Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.759
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.803

CiteScore 2017: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.299
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.544

Online
ISSN
1336-9563
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 69, Issue 12

Issues

Morphometric aspects and growth modeling of exotic bivalve blood cockle Scapharca inaequivalvis from the Black Sea, Turkey

Mehmet Aydin / Uğur Karadurmuş / Evren Tunca
Published Online: 2015-01-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-014-0476-3

Abstract

This study was planned to determine biometric features and relationships between them in blood cockle, Scapharca inaequivalvis, a benthic exotic bivalve species of the Black Sea, Turkey during a period of 12 months. Over the study, 4,543 samples were collected and their shell length (SL), width (SWi), thickness (ST) and weight (SWe), as well as total (TW) and meat weights (MW) were measured. SL changed between 0.45 and 7.18 cm with an average value of 3.77 ± 0.02 cm. Average TW of the samples was 22.37 ± 0.26 g. Average MW of S. inaequivalvis was calculated as 10.66 ± 0.32 g with a rate of 26.85% of TW. The findings obtained showed that monthly measurements of SWe and MW had a small variation. On the other hand, monthly ST varied greatly. SL and SWe increment (%) models were also generated according to SL classes using regression analysis. Correlation and cluster analysis showed that MW had a weak association with other variables. The strongest correlation was between ST and SWe in October (R 2 = 1.0). The results present valuable information for this exotic species but more studies are required to better understand its biological characteristics and long term effects on the ecosystem.

Keywords: Scapharca inaequivalvis; morphometrics; shell; meat; modeling

  • [1] Acarli S., Lok A. & Yigitkurt S. 2012. Growth and survival rates of Anadara inaequivalvis (Bruguiere, 1789) in Homa Lagoon, Izmir (Turkey). The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-Bamidgeh 64: 1–7. Google Scholar

  • [2] Babaei M.M., Sahafi H.H., Ardalan A.A., Ghaffari H. & Abdollahi R. 2010. Morphometric relationship of weight and size of clam Amiantis umbonella L., 1818 (Bivalvia: Veneridae) in the eastern coasts of Bandar Abbas, Persian Gulf. Adv. Environ. Biol. 4(3): 376–382. Google Scholar

  • [3] Bellaaj-Zouari A., Dkhili S., Gharsalli R., Derbali A. & Aloui-Bejaoui N. 2012. Shell morphology and relative growth variability of the invasive pearl oyster Pinctada radiata in coastal Tunisia. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 92(3): 553–563. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315411001925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315411001925CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Bodis E., Nosek J., Oertel N., Toth B. & Feher Z. 2011. A comparative study of two Corbicula morphs (Bivalvia, Corbiculidae) inhabiting River Danube. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 96(3): 257–273. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.201111344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201111344CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Boonruang P. & Janekarn V. 1983. Distribution density, biomass and population bionics of Anadara granosa (L.) in relation of environmental factors at Sapum bay on the east coast of Phuket Island. Thai. Fish. Gaz. Bangkok (Warasan kanpramong) 36: 461–468. Google Scholar

  • [6] Broom M.J. 1982. Analysis of the growth of Anadara granosa (Bivalvia: Arcidae) in natural, artificially seeded and experimental populations. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 9: 69–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps009069CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Broom M.J. 1985. The Biology and Culture of Marine Bivalve Mollusks of the Genus Anadara. ICLARM Studies and Reviews. 12, International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines, 37 pp. ISSN: 0115-4389, ISBN: 971-1022-21-4 Google Scholar

  • [8] Cabral J.P. & Silva A.C.F. 2003. Morphometric analysis of limpets from an Iron-Age shell miden found in North West Portugal. J. Archaeol. Sci. 30(7): 817–829. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-4403(02)00254-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4403(02)00254-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Cruz R.A. & Palacios J.A. 1983. Biometria del molusco Anadara tuberculosa (Pelecypoda: Arcidae) en Punta Morales, Puntarenas, Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical 31(2): 175–179. Google Scholar

