In 1942, a protein migrating ahead of albumin during electrophoresis of human plasma (1) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (2) samples, was identified and denominated ‘prealbumin’. The discovery that prealbumin could bind thyroid hormones (THs) led to a change of its name to ‘thyroxine-binding prealbumin’ (TBPA) (3). Later, it was found that TBPA could also bind retinol-binding protein (RBP) (4). In 1981, the International Union of Biochemists adopted the name ‘transthyretin’ (TTR) (5) because of its well-known role in the transport of the THs thyroxine and retinol (vitamin A) through binding to RBP.
TTR is a highly conserved protein that is found in several vertebrate species (6, 7). Recently, sequences homologous to TTR, known as transthyretin-like proteins (TLPs), have been found in bacteria, nematodes and plants. In Escherichia coli and Caenorhabditis elegans TLPs form homotetramers, like TTR, although without the ability to bind T4 (8).
The first X-ray crystal structure of TTR was reported in 1971 (9). TTR is a 54,980 Daltons (Da) homotetrameric protein; each subunit has 13,745 Da and is composed of 127 amino acids (10). Native TTR has a globular shape with an overall size of 70 Å×55 Å×50 Å and a central hydrophobic channel. Each monomer consists of eight antiparallel β-strands (A through H), which are organized into two four-stranded β-sheets (DAGH and CBEF) and only a short α-helix located on β-strand E (11). A dimer is formed when β-strands F and H of each subunit interact by hydrogen bonds. Tetramer formation results from interaction of the residues of the loops that join β-strands G to H and A to B. It is known that low pH promotes the dissociation of TTR tetramer into monomers. The neutral crystal structure of TTR demonstrated double protonation of His88 to break the hydrogen-bond network, causing destabilization of the TTR tetramer (12).
TTR is mainly synthetized by the liver (13) and the choroid plexus of brain (14), which are the sources of TTR in plasma and CSF, respectively. In humans, 90% of plasma TTR is secreted from liver and its concentration ranges from 20 to 40 mg/dl (15). TTR levels in plasma change with age: they are decreased in healthy newborns when compared with adults (16, 17) and start to decline after 50 years of age (18).
Synthesis of TTR by epithelial cells of the choroid plexus is the main source of CSF TTR (14). TTR concentration in CSF ranges from 5 to 20 mg/l (19), representing approximately 25% of the total CSF protein content (20). The choroid plexus has 11 times more mRNA than the liver, normalized for tissue weight, and synthetizes TTR 13 times faster than the liver (21).
TTR synthesis in brain areas, other than the choroid plexus, has been a controversial subject. The presence of TTR mRNA in murine or human brains has been detected in brain areas such as the cortex, hippocampus or cerebellum (22–25). Some authors claimed that brain TTR may be caused by neuronal synthesis of the protein in these tissues; while others proved, by laser microdissection technology and in situ hybridization, that TTR is not produced in brain parenchyma, suggesting that TTR contamination by choroid plexus may induce false-positive results concerning sites of TTR synthesis (26).
Besides the liver and the choroid plexus, TTR synthesis has been described in several other tissues. TTR is highly transcribed and translated in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), a monolayer of cells that acts as blood barrier for the retina (27). TTR is also produced in the pancreatic islet of Langerhans (α cells) (28, 29), and to a small extent in the heart, skeletal muscle, spleen (30), visceral yolk sac endoderm (31), pineal gland (32) and trophoblasts of human placenta (33). Although the expression of TTR in the stomach was previously described (30), a specific gastric cellular population of ghrelin cells was recently identified as TTR producers (34).
Although TTR production has been extensively studied, its catabolism is not fully understood. The biological half-life of TTR is about 2–3 days in humans (35), 23h in monkeys (36) and 29h in Buffalo rats (37). In 1988, Makover and colleagues demonstrated that the major sites of TTR degradation were the liver, muscle and skin. In their studies, 36–38% of total body TTR degradation occurred in liver, 12–15% in muscle and 8–10% in skin. In kidneys, adipose tissue, testis and gastrointestinal tract (GI), the degradation rate of body TTR was 1–8%, whereas <1% was degraded by the other tissues examined (38). No evidence was found of TTR degradation in tissues of the nervous system. Liver and kidney were the most active organs of TTR catabolism, per gram of wet weight. TTR internalization in liver and kidney is receptor-mediated. Renal uptake of TTR was shown to be megalin-[also known as low-density lipoprotein-related protein 2 (LRP2)] mediated (39). Megalin is an endocytic multi-ligand receptor of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, that is expressed in the epithelium of renal proximal tubes, among other epithelia. Sousa et al. demonstrated that TTR uptake in liver was mediated by a receptor member of LDL family sensitive to receptor-associated protein (RAP) (40). Inhibition of TTR uptake by RAP suggested a common pathway between TTR and lipoproteins metabolism. As megalin is not expressed in liver, further studies need to be performed in order to clarify TTR internalization in this organ.
TTR synthesis and secretion by placental trophoblasts was described (33, 41). Secretion of TTR from trophoblasts to maternal placental circulation is followed by trophoblasts uptake of TTR-T4 complex to the fetal circulation (42) and is important for fetal development. This uptake was suggested to occur through a LRP receptor.
TTR has been mainly recognized by its role as a carrier protein of THs and retinol in plasma and CSF. However, during the last years, a role in proteolysis and in several functions in the nervous system has also been proposed.
Transport of T4
Thyroid hormones are iodinated compounds essential for development, tissue differentiation and regulation of metabolic balance in mammals. In recent years a role in cell migration, signaling, myelination and promotion of neurite outgrowth has also been proposed (43, 44).
