Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biodiversity Research and Conservation

The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University

4 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1897-2810
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Just Accepted

Issues

Genetic relationships between some of Malva species as determined with ISSR and ISJ markers

Zbigniew Celka
  • Department of Plant Taxonomy, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Monika Szczecińska
  • Department of Botany and Nature Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 1, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jakub Sawicki
  • Department of Botany and Nature Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 1, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-07-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-010-0006-2

Genetic relationships between some of Malva species as determined with ISSR and ISJ markers

Two categories of DNA markers were used to determine genetic relationships among eight Malva taxa. A maximum parsimony analysis validated the division of the genus Malva into the sections Bismalva and Malva. The species classified into those sections formed separate clusters. M. moschata was a distinctive species in the section Bismalva, as confirmed by previous genetic research based on ITS and cpDNA sequence analyses. The applied markers revealed a very high level of genetic identity between M. alcea and M. excisa and enabled molecular identification of M. alcea var. fastigiata. Speciesspecific markers were determined for the majority of the analyzed species, permitting their molecular identification. A specific marker supporting the differentiation of M. alcea and M. excisa was not found.

Keywords: Malva; genetic similarity; molecular markers; ISJ; ISSR

  • Abromeit J., Jentzsch A. & Vogel G. 1898. Flora von Ostund Westpreussen. I, 690 pp. In Komission bei R. Friedländer & Sohn, Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Ascherson P. & Graebner P. 1898-1899. Flora des Nordostdeutschen Flachlandes (ausser Ostpreussen). xii+875 pp. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Bączkiewicz A., Sawicki J., Buczkowska K. Polok K. & Zielińaski R. 2008. Application of different DNA markers in studies on cryptic species of Aneura pinguis (Hepaticae, Metzgeriales). Cryptogamie Bryologie 29(1): 3-21.Google Scholar

  • Boisselier-Dubayle M. C., Jubier M. F., Lejeune B. & Bischler H. 1995. Genetic variability in the three subspecies of Marchantia polymorpha (Hepaticae): Isozymes, RFLP and RAPD markers. Taxon 44: 363-376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bonin A., Bellemain E., Bronken Eidesen P., Pompanon F., Brochmann C. & Taberlet P. 2004. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetic studies. Mol. Ecol. 13: 3261-3273.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Celka Z., Drapikowska M., Buczkowska K., Bączkiewicz A. & Marciniak J. 2006a. Morphological variability of Malva alcea L. populations from Poland. In: P. Kočáarek, V. PLášek & K. Malachová (eds.). Environmental changes and biological assessment. III. Scripta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Ostraviensis 163:159-165.Google Scholar

  • Celka Z., Szkudlarz P. & Biereżnoj U. 2006b. Morphological variation of hairs in Malva alcea L. (Malvaceae). Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 3-4: 258-261.Google Scholar

  • Celka Z., Drapikowska M., Lembicz M., Kubiak L. & Szkudlarz P. 2008. The population of Malva alcea at the medieval settlement: from distribution to the reproduction of individuals. In: P. Kočárek, V. Plášek, K. Malachová & Š Cimalová (eds.). Environmental changes and biological assessment. IV. Scripta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Ostraviensis 186: 224-230.Google Scholar

  • Celka Z., Drapikowska M., Ogrodowicz K., Shevera M. V. & Szkudlarz P. 2007. Differentiation of petals in the Malva alcea populations from the region of Central and Eastern Europe. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 5-8: 17-24.Google Scholar

  • Cronberg N. 1996. Isozyme evidence of relationships within Sphagnum sect. Acutifolia (Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta). Pl. Syst. Evol. 203: 41-64.Google Scholar

  • Dalby D. H. 1968. Malva L. In: T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Weeb (eds.). Flora Europea. Rosaceae to Umbelliferae, 2, pp. 249-251. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Daniels R. E. & Eddy A. 1990. Handbook of European Sphagna. 263 pp. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Natural Environment Research Council, Hmso. London.Google Scholar

  • Dogan B., Duran A. & Hakki E. E. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of Jurinea (Asteraceae) species from Turkey based on Issr amplification. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 44: 353-358.Google Scholar

  • Dostál J. 1989. Nová kvetena ČSSR. 1548+viii pp. Academia Praha.Google Scholar

  • El Naggar S. M. 2004. Pollen Morphology of Egyptian Malvaceae: An Assessment of Taxonomic Value. Turk. J. Bot. 28: 227-240.Google Scholar

  • Escobar García P., Schönswetter P., Fuertes Aguilar J., Nieto Feliner G., & Schneeweiss G. M. 2009. Five molecular markers reveal extensive morphological homoplasy and reticulate evolution in the Malva alliance (Malvaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50: 226-239.Google Scholar

