Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biologia

12 Issues per year




Online
ISSN
1336-9563
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 71, Issue 8

Issues

Using radio telemetry to track ground beetles: Movement of Carabus ullrichii

Jana Růžičková
  • Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, 17. Listopadu 50, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Milan Veselý
  • Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, 17. Listopadu 50, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-09-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0108

Abstract

Radio telemetry is an advanced method for studying movement behaviour which is one of the keys to understanding species ecology and biology. Using this method we studied the movement of Carabus ullrichii Germar, 1824, a large and apterous ground beetle species. Four individuals (one male, three females) were equipped with 0.28 g transmitters and radio-tracked for 10 days in three hour intervals in mosaic rural area; meadow and orchard. We found that maximum distance covered by an individual during this period was 120.9 m and C. ullrichii travelling speed in such habitat ranged from 1.69 to 13.43 m per day. Our preliminary results indicate that diurnal activity of this species is not affected by light conditions but by temperature. Beetles were most active at temperatures 15.0–17.4°C. Here we provide the first study of the movement ability of this species.

Key words: carabid beetles; Carabus ullrichii; radio-tracking; telemetry; movement

References

  • Andorkó R. 2014. Studies on carabid assemblages and life-history characteristics of two Carabus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) species. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, 97 pp.Google Scholar

  • Baars M.A. 1979. Patterns of movement of radioactive carabid beetles. Oecologia 44 (1): 125–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. & Walker S. 2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 1.1–7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

  • Bérces S. & Elek Z. 2013. Overlapping generations can balance the fluctuations in the activity patterns of an endangered ground beetle species: long-term monitoring of Carabus hungaricus in Hungary. Insect Conserv. Divers. 6: 290–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bretz F., Hothorn T. & Westfall P. 2010. Multiple Comparisons Using R. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 205 pp. ISBN: 978-1-58488-574-0Google Scholar

  • Brouwers N.C. & Newton A.C. 2009. Movement rates of woodland invertebrates: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2 (1): 10–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chiari S., Carpaneto G.M., Zauli A., Zirpoli G.M., Audisio P. & Ranius T. 2013. Dispersal patterns of a saproxylic beetle, Osmoderma eremita, in Mediterranean woodlands. Insect Conserv. Divers. 6 (3): 309–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Firle S., Bommarco R., Ekbom B. & Natiello M. 1998. The influence of movement and resting behaviour on the range of three carabid beetles. Ecology 79 (6): 2113–2122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hagen M., Wikelski M. & Kissling W.D. 2011. Space use of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) revealed by radio-tracking. PLoS One 6 (5): e19997. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hedin J., Ranius T., Nilsson S.G. & Smith H.G. 2008. Restricted dispersal in a flying beetle assessed by telemetry. Biodivers. Conserv. 17 (3): 675–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holland J.M. & Luff M.L. 2000. The effects of agricultural practices on Carabidae in temperate agroecosystems. Integrated Pest Manage. Rev. 5 (2): 109–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hothorn T., Bretz F. & Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric. Biom J. 50 (3): 346–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hůrka K. 1996. Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Kabourek, Zlín, 566 pp. ISBN: 80-901466-2-7Google Scholar

  • Hůrka K. 2005. Beetles of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Kabourek, Zlín, 394 pp. ISBN: 8086447111Google Scholar

  • Kareiva P. 1990. Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 330 (1257): 175–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kawaga Y. & Maeto K. 2009. Spatial population structure of the predatory ground beetle Carabus yaconinus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the mixed farmland-woodland satoyama landscape of Japan. Eur. J. Entomol. 106 (3): 385–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kennedy P.J. 1994. The distribution and movement of ground beetles in relation to set-aside arable land, pp. 439–444. . In: Desender K., Dufręne M., Loreau M., Luff M.L. & Maelfait, J.P. (eds), Carabid Beetles Ecology and Evolution, Series Entomologica Vol. 51, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 476 pp. ISBN: 978-90-481-4320-7, CrossrefCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenward R.E. 2000. A Manual for Wildlife Radio Tagging. Academic Press 2nd ed., San Diego, 311 pp. ISBN-10: 0124042422, ISBN-13: 978-0124042421Google Scholar

  • Kissling D.W., Pattemore D.E. & Hagen M. 2014. Challenges and prospects in the telemetry of insects. Biol. Rev. 89: 511–530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kotze D.J., Brandmayr P., Casale A., Dauffy-Richard E., Dekoninck W., Koivula M.J., Lövei G.L., Mossakowski D., Noordijk J., Paarmann W., Pizzolotto R., Saska P., Schwerk A., Serrano J., Szyszko J., Taboada A., Turin H., Venn S., Vermeulen R. & Zetto T. 2011. Forty years of carabid beetle research in Europe – from taxonomy, biology, ecology and population studies to bioindication, habitat assessment and conservation, pp. 55–148. . In: Kotze D.J., Assmann T., Noordijk J., Turin H. & Vermeulen R. (eds), Carabid Beetles as Bioindicators: Biogeographical, Ecological and Environmental Studies, ZooKeys 100 (Special Issue), 573 pp. ISBN: 9789546425904CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kromp B. 1999. Carabid beetles in sustainable agriculture: a review on pest control efficacy, cultivation impacts and enhancement. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 74 (1-3): 187–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levett S. & Walls S. 2011. Tracking the elusive life of the Emperor Dragonfly Anax imperator Leach. J. Br. Dragonfly Soc. 27 (1): 59–68.Google Scholar

