Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Biodiversity Research and Conservation

The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University

4 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Just Accepted


The Charophytes of Israel: historical and contemporary species richness, distribution, and ecology

Roman E. Romanov
  • Corresponding author
  • Central Siberian Botanical Garden of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Zolotodolinskaja Str., 101, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Sophia S. Barinova
Published Online: 2012-11-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-012-0015-4


The historical and contemporary species richness, distribution, and ecology of Israel charophytes are described. The first charophyte collection in this region was made in the 19th century. Almost all reported localities were found earlier than 1970; some of them were not described. At the end of the 20th century, only two localities of two species were reported. According to the literature, 13 species, including two undetermined species of Chara, and nearly 23 exact localities are known from Northern and Central Israel. We found seven species and one variety of charophytes in 23 new localities in eight river drainage basins from six ecological regions of Israel during the period extending from 2001-2011. One genus n Tolypella, and two species n Chara intermedia and Tolypella glomerata, were found for the first time in Israel. There are 15 species and four genera of charophytes known from the studied territory based on published and original data. The common habitats of charophytes in Israel are river channels, pools, and, especially, artificial water bodies. The Chara vulgaris var. longibracteata, C. gymnophylla and C. contraria are the most frequently encountered species. The species ecology is briefly characterized by selected environmental variables. It may be that charophytes are rather rare plants in Israel and that their distribution in space and time is strongly variable due to the absence of large water bodies in this region, great variability of natural environmental conditions and severe continuous transformations of the environment by human activity for millennia.

Keywords : charophytes; Israel; species diversity; distribution; ecology

  • ADLER R., AMIRAN D. H. K., ELIAKIM H., GILEAD M. H., HINBERGER Y., KADMON N., KANTOR M., SHACHAR A. & TSAMERET R. 1985. Atlas of Israel n Cartography, Physical and Human Geography. 3rd ed. 160 pp. Survey of Israel, Tel-Aviv; Macmillan Publishing Co, New York; Collier Macmillan, London.Google Scholar

  • BARBER M. A. 1924. The effect of Chara robbinsii on mosquito larval. Publ. Health Rep. 39(13): 611-615.Google Scholar

  • BARINOVA S. S., ANISSIMOVA O. V., NEVO E. & WASSER S. P. 2005. Diversity and ecology of phytoplankton and periphyton of the Nahal Oren, Alon Natural Park, Northern Israel. Algol. Stud. 116:169-197.Google Scholar

  • BARINOVA S. S. & NEVO E. 2010. The Upper Jordan River Algal Communities are Evidence of Long-Term Climatic and Anthropogenic Impacts. J. Water Resource and Protection. 2: 507-526.Google Scholar

  • BARINOVA S., PETROV A. & NEVO E. 2011. Comparative analysis of algal biodiversity in the rivers of Israel. Central Europ. J. Biol. 6(2): 246-259.Google Scholar

  • BARINOVA S. S., YEHUDA G. & NEVO E. 2010. Comparative analysis of algal communities in the rivers of northern and southern Israel as bearing on ecological consequences of climate change. J. Arid Environments. 74: 765-776.Google Scholar

  • BAR-OR Y. 2000. Restoration of the rivers in Israelis coastal plain. Water Air & Soil Poll. 123: 311-321.Google Scholar

  • BOVÉ N. 1834. Relation abrEgEe diun voyage botanique en Egypte, dans les trois Arabies, en Palestine et en Syrie. Ann. Sci. Natur. comprenant la zoologie, la botanique, lianatomie et la physiologie comparEe des deux rEgnes et lihistoire des corps organisEs fossiles. REdigEe pour la zoologie par Audouin et Milne-Edwards; pour la botanique par Ad. Brongniart et Guillemin. Seconde sErie. Tome premier. Botanique, pp. 72-87, 161-179, 230-239. Crochard, Libraire-Éditeur, Paris.Google Scholar

  • BRAUN A. 1834. Esquisse monographique du genre Chara. Ann. Sci. Natur. comprenant la zoologie, la botanique, lianatomie et la physiologie comparEe des deux rEgnes et lihistoire des corps organisEs fossiles. REdigEe pour la zoologie par Audouin et Milne-Edwards; pour la botanique par Ad. Brongniart et Guillemin. Seconde sErie. Tome premier. Botanique, pp. 349-357. Crochard, Libraire-…diteur, Paris.Google Scholar