The thyroid gland synthetizes three THs: tetraiodothyroxine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3) and a biologically inactive reverse T3 (rT3).
T4 is the most abundant TH secreted by the thyroid gland and circulates in plasma bound to thyroid hormone-binding proteins (THBPs) thyroxin-binding globulin (TBG), TTR and albumin. TBG has the strongest affinity to T4, carrying 65% of the hormone (45); 15% of human plasma T4 is transported by TTR and about 10% by albumin; finally, 0.03–0.05% circulates unbound or in a free form (46). In rodents, 50% of total T4 is carried by TTR (47). In CSF of both rodents and humans, TTR is the main carrier of T4, transporting 80% of the hormone (48). The homotetrameric structure of native TTR forms a central hydrophobic channel with two binding sites for T4 (49). As these binding sites exhibit negative cooperativity, just one molecule of T4 is transported by TTR (50).
The delivery of T4 in cells is not a consensual subject; while some defend that uptake of T4 occurs bound to the carrier proteins, others claim that T4 enters the cell by passive diffusion after dissociation from the carrier protein (51, 52). Studies on TTR null mice (53) support the free T4 tissue uptake hypothesis. TTR null mice exhibited 50% reduction of total T4 in blood and 30% in CSF, when compared with wild-type animals, whereas the levels of free T4 and total circulating T3 were unaltered. Several parameters measured in this strain of mice indicated the animals to be euthyroid (54). Taken together, the results suggest that TTR is not pivotal to TH metabolism, even in conditions of increased hormone demand as cold exposition or thyroidectomy (55).
The redundant role of TTR was also described for other THBPs, such as albumin in rats (56) and TBG in humans (57, 58). A critical role for TTR on T4 transport across the placenta and delivery to the fetus was recently described (42, 59). Further studies need to be performed to clarify the role of TTR on T4 delivery into tissues.
Transport of retinol
Retinol, or vitamin A, and related metabolites are obtained from the diet. Oxidation of retinol originates retinoic acid, which is very important in several functions including vision, reproduction, growth and development (60). It also modulates neurogenesis, neuronal survival and synaptic plasticity in hippocampus, olfactory bulb and hypothalamus (61). Retinoids can regulate cell differentiation, neurite outgrowth and protection against oxidative stress (62). Several studies suggest vitamin A as a possible therapeutic agent in Alzheimer disease (AD): (i) the disruption of retinoid signaling induced deposition of Aβ in the cerebral blood vessels (63); (ii) vitamin A inhibited amyloid fibril formation (64) and (iii) in vivo studies revealed that administration of vitamin A decreased Aβ deposition and improved spatial learning and memory (65).
The transport of retinol in circulation occurs through RBP (66). This molecule is mainly synthetized in the liver and secreted to plasma after retinol binding. TTR associates to the RBP-retinol complex before secretion into the plasma (4). The TTR-RBP complex is a very stable form of retinol transport, allowing its delivery to cells and is important to prevent RBP from being filtered and degraded in the kidney (67, 68).
TTR tetramer has four RBP-binding sites, two in each dimer at the protein’s surface; because of steric hindrance, just two RBP are transported by each TTR molecule. Under physiological conditions, due to low RBP levels comparatively with TTR, just one molecule of RBP is transported by the TTR tetramer (69, 70). T4 binding to TTR is not influenced by RBP binding (4).
Studies in TTR null mice showed a dramatic reduction of retinol and RBP plasma levels (around 95%) when compared with wild-type littermates. This finding could be explained by increased renal filtration of the retinol-RBP complex (70). Increased hepatic RBP levels were found in TTR null mice (71). However, in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that RBP liver secretion from plasma was unchanged (70), which indicates that diminished levels of RBP and retinol in plasma are not caused by a failure in secretion.
Symptoms of vitamin A deficiency, such as weight loss, infections and eye abnormalities were not observed in TTR mutant mice (70), suggesting that TTR role on RBP-retinol transport, does not play a critical role on retinol metabolism.
Retinol uptake was suggested to be mediated by a TTR-independent membrane receptor (72). Stra6 (a multi-transmembrane domain protein) was reported as a mediator of RBP4 binding to cell membranes and as crucial for cellular uptake of retinol (73). Moreover, a new retinol transporter has recently been identified, RBPR2, and suggested to play a role in retinol absorption (74).
Another important function of TTR besides its role in transport of T4 and retinol is its proteolytic activity on several substrates. A small fraction of plasma TTR (1–2%) is carried by high-density lipoproteins (HDL) through binding to apolipoprotein (apo) A-I (75). The TTR-apoA-I interaction was further investigated and TTR was described as a non-canonical serine protease capable to cleave apoA-I carboxyl terminal domain (76) and to reduce cholesterol efflux (77). TTR has also the ability to cleave neuropeptide Y (NPY) (78) and Aβ peptide (79). Cleavage of Aβ can occur at several different sites, and the resulting peptides were shown to have decreased amyloidogenic potential when compared with the complete peptide. TTR was also able to degrade aggregated forms of Aβ; inhibition of TTR activity resulted in increased Aβ fibril formation (79). TTR proteolytic role on NPY and Aβ peptide need further investigation to determine its functional role in the nervous system.
TTR in the nervous system
Several studies have shown different roles for TTR in nervous system physiology. Behavior, cognition, neuropeptide amidation, neurogenesis, nerve regeneration, axonal growth and 14-3-3ζ metabolism are some of the known processes influenced by TTR as studied in TTR null mice.
