Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

The Journal of Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.94

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.461
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.922

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 33, Issue 33


The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and the challenge of integrating social sciences and humanities

Marie Stenseke
  • CDFMR, University of Gothenburg, Faculty of Economics Business and Law, Department of Economy and Society, Unit for Human Geography, P.O. Box 625, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-07-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2016-0029


For the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), established in 2012, under the auspices of four United Nations entities (FAO, UNDP, UNEP and UNESCO), there is an urgent need to engage scholars in social sciences and humanities in assessing the state of the planet’s biodiversity. This article addresses the fundaments for involving scientists from these fields of science in IPBES, and reflects on the existing barriers. It builds on previous research on IPBES from various perspectives, as well as on the author’s insights from work in the organization. A fundamental condition recognized is that there needs to be a qualified understanding of what it means to integrate natural sciences and social sciences/humanities, and also that the latter have to be accepted on their own terms. Other barriers are related to the contextualisation of biodiversity issues and the more politically sensitive character of research carried out in social sciences and humanities. In the conclusions it is emphasized that the deliverables of the first round of IPBES assessments have to be solid enough from the perspectives of social sciences and humanities, in order to attract more of these scholars to work for the platform in the future.

Keywords: IPBES; biological diversity; interdisciplinarity


  • Adger, W.N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N, and O’Brien, K., 2012: Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. In: Nature Climate Change, 3, pp. 112-117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Amara, N., Ouimet, M. and Landry, R., 2004: New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies. In: Science Communication, 26, pp. 75-106. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547004267491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beck, S., Borie, M., Chilvers, J., Esguerra, A., Heubach, K., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., Lövbrand, E., Marquard, E., Miller, C., Nadim, T., Neßhöver, C., Settele, J., Turnhout, E., Vasileiadou, E. and Gorg, C., 2014: Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise. The cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. In: GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23, pp. 80-87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.2.4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borie, M. and Hulme, M., 2015: Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between mother earth and ecosystem services. In: Environmental Science & Policy, 54, pp. 487-496. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.009.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brooks, T., Lamoreux, J.F. and Soberón, J., 2014: IPBES ≠ IPCC. In: Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(10), pp. 543-545. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.08.004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carmen, E., Nesshöver, C., Saarikoski, H., Vandewalle, M., Watt, A., Wittmer, H. and Young, J., 2015: Creating a biodiversity science community: Experiences from a European Network of Knowledge. In: Environmental Science and Policy, 54, pp. 497-504. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J. et al. 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, pp. 1-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Figari, H. and Skogen, K., 2011: Social representations of the wolf. In: Acta Sociologica, 54, pp. 317-332. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001699311422090CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gill, N., 2006: What is the Problem? Usefulness, the cultural turn and social research for natural resource management. In: Australian Geographer, 37, pp. 5-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049180500511939.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Granjou, C., Mauz, I., Louvel, S. and Tournay, V., 2013: Assessing Nature? The Genesis of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). In: Science, Technology & Society, 18(1), pp. 9-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0971721813484232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Head, L. and Stenseke, M., 2014: Humanvetenskapen star for djup och forstaelse. (Social science and humanities contribute with depth and understanding - in Swedish). In: Mineur, B. and Myrman, E. editors, Hela vetenskapen! 15 forskare om integrerad forskning, Stockholm: Swedish Research Council, pp. 26-33.Google Scholar

  • Head, L., Trigger, D., and Mulcock, J., 2005: Culture as concept and influence in environmental research and management. In: Conservation and Society, 3(2), pp. 251-264. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/17.07.PR0.116k12w8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • IPBES, 2015: About IPBES. Available at: http://www.ipbes.net/about-us, DoA: 10 April 2016.Google Scholar

  • IPBES, 2016a: Preliminary guide on the methodological assessment regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits. Report number: IPBES / 4 / INF/13. Available at: http://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/IPBES-4-INF-13_EN.pdf, DoA: 21 April 2016.Google Scholar