  • Ferriol M., Pico B. & Nuez F. 2003. Genetic diversity of a germplasm collection of Cucurbita pepo using SRPA and AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 271-282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furmanowa M., Michalska Z., Parczewski A. & Zarębska I. 1959. Lecznictwo renesansowe w Polsce na podstawie "erbarza" Marcina z Urzędowa. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Nauki Polskiej. Seria B - Historia nauk biologicznych i medycznych 2: 233-313.Google Scholar

  • Garcke A. 1972. Illustrierte Flora Deutschland und angrenzende Gebiete. 1607 pp. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin und Hamburg.Google Scholar

  • Gunnarsson U., Hassel K. & Soderstrom L. 2005. Genetic structure of the endangered peat moss Sphagnum angermanicum in Sweden: a result of historic or contemporary processes? Bryologist 108: 194-203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamrick J. L. & Godt M. J. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler & B. S. Weir (eds.). Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Germplasm Resources, pp. 43-63. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar

  • Hegi G. 1925. Malvaceae. In: Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa 5(1): 453-498. J. F. Lehmanns Verlag München.Google Scholar

  • Hey J. & Wakeley J. 1997. A coalescent estimator of the population recombination rate. Genetics 145: 833-846.Google Scholar

  • Hlavaček A. 1982. Malvaceae. In: J. Futák & L. Bertová (eds.). Flora Slóvenska, 3, pp. 372-405. VEDA, vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied Bratislava.Google Scholar

  • Inamdar J. A. & Chohan A. J. 1969. Epidermal Structure and Stomatal Development in Some Malvaceae and Bombacaceae. Oxford Journals - Annals of Botany 33: 865-878.Google Scholar

  • Inamdar J. A., Balakrishna Bhat R. & Ramana Rao T. V. 1983. Structure, ontogeny, classification, and taxonomic significance of trichomes in Malvales. Korean J. Bot. 26(3): 151-160.Google Scholar

  • Jundziłł B. S. 1791. Opisanie roślin w prowincyi W. X. L. naturalnie rosnących według układu Linneusza. 570 pp. + Regester. W Drukarni J. K. Mci y Rzeplitey u XX. Piarow.Google Scholar

  • Kluk K. 1808. Dykcyonarz roślinny, 2, 256 pp. Drukarnia Xięży Piarów, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Kumar P. & Singh Dalbir 1991. Development and structure of seed coat in Malva L. Phytomorphology 41(1-2): 147-153.Google Scholar

  • Liu X.-Q., Gituru R.W. & Chen L.-Q. 2007. Genetic variation in the endangered fern Adiantum reniforme var. sinense (Adiantaceae) in China. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 44: 25-32.Google Scholar

  • Mabberley D. J. 1987. The plant-book. 858 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Marcin Z Urzędowa 1595. Herbarz Polski. Drukarnia Lazarzowa, Kraków.Google Scholar

  • Mirek Z., PIękoś-Mirkowa H., ZająC A. & Zając M. 2002. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland. A checklist. In: Z. Mirek (ed.). Biodiversity of Poland 1, 442 pp. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.Google Scholar

  • Mosyakin S. L. 1999. Malvaceae. In: S. L. Mosyakin & M M. Fedoronchuk (eds.). Vascular plants of Ukraine a nomenclatural checklist, pp. 249-250. M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, Kiev.Google Scholar

  • Nei M. & Li W. H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 5269-5273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olyanitskaya L. G. & Tzvelev N. N. 1996. Malvaceae. In: N. N. Tzvelev (ed.). Flora Europae Orientalis, pp. 231-255. Mir i Semia Petropoli.Google Scholar

  • Peakall R. & Smouse P. E. 2006. GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Not. 6: 288-295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Percifield R. J., Hawkins J. S., Mccoy J.-A., Widrlechner M. P. & Wendel J. F. 2007. Genetic diversity in Hypericum and AFLP markers for species-specific identification of H. perforatum L. Planta Med 73: 1614-1621.Google Scholar

  • PlášeK V. & Sawicki J. 2010. Is the hairy vaginula an diagnostic feature in the taxonomy of the genus Orthotrichum? Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 79: 73-80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Polok K. 2005. Evolutionary status of closely related Lolium taxa. In: W. Prus-GŁowacki & E. Pawlaczyk (eds.). Variability and Evolution - New Perspectives, Biologia 72: 195-208. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar

  • Polok K. 2007. Molecular evolution of the genus Lolium L. 317 pp. Studio Poligrafii Komputerowej "SQL", Olsztyn.Google Scholar