TTR null animals are viable, phenotypically similar to wild-type and heterozygous littermates, and fertile (53). This strain presents reduced signs of depressive-like behavior, increased exploratory activity and anxiety (80). Increased levels of norepinephrine in the limbic forebrain could be a possible explanation for the observed phenotype. TTR null mice presented increased levels of NPY in dorsal root ganglia (DRG), sciatic nerve, spinal cord, hippocampus, cortex and CSF ascribed to up-regulation of peptidylglycine α-amidating monooxygenase (PAM) – the only enzyme that amidates neuropeptides, being crucial for the maturation process of NPY (81, 82). These findings corroborate the importance of TTR in modulating depressive behavior.
Cognitive performance analysis of young/adult TTR null mice showed memory impairment when compared with wild-type littermates (24, 83, 84). With aging, TTR wild-type animals presented worsened cognitive performance, attributable to reduced levels of CSF TTR, a fact that enhances the important role of TTR in cognition (83).
Increased locomotor activity in young/adult TTR null animals was confirmed by Fleming et al.; in older mice, a sensorimotor impairment was observed (85). No morphological differences in sciatic nerves and cerebellum were found in TTR null animals that could explain the absence of sensorimotor impairment at young ages. However, under nerve crush conditions, absence of TTR slowed nerve regeneration (85). TTR null mice have slower recovery of locomotor activity and slower nerve conduction velocity. Neuropathological parameters such as decreased levels of myelinated and unmyelinated axons were also observed in TTR null animals when compared with wild-type littermates. TTR properties as a nerve regeneration enhancer were further demonstrated when TTR delivery to crushed sciatic nerves rescued the regeneration phenotype of TTR null animals (86).
TTR has also the capacity of inducing neurite outgrowth in DGR and PC12 cells, independently of its ligands (85). Neuritogenic activity of TTR in DRG neurons depends on its internalization, a process that is clathrin-dependent and megalin-mediated. In vivo studies in a mouse model with reduced levels of megalin, demonstrated decreased nerve regeneration capacity. Thus, reduced megalin levels impair TTR action as an enhancer of regeneration (86).
The binding of TTR to glucose-regulated protein (Grp)78 at the plasma membrane of β-cells and its internalization was recently demonstrated (87) and hypothesized to be essential for insulin release and protection against β-cells apoptosis (88).
Finally a role for TTR in 14-3-3ζ metabolism has been suggested. Hippocampus of young TTR null mice presented lower levels of 14-3-3ζ protein, but no changes in gene expression. Lysosomal degradation of 14-3-3ζ in the absence of TTR was the mechanism proposed for the reduced 14-3-3ζ levels (89). Hippocampal slice cultures of TTR null mice did not present increased cellular death when compared wild-type animals (90), suggesting that the decreased levels of 14-3-3ζ observed in these animals are not associated with increased cellular death. Furthermore, in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease patients, 14-3-3 proteins are used as a surrogate marker for the in vivo diagnosis of the disease, whereas TTR levels are the same as compared with healthy controls (91, 92). Taken together, these results suggest that the regulation of 14-3-3ζ levels by TTR is not associated with cellular death. Further studies should be performed to dissect the mechanism and the consequences of this regulation.
TTR in diseases of the nervous system
Differences in TTR levels and/or increased oxidation are found in several neuropathologies, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), frontotemporal dementia (FDT), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). In GBS and FDT, TTR levels are elevated as compared to controls, in plasma and CSF (93, 94), whereas in ALS TTR was up regulated in rapid progression of the disease when compared with slow progression of the disease (95). Finally, plasma and CSF from PD patients present increased TTR levels when compared to controls, which led to suggest TTR as an early marker of the disease (96). Further studies should be performed in order to dissect the underlying mechanisms behind TTR role in PD.
The neuroprotective role of TTR in the central nervous system has been described in more detail in ischemia and AD and will be discussed in the next sections.
Ischemia is a significant cause of brain injury worldwide, leading to high mortality, physical and cognitive incapacities. TTR was identified as being differentially expressed in fluids or tissues after ischemia (97–99) and a mice model of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) showed TTR as a neuroprotective molecule. TTR null mice heterozygous for heatshock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) (TTR-/-/HSF1/+/-) presented increased infarct area, cerebral edema and microglial-leukocyte response when compared with TTR wild-type animals (TTR+/+/HSF+/-), 24h after pMCAO. Interestingly, TTR was localized in disintegrated β-tubulin III-positive neurons and cell debris. Elimination of TTR secreted by liver after treatment with RNAi had no effect on the distribution of TTR in endangered neurons, indicating that TTR mobilization to neurons was of CSF origin. These results suggested the neuroprotective role of CSF TTR in cerebral ischemia (100).
An epidemiologic study revealed that the population heterozygous for T119M (a TTR mutant with increased tetrameric stability) have decreased risk of cerebrovascular disease and increased life expectancy when compared with noncarriers individuals (101).
The mechanisms behind these observations warrant further investigation.
AD is the most common form of dementia, affecting millions of people worldwide. The two main histopathological marks of AD are neurofibrillary tangles (aggregates of hyperphosphorylated tau protein) and senile plaques (aggregates of Aβ peptide) (102).
A role for TTR in AD has been suggested by several groups. The first description of decreased TTR levels in CSF of AD patients dates back to 1986 (103). Recently, with the use of powerful tools, a 2-fold decrease in TTR levels in CSF of AD patients was demonstrated (92, 104). As observed in CSF, TTR plasma levels are decreased in AD patients and mild-cognitive impairment (MCI) when compared with non-demented controls, suggesting TTR as an early AD biomarker (105, 106).
