. Entomol. Online 77: 209–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3495506CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Gotelli N.J. & Colwell R.K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Groot de M., Kleijn D. & Jogan N. 2007. Species groups occupying different trophic levels respond differently to the invasion of seminatural vegetation by Solidago canadensis. Biol. Conserv. 136: 612–617. DOI 10.1016/j.biocom.2007.01.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.005CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Güsewell S., Jakobs G. & Weber E. 2006. Native and introduced populations of Solidago gigantea differ in shoot production but not in leaf traits or litter decomposition. Funct. Ecol. 20: 575–584. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01141.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01141.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Hansen S.O., Hattendorf J., Wittenberg R., Reznik S.Y., Nielsen C., Ravn H.P. & Nentwig W. 2006. Phytophagous insects of giant hogweed Heracleum mantegazzianum (Apiaceae) in invaded areas in Europe and its native area of Caucasus. Eur. J. Entomol. 103: 387–395. Google Scholar

  • [27] Holopainen J.K. & Varis A.L. 1991. Host plants of the European tarnished plant bug Lygus rugulipennis Poppius (Het., Miridae). Z. Angew. Zool. 111: 484–498. Google Scholar

  • [28] Hull-Sanders H.M., Clare R., Johnson R. & Meyer G.M. 2007. Evaluation of the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA) hypothesis: loss of defence against generalist but not specialist herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 33: 781–799. DOI 10.1007/s10886-007-9252-y http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9252-yCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Jakobs G., Weber E. & Edwards P.J. 2004. Introduced plants of the invasive Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae) are larger and grow denser than their conspecifics in the native range. Divers. Distrib. 10: 11–19. DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00052.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00052.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Jobin A., Schaffner U. & Nentwig W. 1996. The structure of the phytophagous insect fauna on the introduced weed Solidago altissima in Switzerland. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 79: 33–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00333819CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Johnson R.H., Hull-Sanders H.M. & Meyer G.M. 2007. Comparison of foliar terpenes between native and invasive Solidago gigantea. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 35: 821–830. DOI 10.1016/j.bse.2007.06.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2007.06.005CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Jones C.G. & Colemann J.S. 1991. Plant stress and insect herbivory: towards an integrated perspective, pp. 249–279. In: Mooney H.A., Winner W.E. & Pell E. (eds), Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses, Academic Press, San Diego. Google Scholar

  • [33] Jones C.G. & Lawton J.H. 1991. Plant chemistry and insect species richness of British umbellifers. J. Anim. Ecol. 60: 767–777. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/5413CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Joshi J. & Vrieling K. 2005. The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecol. Lett. 8: 704–714. DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00769.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00769.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Kabuce N. 2006. NOBANIS — Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet — Solidago canadensis. From: Online Database of the Nort European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien species — NOBANIS. http://www.nobanis.org (accessed 11.02.2009). Google Scholar

  • [36] Kalemba D. 2000. Skłladniki i włlaściwości biologiczne olejków eterycznych z roślin z rodzajów Solidago i Artemisia. Zesz. Nauk. 857, Rozpr. Nauk. 281, Politechnika Łódzka, 118 pp. Google Scholar

  • [37] Kalemba D., Góra J. & Kurowska A. 1990. Analysis of the essential oil of Solidago canadensis. Planta Med. 56(1): 222–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-960930CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Kalemba D., Góra J., Kurowska A.S., Lis A. & Lasocka I. 1993. Polyphenolic compounds in four Solidago species. Acta Pol. Pharm. Drug Res. 50: 441–442. Google Scholar

  • [39] Keane R.M. & Crawley M.J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy-release hypotheis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 164–170. DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Kowarik I. 2003. Biologische Invasionen: Neophyten und Neozen in Mitteleuropa. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 380 pp. Google Scholar

  • [41] Lambdon P.W., Pyšek P., Basnou C., Hejda M., Arianoutsou M., Esek F., Janošík V., Pergl J., Winter M., Anastasii P., Andriopoulos P., Bazos I., Brundu G., Celesti-Grapow L., Chassot P., Delipetrou P., Joseffsson M., Kark S., Klotz S., Kokkoris Y., Kühn I., Barchante H., Perglová I., Pino J., Vilø M., Zikos A., Roy D. & Hulme P.E. (2008) Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80: 101–149. Google Scholar

