Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Biomolecular Concepts

Editor-in-Chief: Jollès, Pierre / Mansuy, Isabelle

Editorial Board Member: Avila, Jesus / Bonetto, Valentina / Cera, Enrico / Jorgensen, Erik / Jörnvall, Hans / Lagasse, Eric / Norman, Robert / Pinna, Lorenzo / Raghavan, K. Vijay / Venetianer, Pal / Wahli, Walter

6 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 2.39

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.753
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.567

Online
ISSN
1868-503X
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Telocytes revisited

Sanda M. Cretoiu
  • ‘Victor Babeş’ National Institute of Pathology, Department of Ultrastructural Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania
  • Division of Cell Biology and Histology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
/ Laurentiu M. Popescu
  • Corresponding author
  • ‘Victor Babeş’ National Institute of Pathology, Department of Ultrastructural Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania
  • ‘Victor Babeş’ National Institute of Pathology, Department of Advanced Studies, 050096 Bucharest, Romania
  • Email:
Published Online: 2014-11-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2014-0029

Abstract

Telocytes (TCs) are a novel interstitial (stromal) cell type described in many tissues and organs (www.telocytes.com). A TC is characterized by a small cell body (9–15 μm) and a variable number (one to five) of extremely long and thin telopodes (Tps), with alternating regions of podomers (∼80 nm) and podoms (250–300 nm). Tps are interconnected by homo- and heterocellular junctions and form three-dimensional networks. Moreover, Tps release three types of extracellular vesicles: exosomes, ectosomes, and multivesicular cargos, which are involved in paracrine signaling. Different techniques have been used to characterize TCs, from classical methods (light microscopy, electron microscopy) to modern ‘omics’. It is considered that electron microscopy is essential for their identification, and CD34/PDGFRα double immunohistochemistry can orientate the diagnosis. Functional evidence is accumulating that TCs may be intimately involved in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and renewal by short- and long-distance intercellular communication. This review focuses on the most recent findings regarding TC features and locations and the principal hypotheses about their functions in normal and diseased organs. TC involvement in regenerative medicine is also considered.

Keywords: exosomes/ectosomes; intercellular signaling; regenerative medicine; telocytes; telopodes

Introduction: identification and phenotypic expression of TCs

Telocytes (TCs) are identified as a new cell type among ‘classical’ interstitial cells. The key feature that distinguishes TCs from any other cell is their extremely long and thin prolongations named telopodes (Tps) (1). Therefore, TCs are shortly defined as ‘cells with telopodes’ (2) (Figure 1). Discovered by serendipity in 2010, TCs were previously (between 2005 and 2009) described by our team using the acronym ICLC (interstitial Cajal-like cells) (1). However, TCs are not Cajal-like cells. They are different from the well-known Cajal cells of the intestine and considered to be completely distinct in ultrastructure, immunophenotype, electrophysiology, gene profile, and proteomics (2–6). The TCs are widely distributed in vertebrate (fish, reptiles, birds, mammals, including humans) organs, as well as in serous membranes as detailed in Table 1.

Figure 1

Representative scanning electron micrograph.

Monkey left ventricular myocardium. The image shows a typical telocyte located across the cardiomyocytes. Another (possible) telocyte appears located near the cardiomyocytes (upper left). The 3D view reveals close interconnections of TCs with cardiomyocytes and capillaries. Note the cardiomyocyte striations and the openings of T tubules. Reproduced with permission from ref. (8).

Table 1

Telocyte distribution in various organs.

Ultrastructural portrait

TCs are a rather unique cell type with a particular morphology, if it is examined by electron microscopy. TCs are defined by specific very long and thin, dichotomously branched, cytoplasmic processes called Tps, considered to be the ‘ultrastructural hallmark’ (1). The cell body, measuring between 9 and 15 μm, has a variable morphology: fusiform/pyriform/triangular depending on the number of Tps (21, 60). The Tps measure up to 1000 μm in length and between 0.05 and 0.2 μm in thickness, and have a moniliform aspect with many dilations – a ‘bead on a string’ appearance (1, 44) (Figures 2 and 3). The thin, fibrillar segments are called podomers (average diameter, ∼75–80 nm) and the dilated, cistern-like regions are called podoms (average caliber, 250–300 nm) (42, 61). Podoms accommodate functional units consisting of caveolae, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum, possibly involved in calcium uptake/release (5, 10) (Figure 4). Cytoplasmic organelles are scarce, located mainly in the cell body and in the podoms (mitochondria 5%, endoplasmic reticulum 1–2% of cell volume, caveolae 2–3%) (42, 61). TCs and their Tps are usually evidenced by transmission and scanning electron microscopy, electron tomography, and focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) (Figures 57).

Figure 2

Digitally colored electron microscope image of a telocyte in rat myometrium.

Blue, TC; sienna-brown, smooth muscle cells; N, nuclei. Note the three long, moniliform processes that encircle bundles of cross-cut smooth muscle cells. Original magnification, ×6800. Inset, human pregnant myometrium. Primary confluent culture (day 8) showing a telocyte with at least three prolongations with several ‘beads’ along telopodes. Reproduced with permission from ref. (1).

Figure 3

Transmission electron microscopy on skin.

TC with typical cellular prolongation named telopodes. Courtesy of Dr. M. Gherghiceanu, Department of Ultrastructural Pathology, Victor Babeş National Institute of Pathology, Bucharest, Romania.

Figure 4

Rat jejunum.

A typical Tp (blue) located between smooth muscle cells (SMC) and nerve endings. Note a large podom and the corresponding podomeres. TC body is not captured in the image. Courtesy of Dr. D. Cretoiu, Division of Cell Biology and Histology, University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania.

Figure 5

Three-dimensional reconstruction of TCs in myocardium using FIB-SEM serial images.

Courtesy of Dr. D. Cretoiu, Division of Cell Biology and Histology, University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania and Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Figure 6

Scanning electron microscope images of mice bone marrow.

A telocyte (TC) with one visible telopode (Tp) is shown. The cellular body of TC is round (inset), having measured sizes of 3.55/4.5 μm. Tps have a measured length of 66.5 μm, with the distal end partially covered. The inset shows the abrupt emerging on the Tp from the cellular body of TC; bar, 30 μm. Reproduced with permission from ref. (59).

Figure 7

Scanning electron microscope image of a medium-sized artery in pig.

A TC with three Tps and typical podomer and podom. Reproduced with permission from ref. (49).

TCs have tortuous, overlapping Tps that interconnect to form a three-dimensional (3D) network by homocellular interactions (13, 40). Tps’ homocellular contacts are established at distances between 10 and 30 nm, and generally can be classified as close contacts and nanocontacts; ‘classical’ cell–cell junctions such as gap junctions (42), and atypical homocellular junctions such as puncta adhaerentia minima, processus adhaerens, and manubria adhaerentia (13). Recessus adhaerentes junctions can also be formed between Tps and the cellular body of TCs or between Tps of different cells (13).

TCs occupy a strategic position in relation to stem cell niches (3, 32, 57, 62), blood capillaries (15, 45, 48, 63), and/or nerve bundles (21). Tps also establish contacts with other cells such as mast cells, basophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, plasma cells, or macrophages (64), and non-cellular elements, e.g., collagen and elastic fibers.