TTR is able to bind Aβ peptides, preventing the formation of amyloid fibrils (107). Analysis of Aβ aggregation kinetics, showed that, in the presence of TTR, the aggregation rate of this peptide is decreased (108).
Animal models of AD are a useful tool to dissect the mechanism behind the disease. Different animal models have been used but TTR role in AD is controversial.
Initially, a protective role of TTR was described in APPswe/PS1ΔE9 animals. In this strain of mice [double transgenic mice expressing the human amyloid precursor (APP) with a Swedish mutation and a human presenilin (PS) deletion] Aβ and amyloid deposits were decreased when the animals were exposed to an enriched environment (large cages, running wheels, colored tunnels, toys, and chewable material), which was attributable to TTR up-regulation (109). When these animals were in a heterozygous background for endogeneous TTR (half dose TTR), Aβ levels and deposition were increased in the hippocampus and cortex as compared with their TTR wild-type animals littermates (110). Moreover, TTR neuroprotection in AD was also observed in female APP/PS double transgenic mice bearing a PS A24E mutation; female heterozygous animals for TTR presented increased levels of Aβ42 when compared with TTR wild-type female littermates whereas no differences were found in males of the different genotypes (111). The neuroprotective role of TTR in AD was further corroborated by overexpression of human TTR in the APP23 mouse model (that expresses human APP), leading to decreased Aβ levels and deposition and improved cognition (24).
By contrast, other studies revealed a harmful role of TTR in AD. In the Tg2576 mouse model (transgenic mutant APP), absence of TTR was associated with decreased vascular Aβ burden (112). Moreover, studies in the TgCRND8 mouse strain (strain carrying combined APP mutations), demonstrated that reduction of TTR levels decreased Aβ plaque burden in the hippocampus of 4-month-old animals (113).
All together, the observed effects in the different mice strains, call attention to the interplay of genetic, hormonal and environmental factors known to exist in a complex disease such as AD.
Recently, it was demonstrated that administration of the TTR tetrameric stabilizer iododiflunisal (IDIF) to APP//PS A246E mice, heterozygous for TTR, decreased Aβ deposition and improved cognitive functions (114). Stabilization of TTR through IDIF seems to be a good mechanism to design drugs to AD treatment and sets the basis for further experiments with different TTR tetrameric stabilizers classes.
TTR as an amyloidogenic protein
When the word ‘transthyretin’ is mentioned, the first pathology that emerges is systemic amyloidosis. TTR is the causative agent of a special group of diseases of protein aggregation associated with amyloid fibril deposition. The amyloidoses comprise a spectrum of diseases, either acquired or hereditary, characterized by the extracellular deposition of fibrillar material in specific organs and tissues in the form of amyloid. These fibrils are 7–10 nm wide, rigid, non-branching and are of variable lengths with a typical twisted β-pleated-sheet structure. They present unique tinctorial properties, such as apple-green birefringence under polarized light upon staining with Congo red. The excessive accumulation of these amyloid fibrils gives rise to abnormalities in the function of affected organs. Several apparently nonrelated proteins can be found as main constituents of amyloid fibrils, and this chemical heterogeneity is associated with specific clinical forms of amyloidosis.
Most forms of TTR amyloidosis are hereditary in an autosomal dominant manner; Andrade described the first form of an hereditary amyloidosis in the Northern area of Portugal, near Porto, in family members with age of onset of clinical symptoms in the third to fourth decade of life, nominated familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) (115). Early impairment of temperature and pain sensation in the feet, and autonomic dysfunction leading to paresis, malabsorption, emaciation and death were typical clinical features (116, 117). The genetic defect in these Portuguese families has been ascribed to a single point mutation in the TTR gene, originating a mutant TTR (TTR Val30Met) by far, the most frequent TTR mutation associated with FAP in Portugal and elsewhere (118). Over 100 different TTR mutations have been described (119), some of these are associated with FAP clinically, not differing from the original description of the disease; others give rise to variable phenotypes, such as the presence of both neuropathy and cardiomyopathy, presentation of carpal tunnel syndrome, predominant vitreous TTR deposition and leptomeningeal involvement. A few TTR mutations are related to cardiomyopathy without neurological symptoms [familial amyloidotic cardiomyopathy (FAC)]. The most common TTR mutation associated with cardiac amyloidosis is Val122Ile, in the Black population after the age of 60; isolated cardiac amyloidosis is four times more common among Black people than White people in the US and 3.9% of Black people are heterozygous for Val122Ile (120).
TTR can also deposit as amyloid in the heart of elderly people; in the early days this was recognized as a post-mortem finding on 5% of autopsies, a condition termed ‘senile systemic amyloidosis’. With the evolution of imagiology tools, awareness is growing (121).
Normal TTR can also aggregate and form deposits in preeclampsia placental tissue to cause apoptosis. It is present at reduced levels in sera of preeclamptic women, as detected by a proteomic screen (122). The mechanism behind TTR aggregation under this physiological condition is highly unknown.
The precise trigger for TTR aggregation as amyloid is unknown and constitutes a major trend in TTR amyloidosis research. Structural studies correlate the amyloidogenic potential of TTR with weak interactions between subunits. These studies suggest that amyloid fibril formation by some TTR mutants might be triggered by tetramer dissociation to a compact non-native monomer with low conformational stability, which results in partially unfolded monomeric species with a high tendency for ordered aggregation into amyloid fibrils (123). In senile systemic amyloidosis where normal non-mutated TTR deposits in the heart, is has been hypothesized that amyloid formation is related to proteolytic events, or yet unidentified factors related to aging.