  • BRAUN A. 1835. Uebersicht der genauer bekannten Chara- Arten. Flora oder Allgemeine Botanische Zeitung. 18(1: 4): 49-73.Google Scholar

  • BRAUN A. 1868. Die Characeen Afrikais. Monatsbericht der Kˆniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften vom December 1867. ss. 781-872. Akademische B,chdruckerei, Berlin.Google Scholar

  • BUXTON P. A. 1924. Applied entomology of Palestine, being a report to the Palestine Government. Bull. Entomolog. Res. 14(3): 289-340.Google Scholar

  • CIRUJANO S., CAMBRA J., S!NCHEZ CASTILLO P. M., MECO A. & FLOR ARNAU N. 2007. Flora ibErica. Algas continentales. CarUfitos (Characeae). 132 pp. Real JardIn Bot・nico, Madrid.Google Scholar

  • CORILLION R. 1973. Aspects gEnEraux de la distribution gEographique des CharacEes Africano-malgaches. Comptes rendus Soc. BiogEogr. 49(431): 64-81.Google Scholar

  • CORILLION R. & GUERLESQUIN M. 1971. Notes phytogEographiques sur les CharophycEes diEgypte. Rev. Algologique, n.s. 10: 177-191.Google Scholar

  • DECAISNE M. J. 1834. …numEration des plantes recueillies par M. BovE dans les deux Arabies, la Palestine, la Syrie et li…gypte. Ann. Sci. Natur. comprenant la zoologie, la botanique, lianatomie et la physiologie comparEe des deux rEgnes et lihistoire des corps organisEs fossiles. REdigEe pour la zoologie par Audouin et Milne-Edwards; pour la botanique par Ad. Brongniart et Guillemin. Seconde sErie. Tome second. Botanique. pp. 5-18, 239-270. Crochard, Libraire- …diteur, Paris.Google Scholar

  • GALUN M. 1970. The lichens of Israel. 116 pp. The Israel Academy of Science and Humanities, Jerusalem.Google Scholar

  • GOLDREICH Y. 2003. The climate of Israel: Observation, Research and Application. 270 pp. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar

  • GRANT M. C. 1970. Reproductive isolation between cytotypes of Chara contraria, Master of Science thesis, Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USA.Google Scholar

  • GRANT M. C. & PROCTOR V. W. 1972. Chara vulgaris and Chara contraria: Patterns of reproductive isolation for two cosmopolitan species complexes. Evolution. 26: 267-281.Google Scholar

  • GROVES J. & BULLOCK-WEBSTER G. R. 1924. The British Charophyta. 2. Chareae. VIII, (4), 129 pp., Plates XXIXLV. Ray Society, London.Google Scholar

  • GUTMAN M., KAPLAN D. & GUTMAN R. 2001. Restoration and Conservation of Fauna and Flora in the Re-Flooded Hula Wetland in Northern Israel. Final Report (1997-2001). LIFE n Third Countries. PROJECT No: LIFE TCY/97/1L/O38. http://www.migal-life.co.il/Google Scholar

  • HAMBRIGHT K. D. & ZOHARY T. 1998. Lakes Hula and Agmon: destruction and creation of wetland ecosystems innorthern Israel. Wetlands Ecology and Management 6: 83-89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • HART H. C. 1891. Some account of the fauna and flora of Sinai, Petra, and W‚dy \Arabah. pp. [v]-x + 1-255. Alexander P. Watt, London.Google Scholar

  • HOLLERBACH M. M. & KRASAVINA L. K. 1983 The identification manual of freshwater algae of the USSR. Issue 14. The charophytes n Charophyta. 190 pp. Science, Leningrad.Google Scholar