Recently, evidence has come to light about the fact that TCs are able to release extracellular vesicles (12, 25, 27, 42, 65, 66). These vesicles might function as intercellular shuttles for biological signals. There are at least three types of extracellular vesicles: exosomes (released from endosomes, 45±8 nm), ectosomes (budding directly from the plasma membrane, 128±28 nm), and multivesicular cargos (MVCs, 1±0.4 μm).

There is a net distinction between TCs and fibroblasts both from an ultrastructural point of view (Figure 8 and Table 2) and concerning gene expression profile. More than 2000 genes were found to be upregulated and >4000 downregulated in TCs compared with mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts (Figure 9). Functionally, fibroblasts are mainly involved in the synthesis of collagen and other matrix components, while TCs are oriented to intercellular signaling, either by direct contact (junctions) with surrounding elements or at long distance by release of extracellular vesicles (66).

Figure 8

(A) Digitally colored electron micrograph of rat ventricular myocardium: a typical TC (blue) with a long tortuous Tp and with uneven caliber (moniliform) in between two cardiomyocytes. The circle indicates a podom. Reproduced with permission from ref. (8). (B) A typical fibroblast with abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER).

Table 2

Comparison of the characteristics of telocytes and fibroblasts. Modified with permission from ref. (6).

Figure 9

Hierarchical cluster analysis of the differentially expressed genes among TCs, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and fibroblasts (Fbs).

Reproduced with permission from ref. (77).

Phase-contrast microscopy, supra(vital) staining, immunophenotype

In vitro, after 72 h in cell culture, TCs take on particular morphological characteristics: a small cell body and extremely long Tps with uneven caliber due to the alternation of podoms and podomers (Figures 10 and 11). Early studies demonstrated by phase-contrast microscopy that Tps are interconnected in a network-like pattern. Moreover, it has been shown that TCs have affinity for supravital dyes, such as methylene blue and crystal violet, which do not induce immediately evident degenerative changes (45, 63). MitoTracker Green FM and Janus Green B were also used to demonstrate the presence of mitochondria in the cell body of TCs and in Tps (5, 30, 42). In vitro, TCs’ dynamic behavior can be analyzed by time-lapse videomicroscopy and reveals that Tps are responsible for a cellular-driven guidance for neighboring cells and are able to detach from the cell body and to release signaling (macro)molecules (42), possibly contained in exosomes or ectosomes (66).

Figure 10

Fallopian tube TCs in primary culture.

Original magnification, ×40. (A) Crystal violet vital staining makes the TC visible, using conventional light microscopy. (B) The same cell after the dye was washed out (30 min with DMEM); the TC was visible only in phase contrast. (C) The same cell after trypan blue staining (this viability test shows that the cell is still alive, as the dye was excluded). ‘Invisible’ prolongations may be only presumed using conventional light microscopy. Reproduced with permission from ref. (37).

Figure 11

Human fallopian tube, preconfluent primary cell cultures.

A TC with ‘octopus’ morphology can be recognized. Observe the very long, moniliform telopodes. Giemsa staining; original magnification, ×100; oil immersion. Reproduced with permission from ref. (37).

Although TCs have no definite immunophenotypic characteristics, several reports claim that they have the ability to bind different antibodies. However, we can consider that the double-positive immunostaining with CD34/PDGFRα and CD34/vimentin (for Tps) is appropriate when we refer to these cells (36, 67–70). It is believed that TCs suffer temporal changes in immunophenotype, explaining why sometimes the results vary between laboratories (71). Moreover, TCs inconstantly express stem cell markers such as c-kit, Sca-1, and Oct 4 (44, 72, 73), suggesting their ability to be active players in the regenerative process (73). In skeletal muscle interstitium, TCs were found to express VEGF and PDGFR-β both in situ and in vitro, proposing a role in angiogenesis and vascular stability during tissue repair (54, 55). Also, expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been identified in TCs from fallopian tubes (74), myometrium (75), and in the upper lamina propria of the renal pelvis, ureter, bladder, and urethra (35).

Also, we must not overlook a recent attempt to clarify TCs phenotype(s) in the human urinary bladder by transmission electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Vannucchi et al. describe three types of TCs in human bladder according to their ultrastructure and two types of different TCs on the basis of their immunolabelling characteristics (36). Several antibodies were used: CD34, PDGFRα, αSMA, c-Kit and calreticulin. It was revealed that PDGFRα/calret-positive, CD34/c-Kit-negative TCs are present in the sub- urothelium while PDGFRα/αSMA/c-Kit-negative, CD34/calret-positive TCs are located in the submucosa and detrusor (36). These observations point out possible region-specific roles played by TCs subtypes which seem to adapt their morphology and phenotype to the organ activity.

MicroRNA imprint, gene profile, and proteomic analysis

MicroRNAs are important for development and cell- and tissue-specific gene expression. In the heart, TCs express significant amounts of miR-21, miR-22, miR-29, and miR-199a but lack the expression of cardiomyocyte-specific miRs (miR-1 and miR-133a or miR-208a), and do not express miR-193, which supports the view that TCs are of mesenchymal origin (76). Transcriptomic analysis also revealed that TCs express many of the pro-angiogenic microRNAs (e.g., miR-126, miR-130, let-7e, miR-21, miR-27b, miR143, miR-503, and miR-100) (12).

The murine lung TC gene expression profile was established by comparing them with both fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells. Several genes were found to be highly upregulated in TCs as compared with mesenchymal stem cells: connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf), transgelin (Tagln), nidogen 1 (Nid1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (Timp3), collagen type IV, matrix metallopeptidase 3 (Mmp3), and matrix metallopeptidase 10 (Mmp10), with regulatory effects in tissue remodeling/repair. Approximately the same genes were found to be upregulated also in TCs when compared with fibroblasts: Ctgf, Mmp10, Mmp3, and Myh14 (myosin, heavy chain 14) (77). Moreover, the network of main genes and the potential functional correlations were investigated and differences in the expression of chromosomes 1, 2, and 3 genes, between TCs and mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, alveolar type II cells, airway epithelial cells, and lymphocytes were analyzed (Figure 12) (78, 79).

Figure 12

Hierarchical cluster analysis of the differentially expressed genes among TCs, MSCs, Fbs, proximal airway cells (PACs), airway basal cells (ABCs), alveolar type II cells (ATII), and lymphocytes from lungs (T-LL) and bronchial lymph nodes (T-BL).

TC5 – telocytes in cell culture, 5th day. TC10 – telocytes in cell culture, 10th day. Reproduced with permission from ref. (78).

Lately, proteomic analysis of TCs showed that they are, indeed, completely different from fibroblasts (Figure 13) and endothelial cells (Figure 14) (80, 81). According to the proteomic analysis, the following proteins were found to be upregulated in TCs as compared with fibroblasts: myosin-14, periplakin, and several proteins with oxidoreductase activity, mostly located within mitochondria. Their presence was considered suggestive for a role in mechanical sensing, mechanochemical conversion, tissue homoeostasis, and remodeling/renewal (80). Some of the upregulated proteins, such as mitochondrial thioredoxin-dependent peroxide reductase, protein disulfide-isomerase A3, myosin-14, myosin-10, filamin-B, sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit-1, and keratin, type II cytoskeletal, were found to be common with extracellular vesicle proteome (82), and therefore a role in intercellular signaling and stem cell niche modulation has been suggested for lung TCs (80). Moreover, when TCs were compared with microvascular endothelial cells, their proteome revealed the upregulated presence of superoxide dismutase 2, acid ceramidase, and envoplakin, suggesting that TCs might play specific roles in intercellular communication, oxidative stress, and cellular aging, and might have pro-proliferative effects through the inhibition of apoptosis (81).