In the future it is important to dissect in molecular terms the role of TTR in the nervous system, both in the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) – namely receptors and downstream pathways – to explain the phenotypes so far described in TTR null mice both in normal conditions and in experimental paradigms under stressful conditions. Additionally the role of TTR in other systems, such as the intestinal tract and the placenta should be developed.
TTR transport of thyroxine and RBP
TTR and neurite outgrowth
TTR and 14-3-3ζ metabolism
TTR in neurodegenerative diseases
TTR in behavior
Role of TTR in AD and ischemia
Seibert FB, Nelson JW. Electrophoretic study of the blood protein response in tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 1942; 143: 29–38.Google Scholar
Kabat EA, Moore DH, Landow H. An electrophoretic study of the protein components in cerebrospinal fluid and their relationship to the serum proteins. J Clin Invest 1942; 21: 571–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingbar SH. Pre-albumin: a thyroxine binding protein of human plasma. Endocrinology 1958; 63: 256–9.Google Scholar
Raz A, Goodman DS. The interaction of thyroxine with human plasma prealbumin and with the prealbumin-retinol-binding protein complex. J Biol Chem 1969; 244: 3230–7.Google Scholar
Nomenclature committee of the International Union of Biochemistry (NC-IUB). Enzyme nomenclature. Recommendations 1978. Supplement 2: Corrections and additions. Eur J Biochem 1981; 116: 423–35.Google Scholar
Eneqvist T, Lundberg E, Nilsson L, Abagyan R, Sauer-Eriksson AE. The transthyretin-related protein family. Eur J Biochem 2003; 270: 518–32.Google Scholar
Kanda Y, Goodman DS, Canfield RE, Morgan FJ. The amino acid sequence of human plasma prealbumin. J Biol Chem 1974; 249: 6796–805.Google Scholar
Blake CC, Geisow MJ, Oatley SJ, Rérat B, Rérat C. Structure of prealbumin: secondary, tertiary and quaternary interactions determined by Fourier refinement at 1.8 Å. J Mol Biol 1978; 121: 339–56.Google Scholar
Yokoyama T, Mizuguchi M, Nabeshima Y, Kusaka K, Yamada T, Hosoya T, Ohhara T, Kurihara K, Tanaka I, Niimura N. Hydrogen-bond network and pH sensitivity in transthyretin: neutron crystal structure of human transthyretin. J Struct Biol 2012; 177: 283–90.Google Scholar
Felding P, Fex G. Cellular origin of prealbumin in the rat. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982; 716: 446–9.Google Scholar
Vahlquist A, Rask L, Peterson PA, Berg T. The concentrations of retinol-binding protein, prealbumin, and transferrin in the sera of newly delivered mothers and children of various ages. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1975; 35: 569–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vatassery GT, Quach HT, Smith WE, Benson BA, Eckfeldt JH. A sensitive assay of transthyretin (prealbumin) in human cerebrospinal fluid in nanogram amounts by ELISA. Clin Chim Acta 1991; 197: 19–25.Google Scholar
Schreiber G, Aldred AR, Jaworowski A, Nilsson C, Achen MG, Segal MB. Thyroxine transport from blood to brain via transthyretin synthesis in choroid plexus. Am J Physiol 1990; 258: R338–45.Google Scholar
Stein TD, Johnson JA. Lack of neurodegeneration in transgenic mice overexpressing mutant amyloid precursor protein is associated with increased levels of transthyretin and the activation of cell survival pathways. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 7380–8.Google Scholar
Buxbaum JN, Ye Z, Reixach N, Friske L, Levy C, Das P, Golde T, Masliah E, Roberts AR, Bartfai T. Transthyretin protects Alzheimer’s mice from the behavioral and biochemical effects of Abeta toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 2681–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer BA, Becerra SP, Borst DE, Wong P. Expression of transthyretin and retinol binding protein mRNAs and secretion of transthyretin by cultured monkey retinal pigment epithelium. Mol Vis 2004; 10: 23–30.Google Scholar
Kato M, Kato K, Blaner WS, Chertow BS, Goodman DS. Plasma and cellular retinoid-binding proteins and transthyretin (prealbumin) are all localized in the islets of Langerhans in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82: 2488–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson B, Collins VP, Grimelius L, Pettersson T, Sandstedt B, Carlstrom A. Transthyretin immunoreactivity in human and porcine liver, choroid plexus, and pancreatic islets. J Histochem Cytochem 1989; 37: 31–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soprano DR, Herbert J, Soprano KJ, Schon EA, Goodman DS. Demonstration of transthyretin mRNA in the brain and other extrahepatic tissues in the rat. J Biol Chem 1985; 260: 11793–8.Google Scholar
Soprano DR, Soprano KJ, Goodman DS. Retinol-binding protein and transthyretin mRNA levels in visceral yolk sac and liver during fetal development in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83: 7330–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martone RL, Mizuno R, Herbert J. The mammalian pineal gland is a synthetic site for TTR and RBP. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 175.Google Scholar
Socolow EL, Woeber KA, Purdy RH, Holloway MT, Ingbar SH. Preparation of I-131-labeled human serum prealbumin and its metabolism in normal and sick patients. J Clin Invest 1965; 44: 1600–9.Google Scholar
Vahlquist A. Metabolism of the vitamin-A-transporting protein complex: turnover of retinol-binding protein, prealbumin and vitamin A in a primate (Macaca Irus). Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1972; 30: 349–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dickson PW, Howlett GJ, Schreiber G. Metabolism of prealbumin in rats and changes induced by acute inflammation. Eur J Biochem 1982; 129: 289–93.Google Scholar