  • [42] Lis J.A. 1989. Płluskwiaki różnoskrzydłle (Insecta: Heteroptera) wyżyny Sląskiej. Rocz. Muz. Górnosląs. Bytom — Przyroda 12: 5–60. Google Scholar

  • [43] Maddox G.D. & Root R.R. 1987. Resistance to 16 diverse species of herbivorous insects within a population of goldenrod, Solidago altissima: genetic variation and heritability. Oecologia (Berlin) 72: 8–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00385037CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [44] Maddox G.D. & Root R.B. 1990. Structure of the encounter between goldenrod (Solidago altissima) and its diverse insect fauna. Ecology 71: 2115–2124. DOI 10.2307/1938625 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1938625CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45] McCrindle R. & Nakamura E. 1974. Constituents of Solidago species. Part VI. The constitution of diterpenoids from a chemically distinct variety of Solidago serotina. Can. J. Chem. 52: 2029–2036. DOI 10.1139/v74-293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/v74-293CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [46] Melville M. & Morton J. 1982. A biosystematic study of the Solidago canadensis (Compositae) complex. I. The Ontario populations. Can. J. Bot. 60: 976–997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b82-123CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [47] Messina F. 1978. Mirid fauna associated with old-field goldenrods (Solidago: Compositae) in Ithaca, J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 86(3): 137–143. Google Scholar

  • [48] Messina F.J. & Root R.B. 1980. Association between leaf beetles and meadow goldenrod (Solidago spp.) in Central New York. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73: 641–646. Google Scholar

  • [49] Meyer A.G. & Hull-Sanders H.M. 2008. Altered patterns of growth, physiology and reproduction of invasive genotypes of Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae). Biol. Invasions 10: 303–317. DOI 10.1007/s10530-007-9131-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9131-zCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [50] Miura K., Kida H., Imai K., Lyon S., Reardon R. & Fujisaki K. 2008. Herbivorous insect fauna of mile-a-minute weed, Persicaria perfoliata (Polygonaceae), in Japan. Fla. Entomol. 91: 319–323. DOI 10.1653/0015-4040(2008)91[319:HIFOMW]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2008)91[319:HIFOMW]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [51] Müller-Schärer H., Schaffner U. & Steiner T. 2004. Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 417–422 DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2004.05.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.05.010CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [52] Pučkov V.G. 1962. Fauna Ukraini. Tom 21. Krajoviki. Vyp. 2. Vidavnictvo Akademii Nauk Ukrainskoi RSR, Kiiv, 157 pp. Google Scholar

  • [53] Pyšek P., Richardson D.M., Rejmánek M., Webster G.L., Williamson M. & Kischner J. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and flora: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53: 131–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4135498CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [54] Pyšek P., Sádlo J. & Mandák B. 2002. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74: 97–186. Google Scholar

  • [55] Rabitsch W. 2004. Wanzen (Insecta, Heteroptera) im Botanischen Garten der Universität Wien, pp. 83–108. In: Pernstich A. & Krenn H.W. (eds), Die Tierwelt des Botanischen Gartens der Universität Wien. Eigenverlag Institut für Angewandte Biologie und Umweltbildung, Wien. Google Scholar

  • [56] Reid D.G., Loan C.C. & Harmsen R. 1976. The mirid (Hemiptera) fauna of Solidago canadensis (Asteracea) in south-eastern Ontario. Can. Entomol. 108: 561–567. http://dx.doi.org/10.4039/Ent108561-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [57] Remane R. 1955. Lygus (Exolygus) wagneri nov. spec., eine weitere europäische Exolygus-Art. Zool. Anz. 155: 115–119. Google Scholar

  • [58] Roháčová M. 2008. Structure and seasonal dynamics of the true bug assemblages (Heteroptera) on alien goldenrods Solidago spp. Čas. Slez. Muz. Opava (A) 57: 97–116. Google Scholar

