Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia

12 Issues per year




Online
ISSN
1336-9563
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 68, Issue 3

Issues

The importance of disturbance for the conservation of a low-competitive herb in mesotrophic grasslands

Kristin Fleischer
  • Department of Ecosystem Research, Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Robert-Koch-Straße 26, D-48149, Münster, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Merle Streitberger
  • Department of Community Ecology, Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Robert-Koch-Straße 26, D-48149, Münster, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Thomas Fartmann
  • Department of Community Ecology, Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Robert-Koch-Straße 26, D-48149, Münster, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-04-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0164-8

Abstract

For the protection or re-establishment of species-rich grasslands, the limiting factors controlling species richness have increasingly become of scientific interest. This study aims to analyze the role of disturbance for the occurrence of a low-competitive herb, Centaurium erythraea Rafn, in mesotrophic, lowland grasslands in NW Germany. We sampled a total of 38 plots with presence of C. erythraea and 24 control (random) plots in semi-natural grasslands. As a proxy for disturbance, we estimated the cover of bare ground and Ellenberg flooding indicator species and measured the distance between the plot and the nearest path. Moreover, we counted the number of C. erythraea individuals within each plot. In the GLM analyses the distance from path was the only predictor; both the presence of the species and the number of individuals decreased with the distance from path. The grasslands at the path edges had the highest disturbance intensity. Here horse riding, military-vehicle traffic and regular sod-cutting directly create bare ground. In general, disturbance creating bare ground seems to be the key factor enabling germination and growth of C. erythraea in mesotrophic grasslands and other low-competitive short-lived species. Disturbance enhances the expression of the seed bank, favours the development of the shade-avoiding and low-growing rosettes and oppresses tall-growing competitors. Therefore we suggest grazing as the best management method.

Keywords: bare ground; conservation management; grazing; light germination; species-rich grassland; vegetation gap

  • [1] Bakker J.P. 1989. Nature management by grazing and cutting. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 400 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2255-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Bobbink R., Hornung M. & Roelofs J.G. 1998. The effect of airborne nitrogen pollutant on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J. Ecol. 86: 717–738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.8650717.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Brown A.H.F. & Oosterhuis L. 1981. The role of buried seeds in coppice woods. Biol. Conserv. 21: 329–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(81)90066-5CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Bullock J.M., Clear H.B., Dale M.P. & Silvertown J. 1994. An experimental study of the effects of sheep grazing on vegetation change in a species-poor grassland and the role of seedling recruitment into gaps. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 493–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2404445CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Bullock J.M., Franklin J., Stevenson M.J., Silvertown J., Coulson S.J., Gregory S.J. & Tofts R. 2001. A plant trait analysis of responses to grazing in a long-term experiment. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 253–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00599.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Chapin F.S., Zavaleta E.S., Eviner V.T., Naylor R.L., Vitousek P.M., Reynolds H.L., Hooper D.U., Lavorel S., Sala O.E., Hobbie S.E., Mack M.C. & Díaz S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405: 234–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35012241CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Chytry M., Hejcman M., Hennekens S. & Schellberg J. 2009. Changes in vegetation types and Ellenberg indicator values after 65 years of fertilizer application in the Rengen Grassland Experiment, Germany. Appl. Veg. Sci. 12: 167–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2009.01011.xWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Critchley C.N.R., Burke M.J.W. & Stevens D.P. 2003. Conservation of lowland semi-natural grasslands in the UK: a review of botanical monitoring results from agri-environment schemes. Biol. Conserv. 115: 263–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00146-0CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Cousins S.A.O. & Eriksson O. 2008. After the hotspots are gone. Land use history and grassland plant species diversity in a strongly transformed agricultural landscape. Appl. Veg. Sci. 11: 365–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.3170/2008-7-18480Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Cousins S. 2009. Landscape history and soil properties affect grassland decline and plant species richness in rural landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 142: 2752–2758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.001Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Davies A. & Waite S. 1998. The persistence of calcareous grassland species in the soil seed bank under developing and established scrub. Plant Ecol. 136: 27–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009759227900CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Davies A., Dunnett N.P. & Kendle, T. 1999. The importance of transplant size and gap width in the botanical enrichment of species-poor grasslands in Britain. Restor. Ecol. 7(3): 271–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72020.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Dierschke H. 1994. Pflanzensoziologie. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 683 pp. Google Scholar

