Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia




More options …
Volume 68, Issue 2

Issues

Spatial pattern of native species Myriophyllum spicatum and invasive alien species Elodea nuttallii after introduction of the latter one into the Drava River (Slovenia)

Zdenka Mazej Grudnik / Mateja Germ
Published Online: 2013-02-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0006-8

Abstract

Invasive alien species Elodea nuttallii was introduced into the Drava River (Slovenia) in 2007. The spatial distribution of native macrophyte species Myriophyllum spicatum and the invasive alien species E. nuttallii was studied in two impoundments, HPP Vuhred and HPP Mariborski otok in the years 2009, 2010 and 2011. The very heterogeneous environment of the Drava River had resulted in dynamic and non-uniform distributions of E. nuttalli and M. spicatum in both impoundments. The distribution of E. nuttalli was shown to be suppressed in river stretches exposed to great turbulence. It had, however, successfully invaded areas with gentle slope of littoral, low exposition to main water flow and muddy sediment and prevailed against the native species M. spicatum. The latter was more abundant than E. nuttallii in stretches exposed to higher flow velocity. Thus, the competitive success of M. spicatum and E. nuttallii depended on environmental conditions. Our results lead to the prediction that E. nuttallii will increase further in the river Drava, causing serious economic problems.

Keywords: Elodea nuttallii; Myriophyllum spicatum; invasive alien species; Drava River; Slovenia

  • [1] Angelstein S. & Schubert H. 2009. Light acclimatisation of Elodea nuttallii grown under ambient DIC conditions. Plant Ecology 202: 91–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9500-4Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Angelstein S., Wolfram C., Rahn K., Kiwel U., Frimel S., Merbach I. & Schubert H. 2009. The influence of different sediment nutrient contents on growth and competition of Elodea nuttallii and Myriophyllum spicatum in nutrient-poor waters. Fund. Appl. Limnol. 173: 49–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2009/0175-0049CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Baattrup-Pedersen A. & Riis T. 1999. Macrophyte diversity and composition in relation to substratum characteristics in regulated and unregulated Danish streams. Freshwater Biol. 42: 375–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.444487.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Barrat-Segretain M.-H. 2001. Invasive species in the Rhone River floodplain (France): replacement of Elodea canadensis Michaux by E. nuttallii St. John in two former river channels. Arch. Hydrobiol. 152: 237–251. Google Scholar

  • [5] Barrat-Segretain M.-H. 2004. Growth of Elodea canadensis and Elodea nuttallii in monocultures and mixture under different light and nutrient conditions. Arch. Hidrobiol. 161: 133–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2004/0161-0133CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Barrat-Segretain M-H. 2005. Competition between invasive and indigenous species: impact of spatial pattern and developmental stage. Plant Ecol. 180: 153–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-004-7374-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Barko J.W. 1983. The growth of Myriophyllum spicatum in relation to selected characteristics of sediment and solution. Aquat. Bot. 15: 91–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(83)90102-XCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Bernez I., Daniel H., Haury J. & Ferreira M.T. 2004. Combined effects of environmental factors and regulation on macrophyte vegetation along three rivers in Western France. Riv. Res. Appl. 20: 43–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.718CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Bornette G. & Heiler G. 1994. Environmental and biological responses of former channels to river incision: a diachronic study on the Upper Rhône River. Regul. River 9: 79–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450090202CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Butcher R. W. 1933. Studies on the ecology of rivers. I. On the distribution of macrophytic vegetation in the rivers of Britain. J. Ecol. 21: 58–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2255874CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Catford J.A., Roland J. & Nilsson C. 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity Distrib. 15: 22–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.xWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Clarke S.J. & Wharton G. 2001. Sediment nutrients characteristics and aquatic macrophytes in lowland English rivers. Sci. Tot. Environ. 266: 103–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00754-3CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Crawley M. J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? pp. 429–454. In: Gray A.J., Crawley M.J. & Edwards P.J. (eds), Colonization, Succession and Stability, Blackwell, Oxford. Dravske elektrarne Maribor homepage. http://www.dem.si/eng/ (accessed 01.03.2012). Google Scholar

  • [14] Ellawala C., Asaeda T. & Kawamura K. 2011. Influence of flow turbulence on growth and indole acetic acid and H2O2 metabolism of three aquatic macrophyte species. Aquatic Ecol. 45: 417–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10452-011-9364-xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Goodwin B.J., McAllister A.J. & Fahrig L. 1999. Predicting Invasiveness of Plant Species Based on Biological Information. Conserv. Biol. 13: 422–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002422.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Greulich S. & Tremolieres M. 2006. Present distribution of the genus Elodea in the Alsatian Upper Rhine floodplain (France) with a special focus on the expansion of Elodea nuttallii St. John during recent decades. Hydrobiologia 570: 249–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0188-yCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Hamabata E. 1997. Distribution, stand structure and yearly biomass fluctuation of Elodea nuttallii, an alien species in Lake Biwa — Studies of submerged macrophyte communities in Lake Biwa (3). JPN. J. Limnol. 58: 173–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.3739/rikusui.58.173CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Hrivnák R., Oťaheľová H. & Jarolímek I. 2009. Diversity of aquatic macrophytes in relation to environmental factors in the Slatina River (Slovakia). Biologia 61: 417–423. Google Scholar

