Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section


12 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.759
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.803

CiteScore 2016: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.322
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.510

See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 68, Issue 1 (Jan 2013)


Growth, survival and generative reproduction in a population of a widespread annual hemiparasite Melampyrum pratense

Monika Průšová
  • Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005, Česká Budějovice, Czech Republic
  • Email:
/ Jan Lepš
  • Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005, Česká Budějovice, Czech Republic
  • Institute of Entomology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Praha, Czech Republic
  • Email:
/ Milan Štech
  • Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005, Česká Budějovice, Czech Republic
  • Email:
/ Jakub Těšitel
  • Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005, Česká Budějovice, Czech Republic
  • Email:
Published Online: 2012-12-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0130-x


Melampyrum pratense is one of the most successful root-hemiparasitic species of temperate Europe occurring in various habitats including both forest and open communities. The species shares its life history traits (large seeds, annuality, lack of clonality) with most of other hemiparasitic Orobanchaceae. Due to lack of vegetative propagation, the reproductive success of a M. pratense individual largely depends on the seed production. We used an individual-based observation of ontogenetic development of plants and analysed the development of spatial distribution of individuals to reveal links between fecundity of individuals and their vegetative growth in the context of population dynamics within one growing season. We demonstrated a tight dependency of seed production on vegetative growth and survival till the end of the growing season. Plants that were still alive and big (due to a high number of lateral branches) in the end of August produced the highest numbers of seeds. These were several times higher than the population average due to positively skewed distribution of seed production across individuals. The rate of premature mortality was rather low (below 50%) once seedlings successfully emerged and was most likely caused by intraspecific competition. By contrast, moderate level of herbivory (stem clipping by grazers) had a limited effect on the survival and the inflicted biomass losses seemed compensated. Therefore, despite being an annual, M. pratense appears well-adapted to its life in perennial-dominated forest communities, which is also underpinned by its hemiparasitic strategy providing essential resources and allowing to avoid below-ground competition.

Keywords: demography; hemiparasitism; Melampyrum; population; reproduction; seed

  • [1] Bekker R.M. & Kwak M.J. 2005. Life history traits as predictors of plant rarity, with particular reference to hemiparasitic Orobanchaceae. Folia Geobot. 40: 231–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02803237CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Cameron D.D. & Seel W.E. 2007. Functional anatomy of haustoria formed by Rhinanthus minor: linking evidence from histology to isotope tracing. New Phytol. 174: 412–419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02013.xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Chytry M. & Rafajová M. 2003. Czech National Phytosociological database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. Preslia 75: 1–15. Google Scholar

  • [4] Curtis E.J.C. & Cantlon J.E. 1968. Seed Dormancy and Germination in Melampyrum lineare. Am. J. Bot. 55: 26–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2440488CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Dalrymple S.E. 2007. Biological flora of the British Isles: Melampyrum sylvaticum L. J. Ecol. 95: 583–597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01234.xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [6] de Hullu E., Brouwer T. & ter Borg S.J. 1985. Analysis of the demography of Rhinanthus angustifolius populations. Acta Bot. Neerl. 34: 5–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Ehleringer J.R. & Marshall J.D. 1995. Water relations, pp. 125–140 In: Press M.C. & Graves J.D. (eds), Parasitic plants. Chapman & Hall, London. Google Scholar

  • [8] Eliáš P. 1986. Effects of drought on population dynamics of Melampyrum pratense L. Biologia 41: 57–86. Google Scholar

  • [9] Gibson W. 1993. Selectivity advantages to hemiparasitic-annuals, genus Melampyrum, of seed-dispersal mutualism involving ants: II. Seed predator avoidance. Oikos 67: 345–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Grime JP., Hodgson J.G. & Hunt R. 2007. Comparative plant ecology, a functional approach to common British species, second edition. Castlepoint Press, Colvend Dalbeattie. Google Scholar

  • [11] Heinken T. 2004. Migration of an annual myrmecochore: a four year experiment with Melampyrum pratense L. Pl. Ecol. 170: 55–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000019020.90968.0bCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Jalas J. 1967. Populationsstudien an Melampyrum pratense L. in Finnland. III. Merkmalsverbreitung und Taxonomie. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 4: 486–536. Google Scholar

  • [13] Karlsson T. 1974. Recurrent ecotypic variation in Rhinanthae and Gentianaceae in relation to hemiparasitism. Bot. Notiser 127: 527–539. Google Scholar

  • [14] Kleyer M., Bekker R.M., Knevel I.C., Bakker J.P, Thompson K., Sonnenschein M., Poschlod P., van Groenendael J.M., Klimeš L., Klimešová J., Klotz S., Rusch G.M., Hermy M., Adriaens D., Boedeltje G., Bossuyt B., Dannemann A., Endels P., Götzenberger L., Hodgson J.G., Jackel A-K., Kühn I., Kunzmann D., Ozinga W.A., Römermann C., Stadler M., Schlegelmilch J., Steendam H.J., Tackenberg O., Wilmann B., Cornelissen J.H.C., Eriksson O., Gernier E. & Peco B. 2008. The LEDA Traitbase: A database of life-history traits of Northwest European flora. J. Ecol. 96: 1266–1274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01430.xWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Klimešová J. & Klimeš L.2007. Clo-Pla3 — database of clonal growth of plants from Central Europe. http://clopla.butbn.cas.cz/. (Accessed 10.12.2011) Google Scholar