  • JONES R. F. 1940. Report of the Percy Sladen expedition to Lake Huleh: a contribution to the study of the fresh waters of Palestine. The plant ecology of the district. J. Ecol. 28(2): 357-376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KATO S., SAKAYAMA H., MORISHIMA H., SANO S., OOMORI Y., KATO N., ITO M., KASAI F., WATANABE M. M. & NOZAKI H. 2010. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Chara altaica (Charales, Charophyceae), a monoecious species of the section Desvauxia. Cytologia. 75: 211-220.Google Scholar

  • KATO S., SAKAYAMA H., SANO S., KASAI F., WATANABE M. M., TANAKA J. & NOZAKI H. 2008. Morphological variation and intraspecific phylogeny of the ubiquitous species Chara braunii (Charales, Charophyceae) in Japan. Phycologia. 47(2): 191-202.Google Scholar

  • KRAUSE W. 1997. Charales (Charophyceae). S,flwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. ETTL H., GƒRTNER G., HEYNIG H., & MOLLENHAUER D. (eds.). B. 18, 202 pp. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar

  • KÜTZING F. T. 1849. Species algarum. pp. [i]-vi + [1]-922. F. A. Brockhaus, Lipsiae.Google Scholar

  • LANGANGEN A. in: GUIRY M. D. & GUIRY G. M. 2011. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www. algaebase.org; searched on 30 October 2011.Google Scholar

  • MCCOURT R. M., KAROL K. G., CASANOVA M. T. & FEIST M. 1999. Monophyly of genera and species of Characeae based on rbcL sequences, with special references to Australian and European Lychnothamnus barbatus (Characeae: Charophyceae). Austral. J. Bot. 47: 361-369.Google Scholar

  • MEIERS S. T., PROCTOR V. W. & CHAPMAN R. L. 1999. Phylogeny and biogeography of Chara (Charophyta) inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Austral. J. Bot. 47: 347-360.Google Scholar

  • MIGULA W. 1897. Die Characeen Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. Unter Ber,cksichtigung aller Arten Europas. L. Rabenhorst n Kryptogamenflora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz. 2. Aufl. Vol. 5. XIII, (3), 765 pp. Verlag Eduard Kummer, Leipzig.Google Scholar

  • NEVO E. 1995. Asian, African and European biota meet at NEvolution Canyoni, Israel: local tests of global biodiversity and genetic diversity patterns. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B 262: 149-155.Google Scholar

  • PERRY A. S.& PERRY R.Y. 1989. Effects in arid regions. In: P. BOURDEAU, J. A. HAINES, W. KLEIN & C. R. KRISHNA MURTI (eds.). Ecotoxycology and Climate with Special Reference to Hot and Cold Climates. SCOPE 38. IPCS JOINT SYMPOSIA 9, pp. 155-193. John Wiley & Sons LtdP, Chichester-New York-Brisbane- Toronto-Singapore.PROCTOR V. W. 1970. Taxonomy of Chara braunii: an experimental approach. J. Phycol. 6: 317-321.Google Scholar

  • PROCTOR V. W. 1971a. Chara globularis Thuillier (= C.fragilis Desvaux): breeding patterns within a cosmopolitan complex. Limnol. and Ocean. 16: 422-436.Google Scholar

  • PROCTOR V. W. 1971b. Taxonomic significance of monoecism and dioecism in the genus Chara. Phycologia 10: 299-307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PROCTOR V. W. 1975. The nature of charophyte species. Phycologia 14: 97-113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PROCTOR V. W. 1976. Genetics of Charophyta. In: R. A. LEWIN (ed.). The genetics of algae, pp. 210-218. University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles.Google Scholar

  • PROCTOR V. W. 1980. Historical biogeography of Chara (Charophyta): an appraisal of the Braun-Wood classification plus a falsifiable alternative for future consideration. J. Phycol. 16: 218-233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PROCTOR V. W. & WIMAN F. H. 1971. An experimental approach to the systematics of the monoecious-conjoined members of the genus Chara, series Gymnobasalia. Am. J. Bot. 58: 885-893.Google Scholar

  • RAYSS T. 1951. Les algues des eaux continentales; materiaux pour la flore algologique de la Palestine. Palest. J. Bot. 5: 71-95.Google Scholar

