[1] Anonymous a 2005. Raport WIOŚ Łódź 2005. Raport o stanie środowiska w województwie łódzkim w 2004 roku. Google Scholar
[2] Anonymous b 2008. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dn. 20. 08. 2008, Dziennik Ustaw Nr 162, poz. 1008. Google Scholar
[3] Bogaczewicz-Adamczak B. & Koźlarska I. 1999. The evaluation of water quality in the Swelina Stream on the basis of diatom analysis. Oceanol. St. 28(1–2): 59–71. Google Scholar
[4] Bogaczewicz-Adamczak B., Kłosińska D. & Zgrundo A. 2001. Diatoms as indicators of water pollution in the coastal zone of the Gulf of Gdańsk (southern Baltic Sea). Oceanol. St. 30(3–4): 59–75. Google Scholar
[5] Bogaczewicz-Adamczak B. & Dziengo M. 2003. Using benthic diatom communities and diatom indices to assess water pollution in the Pucka Bay (Southern Baltic Sea) littoral zone. Oceanol. St. 32(4): 131–157. Google Scholar
[6] CEMAGREF 1982. Etude des méthods biologiques quantitatives d’appréciation de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Division Qualite des Eaux Lyon-A.F. Bassin Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse, Pierre-Bénite, 218 pp. Google Scholar
[7] Dell’ Uomo A. 1996. Assessment of water quality of an Apennine river as a pilot study for diatom-based monitoring of Italian watercourses, pp. 65–72. In: Whitton B.A. & Rott E. (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring River II, Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck. Google Scholar
[8] Descy J.P.1979. A new approach to water quality estimation using diatoms. Nova Hedwigia 64: 305–323. Google Scholar
[9] Cholnoky B. 1968. Die Ökologie der Diatomeen in Binnengewässern. J. Cramer Verl., 699 pp. Google Scholar
[10] Coste M. & Ayphassorho H. 1991. Etude de la qualité des eaux du bassin Artois Picardie à l’aide des communautés de diatomées benthiques (Application des indices diatomiques). Rapport Cemagref Bordeaux — Agence de l’Eau Artois Picardie, 227 pp. Google Scholar
[11] Dumnicka E., Jelonek M., Kwandrans J., Wojtal A. & Żurek R. 2006. Ichtiofauna i status ekologiczny wód Wisły, Raby, Dunajca i Wisłoki. Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, 220 pp. Google Scholar
[12] Eloranta P. & Kwandrans J. 1996. Testing the use of diatoms and macroalgae for river monitoring in Finland, pp. 119–124. In: Whitton B.A. & Rott E. (eds), Use of algae for monitoring rivers II. Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck. Google Scholar
[13] Eloranta P. & Soininen J. 2002. Ecological status of some Finnish rivers evaluated using benthic diatoms communities. J. Appl. Phycol. 14: 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015275723489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[14] European Union (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L327: 1–73. Google Scholar
[15] Gazda E. 2008. Okrzemki bentosowe w ocenie jakości wody środkowego odcinka rzeki Widawki. Praca magisterska. Katedra Algologii i Mikologii UŁ. Google Scholar
[16] Harding W.R., Archibald C.G.M. & Taylor J.C. 2005. The relevance of diatoms for water quality assessment in South Africa: A position paper. Water S.A. 31: 41–46. Google Scholar
[17] Kawecka B., Kwandrans J. & Szyjkowski A. 1999. Use of algae for monitoring rivers in Poland — Situation and development, pp. 57–65. In: Prygiel J., Whitton B. A. & Bukowska J. (eds), Use of algae for monitoring rivers III, Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie. Google Scholar
[18] Kelly M.G. & Whitton B.A. 1995. The trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol. 7: 433–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00003802CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[19] Kelly M.G. 1998. Use of community-based indices to monitor eutrophication in European rivers. Environ. Conserv. 25(1): 22–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037689299800006XCrossrefGoogle Scholar
[20] Kelly M.G. 2003. Short term dynamics of diatoms in an upland stream and implications for monitoring eutrophication. Environ. Pollut. 125: 117–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00075-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[21] Kelly M.G., Juggins S., Guthrie R., Pritchard S., Jamieson J., Rippey B., Hirst H. & Yallop M. 2008. Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biology 53: 403–422. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
[22] Kosobudzka I. 2007. Charakterystyka jakości wody rzeki Ner na terenie Poddębic na podstawie okrzemek bentosowych. Praca magisterska. Katedra Algologii i Mikologii UŁ. Google Scholar
