Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Basic Income Studies

Ed. by Haagh, Anne-Louise / Howard, Michael

2 Issues per year

CiteScore 2017: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.209
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.448

See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Relative Cost of a Universal Basic Income and a Negative Income Tax

Philip L. Harvey
Published Online: 2006-12-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1032

The cost of a negative income tax (NIT) designed to mimic the redistributive effects of a universal basic income (UBI) and set at a level sufficient to eliminate official poverty in the US is estimated using income distribution data for 2002. It is estimated that an NIT satisfying these conditions would have required an $826 billion increase in government spending in 2002, compared to a $1.69 trillion increase for an equivalent UBI. Despite this cost difference, the income and substitution effects of a UBI and an equivalent NIT are shown to be the same; and these effects are analyzed. Finally, the cost of providing a basic income guarantee (BIG) by either of these means is compared to the cost of securing the right to work and income security recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights using a program of direct job creation and conventional income transfers.

Keywords: Keywords – basic income; negative income tax; Universal Declaration of Human Rights

About the article

Published Online: 2006-12-28

Citation Information: Basic Income Studies, Volume 1, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) 1932-0183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1032.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

David Calnitsky
Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 2016, Volume 53, Number 1, Page 26

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in