Figure 13

Radars of differential protein expression on the 5th day in cell culture for top proteins of TCs (A) and Fbs (B).

For display purposes, high values of fold change were limited to 10 in (A) and to 5 in (B), respectively. For proteins with fold change >2, the corresponding fold change value was taken into account, even if <2. Reproduced with permission from ref. (80).

Figure 14

iTRAQ quantitative proteomics of TCs compared with endothelial cells.

Protein interaction network generated with STRING showing, for TCs at day 5 in cell culture, the major clusters of interacting proteins including those involved in oxidation-reduction process (A) and extracellular vesicular exosome (B). Red nodes represent upregulated proteins involved in these processes. Reproduced with permission from ref. (81).

Electrophysiology

Ion channels, present in the membranes of all cells, are also of significance in understanding the function of TCs. Several ion channels have been identified in the TCs from non-pregnant and pregnant human myometrium. SK3 channels have been found in CD34-positive TCs in human non-pregnant myometrium using immunohistochemistry and SK3 mRNA determined by qRT-PCR. The same CD34-positive TCs lacked SK3 channel expression in pregnant myometrium, which indicated that SK3 channel modulation may be involved in myometrial contractility during pregnancy through the TC influence (83). In addition, TCs also express T-type (transient) calcium channels (CaV3.1 and CaV3.2), as demonstrated by immunofluorescence analysis and confirmed by the application of brief ramp depolarization protocols (84).

Because of the paucity of electrophysiological data regarding TCs and regardless of the absence of regular slow waves of depolarization in TCs (42, 85), new strategies for understanding uterine bioelectrical signaling mechanisms must be developed. In the human heart, the electrophysiological properties of TCs were explored by whole-cell patch clamp and it was demonstrated that TCs expressed large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ current (BK(Ca)) and inwardly rectifying K+ current (IK(ir)), but not transient outward K+ current (I(to)) and ATP-sensitive potassium current (K(ATP)) (86).

There is strong evidence that TCs have the ability to form homo- and heterocellular interactions and therefore the formation, elongation, deviation, and ramification of Tps may importantly modulate the morphology and the function of TCs. Stimulation by near-infrared laser of the Tps have been used to test their ability to grow. Low-level laser stimulation (LLLS) induces a higher growth rate of telopodal lateral extension (TLE) in pregnant myometrium. Therefore, the modulatory effects of LLLS on TLE growth can be regarded as future therapeutic strategy in uterine regenerative medicine (69).

The roles of TCs

The importance of TCs is reflected by the exponential growth of publications in the field, and many (un)proven roles were attributed to TCs. One of the first hypothesized role of TCs was in juxta- and/or paracrine signaling (26). Nowadays, it has become evident that, indeed, TCs are able to perform such a role, as it was proved that TCs establish homo- and heterocellular junctions (42, 61) and are able to release extracellular vesicles (Figure 15) (27, 42, 65, 66, 87).

Figure 15

Electron microscopy of TCs in culture releasing MVC.

(A) Gathered endomembrane-bound vesicles released into the extracellular space as a cargo shielded by plasma membrane. (B) Dissolution of external membrane of MVC release individual or grouped endomembrane vesicles into the extracellular space. Electron tomography of MVCs: (C) Central tomogram section of an MVC, in direct contact with the cell membrane, revealing clustered vesicles enclosed by a membrane. (D) 3D model of section shown in (C) with isosurface representation of contained vesicles, revealing dense packaging. Cell membrane shown in dark blue. Scale bar represents 400 nm. Reproduced with permission from ref. (66).

TCs could function as mechanical support, resistant and deformable owing to the 3D network properties, possibly controlling the blood vessel closure or rheology in rat mesentery (51). It was also suggested that TCs located in the neuromuscular spindles can participate in the control of muscle tone and motor activity (56).

TCs might act as guiding devices for the surrounding cells (e.g., mesenchymal cells, myocardial precursors, neural stem cells) (3, 53, 62) and might even be able to control and regulate their activity of participating in tissue remodeling/renewal. TCs were described to be in close contact with cardiac stem cells and cardiomyocyte progenitors (Figure 16), and also with blood capillaries, nerve endings (Figure 17), and other cells found in the interstitial space, e.g., immune cells (Figures 18 and 19) (3, 88, 89). Consequently, TCs might be essential for the proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of myocardial precursors into new cardiomyocytes in normal and/or injured heart (90) and also as potential stimulators of angiogenesis (12). Skin is regarded as the body’s largest and fastest-growing organ, known for its extraordinary regenerative capacity and is frequently chosen as a model for studying interactions between stem cells and their microenvironments (91). Skin TCs were reported in close vicinity of collagen and elastic fibers, as well as with mast cells, fibroblasts, adipocytes, blood vessels, nerves, and around the cluster of stem cells in the hair follicle bulge (25, 60). Very recent bioinformatics analysis of lung TCs has also demonstrated the potential involvement of TCs in processes such as stem cell niche modulation, tissue homeostasis, inhibition of oxidative stress, and prevention of cellular aging (80, 81).

Figure 16

Electron microscopy images from epicardial stem cell niche showing more differentiated cardiomyocyte progenitors (CMP) with characteristic leptofibrils.

TC chaperone a low differentiated CMP with distinctive leptofibrils (lf), unorganized myofibrils (f), Golgi apparatus, and clusters of mitochondria (m). Reproduced with permission from ref. (3).

Figure 17

Rat jejunum muscularis mucosae.

The photo is a color-enhanced digital micrograph of a black-and-white transmission electron microscopy image. A blue Tp of 14.2 μm in the section plane is illustrated around a nerve bundle (green) between SMCs (brown). ax, axon; m, mitochondria. Scale bar, 2 μm. Reproduced with permission from ref. (21).

Figure 18

Rat stomach, multicontact stromal synapses between two TC, a plasma cell, and an eosinophil, respectively.

Three-dimensional image computer-aided reconstruction from nine serial ultrathin sections; original magnification, ×1500. The upper inset shows contact points where the distance between both cell membranes (Tp membrane and plasma-cell membrane) is ≤15 nm (in violet), seen from the plasma cell cytoplasm. In the lower inset, Tp were rendered transparent in order to depict the same synapse. Reproduced with permission from ref. (64).

Figure 19

Human mammary gland stroma.

Transmission electron microscopy; original magnification, ×9100. (A) Lymphocyte establishing a multicontact synapse (MS) with a TC. The blue rectangle shows the synaptic ‘kiss and run’ region. The synaptic membranes appear traced in (B) (violet, TC; orange, lymphocyte). The distances between membranes are shown in (C). Note (asterisk) a peculiar conformation of ER connecting mitochondria with the cell surface, suggestive for a possible role in synaptic Ca2+ homeostasis. Reproduced with permission from ref. (64).

