Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Baltic Journal of European Studies

Tallinn Law School, Department of Law, School of Business and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology

2 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.140

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Regulatory Patterns of the Internet Development: Expanding the Role of Private Stakeholders through Mediatized “Self-regulation”

Maria Claudia Solarte-Vasquez
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Public Economy, Tallinn University of Technology Akadeemia tee 3, Tallinn 12618, Estonia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-06-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2013-0006


This article studies the Internet from an evolutionary point of view, based on historic analysis, to confirm institutional change predictions suggested by Utterback’s innovation development theory. It explores the appearance of rules and the consolidation of public and private initiatives that could enhance the capacity of the private sector to coregulate in the digital sphere, which is especially relevant to the field of electronic commerce-related transactions. This institutional review distinguishes between two distinct layers of the Internet. Also, formal and informal regulatory patterns are identified in their evolutionary stages, revealing the prevailing models: unregulated, self-regulated, co-regulated, or regulated. These conceptual associations aim to provide a framework scheme to further study specific topics in the fields of Internet governance, digital economy, and the information society. This primer should also induce interdisciplinary research, for better understanding on how rules influence digital innovation and behaviour, in practice. Implicit in this account is that most of the credit for the efficient development of these technologies, in their two layers, during their first stages, might be attributed to the availability of collective, collaborating, or independent self-regulatory capacity. The most immediate observations show a growing tendency towards over-prescriptive regulatory systems, promoted to control its use and content; incompatible with the needs and interests of the majority of stakeholders. A concluding claim is that the Internet and telecommunication technologies in general, considered as enabling mediums, would benefit from dynamic and mixed regulatory solutions, according to and depending on whether their object is their infrastructure or the surface layer of its applications.

Keywords : digital economy; electronic trade; Internet development; Internet governance; Internet society; knowledge economy; mediatized conflict management; regulatory systems; self-regulation; technology and the law

  • Abbate, J. (2001), ‘Government, Business, and the Making of the Internet,’ BusinessHistory Review, no. 75, pp. 147-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3116559CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anttiroiko, A. V. (2001), ‘Toward the European information society,’ Communicationsof the ACM, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 31-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/357489.357501CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Argyres, N. & Mayer, K. J. (2007), ‘Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives,’ Academy ofManagement Review, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1060-1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26585739CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berkes, F. (2006), ‘From community-based resource management to complex systems: the scale issue and marine commons,’ Ecology and Society, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 45.Google Scholar

  • Berman, F.; Fox, G. & Hey, A. J. G., eds. (2003), Grid Computing: Making the GlobalInfrastructure a Reality, vol. 2, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Boyle, J. (1997), ‘A politics of intellectual property: Environmentalism for the Net?’ Duke Law Journal, vol. 47: 87, pp. 87-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1372861CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • -- (2009), The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind, Ney Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brown, I. (2010), ‘Internet Self-Regulation and Fundamental Rights (January 21, 2010),’ Index on Censorship, vol. 1 (March 2010). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1539942 [accessed May 2013] Brousseau, E. (2004), ‘Property rights on the internet: is a specific institutional framework needed?’ Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 489-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000188737CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • -- (2004), ‘Property rights in the digital space,’ in E. Colombatto (ed.) Companion toEconomics of Property Rights, Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publications, pp. 438-472.Google Scholar

  • Bygrave, L. A. (2002), ‘Online dispute resolution-what it means for consumers.’ Paper presented at the conference ‘Domain Name Systems and Internet Governance’ on 7 May 2002 at the University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar

  • Canavilhas, J. (2011), ‘El nuevo ecosistema mediático,’ index. comunicación, vol. 1, pp. 13-24.Google Scholar

  • Castells, M. (1996), The Rise of the Network Society. Volume I of The Information Age:Economy, Society and Culture, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

  • -- (1997), The Power of Identity. Volume II of The Information Age: Economy,Society and Culture, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

  • -- (1998), End of Millennium, Volume III of The Information Age: Economy, Societyand Culture, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Cerf G. V. & Kahn E. R. (1974), ‘A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication,’ IEEE Trans on Comms, vol 22, no. 5 May 1974. Retrieved from http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall06/cos561/papers/cerf74.pdf [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • CERN (2005), A Little History of the World Wide Web: From 1960s to 1995. Retrieved from http://ref.web.cern.ch/ref/CERN/CNL/2001/001/www-history/ [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Chang, S. B. & Chang, S. M. (2009), ‘A meta-analysis of the innovation issue: Based on the technology management field,’ Industrial Engineering and EngineeringManagement, 2009. IEEM 2009. IEEE International Conference, pp. 1875-1879.Google Scholar

