Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


12 Issues per year

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 72, Issue 5


Haplotype diversity in common pipistrelle’s mass hibernacula from central Europe

Gréta Nusová
  • Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Moyzesova 11, SK-04001 Košice, Slovakia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Martina Šemeláková
  • Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Moyzesova 11, SK-04001 Košice, Slovakia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Lenka Paučulová
  • Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Moyzesova 11, SK-04001 Košice, Slovakia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marcel Uhrin
  • Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Moyzesova 11, SK-04001 Košice, Slovakia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Peter Kaňuch
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Moyzesova 11, SK-04001 Košice, Slovakia
  • Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Štúra 2, SK-96053 Zvolen, Slovakia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-05-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2017-0061


Mass hibernacula of several tens of thousands of Pipistrellus pipistrellus associated with the swarming of bats during seasonal movements should serve as important sites of gene flow in this species. The massive occurrence of hibernating bats which is observed in few caves in the Carpathian Mountains encourages the idea that the genetic diversity at these sites will be greater comparing to known situation in surrounding region. This study aimed to determine the genetic diversity of individuals that aggregate in two such caves in Slovakia and Romania with the help of a common and available genetic marker. Using an mtDNA cytochrome b, 571 bp long fragment, very low haplotype diversity was found within both mass hibernacula of P. pipistrellus (15 haplotypes only, from which one significantly predominated with > 80% in both caves). The initial screening did not suggest that hibernating bats migrated to mass hibernacula from remote areas behind central European region. However, reliable study of the species’ migratory behaviour is required to understand more about the phenomenon of the mass hibernacula of these bats.

Key words: Chiroptera; phylogeography; mitochondrial DNA; winter roosts; migration; Europe


  • Boston E.S., Puechmaille S.J., Clissmann F. & Teeling E.C. 2014. Further evidence for cryptic north-western refugia in Europe? Mitochondrial phylogeography of the sibling species Pipistrellus pipistrellus and Pipistrellus pygmaeus. Acta Chiropterol. 16: 263–277. DOI: 10.3161/150811014X687233CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bryja J., Kaňuch P., Fornůsková A., Bartonička T. & Řehák Z. 2009. Low population genetic structuring of two cryptic bat species suggests their migratory behaviour in continental Europe. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 96: 103–114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01093.xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bücs S., Jére C., Csősz I., Barti L. & Szodoray-Parádi F. 2012. Distribution and conservation status of cave-dwelling bats in the Romanian Western Carpathians. Vespertilio 16: 97–113.Google Scholar

  • Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R. & Posada D. 2012. jModel-Test 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Meth. 9: 772. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2109CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dietz C., von Helversen O. & Nill D. 2009. Bats of Britain, Europe and Northwest Africa. A&C Black, London, 400 pp. ISBN: 978-1-4081-0531-3Google Scholar

  • Dumitrescu M. & Orghidan T. 1963 Contribution ŕ la connaissance de la biologie de Pipistrellus pipistrellus Schreber. Annales de Spéléologie 18: 511–517.Google Scholar

  • Gaisler J., Hanák V., Hanzal V. & Jarský V. 2003. Results of bat banding in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, 1948–2000. Vespertilio 7: 3–61.Google Scholar

  • García-Mudarra J.L., Ibáñez C. & Juste J. 2009. The Straits of Gibraltar: barrier or bridge to Ibero-Moroccan bat diversity? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 96: 434–450. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01128.xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Horáček I. 1984. Remarks on the causality of population decline in European bats. Myotis 2122: 138–147.Google Scholar

  • Horáček I. & Jahelková H. 2005. History of the Pipistrellus pipistrellus group in Central Europe in light of its fossil record. Acta Chiropterol. 7: 189–204. DOI: 10.3161/1733-5329(2005)7[189:HOTPPG]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hulva P., Benda P., Hanák V., Evin A. & Horáček I. 2007. New mitochondrial lineages within the Pipistrellus pipistrellus complex from Mediterranean Europe. Folia Zool. 56: 378–388.Google Scholar

  • Hulva P., Fornůsková A., Chudárková A., Evin A., Allegrini B., Benda P. & Bryja J. 2010. Mechanisms of radiation in a bat group from the genus Pipistrellus inferred by phylogeography, demography and population genetics. Mol. Ecol. 19: 5417–5431. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04899.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hulva P., Horáček I., Strelkov P.P. & Benda P. 2004. Molecular architecture of Pipistrellus pipistrellus/Pipistrellus pygmaeus complex (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): further cryptic species and Mediterranean origin of the divergence. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 32: 1023–1035. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.04.007CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hutterer R., Ivanova T., Meyer-Cords Ch. & Rodrigues L. 2005. Bat Migrations in Europe. A Review of Banding Data and Literature. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, 162 pp. ISBN: 3-7843-3928-XGoogle Scholar

