Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia




More options …
Volume 70, Issue 5

Issues

New data on the biology and habitat preferences of the oligochaete species Ripistes parasita (Annelida: Clitellata: Naididae): a case study in a temporary woodland pond

Mariola Krodkiewska
  • Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Bankowa 9, 40-007 Katowice, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Aneta Spyra
  • Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Bankowa 9, 40-007 Katowice, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-06-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0070

Abstract

Studies carried out in woodland ponds located in an industrial area of southern Poland revealed the occurrence of a large population of Ripistes parasita (Schmidt, 1847) in one of them. This is a naidid species that is not usually abundant in oligochaete communities. Its ecology and biology is poorly known and thus the aim of this study was to characterise the environmental conditions influencing the occurrence of R. parasita and to assess its population dynamics and life history pattern. R. parasita occurred in a pond with soft water and a low level of mineralisation, a pH ranging from 6.1 to 7.0, and a high content of nitrogen and phosphorus. During our investigation, considerable seasonal changes in the occurrence and population density were detected. Specimens of this species inhabited alder leaf deposits in winter and early spring while in summer and autumn they occupied in large number floating Nuphar lutea leaves. A stepwise regression analysis showed a relationship between the temperature and dissolved oxygen content in the water and the density of R. parasita. The R. parasita reproduced asexually by paratomy (between May and November). The mean doubling time (days) for the population was 22.4. Only a few individuals (less than 1% of the population) matured in September and October.

Keywords: Ripistes parasita; reproduction mode; environmental factors; woodland pond

References

  • Arhipova N.P. 1989. Strojenie kokonov niekotorych oligochet [Structure of cocoons certain oligochaetes]. Trudy Instituta Biologii Vnutrennikh Vod AN SSSR 56: 115-132.Google Scholar

  • Armendáriz L.C. 2000. Population dynamics of Stylaria lacustris (Linnaeus, 1767) (Oligochaeta, Naididae) in Los Talas, Argentina. Hydrobiologia 438 (1): 217-226. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004139622036CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barton D.R. & Griffith M. 1984. Benthic invertebrates of the nearshore zone of eastern Lake Huron, Georgian Bar and North Channel. J. Great Lakes Res. 10 (4): 407-416. DOI: 10.1016/S0380-1330(84)71857-0CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baturina M. 2012. Distribution and diversity of aquatic Oligochaeta in small streams of the middle taiga. Turk. J. Zool. 36 (1): 75-84. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1002-64CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brainwood M. & Burgin S. 2009. Hotspots of biodiversity or homogeneous landscapes? Farm dams as biodiversity reserves in Australia. Biodivers. Conserv. 18 (11): 3043-3052. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9623-5CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattaneo A., Galanti G., Gentinetta S. & Romo S. 1998. Epiphytic algae and macroinvertebrates on submerged and floating-leaved macrophytes in an Italian lake. Freshwater Biol. 39 (4): 725-740. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00325.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Céréghino R., Biggs J., Oertli B. & Declerck S. 2008. The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of a neglected freshwater habitat. Hydrobiologia 597: 1-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-007-9225-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cori C.J. 1923. ¨Uber die Art der Nahrungsaufnahme bei Nais, Stylaria und Ripistes. Lotos (Prag) 71: 67-73.Google Scholar

  • Davies B., William P., Whitefield M., Nicolet P., Sear D., Bray S. & Maund S. 2008. Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 125 (1-4): 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.10.006CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dumnicka E. & Krodkiewska M. 2003. Studies on freshwater Oligochaeta in the Upper Silesia region (Southern Poland). Biologia 58 (5): 897-902.Google Scholar

  • Finogenova N.P. 1996. Oligochaete communities at the mouth of the Neva and their relationship to anthropogenic impact. Hydrobiologia 334 (1-3): 185-191. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5452-9 21CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grigorovich I.A., Korniushin A.V., Gray D.K., Duggan I.C., Colautti R.I. & MacIsaac H.J. 2003. Lake Superior: an invasion coldspot? Hydrobiologia 499 (1-3): 191-210. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026335300403CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hermanowicz W., Dojlido J., Do˙za´nska W., Koziorowski B. & Zerbe J. 1999. Fizyczno-chemiczne badanie wody i ´scieków [Physico-chemical surveys of water and sewages]. Arkady Warszawa, 556 pp. ISBN: 83-213-4067-9, 9788321340678Google Scholar

  • Hoek T.H. van den & Verdonschot P.F.M. 2005. Distribution and ecology of Aulodrilus japonicus in the Netherlands (Oligochaeta: Tubificidae). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen. 23: 103-112.Google Scholar

  • Ilyashuk B.P. 1999. Littoral oligochaete (Annelida: Oligochaeta) communities in neutral and acidic lakes in the Republic of Karelia, Russia. Boreal Environment Research 4: 277-284.Google Scholar