Makover A, Moriwaki H, Ramakrishnan R, Saraiva MJ, Blaner WS, Goodman DS. Plasma transthyretin. Tissue sites of degradation and turnover in the rat. J Biol Chem 1988; 263: 8598–603.Google Scholar
Sousa MM, Norden AG, Jacobsen C, Willnow TE, Christensen EI, Thakker RV, Verroust PJ, Moestrup SK, Saraiva MJ. Evidence for the role of megalin in renal uptake of transthyretin. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 38176–81.Google Scholar
Sousa MM, Saraiva MJ. Internalization of transthyretin. Evidence of a novel yet unidentified receptor-associated protein (RAP)-sensitive receptor. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 14420–5.Google Scholar
Mortimer RH, Landers KA, Balakrishnan B, Li H, Mitchell MD, Patel J, Richard K. Secretion and transfer of the thyroid hormone binding protein transthyretin by human placenta. Placenta 2012; 33: 252–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landers KA, McKinnon BD, Li H, Subramaniam VN, Mortimer RH, Richard K. Carrier-mediated thyroid hormone transport into placenta by placental transthyretin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 2610–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loun B, Hage DS. Characterization of thyroxine-albumin binding using high-performance affinity chromatography. I. Interactions at the warfarin and indole sites of albumin. J Chromatogr 1992; 579: 225–35.Google Scholar
Chanoine JP, Braverman LE. The role of transthyretin in the transport of thyroid hormone to cerebrospinal fluid and brain. Acta Med Austriaca 1992; 19 Suppl 1:25–8.Google Scholar
Blake CC, Geisow MJ, Swan ID, Rerat C, Rerat B. Structure of human plasma prealbumin at 2-5 Å resolution. A preliminary report on the polypeptide chain conformation, quaternary structure and thyroxine binding. J Mol Biol 1974; 88: 1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palha JA, Nissanov J, Fernandes R, Sousa JC, Bertrand L, Dratman MB, Morreale de Escobar G, Gottesman M, Saraiva MJ. Thyroid hormone distribution in the mouse brain: the role of transthyretin. Neuroscience 2002; 113: 837–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Episkopou V, Maeda S, Nishiguchi S, Shimada K, Gaitanaris GA, Gottesman ME, Robertson EJ. Disruption of the transthyretin gene results in mice with depressed levels of plasma retinol and thyroid hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 2375–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palha JA, Episkopou V, Maeda S, Shimada K, Gottesman ME, Saraiva MJ. Thyroid hormone metabolism in a transthyretin-null mouse strain. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 33135–9.Google Scholar
Sousa JC, de Escobar GM, Oliveira P, Saraiva MJ, Palha JA. Transthyretin is not necessary for thyroid hormone metabolism in conditions of increased hormone demand. J Endocrinol 2005; 187: 257–66.Google Scholar
Mendel CM, Murai JT, Siiter PK, Monroe SE, Inoue M. Conservation of free but not total or non-sex-hormone-binding-globulin-bound testosterone in serum from Nagase analbuminemic rats. Endocrinology 1989; 124(6): 3128–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartalena L, Robbins J. Thyroid hormone transport proteins. Clin Lab Med 1993; 13: 583–98.Google Scholar
Gudas LJ. Emerging roles for retinoids in regeneration and differentiation in normal and disease states. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012; 1821: 213–21.Google Scholar
Ono K, Yoshiike Y, Takashima A, Hasegawa K, Naiki H, Yamada M. Vitamin A exhibits potent antiamyloidogenic and fibril-destabilizing effects in vitro. Exp Neurol 2004; 189: 380–92.Google Scholar
Goodman DS. Vitamin A and retinoids in health and disease. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 1023–31.Google Scholar
Monaco HL, Rizzi M, Coda A. Structure of a complex of two plasma proteins: transthyretin and retinol-binding protein. Science 1995; 268: 1039–41.Google Scholar
van Bennekum AM, Wei S, Gamble MV, Vogel S, Piantedosi R, Gottesman M, Episkopou V, Blaner WS. Biochemical basis for depressed serum retinol levels in transthyretin-deficient mice. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 1107–13.Google Scholar
Wei S, Episkopou V, Piantedosi R, Maeda S, Shimada K, Gottesman ME, Blaner WS. Studies on the metabolism of retinol and retinol-binding protein in transthyretin-deficient mice produced by homologous recombination. J Biol Chem 1995; 270: 866–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram M, Sivaprasadarao A, DeSousa MM, Findlay JB. The transfer of retinol from serum retinol-binding protein to cellular retinol-binding protein is mediated by a membrane receptor. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 3336–42.Google Scholar
Kawaguchi R, Yu J, Honda J, Hu J, Whitelegge J, Ping P, Wiita P, Bok D, Sun H. A membrane receptor for retinol binding protein mediates cellular uptake of vitamin A. Science 2007; 315: 820–5.Google Scholar
Alapatt P, Guo F, Komanetsky SM, Wang S, Cai J, Sargsyan A, Rodriguez Diaz E, Bacon BT, Aryal P, Graham TE. Liver retinol transporter and receptor for serum retinol-binding protein (RBP4). J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 1250–65.Google Scholar
Sousa MM, Berglund L, Saraiva MJ. Transthyretin in high density lipoproteins: association with apolipoprotein A-I. J Lipid Res 2000; 41: 58–65.Google Scholar
Liz MA, Faro CJ, Saraiva MJ, Sousa MM. Transthyretin, a new cryptic protease. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 21431–8.Google Scholar