  • Ibáñez C., García-Mudarra J.L., Ruedi M., Stadelmann B. & Juste J. 2006. The Iberian contribution to cryptic diversity in European bats. Acta Chiropterol. 8: 277–297. DOI: 10.3161/1733-5329(2006)8[277:TICTCD]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaňuch P., Fornůsková A., Bartonička T., Bryja J. & Řehák Z. 2010. Do two cryptic pipistrelle bat species differ in their autumn and winter roosting strategies within the range of sympatry? Folia Zool. 59: 102–107.Google Scholar

  • Matis Š., Uhrin M. & Pjenčák P. 2002. Zimovanie netopierov v jaskyni Erna [Hibernation of bats in Erna cave]. Vespertilio 6: 235–236.Google Scholar

  • McCracken G.F., Safi K., Kunz T.H., Dechmann D.K.N., Swartz S.M. & Wikelski M. 2016. Airplane tracking documents the fastest flight speeds recorded for bats. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3: 160398. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160398CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nagy Z.L. & Postawa T. 2011. Seasonal and geographical distribution of cave-dwelling bats in Romania: implications for conservation. Anim. Conserv. 14: 74–86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00392.xWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nagy Z.L. & Szántó L. 2003. The occurrence of hibernating Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1174) in caves of the Carpathian Basin. Acta Chiropterol. 5: 155–160. DOI: 10.3161/001.005.0115CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roer H. 1989. Field experiments about the homing behaviour of the Common Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus Schreber), pp. 551–558. In: Hanák V., Horáček I. & Gaisler J. (eds), European Bat Research 1987, Charles University Press, Prague.Google Scholar

  • Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. System. Biol. 61: 539–542. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rydell J., Bach L., Bach P., Diaz L.G., Furmankiewicz J., Hagner-Wahlsten N., Kyheröinen E.-M., Lilley T., Masing M., Meyer M.M., Pētersons G., Šuba J., Vasko V., Vintulis V. & Hedenström A. 2014. Phenology of migratory bat activity across the Baltic Sea and the south-eastern North Sea. Acta Chiropterol. 16: 139–147. DOI: 10.3161/150811014X683354CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sachteleben J., von Helversen O. 2006. Songflight behaviour and mating system of the pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) in an urban habitat. Acta Chiropterol. 8: 391–401. DOI: 10.3161/1733-5329(2006)8[391:SBAMSO]2.0.CO;2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sendor T. & Simon M. 2003. Population dynamics of the pipistrelle bat: effects of sex, age and winter weather on seasonal survival. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 308–320. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00702.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siivonen Y. & Wermundsen T. 2003. First records of Myotis dasycneme and Pipistrellus pipistrellus in Finland. Vespertilio 7: 177–179.Google Scholar

  • Smit-Viergutz J. & Simon M. 2000. Eine vergleichende Analyse des sommerlichen Schwärmverhaltens der Zwergfledermaus (45 kHz Ruftyp, Pipistrellus pipistrellus Schreber, 1774) an den Invasionsorten und am Winterquartier. Myotis 38: 69–89.Google Scholar

  • Smith M.F. & Patton J.L. 1993. The diversification of South American murid rodents: evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequence data for the akodontine tribe. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 50: 149–177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb00924.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sztencel-Jabłonka A. & Bogdanowicz W. 2012. Population genetics study of common (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) and soprano (Pipistrellus pygmaeus) pipistrelle bats from central Europe suggests interspecific hybridization. Can. J. Zool. 90: 1251–1260. DOI: 10.1139/z2012-092CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Taake K.-H. & Vierhaus H. 2004. Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774) – Zwergfledermaus, pp. 761–814. In: Krapp F. (ed), Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Band 4. Fledertiere, Teil II: Chiroptera II. Aula Verlag, Wiebelsheim.Google Scholar

  • Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M. & Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2731–2739. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr121CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teacher A.G.F. & Griffiths D.J. 2011. HapStar: automated haplotype network layout and visualisation. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11: 151–153. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02890.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Uhrin M. 1994. Príspevok k hibernácii podkovára južného (Rhinolophus euryale) a večernice malej (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) v Slovenskom krase [Contribution to the hibernation of the Mediterranean horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus euryale) and the common pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) in the Slovak Karst]. Lynx, n. s. 26: 17–20.Google Scholar

  • Uhrin M. 1995. The finding of mass winter colony of Barbastella barbastellus and Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in Slovakia. Myotis 3233: 131–133.Google Scholar

  • Voigt C.C., Lindecke O., Schönborn S., Kramer-Schadt S. & Lehmann D. 2016. Habitat use of migratory bats killed during autumn at wind turbines. Ecol. Appl. 26: 771–783. DOI: 10.1890/15-0671Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-11-10

Accepted: 2017-03-06

Published Online: 2017-05-30

Published in Print: 2017-05-24

Citation Information: Biologia, Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 548–553, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2017-0061.

Export Citation

© 2017 Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in