  • Clark, E.; Cho, G. & Hoyle, A. (2003), ‘Online dispute resolution: Present realities, pressing problems and future prospects,’ International Review of Law,Computers & Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360086032000063084 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cole, S. J. & Underhill, C. I. (2010), ‘Fifteen Years of ODR Experience: The BBB Online Reliability Trust Mark Program,’ UCC Law Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 443-478.Google Scholar

  • Croon F. A. & Jakobsson, M. (2002), ‘Beyond use and design: the dialectics of being in virtual worlds,’ Digital Creativity, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 39-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/digc. Scholar

  • Cybertelecom (n.d.), Timeline: Internet, Federal Govt, and Communications. Retrieved from http://www.cybertelecom.org/notes/timeline.htm [accessed on 30 April 2013]Google Scholar

  • -- (2012), Federal Internet Law & Policy An Educational Project. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.cybertelecom.org/ [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Damasio, M. J.; Henriques, S. & Costa, C. Á. O. (2012), ‘Virtual communities and social activities: reframing the online experience,’ International Journal of WebBased Communities, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 159-176.Google Scholar

  • Del Duca, L., Rule, C., & Loebl, Z. (2011), ‘Facilitating Expansion of Cross-Border E-Commerce-Developing a Global Online Dispute Resolution System (Lessons Derived from Existing ODR Systems-Work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law),’ Penn State Law Legal Studies Research Paper, vol. 1, no. 1.Google Scholar

  • Del Duca, L.; Rule, C. & Rogers, V. (2010), ‘Designing a Global Consumer Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) System for Cross-Border Small Value-High Volume Claims-OAS Developments. UCC Law Journal, vol. 42, p. 221.Google Scholar

  • DeLong, J. B. & Magin, K. (2006), A Short Note on the Size of the Dot-Com Bubble, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 12011.Google Scholar

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983), ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,’ AmericanSociological Review, vol. 48 (April), pp. 147-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drezner, D. W. (2004), ‘The global governance of the Internet: Bringing the state back in,’ Political Science Quarterly, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 477-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20202392CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunne, R. L. (1994), ‘Deterring Unauthorized Access to Computers: Controlling Behavior in Cyberspace through a Contract Law Paradigm,’ Jurimetrics Journal, vol. 35, no. 1.Google Scholar

  • Dutton, W. H.; Dopatka, A.; Hills, M.; Law, G. & Nash, V. (2010), Freedom ofConnection - Freedom of Expression: The Changing Legal and Regulatory EcologyShaping the Internet or Dutton, W. H. et al. (2011), Freedom of Connection -Freedom of Expression: The Changing Legal and Regulatory Ecology Shapingthe Internet, Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1654464 [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Dutton, W. H. & Peltu, M. (2007), ‘The emerging Internet governance mosaic: connecting the pieces,’ Journal of Information Polity, vol. 12, nos. 1-2, pp. 63-81.Google Scholar

  • EC (2009), Internet of Things: An Action Plan for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament,the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2009) 278 final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0278:FIN:EN:PDF [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • EDRI (2013), Copyright: Challenges of the Digital Era, European Digital RightsPapers, No. 7. Retrieved from http://www.edri.org/files/paper07_copyright.pdf [accessed April 2013]Google Scholar

  • Ellison, N. B. (2007), ‘Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship,’ Journalof Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 210-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.10836101.2007.00393.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eurostat (n.d.), Telecommunication statistics: Eurostat. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Telecommunication_statistics [last accessed April 2013]Google Scholar

  • Eveleens, C. (2010), ‘Innovation management; a literature review of innovation process models and their implications,’ Science, 800 (2010), p. 900.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, C. (2007), ‘Towards a dynamic theory of virtual communities,’ InternationalJournal of Knowledge and Learning, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 372-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2007.016701CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, L. J. (1996), ‘No Regulation, Government Regulation, or Self-Regulation: Social Enforcement or Social Contracting for Governance in Cyberspace,’ CornellJL and Pub. Pol’y, vol. 6, pp. 475-529.Google Scholar

  • Goldsmith, J. L. (2000[1998]), ‘Regulation of the Internet: Three Persistent Fallacies,’ Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 73, pp. 1119-1131. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=204632 [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Goldsmith, J. L. & Wu, T. (2006), Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a BorderlessWorld, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Google (n.d.), Our History in Depth. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/intl/en/about/company/history/ [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Google IPv6 (n.d.), What if the Internet Ran out of Room? In fact it is already happening. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6 [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Grier, D. A. & Campbell, M. (2000), ‘A social history of Bitnet and Listserv, 1985-1991,’ Annals of the History of Computing, IEEE, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 32-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/85.841135Google Scholar