Strange as it may seem, we must not neglect the possibility that TCs are capable of neurotransmission in the gut, where ‘smooth muscle cells are electrically coupled to interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) and PDGFRα cells, forming an integrated unit called the SIP syncytium’ (92). Pieri et al. (93) also considered the role of TCs in spreading the slow waves generated by the ICC.

TCs might be considered as active players in immunomodulation and immunosurveillance (64), acting like ‘local data suppliers’ for the immune response (78). We must not exclude that in the human reproductive tract, TCs could function as ‘hormonal sensors’ as they express estrogen and progesterone receptors (94, 95). In general, being under hormonal control, TCs may support the structure of the stratum functionalis of the endometrium (41) or could influence the timing of the contractile activity of smooth muscle cells (42), and even contribute to cell migration and proliferation of myometrial tissue (84). Last, but not least, recent work suggests that TCs might act as a primitive nervous system for the cells found in close relations with TCs and even for those found at a distance, and might be influenced by means of extracellular vesicles (96). The same authors (97) also claim that TCs are well-equipped cells (as concerns different types of junctions, extracellular vesicle release, and the expressed ion channels), able to play at least a part of the role needed in a bioelectric ‘information pathway’ described by Levin (98).

TCs in pathology

In the heart, experimental studies showed that the number of TCs decrease during myocardial infarction (99). TC injection in the infarcted area reduces the infarction size and improved myocardial function (100). TCs have also been proposed to be associated with amyloid deposit formation in patients with long-standing atrial fibrillation. In this process, Tps play an important role, surrounding the amyloid deposits, perhaps with the intention to limit their spreading in the surrounding areas (101).

In lung pathology, TCs are proposed to stimulate and induce cell proliferation through the inhibition of apoptosis (81), which may be one of the mechanisms for the development of interstitial fibrosis. Also, it was hypothesized that TCs may be damaged in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; therefore, the integrity of the lung tissue could not be reinstituted and emphysema develops (102, 103).

TCs were reported in mouse liver, located in the Disse space, with similar density in the four hepatic lobes and close spatial relations with hepatic putative stem (progenitor) cells (22). Their importance in liver regeneration was emphasized using a murine model of partial hepatectomy, concluding that TCs might influence proliferation of hepatocytes and/or the activation of stem/progenitor cells (68).

TCs with severe ultrastructural damages, reduced in number and even lost, were recently reported in scleroderma (104). In addition, the 3D network of TCs is affected (discontinuous or even completely absent) in the myocardium, lung, and gastric wall of patients with systemic sclerosis (105). Consequently, TCs might be key players in the regulation of skin (and not only) homeostasis, repair, and regeneration and a new target for the treatment of this disease. Last but not least, TCs from stroma of the basal and squamous cell skin carcinomas were analyzed, being shown to have a very restrained number of heterocellular junctions and remains to be explained (106).

TCs were identified in the human uterus and fallopian tube (107, 108), organs with reproductive significance that can be disrupted by various pathological states. TCs were morphometrically analyzed in rat uteri and found to be significantly lower in number in immature and pregnant uteri and significantly higher in postpartum uteri (109). Regarding the involvement of TCs in pathological conditions, it has been reported that a gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the uterus may be derived from TCs present in the myometrium (110). This hypothesis is supported by data claiming that TCs share the expression of several markers with gastrointestinal stromal tumors and perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) (111). Another study suggested that such cells might have a role in preventing premature uterine contractility and found no increased number of such cells in the myometrium of women affected by uterine endometriosis (112). The most recent evidence showed that TCs suffer a significant decrease or may be even lost in endometriosis-affected rat oviduct, participating in the deregulation of intercellular signaling, including immune surveillance/regulation (113).

Inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are severe disorders that sometimes are complicated by the development of fibrosis (114, 115). Recent studies have demonstrated that, during fibrotic remodeling of the intestinal wall in patients affected either by Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, the number of TCs is reduced leading to bowel architectural derangement and dysmotility (116, 117).

Several studies reported the presence of TCs in the urinary system, in the kidneys (33), and especially in the lamina propria of drainage system and in the storage reservoir (34–36), claiming that these are ‘peculiar TC able to adapt their morphology to the organ activity’ (36). After renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats, it has been shown that that injection of renal TCs can attenuate renal histological damage and dysfunction, although the underlying mechanism remains unclear, being probably dependent on growth factors (118).

The gallbladder activity seems to be also dependent on the integrity of the TC network, as it was reported that TCs are significantly decreased in the gallbladder wall in patients with gallstone disease (119, 120). It seems that bile composition may influence the TC network integrity: the supersaturated bile can decrease the number of TCs, while glycocholic and taurocholic acids have protective effects on TCs (24).

TC involvement was also considered in the maintenance of epithelium-stroma balance in the mammary gland. TCs were detected and found to be connected with other stromal cells in reconstituted breast cancer tissue and are considered to participate in self-assembly of cells and inhibition of apoptosis, thus facilitating the growth of cancer cells (47).

TCs and regenerative medicine

In the adult life of humans, the regenerative potential is limited except in liver regeneration. Therefore, stem cell-based therapy remains a hope for regeneration in the future. Researchers have tried different types of methods and cells (embryonic stem cells; induced pluripotent stem cells; bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cells; multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells derived from blood, bone marrow, umbilical cord, and adipose tissue, etc.), none of them with spectacular results in humans. We are becoming increasingly confident that TCs and stem cells make a tandem (2, 6). TCs seem to play a crucial role challenging the power of regeneration (121, 122), and have been regarded as important interstitial cells to guide or nurse putative stem and progenitor cells in stem cell niches in a spectrum of tissues and organs; thus, TCs might importantly contribute to tissue repair and regeneration (123). Important lessons in regenerative medicine came from the heart as stated by Bani and Nistri (124), which underline the importance of TCs in morphogenesis based on previous observations that TCs, during mouse heart development, act as mediators for heart compaction from embryonic myocardial trabeculae (10). Anyway, in vitro studies showed that there is a high dynamics of Tps extensions and ramification depending on the type of extracellular matrix proteins (125).

Perspectives

Given the rapidly expanding data concerning TCs (>1500 citations in 4 years) and their possible physiological/pathological functions, one may expect that some of the following questions will soon be answered:

  • Are TCs only a specific form of the wider concept of mesenchymal/progenitor stem cells?

  • How important is the role of TCs in tandem with stem cells?

  • Are TCs involved in mechanotransduction, intercellular signaling, or in modifying the transcriptional activity of cells in their proximity?

  • Which are the consequences of mistiming or errors in TCs biogenesis (number, marker expression, etc.)?

Answering these (and some still not formulated) questions may open new avenues for exploring TC functions.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to ANCS, CNDI – UEFISCDI authority for funding through the program Partnerships in Priority Areas – PN II, project no. 82/2012.

References

  • 1.