[23] Kwandrans J., Eloranta P., Kawecka B. & Wojtan K. 1999. Use of benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland, pp. 154–156. In: Prygiel J., Witton B.A. & Bukowska J. (eds), Use of algae for monitoring rivers III, Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie. Google Scholar
[24] Leclercq L. & Maquet B. 1987. Deux nouveaux indices chimique et diatomique de qualité d’eau courante. Application au Samson et `a ses affluents (Bassin de la Meuse Belge). Comparaison avec d’autres indices chimiques biocénotiques et diatomiques. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belgique, doc. Trav. 38: 113 pp. Google Scholar
[25] Lecointe C., Coste M. & Prygiel J. 1993. OMNIDIA: software for taxonomy. calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia 269/270: 509–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00028048CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[26] Lenoir A. & Coste M. 1996. Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the French National Water Board network, pp. 29–45. In: Whitton B.A. & Rott E. (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring River II, Universität Innsbruck. Google Scholar
[27] Ochman P. 2003. Ocena biologiczna i fizykochemiczna wody rzeki Jeziorki. Praca magisterska. Katedra Algologii i Mikologii UŁ. Google Scholar
[28] PN-ISO 5667-6. 2003. Jakość wody. Pobieranie próbek. Część 6: Wytyczne dotyczące pobierania próbek z rzek i strumieni. Google Scholar
[29] Prygiel J., Lévęque L. & Iserentant R. 1996. Un nouvel indice diatomique pratique pour l’évaluation de la qualité des eauxen réseau de surveillance. Rev. Sci. Eau. 1: 97–113. Google Scholar
[30] Prygiel J. & Coste M. 1999. Progress in the use of diatoms for monitoring rivers in France, pp. 165–179. In: Prygiel J., Whitton B.A. & Bukowska J. (eds), Use of algae for monitoring rivers III, Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie. Google Scholar
[31] Prygiel J. 2002. Mangement of the diatom monitoring network in France. J. Appl. Phycol. 14: 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015268225410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[32] Rakowska B. 1972. Algoflora rzeki Bzury. Zeszyty Naukowe UŁ. II, 51: 175–180. Google Scholar
[33] Rakowska B. 1974. Glony stawów w Arturówku. Zeszyty Naukowe UŁ. II, 54: 123–133. Google Scholar
[34] Rakowska B. 1976. Glony rzeki Bzury na odcinku Łowicz-Sochaczew. Zeszyty Naukowe UŁ. II, 2: 241–254. Google Scholar
[35] Rakowska B. 1977. Glony rzeki Bzury z uwzględnieniem wpływu ścieków na ich skład jakościowy i ilościowy. Praca doktorska. Katedra Botaniki UŁ. Google Scholar
[36] Rakowska B. 2001. Studium różnorodności okrzemek ekosystemów wodnych Polski niżowej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. Łódź, 75 pp. Google Scholar
[37] Rey P.A., Taylor J.C., Laas A., Rensburg L. & Vosloo A. 2004. Determing the possible application value of diatoms as indicators of general water quality: A comparison with SASS 5. Water S.A. 30: 325–332. Google Scholar
[38] Sládeček V. 1986. Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta hydrochim. hydrobiol. 14(5): 555–566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aheh.19860140519CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[39] Szczepocka E. 2008. Okrzemki bentosowe w ocenia jakości wody rzeki Bzury na tle jej renaturyzacji. Praca doktorska. Katedra Algologii i Mikologii UŁ. Google Scholar
[40] Szczepocka E. & Szulc B. 2009. The use of benthic diatoms in estimating water quality of variously polluted rivers. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Studies 38(1): 17–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10009-009-0012-xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
[41] Wagner I., Bocian J. & Zalewski M. 2008. The ecohydrological dimension of small urban river management for storm water retention and pollution loads mitigation: Lodz, Poland, pp. 165–175. In: Wagner I., Marsalek J. & Breil P. (eds), Aquatic habitats in sustainable urban water management. UNESCO, Taylor & Francis, the Netherlands. Google Scholar
[42] Taylor J.C., Vuuren M.S. & Pieterse A.J.H. 2007. The application and testing of diatom-based indices in the Vall and Wilge Rivers, South Africa. Water S.A. 33: 51–59. Google Scholar
[43] Zar J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc. Google Scholar
[44] Zgrundo A. & Bogaczewicz-Adamczyk B. 2004. Applicability of diatom indices for monitoring water qualityu in coastal streams in the gulf of Gdańsk region, Northern Poland. Oceanol. St. 33(3): 31–46. Google Scholar
[45] Żelazowski E., Magiera M., Kawecka B., Kwandrans J. & Kotowicz J. 2004. Use of algae for monitoring rivers in Poland — in the light of a new law for environmental protection. Oceanol. St. 33(4): 27–39. Google Scholar
Comments (0)