Liz MA, Gomes CM, Saraiva MJ, Sousa MM. ApoA-I cleaved by transthyretin has reduced ability to promote cholesterol efflux and increased amyloidogenicity. J Lipid Res 2007; 48: 2385–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liz MA, Fleming CE, Nunes AF, Almeida MR, Mar FM, Choe Y, Craik CS, Powers JC, Bogyo M, Sousa MM. Substrate specificity of transthyretin: identification of natural substrates in the nervous system. Biochem J 2009; 419: 467–74.Google Scholar
Costa R, Ferreira-da-Silva F, Saraiva MJ, Cardoso I. Transthyretin protects against A-beta peptide toxicity by proteolytic cleavage of the peptide: a mechanism sensitive to the Kunitz protease inhibitor. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2899.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sousa JC, Grandela C, Fernandez-Ruiz J, de Miguel R, de Sousa L, Magalhaes AI, Saraiva MJ, Sousa N, Palha JA. Transthyretin is involved in depression-like behaviour and exploratory activity. J Neurochem 2004; 88: 1052–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunes AF, Saraiva MJ, Sousa MM. Transthyretin knockouts are a new mouse model for increased neuropeptide Y. FASEB J 2006; 20: 166–8.Google Scholar
Fleming CE, Mar FM, Franquinho F, Saraiva MJ, Sousa MM. Transthyretin internalization by sensory neurons is megalin mediated and necessary for its neuritogenic activity. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 3220–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekki N, Refai E, Holmberg R, Kohler M, Jornvall H, Berggren PO, Juntti-Berggren L. Transthyretin binds to glucose-regulated proteins and is subjected to endocytosis by the pancreatic beta-cell. Cell Mol Life Sci 2012; 69: 1733–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Refai E, Dekki N, Yang SN, Imreh G, Cabrera O, Yu L, Yang G, Norgren S, Rossner SM, Inverardi L, Ricordi C, Olivecrona G, Andersson M, Jornvall H, Berggren PO, Juntti-Berggren L. Transthyretin constitutes a functional component in pancreatic beta-cell stimulus-secretion coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 17020–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vieira M, Saraiva MJ. Transthyretin regulates hippocampal 14-3-3zeta protein levels. FEBS Lett 2013; 587: 1482–8.Google Scholar
Nunes AF, Montero M, Franquinho F, Santos SD, Malva J, Zimmer J, Sousa MM. Transthyretin knockout mice display decreased susceptibility to AMPA-induced neurodegeneration. Neurochem Int 2009; 55: 454–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zerr I, Bodemer M, Gefeller O, Otto M, Poser S, Wiltfang J, Windl O, Kretzschmar HA, Weber T. Detection of 14-3-3 protein in the cerebrospinal fluid supports the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Ann Neurol 1998; 43: 32–40.Google Scholar
Gloeckner SF, Meyne F, Wagner F, Heinemann U, Krasnianski A, Meissner B, Zerr I. Quantitative analysis of transthyretin, tau and amyloid-beta in patients with dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2008; 14: 17–25.Google Scholar
Zhang HL, Zhang XM, Mao XJ, Deng H, Li HF, Press R, Fredrikson S, Zhu J. Altered cerebrospinal fluid index of prealbumin, fibrinogen, and haptoglobin in patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Acta Neurol Scand 2012; 125: 129–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruetschi U, Zetterberg H, Podust VN, Gottfries J, Li S, Hviid Simonsen A, McGuire J, Karlsson M, Rymo L, Davies H, Minthon L, Blennow K. Identification of CSF biomarkers for frontotemporal dementia using SELDI-TOF. Exp Neurol 2005; 196: 273–81.Google Scholar
Brettschneider J, Lehmensiek V, Mogel H, Pfeifle M, Dorst J, Hendrich C, Ludolph AC, Tumani H. Proteome analysis reveals candidate markers of disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Neurosci Lett 2010; 468: 23–7.Google Scholar
Arguelles S, Venero JL, Garcia-Rodriguez S, Tomas-Camardiel M, Ayala A, Cano J, Machado A. Use of haptoglobin and transthyretin as potential biomarkers for the preclinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem Int 2010; 57: 227–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen R, Vendrell I, Chen CP, Cash D, O’Toole KG, Williams SA, Jones C, Preston JE, Wheeler JX. Proteomic analysis of rat plasma following transient focal cerebral ischemia. Biomark Med 2011; 5: 837–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuyama K, Shiraishi T, Oishi T, Ueda S, Okamoto H, Furuta M, Mineta T, Tabuchi K. Combined proteomic approach with SELDI-TOF-MS and peptide mass fingerprinting identified the rapid increase of monomeric transthyretin in rat cerebrospinal fluid after transient focal cerebral ischemia. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2004; 129: 44–53.Google Scholar
Liverman CS, Cui L, Yong C, Choudhuri R, Klein RM, Welch KM, Berman NE. Response of the brain to oligemia: gene expression, c-Fos, and Nrf2 localization. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2004; 126: 57–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santos SD, Lambertsen KL, Clausen BH, Akinc A, Alvarez R, Finsen B, Saraiva MJ. CSF transthyretin neuroprotection in a mouse model of brain ischemia. J Neurochem 2010; 115: 1434–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstrup LS, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Genetic stabilization of transthyretin, cerebrovascular disease, and life expectancy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2013; 33: 1441–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goedert M, Spillantini MG. A century of Alzheimer’s disease. Science 2006; 314: 777–81.Google Scholar