    Popescu LM, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. TELOCYTES – a case of serendipity: the winding way from interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), via interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) to TELOCYTES. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 729–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Popescu LM. The tandem: telocytes-stem cells. Int J Biol Biomed Eng 2011; 5: 83–92.Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Cardiomyocyte precursors and telocytes in epicardial stem cell niche: electron microscope images. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 871–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Kostin S. Myocardial telocytes: a specific new cellular entity. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 1917–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    Faussone-Pellegrini MS, Popescu LM. Telocytes. Biomol Concepts 2011; 2: 481–9.Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Popescu LM, Nicolescu MI. Telocytes and stem cells. In: dos Santos Goldenberg RC, Campos de Carvalho AC, editors. Resident stem cells and regenerative therapy. Oxford: Academic Press, 2013: 205–31.Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Popescu LM, Manole CG, Gherghiceanu M, Ardelean A, Nicolescu MI, Hinescu ME, Kostin S. Telocytes in human epicardium. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 2085–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    Kostin S, Popescu LM. A distinct type of cell in myocardium: interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLCs). J Cell Mol Med 2009; 13: 295–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Suciu L, Nicolescu MI, Popescu LM. Cardiac telocytes: serial dynamic images in cell culture. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 2687–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Bani D, Formigli L, Gherghiceanu M, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. Telocytes as supporting cells for myocardial tissue organization in developing and adult heart. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 2531–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 11.

    Faussone-Pellegrini MS, Bani D. Relationships between telocytes and cardiomyocytes during pre- and post-natal life. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 1061–3.Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Manole CG, Cismasiu V, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Experimental acute myocardial infarction: telocytes involvement in neo-angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 2284–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 13.

    Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Cardiac telocytes – their junctions and functional implications. Cell Tissue Res 2012; 348: 265–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 14.

    Rusu MC, Pop F, Hostiuc S, Curca GC, Jianu AM, Paduraru D. Telocytes form networks in normal cardiac tissues. Histol Histopathol 2012; 27: 807–16.Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Gherghiceanu M, Manole CG, Popescu LM. Telocytes in endocardium: electron microscope evidence. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 2330–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    Gherghiceanu M, Hinescu ME, Andrei F, Mandache E, Macarie CE, Faussone-Pellegrini MS, Popescu LM. Interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) in myocardial sleeves of human pulmonary veins. J Cell Mol Med 2008; 12: 1777–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 17.

    Yang Y, Sun W, Wu SM, Xiao J, Kong X. Telocytes in human heart valves. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 759–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 18.

    Rusu MC, Nicolescu MI, Jianu AM, Lighezan R, Manoiu VS, Paduraru D. Esophageal telocytes and hybrid morphologies. Cell Biol Int 2012; 36: 1079–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 19.

    Chen X, Zheng Y, Manole CG, Wang X, Wang Q. Telocytes in human oesophagus. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 1506–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 20.

    Cantarero Carmona I, Luesma Bartolome MJ, Junquera Escribano C. Identification of telocytes in the lamina propria of rat duodenum: transmission electron microscopy. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 26–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 21.

    Cretoiu D, Cretoiu SM, Simionescu AA, Popescu LM. Telocytes, a distinct type of cell among the stromal cells present in the lamina propria of jejunum. Histol Histopathol 2012; 27: 1067–78.Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Xiao J, Wang F, Liu Z, Yang C. Telocytes in liver: electron microscopic and immunofluorescent evidence. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 1537–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 23.

    Hinescu ME, Ardeleanu C, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Interstitial Cajal-like cells in human gallbladder. J Mol Histol 2007; 38: 275–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 24.

    Matyja A, Gil K, Pasternak A, Sztefko K, Gajda M, Tomaszewski KA, Matyja M, Walocha JA, Kulig J, Thor P. Telocytes: new insight into the pathogenesis of gallstone disease. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 734–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Rusu MC, Mirancea N, Manoiu VS, Valcu M, Nicolescu MI, Paduraru D. Skin telocytes. Ann Anat 2012; 194: 359–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 26.

    Popescu LM, Hinescu ME, Ionescu N, Ciontea SM, Cretoiu D, Ardelean C. Interstitial cells of Cajal in pancreas. J Cell Mol Med 2005; 9: 169–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    Nicolescu MI, Popescu LM. Telocytes in the interstitium of human exocrine pancreas: ultrastructural evidence. Pancreas 2012; 41: 949–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 28.

    Bosco C, Diaz E, Gutierrez R, Gonzalez J, Perez J. Ganglionar nervous cells and telocytes in the pancreas of Octodon degus: extra and intrapancreatic ganglionar cells and telocytes in the degus. Auton Neurosci 2013; 177: 224–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 29.

    Padhi S, Sarangi R, Mallick S. Pancreatic extragastrointestinal stromal tumors, interstitial Cajal like cells, and telocytes. JOP 2013; 14: 1–14.Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Zheng Y, Li H, Manole CG, Sun A, Ge J, Wang X. Telocytes in trachea and lungs. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 2262–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 31.

    Rusu MC, Jianu AM, Mirancea N, Didilescu AC, Manoiu VS, Paduraru D. Tracheal telocytes. J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 401–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Suciu LC, Manole CG, Hinescu ME. Telocytes and putative stem cells in the lungs: electron microscopy, electron tomography and laser scanning microscopy. Cell Tissue Res 2011; 345: 391–403.Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Qi G, Lin M, Xu M, Manole CG, Wang X, Zhu T. Telocytes in the human kidney cortex. J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 3116–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 34.

    Zheng Y, Zhu T, Lin M, Wu D, Wang X. Telocytes in the urinary system. J Transl Med 2012; 10: 188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 35.

    Gevaert T, De Vos R, Van Der Aa F, Joniau S, van den Oord J, Roskams T, De Ridder D. Identification of telocytes in the upper lamina propria of the human urinary tract. J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 2085–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 36.

    Vannucchi MG, Traini C, Guasti D, Giulio DP, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. Telocytes subtypes in human urinary bladder. J Cell Mol Med 2014; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 37.

    Popescu LM, Ciontea SM, Cretoiu D. Interstitial Cajal-like cells in human uterus and fallopian tube. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1101: 139–65.Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Ullah S, Yang P, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Chen W, Waqas Y, Le Y, Chen B, Chen Q. Identification and characterization of telocytes in the uterus of the oviduct in the Chinese soft shelled turtle, Pelodiscus sinensis: TEM evidence. J Cell Mol Med 2014; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 39.

    Cretoiu SM, Simionescu AA, Caravia L, Curici A, Cretoiu D, Popescu LM. Complex effects of imatinib on spontaneous and oxytocin-induced contractions in human non-pregnant myometrium. Acta Physiol Hung 2011; 98: 329–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 40.

    Cretoiu SM, Cretoiu D, Popescu LM. Human myometrium – the ultrastructural 3D network of telocytes. J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 2844–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 41.

    Hatta K, Huang ML, Weisel RD, Li RK. Culture of rat endometrial telocytes. J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 1392–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 42.

    Cretoiu SM, Cretoiu D, Marin A, Radu BM, Popescu LM. Telocytes: ultrastructural, immunohistochemical and electrophysiological characteristics in human myometrium. Reproduction 2013; 145: 357–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 43.

    Suciu L, Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M. Human placenta: de visu demonstration of interstitial Cajal-like cells. J Cell Mol Med 2007; 11: 590–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 44.

    Suciu L, Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Regalia T, Nicolescu MI, Hinescu ME, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. Telocytes in human term placenta: morphology and phenotype. Cells Tissues Organs 2010; 192: 325–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 45.

