Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia




More options …
Volume 68, Issue 2

Issues

Stream section types of the Danube River in Serbia according to the distribution of macroinvertebrates

Bojana Tubić
  • Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, University of Belgrade, Despota Stefana 142 Blvd, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Vladica Simić / Katarina Zorić
  • Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, University of Belgrade, Despota Stefana 142 Blvd, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Zoran Gačić / Ana Atanacković
  • Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, University of Belgrade, Despota Stefana 142 Blvd, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Bela Csányi / Momir Paunović
  • Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, University of Belgrade, Despota Stefana 142 Blvd, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-02-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0152-z

Abstract

The aim of this study was to use the data on the distribution of aquatic macroinvertebrates obtained from 14 sites within a 413 km long stretch of the Danube River in Serbia to show the relevance of the bordering zone between the Middle and Lower Danube. A total of 68 macroinvertebrate taxa were observed. Molluscs were the major component with regard to species richness and relative abundance. Lithoglyphus naticoides (C. Pfeiffer, 1828) was the most abundant species and Unio tumidus (Retzius, 1788) was the most frequent species. Product-moment correlation coefficients or Pearson r coefficient was used to analyse the relation between the sites based on macroinvertebrate distribution. The data obtained by product-moment correlation served as input for cluster analyses. According to a cluster analyses Danube River in Serbia could be separated in the free-flowing sector, the stretch with a backwater effect and the area of the Iron Gate.

Keywords: aquatic macroinvertebrates; bioindication; Danube River; Iron Gate; river section types

  • [1] Allan J.D. 1995. Stream Ecology: The Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman and Hall, London, 388 pp. ISBN: 0412355302, 9780412355301 Google Scholar

  • [2] Birk S. & Kouwen L. 2009. Supportive analysis of the second Joint Danube Survey data (typology, intercalibration) and Technical support of the Eastern Continental Geographical Intercalibration Group, Final Report. Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive for the development of the Danube River Basin Management Plan (WATERDRB-2009). International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River, Vienna, 83 pp. Google Scholar

  • [3] Csányi B. & Paunovic M. 2006. The aquatic macroinvertebrate community of the River Danube between Klostenburg (1942 rkm) and Calafat — Vidin (795 rkm). Acta Biologica Debrecina, Supplementum Oecologica Hungarica 14: 91–106. Google Scholar

  • [4] Djukic N. & Karaman S. 1994. Qualitative and quantitative structure of the bottom fauna wit a special reference to the oligochaeta community, pp. 124–130. In: Jankovic D. & Jovicic M. (eds), The Danube in Yugoslavia — Contamination, Protection and Exploitation, Institute for Biological Research “S. Stankovic”, Institute for Development of Water Resources “J. Cerni”, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium, Belgrade, 218 pp. Google Scholar

  • [5] Gower J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53(3/4): 325–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2333639CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Elexová E. 1998. Interaction of the Danube River and its left side tributaries in Slovak stretch from benthic fauna point of view. Biologia 53(5): 621–632. Google Scholar

  • [7] Horne A.J. & Goldman C.R. 1994. Limnology, Second Edition. McGraw Hill, Inc. New York, 480 pp. ISBN 10: 0070236739/ISBN 13: 9780070236738 Google Scholar

  • [8] Illies J. 1978. Limnofauna Europaea: eine Zusammenstellung aller der. europäischen. Binnengewässer bewohnenden mehrzelligen Tierarten mit Angaben über ihre Verbreitung und Ökologie. Stuttgart, 532 pp. ISBN-10: 3437302469, ISBN-13: 978-3437302466 Google Scholar

  • [9] Illies J. & Botosaneau L. 1963. Problèmes et mèthodes de la classification et de la zonation ècologique des eaux courantes, considères surtout du point de vue faunistique. Mitt. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 12: 1–57. Google Scholar

  • [10] Jakovcev D. 1987. Die Saprobiologische Analyse der Donau im Belgrader Gebeit Anhand der Boden Fauna, pp. 529–532. In: 26. Arbeitstagung der IAD, SIL, Passau, Deutchland, Wissenschaftliche Referate. Google Scholar