  • Irmler U. 1989. Population ecology and migration of Dero multibranchiata Stieren, 1892 (Naididae, Oligochaeta) in the Central Amazon inundation forest. Amazoniana 11 (1): 31-52.Google Scholar

  • Jung J. 2012. New record of a naidid oligochaete species, Ripistes parasita (Annelida: Clitellata: Naididae) from Korea. Animal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity (ASED)28 (2): 137-139. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2012.28.2.137CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahl K. 1982. Nowe stanowisko rzadkiego gatunku Ripistes parasita (Schmidt, 1847) w Polsce [New locality of the rare species Ripistes parasita (Schmidt, 1847) (Oligochaeta, Naididae) in Poland]. Przegl˛ad Zoologiczny 26: 253-255.Google Scholar

  • Klemm D.J. 1985. Methods of collecting and processing; museum depository for annelids, pp. 4-9. In: Klemm D.J. (ed), A guide to the freshwater Annelida (Polychaeta, naidid and tubificid Oligochaeta and Hirudinea) of North America Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA, 198 pp. ISBN-13: 978-0840335777, ISBN-10: 0840335776Google Scholar

  • Kołodziejczyk A. & Koperski P. 2000. Bezkr˛egowce słodkowodne Polski. Klucz do oznaczania oraz podstawy biologii i ekologii makrofauny [Freshwater macroinvertebrates of Poland. The key to the identification and biology and ecology of macrofauna]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, 250 pp. ISBN: 83-235-0192-0Google Scholar

  • Krodkiewska M. 2006. Freshwater Oligochaeta in mining subsidence ponds in the Upper Silesia Region of Southern Poland. J. Freshwater Ecol. 21 (1): 177-179. DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2006.9664111CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krodkiewska M. 2007. The occurrence of rare in Europe and new to Poland species Aulodrilus japonicus Yamaguchi, 1953 (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) in two fishponds. Pol. J. Ecol. 55 (3): 615-619.Google Scholar

  • Ladle R.J. & Todd P.A. 2006. Sex or sanctuary: how do asexual worms survive the winter? Hydrobiologia 559 (1): 395-399. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-0700-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lafont M., Camus J.C. & Rosso A. 1996. Superficial and hyporheic oligochaete communities as indicators of pollution and water exchange in the River Moselle, France. Hydrobiologia 334: 147-155. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5452-9 17CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Learner M.A., Lockhead G. & Hughes B.D. 1978. A review of the biology of British Naididae (Oligochaeta) with emphasis on the lotic environment. Freshwater Biol. 8 (4): 357-375. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1978.tb01457.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liljaniemi P., Vuori K., Ilyashuk B. & Luotonen H. 2002. Habitat characteristics and macroinvertebrate assemblages in boreal forest streams: relations to catchment silvicultural activities. Hydrobiologia 474 (1-3): 239-251. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016552308537CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loden M.S. 1981. Reproduction ecology of Naididae (Oligochaeta). Hydrobiologia 83 (1): 115-123. DOI: 10.1007/BF0218 7156CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Löhlein B. 1999. Assessment of secondary production of Naididae (Oligochaeta): an example from a North German lake. Hydrobiologia 406: 191-198. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4207-6 19CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McElhone M.J. 1978. A population study of littoral dwelling Naididae (Oligochaeta) in a shallow mesotrophic lake in North Wales. J. Anim. Ecol. 47 (2): 615-626. DOI: 10.2307/3805CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McNaughton S.J. & Wolf L.L. 1979. General ecology. Second ed., Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 702 pp. ISBN-10: 0030198011, ISBN-13: 9780030198014Google Scholar

  • Montz G.R. 1988. The occurrence of Ripistes parasita (Oligochaeta: Naididae) in Minnesota and its implications for benthic sampling. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 7 (2): 160-162.Google Scholar

  • Nicolet P., Ruggiero A. & Biggs J. 2007. Second European Pond Workshop: Conservation of pond biodiversity in a changing European landscape. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Limn. 43 (2): 77-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/limn:2007019CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Odum E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. Third ed. WB. Saunders Co, Philadelphia, PA, 574 pp. ISBN: 9780721669410Google Scholar

  • Oertli B., Joye D.A., Castella E., Juge R., Cambin D. & Lachavanne J.B. 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 104 (1): 59-70. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00154-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ohtaka A. & Nishino M. 1999. Studies on the aquatic oligochaete fauna in Lake Biwa, central Japan.II. Records and taxonomic remarks of nine species. Hydrobiologia 406: 33-47. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4207-6 4CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poddubnaya T.L. 1980. Characteristics of the life cycle of Tubificidae and Naididae, pp. 97-104. In: Kothekar V.S. (ed.), Aquatic Oligochaeta Worms: Taxonomy, Ecology and Faunistic Studies in the USSR. Amerind Publishing Co., New Delhi, 211 pp. (Translated from Russian, Trudy Vsesojuznogo Gidrobiologicheskogo Obshchestva 17) Google Scholar