    Popescu LM, Andrei F, Hinescu ME. Snapshots of mammary gland interstitial cells: methylene-blue vital staining and c-kit immunopositivity. J Cell Mol Med 2005; 9: 476–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 46.

    Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) in human resting mammary gland stroma. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) identification. J Cell Mol Med 2005; 9: 893–910.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 47.

    Mou Y, Wang Y, Li J, Lu S, Duan C, Du Z, Yang G, Chen W, Zhao S, Zhou J, Wang C. Immunohistochemical characterization and functional identification of mammary gland telocytes in the self-assembly of reconstituted breast cancer tissue in vitro. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 65–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 48.

    Cantarero I, Luesma MJ, Junquera C. The primary cilium of telocytes in the vasculature: electron microscope imaging. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 2594–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 49.

    Li H, Lu S, Liu H, Ge J, Zhang H. Scanning electron microscope evidence of telocytes in vasculature. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 1486–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 50.

    Briggs Boedtkjer D, Rumessen J, Baandrup U, Skov Mikkelsen M, Telinius N, Pilegaard H, Aalkjaer C, Hjortdal V. Identification of interstitial Cajal-like cells in the human thoracic duct. Cells Tissues Organs 2013; 197: 145–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 51.

    Hinescu ME, Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. Interstitial Cajal-like cells in rat mesentery: an ultrastructural and immunohistochemical approach. J Cell Mol Med 2008; 12: 260–70.Google Scholar

  • 52.

    Hinescu ME, Gherghiceanu M, Suciu L, Popescu LM. Telocytes in pleura: two- and three-dimensional imaging by transmission electron microscopy. Cell Tissue Res 2011; 343: 389–97.Google Scholar

  • 53.

    Popescu BO, Gherghiceanu M, Kostin S, Ceafalan L, Popescu LM. Telocytes in meninges and choroid plexus. Neurosci Lett 2012; 516: 265–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 54.

    Popescu LM, Manole E, Serboiu CS, Manole CG, Suciu LC, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu BO. Identification of telocytes in skeletal muscle interstitium: implication for muscle regeneration. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 1379–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 55.

    Suciu LC, Popescu BO, Kostin S, Popescu LM. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β-positive telocytes in skeletal muscle interstitium. J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 701–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 56.

    Diaz-Flores L, Gutierrez R, Saez FJ, Diaz-Flores L, Jr., Madrid JF. Telocytes in neuromuscular spindles. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 457–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 57.

    Luesma MJ, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Telocytes and stem cells in limbus and uvea of mouse eye. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 1016–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 58.

    Corradi LS, Jesus MM, Fochi RA, Vilamaior PS, Justulin LA Jr., Goes RM, Felisbino SL, Taboga SR. Structural and ultrastructural evidence for telocytes in prostate stroma. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 398–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 59.

    Li H, Zhang H, Yang L, Lu S, Ge J. Telocytes in mice bone marrow: electron microscope evidence. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 975–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 60.

    Ceafalan L, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM, Simionescu O. Telocytes in human skin – are they involved in skin regeneration? J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 1405–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 61.

    Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Heterocellular communication in the heart: electron tomography of telocyte-myocyte junctions. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 1005–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 62.

    Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Manole CG, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. Cardiac renewing: interstitial Cajal-like cells nurse cardiomyocyte progenitors in epicardial stem cell niches. J Cell Mol Med 2009; 13: 866–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 63.

    Ciontea SM, Radu E, Regalia T, Ceafalan L, Cretoiu D, Gherghiceanu M, Braga RI, Malincenco M, Zagrean L, Hinescu ME, Popescu LM. C-kit immunopositive interstitial cells (Cajal-type) in human myometrium. J Cell Mol Med 2005; 9: 407–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 64.

    Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Cretoiu D, Radu E. The connective connection: interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) and ICC-like cells establish synapses with immunoreactive cells. Electron microscope study in situ. J Cell Mol Med 2005; 9: 714–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 65.

    Mandache E, Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M. Myocardial interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) and their nanostructural relationships with intercalated discs: shed vesicles as intermediates. J Cell Mol Med 2007; 11: 1175–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 66.

    Fertig ET, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Extracellular vesicles release by cardiac telocytes: electron microscopy and electron tomography. J Cell Mol Med 2014; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 67.

    Vannucchi MG, Traini C, Manetti M, Ibba-Manneschi L, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. Telocytes express PDGFRα in the human gastrointestinal tract. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 1099–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 68.

    Wang F, Song Y, Bei Y, Zhao Y, Xiao J, Yang C. Telocytes in liver regeneration: possible roles. J Cell Mol Med 2014; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 69.

    Campeanu RA, Radu BM, Cretoiu SM, Banciu DD, Banciu A, Cretoiu D, Popescu LM. Near-infrared low-level laser stimulation of telocytes from human myometrium. Lasers Med Sci 2014; doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1589-1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 70.

    Koh BH, Roy R, Hollywood MA, Thornbury KD, McHale NG, Sergeant GP, Hatton WJ, Ward SM, Sanders KM, Koh SD. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α cells in mouse urinary bladder: a new class of interstitial cells. J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 691–700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 71.

    Diaz-Flores L, Gutierrez R, Garcia MP, Saez FJ, Diaz-Flores L Jr, Valladares F, Madrid JF. CD34+ stromal cells/fibroblasts/fibrocytes/telocytes as a tissue reserve and a principal source of mesenchymal cells. Location, morphology, function and role in pathology. Histol Histopathol 2014; 29: 831–70.Google Scholar

  • 72.

    Bojin FM, Gavriliuc OI, Cristea MI, Tanasie G, Tatu CS, Panaitescu C, Paunescu V. Telocytes within human skeletal muscle stem cell niche. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 2269–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 73.

    Galiger C, Kostin S, Golec A, Ahlbrecht K, Becker S, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM, Morty RE, Seeger W, Voswinckel R. Phenotypical and ultrastructural features of Oct4-positive cells in the adult mouse lung. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 1321–33.Google Scholar

  • 74.

    Cretoiu SM, Cretoiu D, Suciu L, Popescu LM. Interstitial Cajal-like cells of human Fallopian tube express estrogen and progesterone receptors. J Mol Histol 2009; 40: 387–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 75.

    Cretoiu D, Ciontea SM, Popescu LM, Ceafalan L, Ardeleanu C. Interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) as steroid hormone sensors in human myometrium: immunocytochemical approach. J Cell Mol Med 2006; 10: 789–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 76.

    Cismasiu VB, Radu E, Popescu LM. miR-193 expression differentiates telocytes from other stromal cells. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 1071–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 77.

    Zheng Y, Zhang M, Qian M, Wang L, Cismasiu VB, Bai C, Popescu LM, Wang X. Genetic comparison of mouse lung telocytes with mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 567–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 78.

    Sun X, Zheng M, Zhang M, Qian M, Zheng Y, Li M, Cretoiu D, Chen C, Chen L, Popescu LM, Wang X. Differences in the expression of chromosome 1 genes between lung telocytes and other cells: mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, alveolar type II cells, airway epithelial cells and lymphocytes. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 801–10.Google Scholar

  • 79.