  • [10] Din Z.B. & Ahamad A. 1995. Changes in the scope for growth of blood cockles (Anadara granosa) exposed to industrial discharge. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 31(4–12): 406–410. DOI: 10.1016/0025-326X(95)00143-B http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(95)00143-BCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Erkoyuncu I. 1995. Fisheries Biology and Population Dynamics. Ondokuz May’s University Publication No. 95. Samsun, Turkey. 265 pp. Google Scholar

  • [12] Faulkner P. 2010. Morphometric and taxonomic analysis of granular ark (Anadara granosa) dominated shell deposits of Blue Mud Bay, northern Australia. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37: 1942–1952. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.02.021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.02.021CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Franz D.R. 1993. Allometry of shell and body weight in relation to shore level in the intertidal bivalve Geukensia demissa (Bivalvia: Mytilidae). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 174(2): 193–207. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(93)90017-I http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(93)90017-ICrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Fuiman L.A., Gage J.D. & Lamont P.A. 1999. Shell morphometry of the deep sea protobranch bivalve Ledella pustulosa in the Rockall Trough, north-east Atlantic. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 79(4): 661–671. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315498000824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315498000824CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Gaspar M.B., Santos M.N., Vasconcelos P. & Monteiro C.C. 2002. Shell morphometric relationships of the most common bivalve species (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). Hydrobiologia 477(1–3): 73–80. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021009031717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021009031717CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Ivanovici A.M., Rainer S.F. & Wadely V.A. 1982. Free amino acids in three species of mollusc: responses to factors associated with reduced salinity. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 70(1): 17–22. DOI: 10.1016/0300-9629(81)90386-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(81)90386-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Kamburska L., Lauceri R. & Riccardi N. 2013. Establishment of a new alien species in Lake Maggiore (Northern Italy): Anodonta (Sinanodonta) woodiana (Lea, 1834) (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Aquatic Invasions 8(1): 111–116. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2013.8.1.13 http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2013.8.1.13CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Kolyuchkina G.A. & Miljutin D.M. 2013. Application of the morpho functional analysis of hydrobionts (Anadara sp. cf. Anadara inaequivalvis Bivalvia) to environmental monitoring. Oceanology 53(2): 169–175. DOI: 10.1134/S0001437013010050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0001437013010050Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Kovitvadhi S., Kovitvadhi U., Sawangwong P., Trisaranuwatana P. & Machado J. 2009. Morphometric relationship of weight and size of cultured freshwater pearl mussel, Hyriopsis (Limnoscapha) myersiana, under laboratory conditions and earthen pond phases. Aquacult. Int. 17(1): 57–67. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-008-9180-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9180-zWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Le Cren E.D. 1951. The length-weight relationships and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in perch (Perca fluviatilis). J. Anim. Ecol. 20: 201–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1540CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Lodola A., Nicolini L., Savini D., Deidun A. & Occhipinti-Ambrogi A. 2013. Range expansion and biometric features of Pinctada imbricata radiata (Bivalvia: Pteriidae) around Linosa Island, Central Mediterranean Sea (Italy). Ital. J. Zool. 80(2): 303–312. DOI: 10.1080/11250003.2013.775363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11250003.2013.775363Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Lopez F.J.S., Garcia M.D.G., Vidal J.L.M., Aguilera P.A. & Garrido-Frenich A. 2004. Assessment of metal contamination in Donana National Park (Spain) using crayfish (Procamburus clarkii). Environ. Monit. Assess. 93(1–3): 17–29. DOI: 10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016789.13603.e5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016789.13603.e5CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Mistri M., Rossi R. & Ceccherelli V.U. 1988. Growth and production of the ark shell Scapharca inaequivalvis in a lagoon of the Po River delta. Mar. Ecol. 9(1): 35–49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.1988.tb00197.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.1988.tb00197.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Narasimham K.A. 1969. Studies on some aspects of biology and fishery of the cockle Anadara granosa (Linnaeus), from Kakinada Bay, pp. 407–417. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Mollusca, Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 12–16 January 1968, Cochin. Google Scholar