  • Rodriguez P. & Reynoldson T.B. 2011. The Pollution Biology of Aquatic Oligochaetes. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., Dordrecht, Netherlands, 265 pp. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1718-3, ISBN: 978-94-007-1717-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Särkkä J. 1987. The occurrence of oligochaetes in lake chains receiving pulp mill waste and their relation to eutrophication on the trophic scale. Hydrobiologia 155 (1): 259-266. DOI: 10.1007/BF00025658CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simpson K.W. & Abele L.E. 1984. Ripistes parasita (Schmidt) (Oligochaeta: Naididae), a distinctive oligochaete new to North America. Freshwater Invertebrate Biology 3 (1): 36-41. DOI: 10.2307/1467130CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skalskaya I.A. 1987. Naididy (Naididae, Oligochaeta) v zooperifitone pribrezhieia rybinskogo vodokhranilisha [The naidids (Naididae, Oligochaeta) in zooperiphyton of littoral of the Rybinsk reservoir]. Bulletin IBIW Academic Sciences USSR 75: 30-33.Google Scholar

  • Skalskaya I.A. 2013. Taxonomic and trophic structures of dominants in the zooperiphyton of waterbodies and watercourses of the Upper Volga Basin. Inland Water Biol. 6 (2): 139-149. DOI: 10.1134/S1995082913020090CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith M.E. 1986. Ecology of Naididae (Oligochaeta) from an alkaline bog stream: life history patterns and community structure. Hydrobiologia 133 (1): 79-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF00010805CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spencer D.R. & Hudson P.L. 2003. The Oligochaeta (Annelida, Clitellata) of the St. Lawrence Great Lakes Region: an Update. Journal of Great Lakes Research 29 (1): 89-104. DOI: 10.1016/S0380-1330(03)70418-3CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spyra A. 2011. Autochthonic and allochthonic plant detritus as zoobenthos habitat in anthropogenic woodland ponds. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 40 (1): 27-35. DOI: 10.2478/ s13545-011-0004-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spyra A. & Krodkiewska M. 2013. The significance of woodland ponds in the conservation of rare species: A case study of Placobdella costata (F. Müller, 1846) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae). Pol. J. Ecol. 61 (3): 613-619.Google Scholar

  • Studinski J.M. & Grubbs S.A. 2007. Environmental factors affecting the distribution of aquatic invertebrates in temporary ponds in Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky, USA. Hydrobiologia 575 (1): 211-220. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-006-0368-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scheffer M., van Geest G.J., Zimmer K., Jeppesen E., Sondergaard M., Butler M.G., Hanson M.A., Declerck S. & De Meester L. 2006. Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richness: second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos 112 (1): 227-231. DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14145.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Timm T. 1970. On the fauna of the Estonian Oligochaeta. Pedobiologia 10: 42-78.Google Scholar

  • Timm T.1999. Distribution of freshwater oligochaetes in the west and east coastal regions of the North Pacific Ocean. Hydrobiologia 406: 67-81. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003749519662CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Timm T. 2009. A guide to the freshwater Oligochaeta and Polychaeta of northern and central Europe. Lauterbornia 66: 1-235.Google Scholar

  • Timm T. 2012. Life forms in Oligochaeta: a literature review. Advances of the 5th International Oligochaeta Taxonomy Meeting Zoology in the Middle East, Supplementum 4: 071-082.Google Scholar

  • T., Kangur K., Timm H. & Timm V. 1996. Macrozoobenthos of Lake Peipsi-Pihkva: taxonomical composition, abundance, biomass and their relations to some ecological parameters. Hydrobiologia 338 (1-3): 139-154.Google Scholar

  • Timm T., Seire A. & Pall P. 2001. Half a century of oligochaete research in Estonian running waters. Hydrobiologia 463: 223-234. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0597-5 23CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang H. & Cui Y. 2007. On the studies of Microdrile Oligochaeta and Aeolosomatidae (Annelida) in China: brief history and species checklist. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 31, Suppl.: 87-98.Google Scholar

  • Williams P., Whitfield M., Biggs J., Bray S., Fox G., Nicolet P. & Sear D.A. 2004. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol. Conserv. 115 (2): 329-341. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00153-8 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-11-13

Accepted: 2015-03-12

Published Online: 2015-06-23

Published in Print: 2015-05-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages 615–624, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0070.

Export Citation

© 2015.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Barbara J. Dinkins, David A. Etnier, and Wendell L. Pennington
Southeastern Naturalist, 2017, Volume 16, Number 3, Page 362

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in