  • [11] Jakovcev D. 1988. Die saprobiologische Wasser analyse der Donau im Belgrade Region Aufgrund der Benthofauna, pp. 265–269. In: 27. Arbeitstagung der IAD, SIL, Mamaia, Rumanien, Limnologische Berichte Donau. Google Scholar

  • [12] Karadžić B., Sašo-Jovanović V., Jovanović Z. & Popović R. 1998. “FLORA” a database and software for floristic and vegetation analyzes, pp. 69–72. In: Tsekos I. & Moustakas M. (eds), Progress in Botanical Research, Proceedings of the 1st Balkan Botanical Congress, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dodrecht, 632 pp. Google Scholar

  • [13] Lászlóffy W. 1965. Die Hydrographie der Donau. Der Fluß als Lebensraum, pp. 16–57. In: Liepolt R. (ed.), Limnologie der Donau — Eine monographische Darstellung. II. Kapitel, Schweizerbart, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

  • [14] Literáthy P., Koller-Kreimel V. & Liska I. 2002. Joint Danube Survey. Technical Report of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River, 261 pp. http://www.icpdr.org/pls/danubis/docs/folder/HOME/ICPDR/ICPDRANNUALREPORTS/2002/INDEX.HTML Google Scholar

  • [15] McCune B. & Grace J.B. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA, 304 pp. Google Scholar

  • [16] Moog O., Schmidt-Kloiber A., Ofenböck T. & Gerritsen J. 2001. Aquatische Ökoregionen und Fließgewässer-Bioregionen Österreichs. Eine Gliederung nach geoökologischen Milieufaktoren und Makrozoobenthos-Zönosen. Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Land- & Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt & Wasserwirtschaft, Wien, 102 pp. ISBN: 3-85 174-043-2 Google Scholar

  • [17] Moog O., Sommerhäuser M., Robert S., Battisti T., Birk S., Hering D., Ofenböck T., Schmedtje U., Schmidt-Kloiber A. & Vogel B. 2008. Typology of Danube River sections based on environmental characteristics and benthic invertebrate assemblages. pp. 127–144. In: Dokulil M., Hein T., Janauer G. & Teodorovic I. (eds), Large Rivers, Vol. 18, no. 1–2, Selected papers of the 36th IAD-Conference 4–8 September 2006 Vienna-Klosterneuburg (Austria), Transboundary River Management, Water Framework Directive/Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl. Large Rivers 166 (1–2), E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgard, 360 pp. Google Scholar

  • [18] Naumann E. 1932. Gundzüge der regionalen Limnologie. Die Binnengew ässer 11. Stuttgart, 176 pp. ISBN: 978-3-510-40711-8 Google Scholar

  • [19] Nosek J.N. 2000. Macroinvertebrate studies at the Hungarian Danube section 2, Spatial pattern of macroinvertebrate community, pp. 263–270. In: IAD (2000): The Danube and its Tributaries: Antropogenic Impacts and Revitalisation. Limnologigal Reports, Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the IAD, 3–9 Sept. 2000, Osijek/HR. Google Scholar

  • [20] Oertel N. 2000. Macroinvertebrate studies at the Hungarian Danube section 1. Fundamental and methodological questions of biomonitoring, pp. 271–278. In: IAD (2000): The Danube and its Tributaries: Antropogenic Impacts and Revitalisation. Limnologigal Reports, Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the IAD, 3–9 Sept. 2000, Osijek/HR. Google Scholar

  • [21] Paunović M., Csányi B., Simić V., Đikanović V., Petrović A., Miljanović B. & Atanacković A. 2010. Community structure of the aquatic macroinvertebrates of the Danube River and its main tributaries in Serbia, pp. 157–183. In: Simonović P., Simić V., Simić S. & Paunović M. (eds), The Danube in Serbia — the Results of National Program of the Second Joint Danube Survey. Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management — Directorate for Water, University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research „Siniša Stanković“, University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, Kragujevac, 339 pp. Google Scholar

