Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Botanica Marina

Editor-in-Chief: Dring, Matthew J.

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.239
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.373

CiteScore 2016: 1.28

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.456
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.841

Online
ISSN
1437-4323
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 53, Issue 1 (Feb 2010)

Issues

The effect of boat propeller scarring intensity on genetic variation in a subtropical seagrass species

Patrick D. Larkin
  • Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX 78412-5802, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Krista L. Heideman
  • Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, MSC 3AF, PO Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Dana D. Burfeind
  • Water Studies, School of Engineering, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Gregory W. Stunz
  • Department of Life Sciences, Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX 78412-5869, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2009-12-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2010.004

Abstract

We report here the effect of one form of disturbance, boat propeller scarring, on genetic variation in the subtropical seagrass Halodule wrightii. We developed an amplified fragment length polymorphism assay to measure genetic variation in plots representing four levels of scarring intensity: reference (0% scarring), low (1–5%), moderate (5–15%) and severe (>15%). Although we found severely scarred plots to have the lowest, and moderately scarred plots to have the highest, mean genetic diversity estimates (He, P), differences among scarring levels were found to be non-significant (α=0.05). Analysis of molecular variance also showed no significant effect of scarring intensity. While propeller scarring can cause significant habitat loss, scarring intensities of up to 20% may not yet have seriously affected those factors (population size, flowering density, recruitment, gene flow) that strongly influence population genetic variation. The relatively recent occurrence of this type of disturbance, however, could mean that any long-term effects have yet to be detected.

Keywords: disturbance; genetic variation; propeller scarring; seagrass

About the article

Corresponding author


Received: 2008-08-29

Accepted: 2009-10-26

Published Online: 2009-12-15

Published in Print: 2010-02-01


Citation Information: Botanica Marina, ISSN (Online) 1437-4323, ISSN (Print) 0006-8055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2010.004.

Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in