Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Basic Income Studies

Ed. by Haagh, Anne-Louise / Howard, Michael

CiteScore 2018: 0.47

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.111
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.053

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Framing the Basic Income: An Experimental Study of How Arguments and Metaphors Influence Individuals’ Opinion Formation

Thomas Legein / Audrey Vandeleene / François Randour / Pauline Heyvaert / Julien Perrez / Min Reuchamps
Published Online: 2018-12-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2018-0010


Using an experimental design, this paper tackles the question of the framing impact of metaphors by focusing on the opportunity to implement a basic income (BI) system in a given polity. We take advantage of the preliminary stage of the BI debate in Belgium to study the influence of discursive strategies on the opinion formation process of individuals, since carefully choosing the arguments employed to address this question can help increase its psychological feasibility. Our experiment aims at determining to what extent the confrontation of individuals to metaphors illustrating the BI system impacts the way they apprehend its implementation. We show that very light variations in an informative text can induce major differences in the opinion formation process of the participants. BI proponents should thus pay attention to which metaphors are put forward in the public debate, as this could modify its outcome.

Keywords: basic income; experiment; framing; metaphors; political discourse


  • Ackerman, B., Alstott, A., & Van Parijs, P. (2006). Redesigning distribution. Basic income and stakeholder grants as cornerstones for an egalitarian capitalism.Verso.Google Scholar

  • Baker, J. (1992). An egalitarian case for basic income. In P. Van Parijs (Ed.), Arguing for basic income: Ethical foundations for a radical reform. London: Verso, 101–127.Google Scholar

  • Barry, B. (1996a). Surfer’s saviours? Citizen’s Income Bulletin, 22, 2–4.Google Scholar

  • Barry, B. (1996b). Real freedom and basic income. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(3), 242–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baudewyns, P., Dandoy, R., & Reuchamps, M. (2015). The success of the regionalist parties in the 2014 elections in Belgium. Regional & Federal Studies, 25(1), 91–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Belorgey, J.-M. (2000). Minima sociaux, revenus d’activité, précarité. Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar

  • Birnbaum, S. (2012). Basic income reconsidered. Social justice, liberalism, and the demands of equality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Blais, P. (1999). Loisir, travail et réciprocité. Une justification « rawlsienne » de l’allocation universelle est-elle possible? Loisir Et Société, 22(2), 337–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bougher, L. D. (2012). The case for metaphor in political reasoning and cognition. Political Psychology, 33(1), 145–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2013). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Reviews Political Sciences, 10, 103–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cunliffe, J., & Erreygers, G. (2001). The enigmatic legacy of charles fourier: Joseph charlier and basic income. History of Political Economy, 33(3), 459–484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Wispelaere, J. (2015a). The struggle for strategy: On the politics of the basic income proposal. Political Studies, 36(2), 131–141.Google Scholar

  • De Wispelaere, J. (2015b). An income of one’s own? The political analysis of universal basic income. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar

  • De Wispelaere, J., & Noguera, J. A. (2012). On the political feasibility of universal basic income. In K. Caputo (Eds.), Basic income guarantee and politics. International experiences and perspectives on the viability of income guarantee (pp. 17–38). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • De Wispelaere, J., & Stirton, L. (2004). The many faces of universal basic income. The Political Quarterly, 75(3), 266–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Wispelaere, J., & Stirton, L. (2013). The politics of unconditional basic income: Bringing Bureaucracy back in. Political Studies, 61, 915–932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Debras, C., & L’Hôte, E. (2015). Framing, metaphor and dialogue - a multimodal approach to party conference speeches. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(2), 177–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain: metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, M. (2010). Metaphor and cognition. In D. Schmicking & S. Gallagher (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 401–414). London: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Koistinen, P., & Perkiö, J. (2014). Good and bad times of social innovations: The case of universal basic income in Finland. Basic Income Studies, 9, 25–57.Google Scholar

  • Koller, V. (2009). Missions and Empires: Religious and political metaphors in corporate discourse. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and Discourse (pp. 116–134). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction [2nd ed.]. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • L’Hôte, E. (2012). « Breaking up Britain »? Métaphores et discours sur la dévolution au Royaume-Uni. In J. Perrez & M. Reuchamps (Eds.), Les relations communautaires en Belgique. Approches politiques et linguistiques (pp. 161–189). Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-L’Harmattan (Science politique).Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an Elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. White River Jct., Vt.: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Liebig, S., & Mau, S. (2002). A legitimate guaranteed minimum income? 9th BIEN Congress. Geneva.Google Scholar

  • Maniquet, F., & Neumann, D. (2016). L’allocation universelle : Quelques éléments pour y voir plus clair. Regards Économiques, 1–14.Google Scholar