  • IPBES, 2016b: Report of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science‑Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on the work of its fourth session. Available at: http://www.ipbes.net/plenary/ipbes-4.Google Scholar

  • Larigauderie, A. and Mooney, H.A., 2010: The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCClike mechanism for biodiversity. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1), pp. 9-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Montana, J. and Borie, M., 2015: IPBES and biodiversity expertise: Regional, gender and disciplinary balance in the composition of the interim and 2015 Multidisciplinary Expert Panel. In: Conservation Letters, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Myrdal, J., 2009: Spelets regler i vetenskapens hantverk. Om humanvetenskap och naturvetenskap (The rules of the game in science. On human science and nature science - in Swedish), Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar

  • Roughley, A., 2005: Knowing People. Reflections on Integrating Social Science 1978-2002, Canberra: Land and Water Australia.Google Scholar

  • Sjölander-Lindqvist, A., 2008: Local identity, science and politics indivisible: The Swedish wolf controversy deconstructed. In: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 10(1), pp. 71-94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15239080701652672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stenseke, M., 2016: Integrated landscape management and the complicating issue of temporality. In: Landscape Research, 41(2), pp. 199-211. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.1135316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skår, M., 2010: Experiencing nature in everyday life. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As, Doctor of philosophy (Ph.D.) thesis 2010:07.Google Scholar

  • Swyngedouw, E., 2009: The Antinomies of the Postpolitical: In Search of a Democratic Politics of Environmental Protection. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33 (3), pp. 601-620(609). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turnhout, E., Waterton, C., Neves, K. and Buizer, M., 2013: Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with.” In: Conservation Letters, 6, pp. 154-161. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00307.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • UN, 2015: Historic New Sustainable Development Agenda Unanimously Adopted by 193 UN Members. Available at: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2015/09/historic-new-sustainable-development-agenda-unanimously-adopted-by-193-un-members/, DoA: 10 April 2016.Google Scholar

  • UN, 1992: Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/. DoA: 21 December 2015.Google Scholar

  • UNEP, 2014: Report of the second session of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Antalya, Turkey, 9-14 December 2013. Available at: http://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/IPBES_2_17_en_0.pdf, DoA: 10 April 2016.Google Scholar

  • UNEP, 2012: Functions, operating principles and institutional arrangements of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Available at: http://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/Functions%20operating%20principles%20and%20institutional%20arrangements%20of%20IPBES_2012.pdf, DoA: 21 April 2016.Google Scholar

  • UNEP, 2010: COP 10 decision X/2-. Available at: https:// www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268, DoA: 21 April 2016.Google Scholar

  • Vadrot, A.B.M., 2014: The epistemic and strategic dimension of the establishment of the IPBES: epistemic selectivities at work. In: Innovation - The European Journal for Social Science Research, 27(4), pp. 361-378. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2014.962014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Victor, D., 2015: Climate change: Embed the social sciences in climate policy. In: Nature 520 (7545), pp. 27-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/520027a.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vohland, K., Mlambo, M.C., Horta, L.D., Jonsson, B.G., Paulsch, A. and Martinez, S.I., 2011: How to ensure a credible and efficient IPBES? In: Environmental Science & Policy, 14, pp. 1188-1194. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.005. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, R.T., 2005. Turning science into policy: Challenges and experiences from the science-policy interface. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1454), pp. 471-477. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1601CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-12-22

Revised: 2016-03-10

Accepted: 2016-05-10

Published Online: 2016-07-26

Published in Print: 2016-09-01

Citation Information: Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Volume 33, Issue 33, Pages 119–129, ISSN (Online) 2083-8298, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2016-0029.

Export Citation

© Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Malte Timpte, Jasper Montana, Katrin Reuter, Maud Borie, and Jascha Apkes
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2017, Page 1
Roger Keller, Hans Keune, and Simone Maynard
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2017, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in