  • [22] Paunovic M., Jakovcev-Todorovic D., Simic V., Stojanovic B. & Cakic P. 2007. Macroinvertebrates along the Serbian section of the Danube River (stream km 1429-925). Biologia 62: 1–9. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-007-0032-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11756-007-0032-5Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Paunovic M., Simic V., Jakovcev-Todorovic D. & Stojanovic B. 2005. Results on macroinvertebrate community investigation in the Danube River in the sector upstream the Iron Gate (1083-1071 km). Arch. Biol. Sci. Belgrade 57(1): 57–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/ABS0501057PCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Pottgiesser T. & Sommerhäuser M. 2004. Fließgewässertypologie Deutschlands. Die Gewässertypen und ihre Steckbriefe als Beitrag zur Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie, pp. 1–16. In: Steinberg C., Calmano W., Klapper H. & Wilken R.D. (eds), Handbuch Angewandte Limnologie, Ecomed 19. Erg.Lfg. 07/04, Landsberg/Lech. Google Scholar

  • [25] Robert S., Birk S. & Sommerhäuser M. 2003. Typology of the Danube River — part 1: top-down approach, pp. 6–14. In: UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project, “Strengthening the implementation capacities for nutrient reduction and transboundary cooperation in the Danube River Basin”. Activity 1.1.6. Developing the typology of surface waters and defining the relevant reference conditions for the Danube River, Final Report. University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, 97 pp. Google Scholar

  • [26] Simic S., Ostojic A., Simic V. & Jankovic D. 1997. Changes in structure of plankton and benthos in the part of the Danube from Veliko Gradiste to Prahovo (Serbia, Yugoslavia) during the summer period. Ekologija 32(2): 65–80. Google Scholar

  • [27] Simic V. & Simic S. 2004. Macroinvertebrates and fishes in the part of the Danube river flowing through the Iron Gate National Park and possibilities of their protection under in situ and ex situ conditions. Arch. Biol. Sci. 56(1–2): 53–57. DOI: 10.2298/ABS0402053S http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/ABS0402053SCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28] Sommerwerk N., Baumgartner C., Bloesch J., Hein T., Ostojić A., Paunovic M., Bloesch J., Siber R. & Tockner K. 2009. The Danube River Basin, pp. 59–112. In: Tockner K., Uehlinger U. & Robinson C.T. (eds), Rivers of Europe, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 700 pp. ISBN: 978-0-12-369449-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-369449-2.00003-5Google Scholar

  • [29] Stanković S. 1951. Le peuplement benthique des lacs égéens. Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 11: 367–382. Google Scholar

  • [30] Stanković S. 1962. Ekologija životinja. Univerzitet u Beogradu i Zavod za izdavanje udžbenika SR Srbije, Beograd, 432 pp. Google Scholar

  • [31] Šporka F. & Nagy Š. 1998. The macrozoobenthos of parapotamontype side arms of the Danube River and its response to flowing conditions. Biologia 53: 633–643. Google Scholar

  • [32] Thienemann A. 1928 (ed.). Die Binnengewasser Bd. IV Stuttgart: Schweizerbart’sche Verlagbuchhandlung, 175 pp. Google Scholar

  • [33] Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. & Cushing C.E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f80-017CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Vogel B. & Pall K. 2002. Nine Geo-morphological Danube Reaches, pp. 22–31. In: Literáthy P., Koller-Kreimel V. & Liška I. (eds), Joint Danube Survey, Technical Report of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River/ICPDR, 259 pp. Google Scholar

  • [35] Wasson J.G., Chandesris A., Pella H. & Blanc L. 2002. Typology and reference conditions for surface water bodies in France — the hydro-ecoregion approach. Summary of communication presented at the Symposium “Typology and ecological classification of lakes and rivers”, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland, October 25–26, 2002, Published in TemaNord. Google Scholar

  • [36] WFD 2000. Water Framework Directive. Directive of European Parlament and of the Council 2000/60/EC — Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Journal reference: OJL 327, 22 December 2000, pp. 1–73, Made under: article 175(1). Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-02-23

Published in Print: 2013-04-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 294–302, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0152-z.

Export Citation

© 2013 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Vladica Simić, Snežana Simić, Momir Paunović, Nataša Radojković, Ana Petrović, Trajče Talevski, and Djuradj Milošević
Science of The Total Environment, 2016, Volume 540, Page 410

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in