  • Ray M. F. 1995. Systematics of Lavatera and Malva (Malvaceae, Malveae) - a new perspective. Pl. Syst. Evol. 198: 29-53.Google Scholar

  • Ray M. F. 1998. New Combinations in Malva (Malvaceae: Malveae). Novon 8: 288-295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reichenbach L. 1841. Icones florae germanicae et helveticae. Apud Fridericum Hofmeister, Lipsiae.Google Scholar

  • Rothmaler W., Jäger E. J. & Werner K. 2005. Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Band 4, Gefäßpflanzen: Kritischer Band. 980 pp. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Elsevier Gmbh, München.Google Scholar

  • Rutkowski L. 2004. Klucz do oznaczania roślin naczyniowych Polski niżowej. 814 pp. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Sawicki J. & Szczecińska M. 2007. Semi-specific intron-exon splice junction markers in bryophyte studies. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 5-8: 25-30.Google Scholar

  • Sawicki J., Szczecińska M., Korniak T. & Hołdyński Cz. 2006. Genetic structure of Phyteuma spicatum subsp. coeruleum R. Schulz and Ph. spicatum subsp. spicatum populations. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 1-2: 46-49.Google Scholar

  • Sawicki J. & Zieliński R. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships between five Sphagnum species of the section Acutifolia based on DNA markers. Cas. Slez. Muz. Opava 57: 63-80.Google Scholar

  • Sawicki J., Plášek V. & Szczecińska M. 2010. Molecular studies resolve Nyholmiella (Orthotrichaceae) as a separate genus. J. Syst. Evol. 48: 183-194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schlechtendal D. F. L., Langethal L. E. & Schenk E. 1885. Flora von Deutschland, 21, 304 pp. Verlag von Fr. Eugen Köhler Gera-Untermhaus.Google Scholar

  • SlavíK B. 1992. Malvaceae Juss. - slézovité. In: B. S. Hejný & B. SlavíK (eds.). Květena České republiky, 3, pp. 282-316. Academia, Praha.Google Scholar

  • SlavíK B. 2002. Malvaceae. In: K. Kubát (ed.). Klíč ke květeně české republiky, 286-290 pp. Praha.Google Scholar

  • Swofford D. L. 2003. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods) (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA), 4.0 Beta Syreniusz 1613. Zielnik Simona Syrenniusa z 1613 r. www.zielnik-syrenniusa.art.pl. http://www.zielnik-syrenniusa.art.pl

  • Szczecińska M., Sawicki J., Polok K., Hołdyński Cz. & Zieliński R. 2006. Comparison of the Polygonatum species from Poland on the basis of different DNA markers. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 43(5): 379-388.Google Scholar

  • Szczecińska M., Sawicki J., Wąsowicz K. & Hołdyński Cz. 2009. Genetic variation of the relict and endangered population of Chamaedaphne calyculata (Ericaceae) in Poland. Dendrobiology 62:23-33.Google Scholar

  • Vanderpoorten A., Hedenas L. & Jacquemart A.-L. 2003. Differentiation in DNA fingerprinting and morphology among species of the pleurocarpous moss genus, Rhytidiadelphus (Hylocomiaceae). Taxon 52: 229-236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walas J. 1959. Malvaceae, Ślazowate. In: W. Szafer & B. Pawłowski (eds.). Flora polska. Rośliny naczyniowe Polski i ziem ościennych, 8, pp. 278-301. PWN, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Weining S. & Langridge P. 1991. Identification and mapping of polymorphisms in cereals based on polymerase chain reaction. Theor Appl Genet 82: 209-216.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Werner O., Jime'nez J. A., Ros R. M., Cano M. J. & Guerra J. 2005. Preliminary investigation of the systematics of Didymodon (Pottiaceae, Musci) based on nr ITS sequence data. Syst. Bot. 30: 461-470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wolfe A. D. & Liston A. 1998. Contributions of PCR-based methods to plant systematics and evolutionary biology. In: D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis & J. J. Doyle (eds.). Molecular Systematics in plants. II. DNA sequencing, pp. 43-86. Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Wünsche O. 1932. Die Pflanze Deutschalnds. Eine Anleitung zu ihrer Kenntnis. II. Die höheren pflanzen. 603 pp. Verlag und Druck von. B. G. Teubner, Leipzig und Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Zając A. 1979. Pochodzenie archeofitów występujących w Polsce. Rozpr. habil. Uniw. Jagiell. 29: 1-213. Druk UJ w Krakowie.Google Scholar

  • Zietkiewicz E., Rafalski A. & Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR) - anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176-183.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2011-07-11

Published in Print: 2010-01-01


Citation Information: Biodiversity: Research and Conservation, ISSN (Print) 1897-2810, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-010-0006-2.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in