Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Basic Income Studies

Ed. by Haagh, Anne-Louise / Howard, Michael

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.14

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.112
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.207

Online
ISSN
1932-0183
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Effect of Unconditional Cash Transfers on Adult Labour Supply: A Unitary Discrete Choice Model for the Case of Ecuador

Andrés Mideros
  • Corresponding author
  • Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University and UNU-MERIT, Boschstraat 24, 6211 AX Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Cathal O’Donoghue
Published Online: 2015-11-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2014-0016

Abstract

We examine the effect of unconditional cash transfers by a unitary discrete labour supply model. We argue that there is no negative income effect of social transfers in the case of poor adults because leisure could not be assumed to be a normal good under such conditions. Using data from the national employment survey of Ecuador (ENEMDUR) we estimate the effect of the Bono de Desarrollo Humano (BDH). Results show that cash transfers, unconditional in labour, does not produce labour disincentives in the case of household heads, but may be paying for housework and childcare provided by partners and single adults. However, labour market and care work gender inequality must be addressed by complementary policies.

Keywords: basic income; cash transfers; labour supply; ecuador

References

  • Aaberge, R., & Colombino, U. (2013). Using a microeconometric model of household labour supply to design optimal income taxes. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(2), 449–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alderman, H., & Yemtsov, R. (2012). Productive role of safety nets. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

  • Alzúa, M. L., Cruces, G., & Ripani, L. (2013). Welfare programs and labor supply in developing countries: Expermitental evidence from Latin America. Journal of Population Economics, 26, 1255–1284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arnold, C., Conway, T., & Greenslade, M. (2011). Cash transfers. London: Department for International Development, DFID.Google Scholar

  • Barrientos, A. (2012). Social transfers and growth: What do we know? What do we need to find out? World Development, 40(1), 11–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barrientos, A., & Nino-Zarazua, M. (2010). Effects of non-contributory social transfers in developing countries: A compendium. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar

  • Barrientos, A., & Scott, J. (2008). Social transfers and growth: A review. BWPI Working Paper.

  • Barrientos, A., & Villa, J. M. (2013). Antipoverty transfers and labour force participation effects. BWPI Working Paper, 185.

  • Beninger, D., Laisney, F., & Beblo, M. (2007). Welfare analysis of a tax reform for Germany: A comparison of the unitary and collective models of households labour supply. Journal of Population Economics, 20(4), 869–893.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bloemen, H. (2010). Income taxation in an empirical collective household labour supply model with discrete hours. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper (2010-010/3).

  • Bloemen, H. G. (2009). An empirical model of collective household labor supply with non-participation. The Economic Journal, 120, 183–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blundell, R., Chiappori, P.-A., Magnac, T., & Meghir, C. (2007). Collective labour supply: Heterogeneity and non-participation. The Review of Economics Studies, 74(2), 417–445.Google Scholar

  • Blundell, R., & Shephard, A. (2012). Employment, hours of work and the optimal taxation of low-income families. Review of Economic Studies, 79, 481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F. H., & Leite, P. G. (2003). Conditional cash transfers, schooling, and child labour: Micro-simulating Brazil’s Bolsa Escola program. The World Bank Economic Review, 17(2), 229–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Breunig, R., & Gong, X. (2010). Child care availability, quality and affordability: Are local problems related to maternal labour supply? Treasury Working Paper (2010–02).

  • Buser, T., Oosterbeek, H., Plug, E., Ponce, J., & Rosero, J. (2013). Impactos de quitar el BDH en salud infantil. Mimeo.

  • Cecchini, S., & Martínez, R. (2011). Protección social inclusiva en América Latina. Una mirada integral, un enfoque de derechos. Santiago: Comisión Económica para América Latina y El Caribe (CEPAL).Google Scholar

  • Colombino, U., Locatelli, M., Narazani, E., & O’Donoghue, C. (2010). Alternative basic income mechanisms: An evaluation exercise with microeconometric model. Basic Income Studies, 5(1). ISSN (Online) 1932-0183, DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dagsvik, J., Jia, Z., Kornstad, T., & Thoresen, T. (2014). Theoretical and practical arguments for modelling labor supply as a choice among latent jobs. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 134–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Edmonds, E., & Schady, N.. (2009). Poverty alleviation and child labor. NBER Working Paper Series (15345).

  • Fernandez, F., & Saldarriaga, V. (2014). Do benefit recipients change their labor supply after receiving the cash transfer? Evidence from the Peruvian Juntos Program. IZA Journal of Labor & Development, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.izajold.com/content/3/1/2Google Scholar

  • Foguel, M. N., & de Barros, R. P. (2010). The effects of conditional cash transfers programmes on adult labour supply: An empirical analysis using time-series-cross-section sample of Brazilian municipalities. Est. Econ. Sao Paulo, 40(2), 259/293.Google Scholar

  • Gonzales-Rozada, M., & Llerena Pinto, F. (20 de April de 2011). The effects of a conditional transfer program on the labor market: The Human Development Bonus in Ecuador. Mimeo.