  • [14] Düll R. & Kutzelnigg H. 2005. Taschenlexikon der Pflanzen Deutschlands. Quelle & Meyer, Wiebelsheim, 577 pp. Google Scholar

  • [15] Dutoit T. & Alard D. 1995. Permanent seed banks in chalk grassland under various management regimes: their role in the restoration of species-rich plant communities. Biodivers. Conserv. 4: 939–950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00058205CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V. & Werner W. 2001. Zeigerwerte der Pflanzen von Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobot. 18: 1–258. Google Scholar

  • [17] Eriksson O., Cousins S.A.O. & Bruun H.H. 2002. Land-use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 743–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02102.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Fleischer K., Streitberger M. & Fartmann, T. 2010. Zur Ökologie der Wiesen-Glockenblume (Campanula patula) und des Echten Tausendgüldenkrauts (Centaurium erythraea) im Magergrünland Nordwestdeutschlands. Tuexenia 30: 209–229. Google Scholar

  • [19] Garve E. 2004. Rote Liste und Florenliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen in Niedersachsen und Bremen. 5. Fass. Inform.d. Naturschutz Niedersachs. 24: 1–76. Google Scholar

  • [20] Grime J.P, Hodgson J.G. & Hunt R. 2007. Comparative plant ecology. 2 edn. Castlepoint Press, Dalbeattie, 748 pp. Google Scholar

  • [21] Hellström K., Huhta A.-P., Rautio P. & Tuomi J. 2009. Seed introduction and gap creation facilitate restoration of meadow species richness. J. Nat. Conserv. 17: 236–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2009.04.007CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Hölzel N. 2005. Seedling recruitment in flood-meadow species: The effects of gaps, litter and vegetation matrix. Appl.Veg. Sci. 8: 115–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2005.tb00636.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] LANUV — Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz (ed.) 2012. Rote Liste der gefährdeten Pflanzen, Pilze und Tiere in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Fachbericht 36. Band 1: Pflanzen und Pilze, 536 pp. Google Scholar

  • [24] Isselstein J., Tallowin J.R.B. & Smith R.E.N. 2002. Factors affecting seed germination and seedling establishment of fenmeadow species. Restor. Ecol. 10: 173–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.00045.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Lavorel S., McIntyre S., Landsberg, J. & Forbes T.D.A. 1997. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 474–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01219-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] McIntyre S., Lavorel S. & Tremont R. 1995. Plant life-history attributes: their relationship to disturbance response in herbaceous vegetation. J. Ecol. 83: l–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2261148CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Mierwald U. & Romahn K. 2006. Die Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Schleswig-Holsteins. Rote Liste Band 1. Landesamt für Natur und Umwelt des Landes Schleswig-Holstein, Flintbek, 122 pp. Google Scholar

  • [28] Münzbergová M. & Herben T. 2005. Seed, dispersal, microsite, habitat and recruitment limitation: identification of terms and concepts in studies of limitation. Oecologia 145: 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0052-1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] R Development Core Team 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org Google Scholar

  • [30] Reiné R., Chocarro C. & Fillat F. 2006. Spatial patterns in seed bank and vegetation of semi-natural mountain meadows. Plant Ecol. 186: 151–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9119-2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Ristow M., Herrmann A., Illig H., Klemm G., Kummer V., Kläge H.-C., Machatzi B., Rätzel S., Schwarz R. & Zimmermann F. 2006. Liste und Rote Liste der etablierten Gefäßpflanzen Brandenburgs. Nat.schutz Landsch.pfl. Brandenburg 15(4), suppl. Google Scholar

  • [32] Rosenbauer A. 1996. Gentianaceae — Enziangewächse, pp. 16–42. In: Sebald O., Seybold S., Philippi G. & Wörz A. (eds), Die Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Baden-Württembergs. Band 5: Spezieller Teil (Spermatophyta, Unterklasse Asteridae) Buddlejaceae bis Caprofoliaeceae. Ulmer, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