  • [16] Lehtilä K. & Syrjänen K. 1995. Compensatory responses of two Melampyrum species after damage. Func. Ecol. 9: 511–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2390017CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Lepš J. 1993. Taylor’s power law and measuring variation in the size of populations in space and time. Oikos 68: 349–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3544850CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Masselink A.K. 1980. Germination and seed population in dynamics in Melampyrum pratens. Acta Bot. Neerl. 29: 451–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Matthies D. 1986. Untersuchungen zur Vergesellschaftung und Populationsbiologie von Melampyrum arvense L. Tuexenia 6: 3–20. Google Scholar

  • [20] Matthies D. 1991. Die Populationsbiologie der annuellen Hemiparasiten Melampyrum arvense, Melampyrum cristatum und Melampyrum nemorosum. Ph.D. thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Google Scholar

  • [21] Meusel H., Jäger E., Rauschert S. & Weinert E. 1978. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleurpäishen Flora, vol. 2. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena. Google Scholar

  • [22] Mudrák O. & Lepš J. 2010. Interactions of the hemiparasitic species Rhinanthus minor with its host plant community at two nutrient levels. Folia Geobot. 45: 407–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12224-010-9078-1CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Pate J.S. & Bell T.L. 2000. Host associations of the introduced annual root hemiparasite Parentucellia viscosa in agricultural and bushland settings in western Australia. Ann. Bot. 85: 203–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.1018CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] R Core Development Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. (accessed 10.9.2010). Google Scholar

  • [25] Ramsay P.M. & Fotherby R.M. 2007. Implications of the spatial pattern of Vigur’s Eyebright (Euphrasia vigursii) for heathland management. Basic Appl. Ecol. 8: 242–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2006.06.001Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Ramula S. 2008. Responses to the timing of damage in an annual herb: Fitness components versus population performance. Basic Appl. Ecol. 9: 233–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2007.02.006Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Soó R., Webb D.A. 1972. Melampyrum L. pp. 253–257. In: Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (eds), Flora Europaea 3, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

  • [28] Strykstra R.J., Bekker R.M. & van Andel J. 2002. Dispersal and life span spectra in plant communities: a key to safe site dynamics, species coexistence and conservation. Ecography 25: 145–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250203.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Svensson B.M. & Carlsson B.Å. 2005. How can we protect rare hemiparasitic plants? Early-flowering taxa of Euphrasia and Rhinanthus on the Baltic Island of Gotland. Folia Geobot. 40: 261–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02803239CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Štech M. 1998. Variabilita vybranych druhů sekce Laxiflora (Wettstein) Soó 1927 a revize rodu Melampyrum L. v České republice. Ph.D. thesis, University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science. Google Scholar

  • [31] Štech M. 2000. Melampyrum L., pp. 412–429. In: Slavík B. (ed.), Květena ČR, vol. 6, Academia, Praha. Google Scholar

  • [32] ter Borg S.J. 1972. Variability of Rhinanthus serotinus (Schönh.) Oborny in relation to the environment. PhD thesis, University of Groningen. Google Scholar

  • [33] ter Borg S.J. 1985. Population biology and habitat relations of some hemiparasitic Scrophulariaceae. pp. 463–487. In: White J. (ed.), The population structure of vegetation, Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dodrecht. Google Scholar

  • [34] Těšitel J. 2005. Variabilita Melampyrum sylvaticum agg. v části Střední Evropy. B.Sc. thesis, University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science. Google Scholar

  • [35] Těšitel J., Říha P., Svobodová S., Malinová T. & Štech M. 2010. Phylogeny, life history evolution and biogeography of the Rhinanthoid Orobanchaceae. Folia Geobot. 45: 347–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12224-010-9089-yWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Těšitel J., Lepš J., Vráblová M. & Cameron D.D. 2011. The role of heterotrophic carbon acquisition by the hemiparasitic plant Rhinanthus alectorolophus in seedling establishment in natural communities: a physiological perspective. New Phytol. 192: 188–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03777.xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [37] van Hulst R., Shipley B. & Thériault A. 1987. Why is Rhinanthus minor (Scrophulariaceae) such a good invader? Can. J. Bot. 65: 2373–2379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b87-322CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Wettstein R. 1895. Der Saison-Dimorphismus als Ausgangspunkt für die Bildung neuer Arten im Pflanzenreiche. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 13: 303–313. Google Scholar

  • [39] Winkler E. & Heinken T. 2007. Spread of an ant-dispersed annual herb: An individual-based simulation study on population development of Melampyrum pratense L. Ecol. Model. 203: 424–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.006CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Zopfi H.J. 1995. Life history variation and infraspecific heterochrony in Rhinanthus glacialis (Scrophulariaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 198: 209–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00984738CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Zopfi H.J.1998. Life-history variation among populations of Euphrasia rostkoviana Hayne (Scrophulariaceae) in relation to grassland management. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 64: 179–205. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2012-12-27

Published in Print: 2013-01-01

Citation Information: Biologia, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0130-x.

Export Citation

© 2013 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in