  • Griset, P. & Schafer, V. (2011), ‘Hosting the World Wide Web Consortium for Europe: from CERN to INRIA,’ History and Technology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 353-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2011.604177CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gurstein, M. (2003), ‘Effective use: A community informatics strategy beyond the digital divide,’ First Monday, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i12.1107CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Halpin, E. F. & Simpson, S. (2002), ‘Between self-regulation and intervention in the networked economy: the European Union and Internet policy,’ Journal ofInformation Science, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 285-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800403CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hervás Soriano, F. & Mulatero, F. (2010), ’Knowledge Policy in the EU: From the Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020,’ Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 289-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0020-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hjarvard, S. (2008), ‘The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change,’ Nordicom Review, vol. 29, pp. 105-134.Google Scholar

  • Hodges, C. J.; Benöhr, I. & Creutzfeldt-Banda, N. (2012), Consumer ADR in Europe, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Huded, G. & King, K. F. (2010), ‘Foreword: Maturing Internet Studies,’ Nw. UL Rev., vol. 104, p. 427.Google Scholar

  • IAB (1996), Architectural Principles of the Internet, Memo of Internet Architecture Board from June 1996, ed. by B. E. Carpenter. Retrieved from http://www.rfceditor.org/rfc/rfc1958.txt [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • ICT Statistics (n.d.), ICT Statistics of International Telecommunications Union. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • ICU (n.d.), Official website of International Telecommunications Union. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html [accessed 30 March 2013]Google Scholar

  • IETF (n.d.), The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Retrieved from https://www.ietf.org/ [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • IGF (n.d.), Official website of Internet Governance Forum. Retrieved from http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/ [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Internet2 (n.d.), Internet2: The First 10 Years. Retrieved from http://www.internet2.edu/about/timeline/ [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • ISOC (n.d.), The Internet Society. Retrieved from http://www.internetsociety.org/ [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • ITU (2005), The Internet of Things: ITU Internet Reports 2005, Executive Summary. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/pol/S-POL-IR.IT-2005-SUM-PDF-E.pdf [accessed May 2013Google Scholar

  • Jensen, C. (2003), ‘The more things change, the more they stay the same: Copyright, digital technology, and social norms,’ Stanford Law Review, pp. 531-570.Google Scholar

  • Joamets, K. & Solarte-Vasquez, M. C. S. (2004), Legal Environment of Business:Textbook, Tallinn: Tallinn University of Technology Press.Google Scholar

  • Kanter, J. P. (1998), Understanding Thin-Client/Server Computing, Redmond: Microsoft Press.Google Scholar

  • Kaptelinin, V. & Nardi, B. A. (2006), Acting with Technology: Activity Theory andInteraction Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Katsh, E. & Rainey, D. (2001), ‘Online dispute resolution: Some lessons from the e-commerce revolution,’ N. Ky. L. Rev., vol. 28, p. 810.Google Scholar

  • Kleinrock, L. (2010), ‘An early history of the Internet [History of Communications],’ Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 26-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2010.5534584CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krcmar, H.; Friesike, S.; Böhm, M. & Schildhauer, T. (2012), ‘Innovation, Society and Business: Internet-Based Business Models and Their Implications,’ HIIGDiscussion Paper Series, No. 2012-07.Google Scholar

  • Kshetri, N. B. (2001), ‘Determinants of the locus of global e-commerce,’ Electronic Markets, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 250-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/101967801753405535CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leaffer, M. (1995), ‘Protecting Author’s Rights in a Digital Age,’ U. Tol. L. Rev., vol. 27, no. 1.Google Scholar

  • Lee, C. S. (2001), ‘An analytical framework for evaluating e-commerce business models and strategies,’ Internet Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 349-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10662240110402803CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, E. A. (2000), ‘What’s ahead for embedded software?’ Computer, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.868693CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leiner, B. M.; Cerf, V. G.; Clark, D. D.; Kahn, R. E.; Kleinrock, L.; Lynch,D. C., Postel. J; Roberts, L. G. & Wolff, S. (2009), ‘A brief history of the Internet,’ Computer Communication Review, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 22-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1629607.1629613CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lessig, L. (2001), The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