  • [33] Rosenthal G. 2010. Secondary succession in a fallow central European wet grassland. Flora 205: 153–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2009.02.003CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Sala O.E., Chapin F.S., Armesto J.J., Berlow E., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sanwald E., Huenneke L.F., Jackson R.B., Kinzig B., Leemans R., Lodge D.M., Mooney H.A., Oesterheld M., LeRoy P.N., Sykes M.T., Walker B.H., Walker M. & Wall D.H. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Standortverwaltung Münster 2005. Schafweideplan. Stand: 19.07. 2005. Unpublished manuscript, Münster. Germany. Google Scholar

  • [36] Tilman D. 1997. Community invasability, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78: 81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0081:CIRLAG]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [37] Trimble S.W. & Mendel A.C. 1995. The cow as a geomorphic agent — a critical review. Geomorphol.13: 233–253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(95)00028-4CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Ubsdell R.A.E. 1979. Studies on variation and evolution in Centaurium erythraea Rafn. and C. littorale (D. Turner) Gilmour in the British Isles. 3. Breeding systems, floral biology and general discussion. Watsonia 12: 225–232. Google Scholar

  • [39] Van Dijk G. 1991. The status of semi-natural grasslands in Europe, pp. 15–36. In: Goriup P.D., Batten L.A. & Norton J.A. (eds), The conservation of lowland dry grassland birds in Europe. JNCC, Peterborough. Google Scholar

  • [40] Van Rossum F. 2009a. Succession stage variation in population size in an early-successional herb in a peri-urban forest. Acta Oecol. 35: 261–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2008.11.005Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Van Rossum F. 2009b. Pollen dispersal and genetic variation in an early-succesisonal forest herb in a peri-urban forest. Plant Biology 11: 725–737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00176.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [42] Van Uytvanck J., Milotic T. & Hoffmann M. 2010. Interaction between large herbivore activities, vegetation structure, and flooding affects tree seedling emergence. Plant Ecol. 206: 173–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9632-1CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [43] Veen P., Jefferson R., de Smidt J. & Straaten J. (eds.) 2009. Grasslands in Europe of high nature value. KNNV Publishing, Zeist, 320 pp. Google Scholar

  • [44] Voigtländer U. & Henker H. 2005. Rote Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns. Herausgegeben vom Umweltministerium Schwerin. 5. Fassung, Stand November 2005. Umweltministerium, Schwerin, 61 pp. Google Scholar

  • [45] Walker K.J., Preston C.D. & Boon C.R. 2009. Fifty years of change in an area of intensive agriculture: plant trait responses to habitat modification and conservation, Bedfordshire, England. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 3597–3613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9662-yCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [46] Wilmanns O. 1998. Ökologische Pflanzensoziologie. 6 edn. Quelle & Meyer, Wiesbaden, 479 pp. Google Scholar

  • [47] Zobel M., Otsus M., Liira J., Moora M. & Möls T. 2000. Is smallscale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability? Ecology 81: 3274–3282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3274:ISSSRL]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-04-13

Published in Print: 2013-06-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 398–403, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0164-8.

Export Citation

© 2013 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Dominik Poniatowski, Florian Hertenstein, Nadja Raude, Kathrin Gottbehüt, Herbert Nickel, Thomas Fartmann, and Alan Stewart
Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2018
[3]
Fabian Borchard, Werner Härdtle, Merle Streitberger, Gregor Stuhldreher, Jan Thiele, and Thomas Fartmann
Ecological Engineering, 2017, Volume 101, Page 211
[4]
[5]
Alena Vítová, Petr Macek, Jan Lepš, and Carly Stevens
Functional Ecology, 2017, Volume 31, Number 2, Page 458
[6]
Kristin Gilhaus and Norbert Hölzel
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, Volume 234, Page 5
[7]
Denise Rupprecht, Kristin Gilhaus, and Norbert Hölzel
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, Volume 234, Page 16
[8]
Thomas Fartmann, Fabian Borchard, and Sascha Buchholz
Journal for Nature Conservation, 2015, Volume 28, Page 35
[9]
[10]
G.X. Liu, F. He, L.Q. Wan, and X.L. Li
Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2015, Volume 68, Number 2, Page 204
[11]
Merle Streitberger, Stefan Rose, Gabriel Hermann, and Thomas Fartmann
Journal of Insect Conservation, 2014, Volume 18, Number 4, Page 745
[12]
Merle STREITBERGER and Thomas FARTMANN
European Journal of Entomology, 2013, Volume 110, Number 4, Page 643

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in