  • Meade, J. E. (1989). Agathotopia : The economics of partnership. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar

  • Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Noguera, J. A., & De Wispelaere, J. (2006). A plea for the use of laboratory experiments in basic income research. Basic Income Studies, 1, 2.Google Scholar

  • Paine, T. (1796). Agrarian justice. In P. Foner (Ed.), The Life and Major Writings of Thomas Paine. New-York: Citadel Press, 605-623.Google Scholar

  • Perkiö, J. (2012). The struggle over interpretation: Basic income in the finnish public discussion in 2006–2012. 14th BIEN Congress. Munich.Google Scholar

  • Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (eds.). (2012). Les relations communautaires en Belgique : Approches politiques et linguistiques. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

  • Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2014). Deliberate metaphors in political discourse: The case of citizen discourse. metaphorik.de, 25, 7–41. Retrieved from http://www.metaphorik.de/fr/journal/25/deliberate-metaphors-political-discourse-case-citizen-discourse.html

  • Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2015a). The “Belgian Tetris”: Assessing the political impact of metaphors on citizens’ representations of Belgian federalism. Metaphors and the Social World, 5(2), 223–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2015b). A serious LAT relationship or a crazy machine? Metaphors in citizens’ perception of Belgian federalism. Mots. Les Langages du Politique, 109.Google Scholar

  • Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2015c). Special issue on the political impact of metaphors. Metaphors and the Social World, 5(2), 165–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prats, M. (1996). L’allocation universelle à l’épreuve de théorie de la justice. Documents Pour L’enseignement Économique Et Social, 106, 71–110.Google Scholar

  • Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Reuchamps, M., Dodeigne, J., & Perrez, J. (2018). Changing your political mind: The impact of a metaphor on citizen’s representations and preferences for federalism. Regional & Federal Studies, 28(2), 151–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reuchamps, M., & Perrez, J. (2012). Métaphores conceptuelles dans les discours citoyens en Belgique. In J. Perrez & M. Reuchamps (eds.), Les relations communautaires en Belgique : Approches politiques et linguistiques (pp. 133–158). Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-L’harmattan.Google Scholar

  • Standing, G. (2002). Beyond the new paternalism. Basic security as equality. London: Verso.Google Scholar

  • Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to thibodeau and boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE, 9, 12.Google Scholar

  • Steiner, H. (1992). Three just taxes. In P. Van Parijs (Ed.), Arguing for basic income: Ethical foundations for a radical reform (pp. 81–92). London: Verso.Google Scholar

  • Thibodeau, P. H., & Durgin, F. H. (2011). Metaphor aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 206-226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2015). Measuring effects of metaphor in a dynamic opinion landscape. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133939.Google Scholar

  • Tobin, J. (1965). On improving the economic status of the negro. Daedalus, 94(4), 878–898.Google Scholar

  • van der Veen, R. (1998). Real freedom versus reciprocity: Competing views on the justice of unconditional basic income. Political Studies, 46(1), 140–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van der Veen, R. J., & Van Parijs, P. (1986). A capitalist road to communism. Theory and Society, 15(5), 635–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Parijs, P. (1991). Why surfers should be fed: The liberal case for an unconditional basic income. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 20(2), 101–131.Google Scholar

  • Van Parijs, P. (1998). Real freedom for All: What (if anything) can justify capitalism?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Van Parijs, P. (2006). Basic Income: A simple and powerful idea for the 21st century In B. Ackerman, A. Alstott, P. Van Parijs, & E. O. Wright (Ed.), Redesigning distribution: Basic income and stakeholder grants as alternative cornerstones for a more egalitarian capitalism Vol. V, (pp. 4–39). London: Verso.Google Scholar

  • Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic income: A radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Vanderborght, Y. (2002). Belgique : VIVANT ou l’allocation universelle pour seul programme électoral. Multitudes, 1(1), 135–145.Google Scholar

  • Vanderborght, Y. (2004). The political feasibility of an unconditional minimum income: A comparative analysis of political debates on a basic income, a negative income tax, and a participation income in five OECD countries (1970–2003). Louvain-La-Neuve.Google Scholar

  • Vanderborght, Y., & Van Parijs, P. (2005). L’allocation universelle. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

  • Wendler, F. (2016). Debating Europe in National Parliaments: Public justification and political polarization. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

  • Widerquist, K., Vanderborght, Y., Noguera, J. A., & De Wispelaere, J. (2013). The idea of an unconditional incorme for everyone. In K. Widerquist, Y. Vanderborght, J. A. Noguera, & J. De Wispelaere (Eds.), Basic income: An anthology of contemporary research (pp. xi-xxi). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-12-12

Citation Information: Basic Income Studies, Volume 13, Issue 2, 20180010, ISSN (Online) 1932-0183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2018-0010.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in