Elovaara I, Maury CP, Palo J. Serum amyloid A protein, albumin and prealbumin in Alzheimer’s disease and in demented patients with Down’s syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 1986; 74: 245–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Castano EM, Roher AE, Esh CL, Kokjohn TA, Beach T. Comparative proteomics of cerebrospinal fluid in neuropathologically-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease and non-demented elderly subjects. Neurol Res 2006; 28: 155–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han SH, Jung ES, Sohn JH, Hong HJ, Hong HS, Kim JW, Na DL, Kim M, Kim H, Ha HJ, Kim YH, Huh N, Jung MW, Mook-Jung I. Human serum transthyretin levels correlate inversely with Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 25: 77–84.Google Scholar
Ribeiro CA, Santana I, Oliveira C, Baldeiras I, Moreira J, Saraiva MJ, Cardoso I. Transthyretin decrease in plasma of MCI and AD patients: investigation of mechanisms for disease modulation. Curr Alzheimer Res 2012; 9: 881–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzman AL, Gregori L, Vitek MP, Lyubski S, Strittmatter WJ, Enghilde JJ, Bhasin R, Silverman J, Weisgraber KH, Coyle PK, Zagorski MG, Tafous J, Eisenberg M, Saunders AM, Roses AD, Goldgaber D. Transthyretin sequesters amyloid beta protein and prevents amyloid formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 8368–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazarov O, Robinson J, Tang YP, Hairston IS, Korade-Mirnics Z, Lee VM, Hersh LB, Sapolsky RM, Mirnics K, Sisodia SS. Environmental enrichment reduces Aβ levels and amyloid deposition in transgenic mice. Cell 2005; 120: 701–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi SH, Leight SN, Lee VM, Li T, Wong PC, Johnson JA, Saraiva MJ, Sisodia SS. Accelerated Abeta deposition in APPswe/PS1ΔE9 mice with hemizygous deletions of TTR (transthyretin). J Neurosci 2007; 27: 7006–10.Google Scholar
Oliveira SM, Ribeiro CA, Cardoso I, Saraiva MJ. Gender-dependent transthyretin modulation of brain amyloid-beta levels: evidence from a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 27: 429–39.Google Scholar
Wati H, Kawarabayashi T, Matsubara E, Kasai A, Hirasawa T, Kubota T, Harigaya Y, Shoji M, Maeda S. Transthyretin accelerates vascular Abeta deposition in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol 2009; 19: 48–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doggui S, Brouillette J, Chabot JG, Farso M, Quirion R. Possible involvement of transthyretin in hippocampal β-amyloid burden and learning behaviors in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (TgCRND8). Neurodegener Dis 2010; 7: 88–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro CA, Oliveira SM, Guido LF, Magalhaes A, Valencia G, Arsequell G, Saraiva MJ, Cardoso I. Transthyretin stabilization by iododiflunisal promotes amyloid-β peptide clearance, decreases its deposition, and ameliorates cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J Alzheimers Dis 2014; 39(2): 357–70.Google Scholar
Dyck PJ, Lambert EH. Dissociated sensation in amylidosis. Compound action potential, quantitative histologic and teased-fiber, and electron microscopic studies of sural nerve biopsies. Arch Neurol 1969; 20: 490–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coelho T, Maurer MS, Suhr OB. THAOS – The transthyretin amyloidosis outcomes survey: initial report on clinical manifestations in patients with hereditary and wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2013; 29: 63–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sekijima Y, Yoshida K, Tokuda T, Ikeda S. Familial Transthyretin Amyloidosis. 2001 [updated January 26, 2012]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1194/.
Jacobson DR, Pastore RD, Yaghoubian R, Kane I, Gallo G, Buck FS, Buxbaum JN. Variant-sequence transthyretin (isoleucine 122) in late-onset cardiac amyloidosis in black Americans. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 466–73.Google Scholar
Kalkunte SS, Neubeck S, Norris WE, Cheng SB, Kostadinov S, Vu Hoang D, Ahmed A, von Eggeling F, Shaikh Z, Padbury J, Berg G, Olofsson A, Markert UR, Sharma S. Transthyretin is dysregulated in preeclampsia, and its native form prevents the onset of disease in a preclinical mouse model. Am J Pathol 2013; 183: 1425–36.Google Scholar
Quintas A, Vaz DC, Cardoso I, Saraiva MJ, Brito RM. Tetramer dissociation and monomer partial unfolding precedes protofibril formation in amyloidogenic transthyretin variants. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 27207–13.Google Scholar
About the article
Marta Vieira (left) has a degree in Biochemistry from the University of Porto and obtained in 2013 her PhD in Biomedical Sciences at the same University participating in several research projects at the Molecular Neurobiology group at the Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology at Porto University.
Maria João Saraiva
Maria João Saraiva (right) received a BSc in Biology from the University of Porto in 1976, and an MSc in Biochemistry from the University of London, in 1978. Between 1980 and 1984, she studied for a PhD in biochemistry at the University of Porto, and qualified as Professor of Biochemistry in 1991. She worked for different periods as a Visiting Scientist at the College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia University, New York. Maria J. Saraiva currently holds a number of positions at the Universidade do Porto, Portugal: she is Vice Director at the Institute for Molecular and Cellular Biology (IBMC); a Professor of Biochemistryat the Biomedical Institute; and Director of the Molecular Neurobiology Group at the IBMC.
Published Online: 2014-02-12
Published in Print: 2014-03-01