  • Haan, P. (2004). Discrete Choice Labor Supply: Conditional Logit vs. Random Coefficient Models. DIW Berlin, Discussion Papers 394.

  • Harvey, P. (2013). More for less: The job guarantee strategy. Basic Income Studies, 7(2), 3–18.Google Scholar

  • INEC. (25 de May de 2013). Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos – Proyecciones poblacionales. Retrieved from http://www.inec.gob.ec/estadisticas/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=329&Itemid=328&lang=es

  • Jackson, W. (1999). Basic Income and the right to work: A Keynesian approach. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 21(4), 639–662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kabátek, J., van Soest, A., & Stancanelli, E. (2014). Income taxation, labour supply and housework: A discrete choice model for French couples. Labour Economics, 27, 30–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kornstad, T., & Thoresen, T. (2007). A discrete choice model for labor supply and childcare. Journal of Popular Economics 20(4), 781–803.Google Scholar

  • León, M., & Younger, S. (2007). Transfer payments, mothers’ income and child health in Ecuador. The Journal of Development Studies, 43(6), 1126–1143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Löffler, M., Peichl, A., & Siegloch, S. (2013). Discrete choice labor supply models and wage exogeneity. Mimeo. Retrieved from http://www.sole-jole.org/14404.pdf

  • LoVuolo, R. (2012). Prospects and challenges for the basic income proposal in Latin America. Basic Income Studies, 7(1). DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maurizio, R., & Vázquez, G. (2014). Argentina: Efectos del programa Asignación Universal por Hijo en el comportamiento laboral de los adultos. Revista CEPAL, 113, 121–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mideros, A. (2012). Ecuador: Defining and measuring multidimensional poverty, 2006–2010. ECLAC Review, 108, 49–67.Google Scholar

  • Mideros, A., Gassmann, F., & Mohnen, P. (2013). Estimation of rates of return on social protection: Making the case for non-contributory social transfers in Cambodia. (2013–063).

  • Novella, R., Ripani, L., Cruces, G., & Alzúa, M. L. (2012). Conditional cash transfers, female bargaining power and paternal labour supply. Washington DC: IDB Working Paper Series IDB-WP–368.

  • Oosterbeek, H., Ponce, J., & Schady, N. (2008). The impact of cash transfers on school enrollment. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper (TI 2008-037/4).

  • Paxson, C., & Schady, N. (2010). Does money matter? The effects of cash transfers on child development in rural Ecuador. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 59(1), 187–229.Google Scholar

  • Ponce, J. (2008). Education policy and performance. Evaluating the impact of targeted education programs in Ecuador. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Ponce, J., & Bedi, A. (2010). The impact of a cash transfer program on cognitive achievements: The Bono de Desarrollo Humano of Ecuador. Economics of Education Review, 29, 116–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Posel, D., Fairburn, J. A., & Lund, F. (2006). Labour migration and households: A reconsideration of the effects of the social pension on labour supply in South Africa. Economic Modelling, 23, 836–853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. (2002). Returns to investment in education: A further update. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (2881).

  • Schady, N., & Araujo, M. C. (2008). Cash transfers, conditions, and school enrolment in Ecuador. Economía, 8(2), 43–77.Google Scholar

  • Schady, N., & Rosero, J. (2008). Are cash transfers made to women spent like other sources of income? Economics Letters, 101, 246–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SIISE. (2013). Sistema Integrado de Indicadores Sociales del Ecuador. Retrieved from 25 de May de 2013, http://www.siise.gob.ec/siiseweb/

  • Skoufias, E., & Di Maro, V. (2008). Conditional cash transfers, adult work incentives, and poverty. The Journal of Development Studies, 44(7), 935–960.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Standing, G. (2008). How cash transfers promote the case for basic income. Basic Income Studies, 3(1), 1–30.Google Scholar

  • Standing, G. (2013). Why a basic income is necessary for a right to work. Basic Income Studies, 7(2), 19–40.Google Scholar

  • Suplicy, E. M. (2003). Ligitimizing basic income in developing countries: Brazil, or “the answer is blowin’ in the wind. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 25(3), 407–424.Google Scholar

  • Tirivayi, N., Knowles, M., & Davis, B. (2013). The interaction between social protection and agriculture. A review of evidence. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).Google Scholar

  • UNICEF. (2012). Integrated social protection systems. Enhancing equity for children. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund.Google Scholar

  • Van Parijs, P. (2004). Basic income: A simple and powerful idea for the twenty-first century. Politics & Society, 32(1), 7–39.Google Scholar

  • van Soest, A. (1995). Structural models of family labor supply. A discrete choice approach. The Journal of Human Resources, 30(1), 63–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Soest, A., Das, M., & Gong, X. (2002). A structural labour supply model with flexible preferences. Journal of Econometrics, 107, 345–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • World Bank (7 de July de 2013). The World Bank Indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.CD

About the article

Published Online: 2015-11-03

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Basic Income Studies, Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 225–255, ISSN (Online) 1932-0183, ISSN (Print) 2194-6094, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2014-0016.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in