  • Lorch P.D., Sword G.A., Gwynne D.T. & Anderson G.L. 2005. Radiotelemetry reveals differences in individual movement patterns between outbreak and non-outbreak Mormon cricket populations. Ecol. Entomol. 30 (5): 548–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lövei G.L., Stringer I., Devine C. & Cartellieri M. 1997. Harmonic radar – a method using inexpensive tags to study invertebrate movement on land. N. Z. J. Ecol. 21 (2): 187–193.Google Scholar

  • Lövei G.L. & Sunderland K.D. 1996. Ecology and behaviour of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 231–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luff M.L. 1978. Diel activity pattern of some field Carabidae. Ecol. Entomol. 3 (1): 53–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lys J.A. & Nentwig W. 1991. Surface activity of carabid beetles inhabiting cereal fields. Seasonal phenology and the influence of farming operations on five abundant species. Pedobiologia 35 (3): 129–138.Google Scholar

  • Niehues F.J., Hockmann P. & Weber F. 1996. Genetics and dynamics of a Carabus auronitens metapopulation in the Westphalian lowlands (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 33 (1): 85–96.Google Scholar

  • Negro M., Casale A., Migliore L., Palestrini C. & Rolando A. 2008. Habitat use and movement patterns in the endangered ground beetle species, Carabus olympiae (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 105 (1): 105–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pasquet R.M.S., Peltier A., Hufford M.B., Oudin E., Saulnier J., Paul L., Knudsen J.T., Herren H.R. & Gepts P. 2008. Long-distance pollen flow assessment through evaluation of pollinator foraging range suggests transgene escape distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (36): 13456–13461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • QGIS Development Team 2015. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org

  • R Development Core Team 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org

  • Ranius T. 2006. Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation. Popul. Ecol. 48 (3): 177–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ranjha H. & Irmler U. 2014. Movement of carabids from grassy strips to crop land in organic agriculture. J. Insect. Conserv. 18 (3): 457–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Riecken U. & Raths U. 1996. Use of radio telemetry for studying dispersal and habitat use of Carabus coriaceus L. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 33 (1): 109–116.Google Scholar

  • Riecken U. & Ries U. 1992. Untersuchung zur raumnutzung von laufkäfern (Col.: Carabidae) mittels radio-telemetrie. Methodenentwicklung und erste Freilandversuche. Z. Ökol. Nat. Schutz. 1: 147–149.Google Scholar

  • Rink M. & Sinsch U. 2007. Radio-telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles: implications for conservation. J. Zool. 272 (3): 235–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Svensson G.P., Sahlin U., Brage B. & Larsson M.C. 2011. Should I stay or should I go? Modelling dispersal strategies in saproxylic insects based on pheromone capture and radio telemetry a case study on the threatened hermit beetle Osmoderma eremita. Biodivers. Conserv. 20 (13): 2883–2902. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Szyszko J., Gryuntal S. & Schwerk A. 2004. Differences in locomotory activity between male and female Carabus hortensis (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a pine forest and a beech forest in relation to feeding state. Environ. Entomol. 33: 1442–1446. DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Szyszko J., Gryuntal S. & Schwerk A. 2005. Nocturnal activity of Carabus hortensis L. (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in two forest sites studied with harmonic radar method. Pol. J. Ecol. 53 (1): 117-222.Google Scholar

  • Thiele H.U. 1977. Carabid Beetles in their Environments. Zoophysiology and Ecology Volume 10, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 369 pp. ISBN: 978-3-642-81156-2Google Scholar

  • Tuf I.H., Dedek P. & Veselý M. 2012. Does the diunal activity pattern of carabid beetles depend on season, ground temperature and habitat? Arch. Biol. Sci. 64 (2): 721-732. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turin H., Penev L. & Casale A. (eds). 2003. The Genus Carabus L. in Europe. A Synthesis. Fauna Europaea Evertebrata No. 2, Pensoft Publisher, Sofia-Moscow-Leiden, 540 pp. ISBN: 954-642-120-0Google Scholar

  • Wallin H. & Ekbom B.S. 1988. Movements of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) inhabiting cereal fields – a field tracking study. Oecologia 77 (1): 39–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watts C. & Thornburrow D. 2011. Habitat use, behavior and movement patterns of a threatened New Zealand giant weta, Deinacrida heteracantha (Anostostomatidae: Orthoptera). J. Orthoptera Res. 20 (1): 127–135. DOI: doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • White G.C. & Garrott R.A. 1990. Analysis of Wildlife Radiotracking Data. Academic Press, San Diego, 383 pp. ISBN: 978-0-12-746725-2Google Scholar

  • Wikelski M., Moskowitz D., Adelman J.S., Cochran J., Wilcove D.S. & May M.L. 2006. Simple rules guide dragonfly migration. Biol. Lett. 2 (3): 325–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zlatník A. 1976. Přehled skupin typů geobiocénů původně lesních a křovinných CSSR. Zprávy Geografického ústavu CSAV, Brno 13 (3/4): 55–64.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-01-28

Accepted: 2016-07-13

Published Online: 2016-09-14

Published in Print: 2016-08-01


Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 71, Issue 8, Pages 924–930, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0108.

Export Citation

©2016 Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Martin Volf, Michal Holec, Diana Holcová, Pavel Jaroš, Radek Hejda, Lukáš Drag, Jaroslav Blízek, Pavel Šebek, and Lukáš Čížek
Journal of Insect Conservation, 2018

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in