  • -- (2006), Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Licklider, J. C. R. (1960), ‘Man-computer symbiosis,’ IRE Transactions on HumanFactors in Electronics, vol. HFE-1, pp. 4-11. Retrieved from http://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/people/psz/Licklider.html [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Licklider, J. C. & Taylor, R. W. (1968), ‘The computer as a communication device,’ Science and Technology, vol. 76, no. 2, p. 20-41.Google Scholar

  • Li, Y. M. & Yeh, Y. S. (2010), ‘Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics,’ Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 673-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.004CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGarty, T. P. (2000), The Evolution of International Internet Telephony, Paper presented at Telecommunciations Policy Research Conference on Sept.23-25, 2000, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • Mak, V. & Nemeth, K. (2012), ‘The EU’s Digital Agenda: new proposals for online and offline consumer disputes, e-commerce and card, internet and mobile payments,’ Zeitschrift für Europäisches Unternehmens-und Verbraucherrecht, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 112-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13590-012-0007-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malerba, F. (2005), ‘Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors,’ Economics of Innovationand New Technology, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 63-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milton L. M. (2010), Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Maskus, K. E. (2000), Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

  • May, C. (2000), A Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The NewEnclosures? London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Microsoft (n.d.), Microsoft Corporation. A history of Windows: Highlights from the first 25 years 1975-1981: Microsoft boots up. Retrieved from http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/history [accessed 2 April 2013]Google Scholar

  • Mowery, D. C. & Simcoe, T. (2002), ‘Is the Internet a US invention?-an economic and technological history of computer networking,’ Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1369-1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00069-0CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mueller, M. (1999), ‘ICANN and Internet governance: sorting through the debris of “self-regulation”,’ info, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 497-520.Google Scholar

  • Norris, P. (2003), Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, And theInternet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ottaway, M. & Hamzawy, A. (2011), Protest Movements and Political Change in theArab World, Policy Outlook, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

  • Pearce, G. & Platten, N. (2002), ‘Promoting the Information Society: The EU Directive on Electronic Commerce,’ European Law Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 363-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/14680386.00113CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pechman, R. J. (1998), ‘Seeking Multilateral Protection for Intellectual Property: The United States “TRIPs” over Special 301,’ Minn. J. Global Trade, vol. 7, p. 179.Google Scholar

  • Perez, C. (2004), ‘Technological revolutions, paradigm shifts and socio-institutional change,’ in E. Reinert (ed.), Globalization, Economic Development and Inequality, Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 217-242. Retrieved from http://carlotaperez.org/papers/TRs%20TEP%20shifts%20and%20SIF%20ch.pdf [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Poblet, M., ed. (2011), Mobile Technologies for Conflict Management: Online DisputeResolution, Governance, Participation, Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 2, Dordrecht, London, etc.: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Postel, J. B., Sunshine, C. A., & Cohen, D. (1981), ‘The ARPA internet protocol,’ Computer Networks (1976), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 261-271.Google Scholar

  • Radin, M. P. & Wagner, R. P. (1999), ‘The myth of private ordering: rediscovering legal realism in cyberspace,’ SSRN Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=162488 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.162488 [accessed May 2013]CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reichman, J. H. (1995), ‘Universal minimum standards of intellectual property protection under the TRIPS component of the WTO agreement,’ In Int’l L., vol. 29, no. 2, p. 345-388.Google Scholar

  • Riley, M. C. (2011), ‘Disruptive Internet Innovation and Communications Law,’ SSRNWorking Paper Series. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1933611 [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Rückriem, G. (2009), ‘Digital technology and mediation: A challenge to activity theory,’ in A. Sannino, H. Daniels & K. D. Gutierrez (eds.) Learning and Expanding withActivity Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809989.007CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rustad, M. L. (2009), ‘Internet Law in a Nutshell,’ in M. L. Rustad (ed.) Internet Lawin a Nutshell, Eagan: West Group.Google Scholar

  • Rustad, M. L. & Daftary, C. (2001), E-Business Legal Handbook, New York: Panel Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Rustad, M. L. & D’Angelo, D. (2011), ‘Path of Internet Law: An Annotated Guide to Legal Landmarks,’ The. Duke L. & Tech. Rev., vol. 2011, no. 012.Google Scholar

  • Saldías, O. (2012), ‘Patterns of Legalization in the Internet: Do We Need a Constitutional Theory for Internet Law?’ HIIG Discussion Paper Series, no. 8; Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Internet & Society Working Paper No. 2/11. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1942161 [accessed May 2013] Samuelson, P. (1990), ‘Digital media and the changing face of intellectual property law,’ RutgersComputer & Tech. L.J., vol. 16, pp. 323-340.Google Scholar