    Zheng M, Sun X, Zhang M, Qian M, Zheng Y, Li M, Cretoiu SM, Chen C, Chen L, Cretoiu D, Popescu LM, Fang H, Wang X. Variations of chromosomes 2 and 3 gene expression profiles among pulmonary telocytes, pneumocytes, airway cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and lymphocytes. J Cell Mol Med 2014; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 80.

    Zheng Y, Cretoiu D, Yan G, Cretoiu SM, Popescu LM, Wang X. Comparative proteomic analysis of human lung telocytes with fibroblasts. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 568–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 81.

    Zheng Y, Cretoiu D, Yan G, Cretoiu SM, Popescu LM, Fang H, Wang X. Protein profiling of human lung telocytes and microvascular endothelial cells using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 1035–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 82.

    Choi DS, Kim DK, Kim YK, Gho YS. Proteomics of extracellular vesicles: exosomes and ectosomes. Mass Spectrom Rev 2014; doi: 10.1002/mas.21420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 83.

    Rosenbaum ST, Svalo J, Nielsen K, Larsen T, Jorgensen JC, Bouchelouche P. Immunolocalization and expression of small-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels in human myometrium. J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 3001–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 84.

    Cretoiu SM, Radu BM, Banciu A, Banciu DD, Cretoiu D, Ceafalan LC, Popescu LM. Isolated human uterine telocytes: immunocytochemistry and electrophysiology of T-type calcium channels. Histochem Cell Biol 2014; doi: 10.1007/s00418-014-1268-0.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 85.

    Duquette RA, Shmygol A, Vaillant C, Mobasheri A, Pope M, Burdyga T, Wray S. Vimentin-positive, c-kit-negative interstitial cells in human and rat uterus: a role in pacemaking? Biol Reprod 2005; 72: 276–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 86.

    Sheng J, Shim W, Lu J, Lim SY, Ong BH, Lim TS, Liew R, Chua YL, Wong P. Electrophysiology of human cardiac atrial and ventricular telocytes. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 355–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 87.

    Nicolescu MI, Bucur A, Dinca O, Rusu MC, Popescu LM. Telocytes in parotid glands. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2012; 295: 378–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 88.

    Gherghiceanu M, Barad L, Novak A, Reiter I, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Binah O, Popescu LM. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells: comparative ultrastructure. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 2539–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 89.

    Zhou J, Wang Y, Zhu P, Sun H, Mou Y, Duan C, Yao A, Lv S, Wang C. Distribution and characteristics of telocytes as nurse cells in the architectural organization of engineered heart tissues. Sci China Life Sci 2014; 57: 241–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 90.

    Barile L, Lionetti V, Cervio E, Matteucci M, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM, Torre T, Siclari F, Moccetti T, Vassalli G. Extracellular vesicles from human cardiac progenitor cells inhibit cardiomyocyte apoptosis and improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 2014; 103: 530–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 91.

    Hsu YC, Li L, Fuchs E. Emerging interactions between skin stem cells and their niches. Nat Med 2014; 20: 847–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 92.

    Sanders KM, Ward SM, Koh SD. Interstitial cells: regulators of smooth muscle function. Physiol Rev 2014; 94: 859–907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 93.

    Pieri L, Vannucchi MG, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. Histochemical and ultrastructural characteristics of an interstitial cell type different from ICC and resident in the muscle coat of human gut. J Cell Mol Med 2008; 12: 1944–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 94.

    Hutchings G, Williams O, Cretoiu D, Ciontea SM. Myometrial interstitial cells and the coordination of myometrial contractility. J Cell Mol Med 2009; 13: 4268–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 95.

    Cretoiu SM, Cretoiu D, Simionescu AA, Popescu LM. Telocytes in human fallopian tube and uterus express estrogen and progesterone receptors. In: Kahn S, editor. Sex steroids. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2012: 91–114.Google Scholar

  • 96.

    Smythies J, Edelstein L. Telocytes, exosomes, gap junctions and the cytoskeleton: the makings of a primitive nervous system? Front Cell Neurosci 2014; 7: 278.Google Scholar

  • 97.

    Edelstein L, Smythies J. The role of telocytes in morphogenetic bioelectrical signaling: once more unto the breach. Front Mol Neurosci 2014; 7: 41.Google Scholar

  • 98.

    Levin M. Molecular bioelectricity in developmental biology: new tools and recent discoveries: control of cell behavior and pattern formation by transmembrane potential gradients. Bioessays 2012; 34: 205–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 99.

    Zhao B, Chen S, Liu J, Yuan Z, Qi X, Qin J, Zheng X, Shen X, Yu Y, Qnin TJ, Chan JY, Cai D. Cardiac telocytes were decreased during myocardial infarction and their therapeutic effects for ischaemic heart in rat. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 123–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 100.

    Zhao B, Liao Z, Chen S, Yuan Z, Yilin C, Lee KK, Qi X, Shen X, Zheng X, Quinn T, Cai D. Intramyocardial transplantation of cardiac telocytes decreases myocardial infarction and improves post-infarcted cardiac function in rats. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 780–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 101.

    Mandache E, Gherghiceanu M, Macarie C, Kostin S, Popescu LM. Telocytes in human isolated atrial amyloidosis: ultrastructural remodelling. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 2739–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 102.

    Zheng Y, Bai C, Wang X. Potential significance of telocytes in the pathogenesis of lung diseases. Expert Rev Respir Med 2012; 6: 45–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 103.

    Zheng Y, Bai C, Wang X. Telocyte morphologies and potential roles in diseases. J Cell Physiol 2012; 227: 2311–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 104.

    Manetti M, Guiducci S, Ruffo M, Rosa I, Faussone-Pellegrini MS, Matucci-Cerinic M, Ibba-Manneschi L. Evidence for progressive reduction and loss of telocytes in the dermal cellular network of systemic sclerosis. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 482–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 105.

    Manetti M, Rosa I, Messerini L, Guiducci S, Matucci-Cerinic M, Ibba-Manneschi L. A loss of telocytes accompanies fibrosis of multiple organs in systemic sclerosis. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 253–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 106.

    Mirancea N, Morosanu AM, Mirancea GV, Juravle FD, Manoiu VS. Infrastructure of the telocytes from tumor stroma in the skin basal and squamous cell carcinomas. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2013; 54: 1025–37.Google Scholar

  • 107.

    Popescu LM, Ciontea SM, Cretoiu D, Hinescu ME, Radu E, Ionescu N, Ceausu M, Gherghiceanu M, Braga RI, Vasilescu F, Zagrean L, Ardeleanu C. Novel type of interstitial cell (Cajal-like) in human fallopian tube. J Cell Mol Med 2005; 9: 479–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 108.

    Popescu LM, Vidulescu C, Curici A, Caravia L, Simionescu AA, Ciontea SM, Simion S. Imatinib inhibits spontaneous rhythmic contractions of human uterus and intestine. Eur J Pharmacol 2006; 546: 177–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 109.

    Salama NM. Immunohistochemical characterization of telocytes in rat uterus in different reproductive states. Egyptian J Histol 2013; 36: 185–94.Google Scholar

  • 110.

    Terada T. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the uterus: a case report with genetic analyses of c-kit and PDGFRA genes. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2009; 28: 29–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 111.