  • SAKAYAMA H., NOZAKI H., KASAKI H. & HARA. Y. 2002. Taxonomic re-examination of Nitella (Charales, Charophyceae) from Japan, based on microscopical studies of oospore wall ornamentation and rbcL gene sequences. Phycologia 41: 397-408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SAKAYAMA H., KASAI F., NOZAKI H., WATANABE M. M., KAWACHI M., SHIGYO M., NISHIHIRO J., WASHITANI I., KRIENITZ L. & ITO M. 2009. Taxonomic reexamination of Chara globularis (Charales, Charophyceae) from Japan based on oospore morphology and rbcL gene sequences, and the description of C. leptospora sp. nov. J. Phycol. 45: 917-927.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SCHUBERT H. & BLINDOW I. (eds.). 2004. Charophytes of the Baltic Sea. 326 pp. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag, Ruggel.Google Scholar

  • SUFIAN S. M. 2007. Healing the land and the nation: malaria and the Zionist project in Palestine, 1920-1947. [vii]-[xx]+1-385 pp. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

  • THOMSON R. D. & THOMSON T. 1835. V. Plants of Arabia, Palestine and Egypt. In: R. D. THOMSON, T. THOMSON Records of general science, vol. II. (No. XI. X. n Scientific Intelligence), pp. 398. London, John Taylor (Bookseller and Publisher of University of London).Google Scholar

  • TSARENKO P. M., STUPINA V. V., MORDVINTSEVA G. M., WASSER S. P. & NEVO E. 1997. Chlorophyta: Checklist of Continental Species from Israel. 150 pp. Peledfus Publishing House, Haifa-Kyiv.Google Scholar

  • VILHELM J. 1928. Characeae Europae orientalis et Asiae ex herbario instituti cryptogamici horti botanici reipublicae rossicae (ante Petropolitani). Spisy vyd・vanE Prirodovedeckov Fakultov Karlovy University (Publications de la FacultE des Sciences de liUniversitE Charles, Praha) 80: 1-24.Google Scholar

  • WALLMAN J. H. 1854. Fˆrsˆk till en systematisk uppst‰llning af v‰xtfamiljen Characea. In: Kongl. Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar foer ar 1852, pp. 229-331. P. A. Norstedt & Sˆner, Kongl. Boktrydare, Stockholm.Google Scholar

  • WALLMAN J. H. 1856. Essai diune exposition de la Famille des CharacEes. Traduit du SuEdois par M. le Dr. W. Nylander. Actes de la SociEtE LinnEenne de Bordeaux. 21 (sEr. 3, vol. 1): 1-90.Google Scholar

  • WASHBOURN R. & JONES R. F. 1937. Percy Sladen expedition to Lake Huleh, Palestine. Proc. Linn. Soc. London 149(2): 97-99.Google Scholar

  • WOOD R. D. & IMAHORI K. 1964. Iconograph of the Characeae. In: R. D. WOOD & K. IMAHORI (eds.). A revision of theCharaceae. Vol. II, v-xv+icones 1-395+1-7 pp. Cramer, Weinheim.Google Scholar

  • WOOD R. D. & IMAHORI K. 1965. Monograph of the Characeae. In: R. D. WOOD & K. IMAHORI (eds.). A revision of the Characeae. Vol. I, xi-[xxiv]+1-904 pp. Cramer, Weinheim.Google Scholar

  • ZOHARY M. 1966. Flora Palaestina, Part I n Text. 364 pp. Israel academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2012-11-30

Citation Information: Biodiversity: Research and Conservation, Volume 25, Issue , Pages 67–74, ISSN (Print) 1897-2810, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-012-0015-4.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Serge D. Muller, Laïla Rhazi, Ingeborg Soulie-Märsche, Mohamed Benslama, Marion Bottollier-Curtet, Amina Daoud-Bouattour, Gérard De Belair, Zeineb Ghrabi-Gammar, Patrick Grillas, Laure Paradis, and Hanene Zouaïdia-Abdelkassa
Cryptogamie, Algologie, 2017, Volume 38, Number 3, Page 201
Roman E. Romanov, Andrey A. Gontcharov, and Sophia S. Barinova
Fottea, 2015, Volume 15, Number 1, Page 39

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in