  • Schultz, T. (2004), ‘Does online dispute resolution need governmental intervention?’ North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, vol. 6, p. 71.Google Scholar

  • -- (2006), An Essay on the Role of Government for ODR: Theoretical Considerationsabout the Future of ODR. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=896678 [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • SIIA (2008), Software and Information: Driving the Global Knowledge Community, Washington, DC: Software & Information Industry Association.Google Scholar

  • Spencer, L. & Dale, A. (1979), ‘Integration and regulation in organizations: A contextual approach,’ The Sociological Review, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 679-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467954X.1979.tb00355.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swilley, E.; Hofacker, C. F. & Lamont, B. T. (2012), ‘The evolution from e-commerce to m-commerce: pressures, firm capabilities and competitive advantage in strategic decision making,’ International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jebr.2012010101CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Utterback, J. M. (1996), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

  • Utterback, J. M. & Abernathy, W. J. (1975), ‘A dynamic model of process and product innovation,’ Omega, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 639-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dijk, J. & Hacker, K. (2003), ‘The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon,’ The Information Society, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 315-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vermesan, O.; Friess, P.; Guillemin, P.; Gusmeroli, S.; Sundmaeker, H.; Bassi, A.;Jubert, I. S.; Mazura, M.; Harrison, M.; Eisenhauer, M. & Doody, P. (2011), ‘Internet of things strategic research roadmap,’ in Internet of Things-GlobalTechnological and Societal Trends, pp. 10-52.Google Scholar

  • Wahab, M. (2004), ‘Globalisation and ODR: dynamics of change in e-commerce dispute settlement,’ International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 123-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/12.1.123CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Waz, J. & Weiser, P. (2013), ‘Internet governance: the role of multistakeholder organisations,’ Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, vol.10, no. 2, pp. 331-445.Google Scholar

  • Weber, A. M. (2003), ‘Council of Europe’s Convention on Cybercrime,’ The BerkeleyTech. LJ, vol. 18, p. 425.Google Scholar

  • Wilkinson, I. & Young, L. (2012), ‘Innovation and Evolution of Business Relations and Networks: Theory and Method.’ Retrieved from arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.1332.Google Scholar

  • Whitworth, B. & Ahmad, A. (2013), The Social Design of Technical Systems: Buildingtechnologies for communities. Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation. Online book retrieved from http://www.interactiondesign.org/books/the_social_design_of_technical_systems.html [accessed May 2013] http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2012.047878CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whitworth, B. & Sylla, C. (2012), ‘A social environment model of socio-technical performance,’ International Journal for Networking and Virtual Organizations, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-29.Google Scholar

  • Wu, T. (2006), ‘Network Neutrality: Competition, Innovation, and Non-discriminatory Access.’ Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=903118 [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Webster, F. (2006), Theories of the Information Society, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Worldwidewebsize (2013), The Size of the World Wide Web (the Internet). Retrieved from http://www.worldwidewebsize.com/ [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Yoo, C. S. (2010), ‘Is the Internet a maturing market? If so, what does that imply?’ Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 24-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1787234.1787243CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yoo, Y.; Lyytinen, K. J.; Boland, R. J. & Berente, N. (2010), ‘The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop “Digital Challenges in Innovation Research”.’ Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1622170 [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Zakon, R. H. (2000), Hobbes’ Internet Timeline. Retrieved from http://courseweb.lt.unt.edu/gjones/spr2011/ltec3530/pdf/www.zakon.org_robert.pdf [accessed May 2013]Google Scholar

  • Zittrain, J. L. (2009), The Future of the Internet: And How to Stop It, New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Maria Claudia Solarte-Vasquez

Maria Claudia Solarte-Vasquez received her LLM degree from the Washington College of Law of the American University. She obtained a BA in Law and Political Sciences from the Law Department of Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana in Medellín, Colombia. Her professional activity has developed in the field of international transactions and risk management. From 1996 she has designed courses that incorporate preventive law approaches and alternative resolution methods for dispute resolution. For 16 years she has lectured ADR, introduction to law, comparative legal systems, and legislative policy, with focus on its convergence with technology and innovation. Internet governance has been the subject of her latest research. Her main concerns regard regulatory legitimacy and the limits of the rule of law doctrine.

Published Online: 2013-06-18

Published in Print: 2013-06-01

Citation Information: Baltic Journal of European Studies, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 84–120, ISSN (Print) 2228-0596, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2013-0006.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in