Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Basic Income Studies

Ed. by Haagh, Anne-Louise / Howard, Michael

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.14

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.112
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.207

Online
ISSN
1932-0183
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Basic Income and Time Use Democratization

Corina Rodríguez Enríquez
  • Corresponding author
  • National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) and Interdisciplinary Centre for the Study of Public Policy (CIEPP), Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-06-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0012

Abstract

Time has become a valuable asset within capitalism. “Time is money” is a well known and usually shared principle. As in regard to many other type of assets, the distribution of time is pretty unfair, as well as it is the value consideration of the time allocated for different people to different activities. The distribution of time, as well as what people can or cannot do with their time, is a key issue among feminist debates. The main argument is that time allocation to paid and unpaid work is very different and unfair between genders. Women allocate much more time to unpaid work, and men, on the contrary allocate much more time to paid work. This has a reasonable and direct consequence in terms of income generation. This unequal distribution of time (and work) represents the main obstacle to women’s economic autonomy and to overcome gender income gaps.

Keywords: basic income; time use democratization; feminist approaches to basic income; Latin America; democratization

References

  • Cecchini, S., & Madariaga, A. (2011). Programas de Transferencias Condicionadas. Balance de la experiencia en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: ECLAC – Asdi.Google Scholar

  • Esquivel, V., Budlender, D., Folbre, N., & Hirway, I. (2008). Explorations: Time-use surveys in the South. Feminist Economics, 14(3), 107–152.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Martínez Franzoni, J., & Voorend, K. (2009). Conditional transfers and gender equality in Latina America. Montreal: Paper submitted for the RC19 Conference.

  • Rodríguez Enríquez, C. (2011). Programas de Transferencias Condicionadas de Ingreso e Igualdad de Género. Por dónde anda América Latina?. Santiago: Cepal. Serie Mujer y Desarrollo, 109.Google Scholar

  • Rodríguez Enríquez, C. (2013). Should Citizen’s Income Become a Goal for Feminism in Latin America? In: R. Lo. Vuolo (Ed.), Citizen’s Income and Welfare Regimes in Latin America. From Cash Transfers to Rights. New York: Palgrave Macmillam.Google Scholar

  • Rodríguez Enríquez, C. (2014). El cuidado no remunerado en Argentina: Un análisis desde la evidencia del Módulo de Trabajo no Remunerado. Buenos Aires: ELA – CIEPP – ADC, DT 2.Google Scholar

  • Stampini, M., & Tornerolli, L. (2012). The growth of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean: Did they go too far? Washington: IDB, Policy Brief IDB-PB-185.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-06-18

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Citation Information: Basic Income Studies, ISSN (Online) 1932-0183, ISSN (Print) 2194-6094, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0012.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in