  • [25] Pauly D. 1980. A selection of simple methods for the assessment of tropical fish stocks. FOA Fisheries Circular Roma, No. 729, 54 pp. Google Scholar

  • [26] Ricker W.E. 1975. Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa 191, 382 pp. ISBN-13: 978-1932846232, ISBN-10: 1932846239 Google Scholar

  • [27] Squires H.G., Estevez M., Barona O. & Mora O. 1975. Mangrove cockles, Anadara spp. (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the Pacific coast of Colombia. Veliger 18(1): 57–68. Google Scholar

  • [28] Stern-Pirlot A. & Wolff M. 2006. Population dynamics and fisheries potential of Anadara tuberculosa (Bivalvia: Arcidae) along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical 54(Suppl 1): 87–99. Google Scholar

  • [29] Sşahin C. 1995. [Studies on some population parameters of Anadara cornea, Reeve, 1884, in the South Black Sea. MSc. Thesis, Trabzon: Black Sea Technical University], 70 pp. [in Turkish] Google Scholar

  • [30] Sşahin C. 1999. A study on the population structure and gonadal development of Anadara cornea (Reev, 1884) in the Eastern Black Sea, Turkey. Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, 102 pp. Google Scholar

  • [31] Sşahin C., Düzgüneş E., Mutlu C., Aydın M. & Emiral H. 1999. Determination of the growth parameters of the Anadara cornea R. 1844 population by the bhattacharya method in the Eastern Black Sea. Turk. J. Zool. 23(1): 99–106. Google Scholar

  • [32] Sşahin C., Düzgüneş E. & Okumuş I. 2006. Seasonal variations in condition index and gonadal development of the introduced blood cockle Anadara inaequivalvis (Bruguiere, 1789) in the southeastern Black Sea coast. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 6: 155–163. Google Scholar

  • [33] Sşahin C., Emiral H., Okumuş İ., Gözler A.M., Kalaycı F. & Hacimurtezaoğlu N. 2009. The benthic exotic species of the Black Sea: Blood Cockle (Anadara inaequivalvis, Bruguiere, 1789: Bivalve) and RapaWhelk (Rapana thomasiana, Crosse, 1861: Mollusca). J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 8(2): 240–245. Google Scholar

  • [34] Tlig-Zouari S., Rabaoui L., Irathni I., Diawara M. & Ben Hassine O.K. 2010. Comparative morphometric study of the invasive pearl oyster Pinctada radiata along the Tunisian coastline. Biologia 65(2): 294–300. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-010-0023-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11756-010-0023-9Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Tunca E., Üçüncü E., Özkan A.D., Ulger Z.E., Cansızoğlu A.E. & Tekinay T. 2013. Differences in the accumulation and distribution profile of heavy metals and metalloid between male and female crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 90(5): 570–577. DOI: 10.1007/s00128-013-0960-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-013-0960-4CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Tunçer S. & Erdemir C. 2002. A preliminary study on some properties for Chamelea gallina (L.) (Bivalvia: Veneridae from Karabiga-Canakkale). Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2(2): 117–120. Google Scholar

  • [37] Vismann B. 1993. Hematin and sulfide removal in hemolymph of the hemoglobin-containing bivalve Scapharca inaequivalvis. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 98: 115–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps098115CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Wolff M. 1987. Population dynamics of the Peruvian scallop Argopecten purpuratus during the El Niño phenomenon 1983. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44(10): 1684–1691. DOI: 10.1139/f87-207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f87-207CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [39] Zolotarev V. 1996. The Black Sea ecosystem changes related to the introduction of new mollusc species. Mar. Ecol. 17(1–3): 227–236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.1996.tb00504.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.1996.tb00504.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Zolotaryov V.N. & Zolotaryov P.N. 1987. Dvustvorchatij molljusk (Cunearya cornea) — novij element fauni Chernogo morja [A new Bivalve species (Cunearya cornea) in the Black Sea]. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 297(2): 501–503. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-01-06

Published in Print: 2014-12-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 1707–1715, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-014-0476-3.

Export Citation

© 2014 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in