Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia




More options …
Volume 65, Issue 6

Issues

Pupilla pratensis (Gastropoda: Pupillidae) in the Czech Republic and Slovakia and its distinction from P. muscorum and P. alpicola based on multidimensional analysis of shell measurements

Michal Horsák / Jana Škodová / Jan Myšák / Tomáš Čejka / Vojen Ložek / Jaroslav Hlaváč
  • Institute of Geology AS CR, Laboratory of Environmental Geology, Department of Zoology, National Museum in Prague, Václavské náměstí 68, CZ-11579, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2010-10-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-010-0117-4

Abstract

Pupilla pratensis (Clessin, 1871) was recently confirmed as a distinct species based on morphological, ecological and molecular evidence. The main purpose of this study is to publish the first reliable data on the occurrence of P. pratensis in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The second goal is to analyse conchometry of P. pratensis, P. muscorum (L., 1758), and P. alpicola (Charpentier, 1837) to find out whether it is possible to reliably distinguish these species solely based on shell measurements. For multidimensional analysis of shell measurement variation we used principal components analysis (PCA). We documented six populations of P. pratensis in the Czech Republic and one in SW Slovakia. The revision of voucher material showed that all previously reported records of P. alpicola from the Czech Republic belonged in fact to P. pratensis. This requires the exclusion of P. alpicola from the list of Czech molluscs. Based on multidimensional analysis of shell measurements it was possible to distinguish P. pratensis from P. muscorum with no overlapping specimens. Pupilla alpicola was almost completely different from P. muscorum with only few overlapping specimens, contrary to P. pratensis which was mostly impossible to distinguish from P. alpicola based on analysed shell measurements. Shell width was the best single shell measurement for distinguishing P. pratensis and P. muscorum. Shell measurements of two Swedish populations of P. pratensis did not differ from shell variation of Czech and Slovak populations. However, Scandinavian populations displayed some differences from central European populations in apertural barriers which are discussed in detail. Czech and Slovak populations of P. pratensis occurred in calcium-rich fen meadows which perfectly matches with site characteristics reported from Scandinavia. We assume that the observed morphometric differences between P. pratensis and P. muscorum can be useful for distinguishing the species also outside the Czech territory and for palaeoecological studies where only empty shells are available. Since these species occupy ecologically different habitats their reliable identification in fossil material can improve the reconstructions of past environments.

Keywords: conchometry; taxonomy; autecology; shell variation; identification characters; distribution

  • [1] Beran L., Juřičková L. & Horsák M. 2005. —Mollusca (měkkýši), pp. 69–74. In: Farkač J., Král D. & Škorpík M. (eds), Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České republiky. Bezobratlí [Red list of threatened species in the Czech Republic. Invertebrates], Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha. Google Scholar

  • [2] Brabenec J. 1970. Měkkýši státní přírodní rezervace Dubno. (Molluskenfauna des Naturschutzgebietes Dubno). Práce Stud. Přírodověd. 2: 81–88. Google Scholar

  • [3] Clessin S. 1871. Die Mollusken-Fauna der Umgegend von Augsburg. Ber. Naturhist. Ver. Augsburg 21: 81–126. Google Scholar

  • [4] Clessin S. 1887–1890. Die Molluskenfauna Mitteleuropa’s. II. Theil. DieMolluskenfauna Österreich-Ungarns und der Schweiz. Bauer & Raspe, Nürnberg, 858 pp. Google Scholar

  • [5] Ehrendorfer F. & Hamann U. 1965. Vorschläge zu einer floristischen Kartierung von Mitteleuropa. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Gesell. 78: 35–50. Google Scholar

  • [6] Horsák M. 2003. How to sample mollusc communities in mires easily. Malacol. Bohemoslov. 2: 11–14. Google Scholar

  • [7] Horsák M. 2005. Molluscs, pp. 197–208. In: Poulíčková A., Hájek M. & Rybníček K.. (eds), Ecology and Palaeoecology of Spring Fens in the Western Part of the Carpathians, Palacky University, Olomouc. Google Scholar

  • [8] Jueg U. 1997. Pupilla muscorum (Linnaeus, 1758) im NSG ‘Klädener Plage’ (Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Landkreis Parchim): ein Beitrag zur Ökologie, Gehäusemorphologie und Systematik der Art (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae). Malakol. Abh. 18: 277–285. Google Scholar

  • [9] Juřičkovák M. & Beran L. 2001. Check-list of the molluscs (Mollusca) of the Czech Republic. Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 65: 25–40. Google Scholar

  • [10] Juřičková L., Horsák M., Beran L. & Dvořák L. 2008. Check-list of the molluscs (Mollusca) of the Czech Republic. Available from http://mollusca.sav.sk/malacology/checklist.htm (accessed 3 Nov. 2009). Google Scholar

  • [11] Kerney M.P., Cameron R.A.D. & Jungbluth J.H. 1983. Die Landschnecken Nord- und Mitteleuropas. Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin, 384 pp. Google Scholar

  • [12] Ložek V. 1956. Klíč československých měkkýšů [The Key of Czechoslovakian Molluscs]. Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied, Bratislava, 435 pp. Google Scholar

  • [13] Ložek V. 1982. Z červenšich měkkýšů — zrnovka Pupilla alpicola [From the Czech Republic’s Red Book of Molluscs — Pupilla alpicola]. Živa 30: 145. Google Scholar

  • [14] Ložek V. 1992. Měkkýši (Mollusca), pp. 22–39. In: Škapec L. (ed.), Červená kniha ohrožených a vzácných rostlin a živočichů ČSFR. 3. Bezobratlí [Red Book of threatened and rare plants and animals of Czechoslovakia. 3. Invertebrates], Príroda, Bratislava. Google Scholar

  • [15] Rafajová A. 2002. Měkkýší fauna Dlouhé meze v CHKO Železné hory [Molluscs of the Dlouhá mez in the Protected Landscape Area Železné hory Mts (East Bohemia, Czech Republic)]. Východočes. Sb. Přírodověd. Práce a Studie 10: 273–283. Google Scholar

  • [16] Sádlo J. 2000. Původ travinné vegetace slatin v Čechách: sukcese kontra cenogeneze [The origin of grassland vegetation of fen peats in the Czech Republic: succession versus coenogenesis]. Preslia 72: 495–506. Google Scholar

  • [17] ter Braak C.J.F. & Šmilauer P. 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, 500 pp. Google Scholar

  • [18] von Proschwitz T., Schander C., Jueg U. & Thorkildsen S. 2009. Morphology, ecology and DNA-barcoding distinguish Pupilla pratensis (Clessin, 1871) from Pupilla muscorum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pulmonata: Pupillidae). J. Mollusc. Stud. 75: 315–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyp038CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2010-10-15

Published in Print: 2010-12-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 1012–1018, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-010-0117-4.

Export Citation

© 2010 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Michael Duda, Luise Kruckenhauser, Helmut Sattmann, Josef Harl, Katharina Jaksch, and Elisabeth Haring
Journal of Molluscan Studies, 2014, Volume 80, Number 4, Page 371
[3]
Michal Horsák, Veronika Schenková, and Jan Myšák
Folia Malacologica, 2012, Volume 20, Number 1, Page 21
[4]
Veronika Schenková, Michal HorsáK, Zuzana Plesková, and Paweł Pawlikowski
Journal of Molluscan Studies, 2012, Volume 78, Number 1, Page 105

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in