  • [19] Hrivnák R., Oťaheľová H., Valachovič M., Paľove-Balang R. & Kubinská A. 2010. Effect of environmental variables on the aquatic macrophyte composition pattern in streams: a case study from Slovakia. Fund. Appl. Limnol. 177: 115–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2010/0177-0115CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [20] James C.S., Eaton J.W. & Hardwick K. 1999. Competition between three submerged macrophytes, Elodea canadensis Michx, Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) St John and Lagarosiphon major (Ridl.) Moss. Hydrobiologia 415: 35–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003802205092CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Janauer G.A., Schmidt-Mumm U. & Schmidt B. 2010. Aquatic macrophytes and water current velocity in the Danube River. Ecol. Eng. 36: 1138–1145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.05.002Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Keane R.M. & Crawley M.J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 164–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Király G., Mesterházy A. & Bakan B. 2007. Elodea nuttalii (Planch.) H. St. John, Myosotis laxa Lehm. and Pyrus austriaca Kern., new for Slovenia, as well as other floristic records. Hladnikia 20: 11–15. Google Scholar

  • [24] Kohler A. & Janauer G.A. 1995. Zur Metodik der Untersuchungen von aquatischen Makrophyten in Flussgewasseren, pp. 1–22. In: Landsberg H. & Klapper H. (eds), Handbuch Angewandte Limnologie, Ecomed Verl., Landsberg/Lech. Google Scholar

  • [25] Kuhar U., Germ M. & Gaberščik A. 2010. Habitat characteristics of alien species Elodea canadensis in watercourses. Hydrobiologia 656: 205–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0438-xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Magee T.K., Ringold P.L. & Bollman M.A. 2008. Alien species importance in native vegetation along wadeable streams, John Day River basin, Oregon, USA. Plant Ecol. 195: 287–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9330-9Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Mazej Z. & Epšek M. 2005. The macrophytes of lake Velenjsko jezero, Slovenia — the succession of macrophytes after restoration of the lake. Acta biol. slov. 48: 21–31. Google Scholar

  • [28] Mazej Z. & Germ M. 2008. Competitive advantages of Najas marina L. in a process of littoral colonization in the lake Velenjsko jezero (Slovenia) Acta biol. slov. 51: 13–20. Google Scholar

  • [29] Nagasaka M. 2002. Changes in biomass and spatial distribution of Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) St. John, an invasive submerged plant, in oligomesotrophic Lake Kizaki from 1999 to 2002. Limnology 5: 129–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10201-004-0129-2Google Scholar

  • [30] Nichols S.A. & Shaw H. 1989. Ecological life histories of the three aquatic nuisance plants, Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton crispus and Elodea canadensis. Hydrobiologia 131: 3–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00008319CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Ozimek T., Donk E. & Gulati R. D. 1993. Growth and nutrient uptake by two species of Elodea in experimental conditions and their role in nutrient accumulation in a macrophyte-dominated lake. Hydrobiologia 251: 13–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00007159CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Pall K. & Janauer G. A. 1995. Die Makrophytenvegetation von Flußstauen am Beispiel der Donau zwischen Fluß-km 2552.0 und 2511.8 in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 101(Large Rivers 9): 91–109. Google Scholar

  • [33] Rejmanek M. & Richardson D. M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77: 1655–1661. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2265768CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Schneider S. & Melzer A. 2003. The trophic index of macrophytes (TIM) — a new tool for indicating the trophic state of running waters. Inter. Rev. Hydrobiol. 88: 49–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200390005CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Sculthorpe C.D. 1967. Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold, London, 610 pp. Google Scholar

  • [36] Smith Ñ.S. & Barko J.W. 1990. Ecology of Eurasia watermilfoil. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 28: 55–64. Google Scholar

  • [37] Shea K. & Chesson P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 170–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02495-3CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Simpson D.A. 1984. A short history of the introduction and spread of Elodea Michx in the British Isles. Watsonia 15: 1–9. Google Scholar

  • [39] Simpson D.A. 1990. Displacement of Elodea canadensis Michx by Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) H. St John in the British Isles. Watsonia 18: 173–177. Google Scholar

  • [40] Thiébaut G., Rolland T., Robach F., Trémoliéres M. & Muller S. 1997. Some consequences of the introduction of two macrophyte species, Elodea canadensis Michaux and Elodea nuttallii St. John, in continental aquatic ecosystems: example of two areas in the north-east of France: Alsace plain and northern voges. Bull. Fr. Peche. Piscicult. 344/345: 441–452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/kmae:1997040CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Thiébaut G. & Muller S. 1999. A macrophyte communities sequence as an indicator of eutrophication and acidification levels in weakly mineralised streams in north-eastern France. Hydrobiologia 410: 17–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003829921752CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [42] Tilman D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78: 81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0081:CIRLAG]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [43] Willby N.J., Abernethy V.J. & Demars B.O.L. 2000. Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization. Freshwat. Biol. 43: 43–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00523.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [44] Wolff P. 1980. Die Hydrilleae (Hydrocharitaceae) in Europa. Gottinger Floristische Rundbriefe 14: 33–56. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-02-23

Published in Print: 2013-04-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 202–209, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0006-8.

Export Citation

© 2013 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in