  • [59] Root R.B. 1996. Herbivore pressure on goldenrods (Solidago altissima): its variation and cumulative effects. Ecology 77: 1074–1087. DOI 10.2307/2265577 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2265577CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [60] Root R.B. & Cappuccino N. 1992. Pattern in population change and the organization of the insect community associated with goldenrod. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 393–420. DOI 10.2307/2937117 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2937117CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [61] Sheppard A.W., Shaw R.H. & Sforza Z. 2006. Top 20 environmental weeds for classical biological control in Europe: a review of opportunities, regulations, and other barriers to adaptation. Weed Res. 46: 93–117. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00497.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00497.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [62] Sholes O.D.V. 1984. Responses of arthropods to the development of goldenrod inflorescences (Solidago: Asteraceae). Am. Midl. Nat. 112: 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2425450CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [63] Shure D.J. 1973. Radionuclide tracer analysis of trophic relationships in an old field ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 43: 1–19. DOI 10.2307/1942156 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942156CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [64] Siemann E., Rogers W.E. & Dewalt S.J. 2006. Rapid adaptation of insect herbivores to an invasive plant. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 273: 2763–2769. DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3644CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [65] Strong D.R. 1974. Rapid asymptotic species accumulation in phytophagous insect communities. Science 185: 1064–1066. DOI 10.1126/science.185.4156.1064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4156.1064CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [66] Strong D., Lawton J.H. & Southwood S.R. 1984. Insects on Plants. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 293 pp. Google Scholar

  • [67] Sullivan J.J., Winks C.J. & Fowler S.V. 2008. Novel host associations and habitats for Senecio-specialist herbivorous insects in Auckland. N. Z. J. Ecol. 32: 219–224. Google Scholar

  • [68] Tahvanainen J. & Niemelä P. 1987. Biogeographical and evolutionary aspects of insect herbivory. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 24: 239–247. Google Scholar

  • [69] Viskens G., Aukema B., Churot F., Dethier M., Baugnée J.Y., Konstant J., De Bruyn L., Bruers J. & Janssens F. 2004. Checklist of the Heteroptera: Atlas Miridae Belgica, iteratio 9. http://users.pandora.be/gabyviskens/publicat/belgium/miridae/atlas.htm (accessed 11.02.009). Google Scholar

  • [70] Vitoušek P.M., D’Antonio C.M., Loope L.L., Rejmánek M. & Westbrooks R. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N. Z. J. Ecol. 21: 1–16. Google Scholar

  • [71] Wagenitz G. 1979. Solidago L., pp. 16–29. In: Hegi G. (ed.), Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Carl Hanser Verlag, München. Google Scholar

  • [72] Wagner E. 1966. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands. 54 Teil. Pentatomorpha. Gustav Fischer VEB, Jena, 235 pp. Google Scholar

  • [73] Weber E. & Jakobs G. 2005. Biological flora of central Europe: Solidago gigantea Aiton. Flora 200: 109–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [74] Weber E. & Schmid B. 1998. Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1110–1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2446344CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [75] Wittenberg R. (ed.) 2005. An inventory of alien species and their threat to biodiversity and economy in Switzerland. CABI Bioscience Switzerland centre report to the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forest and Landscape SAEFL, 415 pp. Google Scholar

  • [76] Young O.P. & Lockley T.C. 1990. Autumnal populations of Arthropods on Aster and goldenrod in the delta of Mississippi. J. Entomol. Sci. 25(1): 185–195. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2009-09-10

Published in Print: 2009-10-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 981–993, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0151-2.

Export Citation

© 2009 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Yuzu Sakata, Timothy P. Craig, Joanne K. Itami, Michimasa Yamasaki, and Takayuki Ohgushi
Ecology, 2017
[2]
J. Kašák, M. Mazalová, J. Šipoš, and T. Kuras
Biodiversity and Conservation, 2015, Volume 24, Number 10, Page 2399
[3]
Yiqing Yao, Hongmei Sheng, Yang Luo, Mulan He, Xiangkai Li, Hua Zhang, Wenliang He, and Lizhe An
Energy, 2014, Volume 78, Page 122
[4]
Françoise Immel, Jenny Renaut, and Jean-François Masfaraud
Journal of Proteomics, 2012, Volume 75, Number 4, Page 1129

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in