Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia




More options …
Volume 65, Issue 6

Issues

Somatic characteristics and reproduction of common vole, Microtus arvalis (Microtus arvalis

Ivan Baláž
  • Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, SK-94974, Nitra, Slovakia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2010-10-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-010-0122-7

Abstract

Reproduction potential and biometry of somatic characteristics of the common vole Microtus arvalis were evaluated and discussed. The results were processed on the basis of an extensive material (2,171 individuals) from the whole territory of Slovakia (315 sites situated at altitudes from 100 to 1500 m above sea level). Among the somatic characteristics studied, the highest variability was found in body length and the smallest in hind foot length. Highly significant differences were also found between the foot length of adult males and females. Populations of M. arvalis at low altitudes were less numerous than at higher altitudes. Altitudinal differences in average embryo numbers in female uteri as well as differences in follicle length in males during the reproductive season were also observed.

Keywords: Microtus arvalis; common vole; somatometry; reproduction; altitude; Slovakia

  • [1] Adamczewska-Andrejewska K.A. 1981. Population structures of Microtus arvalis (Pall.) against the background of a community of rodents in crop fields. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 7: 193–211. Google Scholar

  • [2] Adamczewska-Andrejewska K.A. & Nabaglo L. 1977. Demographic parameters and variations in numbers of the common vole. Acta Theriol. 22: 431–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Baláž I. 2010. The influence of the altitude on somatic characterics size of common vole (Microtus arvalis) in Slovakia. Ekológia (Bratislava) 29: 174–181. DOI: 10.4149/ekol_2010_02_174 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Birney E.C., Grant W.E. & Baird D.D. 1976. Importance of vegetative cover to cycles of Microtus populations. Ecology 57: 1043–1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1941069CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Briner T., Favre N., Nentwig W. & Airoldi J.P. 2007. Population dynamics of Microtus arvalis in a weed strip. Mammal. Biol. 72: 106–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2006.07.006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2006.07.006CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Butet A. 1996. Does food quality drive cycle in Microtus arvalis? Study on a french atlantic marsh population, pp. 177–188. In: Ecology & Behaviour, Proceedings of the European Congress of Mammalogy, Museu Bocage, Lisboa. Google Scholar

  • [7] Cruz R., Santos S., Mira A., Monteiro A., Queiros F. & Mathias M.L. 2002. First record of the common vole Microtus arvalis (Pallas 1778) for Portugal. Mammalia 64: 606–609. Google Scholar

  • [8] Devevey G., Niculita-Hirzel H., Biollaz F., Yvon C., Chapuisat M. & Christe P. 2008. Developmental, metabolic and immunological costs of flea infestation in the common vole. Funct. Ecol. 22: 1091–1098. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01493.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01493.xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Flousek J. 1990. Hraboš polní (Microtus arvalis) v subalpínském stupni Krkonoš. Opera Corcontica 27: 149–156. Google Scholar

  • [10] Gliwicz J. 1983. Age structure, pp. 111–117. In: Petrusewicz K. (ed.), Ecology of the Bank Vole, Acta Theriol. 28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Jánová E., Heroldová M. & Bryja J. 2008. Conspicuous demographic and individual changes in a population of the common vole in a set-aside alfalfa field. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 45: 39–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Koshkina T.V. 1966. O periodicheskikh izmeneniyach chislennosti polevok (na primere Kolskogo poluostrova). Bjul. Mosk. Obshch. Izpyt. Prir. Biol. 71(3): 14–25. Google Scholar

  • [13] Kratochvíl J. 1959. Hraboš polní Microtus arvalis. Nakladatelství Československě akademie věd, Praha, 357 pp. Google Scholar

  • [14] Kratochvíl J. & Pelikán J. 1955. Zur Verbreitung der Feldmaus im Nationalpark der Hohen Tatra. Folia Zool. Entomol. 4: 303–312. Google Scholar

  • [15] Ligač S. 1975. Kvantitatívne zmeny v populáciách niektorých druhov drobných cicavcov Tríča. Lynx (Praha), n. s. 16: 31–36. Google Scholar