    Ardeleanu C, Bussolati G. Telocytes are the common cell of origin of both PEComas and GISTs: an evidence-supported hypothesis. J Cell Mol Med 2011; 15: 2569–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 112.

    Horn LC, Meinel A, Hentschel B. c-kit/CD 117 positive cells in the myometrium of pregnant women and those with uterine endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 105–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 113.

    Yang XJ, Yang J, Liu Z, Yang G, Shen ZJ. Telocytes damage in endometriosis affected rat oviduct and potential impact on infertility. J Cell Mol Med 2014; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 114.

    Li C, Kuemmerle JF. Mechanisms that mediate the development of fibrosis in patients with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014; 20: 1250–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 115.

    Gordon IO, Agrawal N, Goldblum JR, Fiocchi C, Rieder F. Fibrosis in ulcerative colitis: mechanisms, features, and consequences of a neglected problem. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014; doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000080.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 116.

    Milia AF, Ruffo M, Manetti M, Rosa I, Conte D, Fazi M, Messerini L, Ibba-Manneschi L. Telocytes in Crohn’s disease. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 1525–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 117.

    Manetti M, Rosa I, Messerini L, Ibba-Manneschi L. A loss of telocytes accompanies inflammation-driven fibrotic remodelling of the colonic wall in ulcerative colitis. J Cell Mol Med 2014; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 118.

    Li L, Lin M, Li L, Wang R, Zhang C, Qi G, Xu M, Rong R, Zhu T. Renal telocytes contribute to the repair of ischemically injured renal tubules. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 1144–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 119.

    Franks I. Gallbladder: Loss of interstitial Cajal-like cells in the gallbladder might contribute to gallstone formation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 9: 689.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 120.

    Pasternak A, Gil K, Matyja A, Gajda M, Sztefko K, Walocha JA, Kulig J, Thor P. Loss of gallbladder interstitial Cajal-like cells in patients with cholelithiasis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25: e17–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 121.

    Horch RE, Kneser U, Polykandriotis E, Schmidt VJ, Sun J, Arkudas A. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine – where do we stand? J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 1157–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 122.

    Ceafalan LC, Popescu BO, Hinescu ME. Cellular players in skeletal muscle regeneration. Biomed Res Int 2014; doi: 10.1155/2014/957014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 123.

    Haines DD, Juhasz B, Tosaki A. Management of multicellular senescence and oxidative stress. J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 936–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 124.

    Bani D, Nistri S. New insights into the morphogenic role of stromal cells and their relevance for regenerative medicine. Lessons from the heart. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18: 363–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 125.

    Niculite CM, Regalia TM, Gherghiceanu M, Huica R, Surcel M, Ursaciuc C, Leabu M, Popescu LM. Dynamics of telopodes (telocyte prolongations) in cell culture depends on extracellular matrix protein. Mol Cell Biochem 2014; doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2215-z.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Sanda M. Cretoiu

Sanda-Maria Cretoiu, MD, PhD, is currently Senior Lecturer of Cell Biology and Histology at the Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University, Bucharest (Romania) and Senior Research Fellow at the “Victor Babeş National Institute of Pathology, Ultrastructural Pathology Laboratory. Her current research interest lies in uterine telocytes (e.g. electron microscopy, cell cultures, scanning confocal microscopy, time-lapse videomicroscopy, etc.). She has published 30 scientific papers in international peer-reviewed journals, having a Hirsch index of 13.

Laurentiu M. Popescu

L.M. Popescu, MD, PhD, dr.h.c.mult., is currently Professor of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 'Davila' University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania and Head of the National Institute of Pathology, Bucharest, Romania. He is fellow of the National Academy of Sciences. He was President of the Federation of European Academies of Medicine, and is President Elect of the International Society for Adaptive Medicine. He published 150 scientific articles in international peer-reviewed journals and is cited more than 4000 times. He has a Hirsch Index of 40. Professor Popescu is Editor-in-Chief (and founder) of the Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (Wiley/Blackwell). He is credited with the discovery of a new type of interstitial cells - Telocytes.


Corresponding author: Laurentiu M. Popescu, ‘Victor Babeş’ National Institute of Pathology, Department of Ultrastructural Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania; and ‘Victor Babeş’ National Institute of Pathology, Department of Advanced Studies, 050096 Bucharest, Romania, e-mail:


Received: 2014-08-26

Accepted: 2014-09-03

Published Online: 2014-11-01

Published in Print: 2014-10-01


Citation Information: Biomolecular Concepts, ISSN (Online) 1868-503X, ISSN (Print) 1868-5021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2014-0029.

Export Citation

©2014, Laurentiu M. Popescu et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Sawa Kostin
Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 2016
[2]
Ping Yang, Ya'an Liu, Nisar Ahmed, Shakeeb Ullah, Yi Liu, and Qiusheng Chen
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2015
[3]
Lucio Díaz-Flores, Ricardo Gutiérrez, Lucio Díaz-Flores, Miriam González Goméz, Francisco J. Sáez, and Juan F. Madrid
Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 2016
[4]
Hui Zhang, Shengwei Zhong, Tingting Ge, Shasha Peng, Pengcheng Yu, Zuohong Zhou, and Xiaoquan Guo
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2016, Page n/a
[5]
Yichun Zhu, Minghuan Zheng, Dongli Song, Ling Ye, and Xiangdong Wang
Journal of Translational Medicine, 2015, Volume 13, Number 1
[7]
Yuqiao Chang, Cixia Li, Zhaohui Lu, He Li, and Zhikun Guo
Experimental Cell Research, 2015
[8]
Radu Albulescu, Cristiana Tanase, Elena Codrici, Daniela I. Popescu, Sanda M. Cretoiu, and Laurentiu M. Popescu
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2015, Page n/a
[9]
Qiulian Zhou, Lei Wei, Chongjun Zhong, Siyi Fu, Yihua Bei, Radu-Ionuț Huică, Fei Wang, and Junjie Xiao
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2015, Page n/a
[10]
Yihua Bei, Fei Wang, Changqing Yang, and Junjie Xiao
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2015, Page n/a
[11]
C.G. Manole, Mihaela Gherghiceanu, and Olga Simionescu
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2015, Page n/a
[12]
D. Cretoiu, E. Hummel, H. Zimmermann, M. Gherghiceanu, and L. M. Popescu
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2014, Volume 18, Number 11, Page 2157
[13]
Dragos Cretoiu, Mihaela Gherghiceanu, Eric Hummel, Hans Zimmermann, Olga Simionescu, and Laurentiu M. Popescu
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2015, Volume 19, Number 4, Page 714
[14]
Alessia Alunno, Lidia Ibba-Manneschi, Onelia Bistoni, Irene Rosa, Sara Caterbi, Roberto Gerli, and Mirko Manetti
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2015, Page n/a
[15]
Siyi Fu, Fei Wang, Yan Cao, Qi Huang, Junjie Xiao, Changqing Yang, and Laurentiu M. Popescu
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2015, Volume 19, Number 3, Page 676
[16]
Valeriu B. Cismasiu and Laurentiu M. Popescu
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2015, Volume 19, Number 2, Page 351
[17]
Laurentiu M. Popescu, Antoanela Curici, Enshi Wang, Hao Zhang, Shengshou Hu, and Mihaela Gherghiceanu
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2015, Volume 19, Number 1, Page 31

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in