  • [16] Mitchell-Jones A.J., Amori G., Bogdanowicz W., Kryštufek B., Reijnders P.J.H., Spitzenberger F., Stubbe M., Thissen J.B.M., Vohralík V. & Zima J. 1999. Atlas of European Mammals. The Academic Press, London, 495 pp. Google Scholar

  • [17] Mošanský A. 1957. Príspevok k poznaniu rozšírenia a taxonometrie niektorých druhov drobných cicavcov na východnom Slovensku. Zborník Slovenského národného múzea, Prírodné vedy 3(5): 1–42. Google Scholar

  • [18] Nabaglo L. 1981. Demographic processes in a confined population of the common vole. Acta Theriol. 26: 163–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Niethammer J. & Krapp F. 1982. Microtus arvalis (Pallas 1779) — Feldmaus, pp. 282–318. In: Niethammer J. & Krapp F. (eds), Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas, Band 2/I Rodentia II, Akademische Verlagsgessellschaft, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar

  • [20] Oli K.O. 1999. The chitty effect: A consequence of dynamic energy allocation in a fluctuating environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 56: 293–300. DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1999.1427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.1999.1427CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Pelikán J. 1955. O stavu některých drobných ssavců ve Vysokých Tatrách na jaře 1955. Zool. Entomol. Listy 4(4): 295–302. Google Scholar

  • [22] Pelikán J. 1966. Srovnání plodnosti čtyř druhů myšic rodu Apodemus. Zool. Listy 15(2): 125–130. Google Scholar

  • [23] Pelikán J. 1982. Microtus arvalis on mown and unmown meadow. Československá akadémia věd, Praha, 36 pp. Google Scholar

  • [24] Reichstein H. 1964. Untersuchungen zum Körperwachstum und zum Reproductionspotential der Feldmaus, Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1779). Z. Wiss. Zool. 170: 112–222. Google Scholar

  • [25] Smith M.H. & McGinnis J.T. 1968. Relationships of latitude, altitude, and body size to litter size and mean annual production of offspring in Peromyscus. Res. Popul. Ecol. 10: 115–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02510868CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Stein G.H.W. 1953. ber das Zahlenverhältnis der Geschlechter bei der Feldmaus, Microtus arvalis. Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 82: 137–156. Google Scholar

  • [27] Uhlíková J. 2004. The common vole, Microtus arvalis (Mammalia: Rodentia) in subalpine and alpine habitats of the Krkonoše Mts (Czech Republic). Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 68: 281–286. Google Scholar

  • [28] Weihe W.H. 1965. Influence of altitude and cold on pregnancy and lactation of rats fed on two different diets. Int. J. Biometeor. 9(1): 43–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02187308CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Zejda J., Zapletal M., Heroldová M. & Tkadlec E. 2004. Analýza časně jarního vzorku populace hraboša polního (Microtus arvalis). Lynx (Praha), n.s. 35: 247–252. Google Scholar

  • [30] Yoccoz N.G. & Mesnager S. 1998. Are alpine bank voles larger and more sexually dimorphic because adults survive better? Oikos 82: 85–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546919CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2010-10-15

Published in Print: 2010-12-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 1064–1071, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-010-0122-7.

Export Citation

© 2010 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Tomáš Veselovský, Kristián Bacsa, and Filip Tulis
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2017, Volume 65, Number 1, Page 225
[3]
Andrea C. Schuster, Antje Herde, Camila J. Mazzoni, Jana A. Eccard, and Simone Sommer
Immunogenetics, 2016, Volume 68, Number 6-7, Page 429
[4]
Filip Tulis, Imrich Jakab, Roman Slobodník, and Michal Hudec
Ekológia (Bratislava), 2015, Volume 34, Number 2
[6]
Adrien Pinot, Bertrand Gauffre, and Vincent Bretagnolle
BMC Ecology, 2014, Volume 14, Number 1, Page 17
[7]
Benjamin F. Blank, Jens Jacob, Anja Petri, and Alexandra Esther
Wildlife Research, 2011, Volume 38, Number 7, Page 541

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in